Wakoborun从敌人手中救出了她哥哥的头:Munduruku Letters的美洲印第安人视角主义和世界政治领域

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
Tiffany Higgins
{"title":"Wakoborun从敌人手中救出了她哥哥的头:Munduruku Letters的美洲印第安人视角主义和世界政治领域","authors":"Tiffany Higgins","doi":"10.1080/13569325.2023.2227595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The collective letters analyzed in this article are a response to hydroextractivism, which uses hydrological control and extraction to convert cultural rivers into decultured waters, transforming them into a neoextractivist commodity. As dams, mining, agribusiness, and cattle ranching infringe on the Amazon River basin, in territorial defence the Munduruku use resistance strategies including collective letters attacking the epistemic and ontological foundations of neoextractive, government-promoted Amazonian “development”, while presenting a counter-narrative insisting on their own cosmology and historical, cultural occupation of their territory. Using an Environmental Humanities approach, based on Munduruku collective letters authored primarily by Ipereğ Ayũ, I identify 19 repeating rhetorical features, including perspectivist representations of non-humans and ancestral spirits. Instead of underlining biological harms of the Teles Pires and São Manoel dams per a Western ontology, the letters instead emphasise cultural harms, creating narratives that insert cosmological entities from oral traditions into current cosmopolitics and a growing authority of women and shamans. I focus on letters tracing the Munduruku attempt to achieve the return of Itiğ’a (urns) removed during dam construction. I discuss Munduruku authorship-authority, antagonism-persuasion, and translation of the sacred from a perspectivist to non-perspectivist audience. I argue self-published Indigenous letters are part of a literature of territory from peoples confronting deterritorialisation that deserves publication and allyship-scholarship in Literature and other fields.","PeriodicalId":56341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wakoborun Rescued her Brother’s Head From Enemy Hands: Munduruku Letters’ Amerindian Perspectivism and Cosmopolitical Territory\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany Higgins\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13569325.2023.2227595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The collective letters analyzed in this article are a response to hydroextractivism, which uses hydrological control and extraction to convert cultural rivers into decultured waters, transforming them into a neoextractivist commodity. As dams, mining, agribusiness, and cattle ranching infringe on the Amazon River basin, in territorial defence the Munduruku use resistance strategies including collective letters attacking the epistemic and ontological foundations of neoextractive, government-promoted Amazonian “development”, while presenting a counter-narrative insisting on their own cosmology and historical, cultural occupation of their territory. Using an Environmental Humanities approach, based on Munduruku collective letters authored primarily by Ipereğ Ayũ, I identify 19 repeating rhetorical features, including perspectivist representations of non-humans and ancestral spirits. Instead of underlining biological harms of the Teles Pires and São Manoel dams per a Western ontology, the letters instead emphasise cultural harms, creating narratives that insert cosmological entities from oral traditions into current cosmopolitics and a growing authority of women and shamans. I focus on letters tracing the Munduruku attempt to achieve the return of Itiğ’a (urns) removed during dam construction. I discuss Munduruku authorship-authority, antagonism-persuasion, and translation of the sacred from a perspectivist to non-perspectivist audience. I argue self-published Indigenous letters are part of a literature of territory from peoples confronting deterritorialisation that deserves publication and allyship-scholarship in Literature and other fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"146 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2023.2227595\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2023.2227595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析的集体信件是对水提取主义的回应,水提取主义利用水文控制和提取将文化河流转化为非养殖水域,将其转变为新提取主义商品。由于水坝、采矿、农业综合企业和畜牧业侵犯了亚马逊河流域,在领土防御中,蒙都鲁库人使用抵抗策略,包括集体写信攻击新采掘、政府推动的亚马逊“发展”的认识论和本体论基础,同时提出一种反叙事,坚持他们自己的宇宙论和对其领土的历史、文化占领。利用环境人文学科的方法,基于主要由伊佩雷埃·艾尤撰写的蒙杜鲁库集体信件,我确定了19个重复的修辞特征,包括对非人类和祖先精神的透视主义表达。这些信件没有按照西方的本体论来强调泰尔斯皮雷大坝和奥马诺埃尔大坝的生物危害,而是强调了文化危害,创造了一种叙事,将口头传统的宇宙实体插入到当前的世界政治中,以及女性和巫师日益增长的权威。我的重点是追踪Munduruku试图归还在大坝建设期间被拆除的ititura(骨灰盒)的信件。我将讨论蒙杜鲁库的作者权威,对抗说服,以及从观点主义者到非观点主义者的神圣翻译。我认为,自行出版的土著信件是面对非领土化的人民的领土文学的一部分,值得出版,并在文学和其他领域获得奖学金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wakoborun Rescued her Brother’s Head From Enemy Hands: Munduruku Letters’ Amerindian Perspectivism and Cosmopolitical Territory
The collective letters analyzed in this article are a response to hydroextractivism, which uses hydrological control and extraction to convert cultural rivers into decultured waters, transforming them into a neoextractivist commodity. As dams, mining, agribusiness, and cattle ranching infringe on the Amazon River basin, in territorial defence the Munduruku use resistance strategies including collective letters attacking the epistemic and ontological foundations of neoextractive, government-promoted Amazonian “development”, while presenting a counter-narrative insisting on their own cosmology and historical, cultural occupation of their territory. Using an Environmental Humanities approach, based on Munduruku collective letters authored primarily by Ipereğ Ayũ, I identify 19 repeating rhetorical features, including perspectivist representations of non-humans and ancestral spirits. Instead of underlining biological harms of the Teles Pires and São Manoel dams per a Western ontology, the letters instead emphasise cultural harms, creating narratives that insert cosmological entities from oral traditions into current cosmopolitics and a growing authority of women and shamans. I focus on letters tracing the Munduruku attempt to achieve the return of Itiğ’a (urns) removed during dam construction. I discuss Munduruku authorship-authority, antagonism-persuasion, and translation of the sacred from a perspectivist to non-perspectivist audience. I argue self-published Indigenous letters are part of a literature of territory from peoples confronting deterritorialisation that deserves publication and allyship-scholarship in Literature and other fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信