俄罗斯联邦宪法法院审议关于就公民投票所提议的问题(所提议的问题)举行公民投票的倡议是否符合俄罗斯联邦宪法的问题的主题和程序

Vitalii B. Sychev
{"title":"俄罗斯联邦宪法法院审议关于就公民投票所提议的问题(所提议的问题)举行公民投票的倡议是否符合俄罗斯联邦宪法的问题的主题和程序","authors":"Vitalii B. Sychev","doi":"10.18500/1994-2540-2023-23-3-341-348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The issue of the subject of review of cases of compliance of the initiative to hold a referendum on the proposed issue (proposed issues) of the referendum with the Constitution of the Russian Federation by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is not regulated in the federal legislation. In addition, the federal legislation regulates the procedure for considering cases of this category only in general terms. Theoretical analysis. The systematization of the opinions presented in the scientific literature regarding the subject of verification in this category of cases allows us to distinguish two positions: the subject of consideration by the Constitutional Court should include both the issues proposed for a referendum and the entire procedure for the initiative of holding a referendum; only the issues proposed for a referendum should be the subject of consideration by the Constitutional Court. Empirical analysis. The analysis of the criteria (limits) of verification for the category of cases under consideration showed that, in any case, they should include compliance of the issues proposed for a referendum, the division of jurisdiction and powers between the state authorities of the Russian Federation and the state authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation with the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The criteria for the admissibility of the motion, the procedural form and procedural periods of consideration of cases of the category under study need to be improved. Conclusions. The subject of verification in cases of the category under consideration should be not only the issues proposed for a referendum but also the entire procedure for the initiative of holding a referendum. The author proposes to amend the legislation providing for the exemption of the President of the Russian Federation from paying state duty when bringing the matter before the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in cases of the category in question, the possibility of participation of representatives of the electoral association or public authority proposing the initiative to hold a referendum, the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation and the President of the Russian Federation in consideration of cases of this category. The author also proposes to provide a special chapter in the relevant law regulating the consideration of cases of compliance of the initiative to hold a referendum on the proposed issue (proposed issues) of the referendum with the Constitution of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":476403,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiâ Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaâ seriâ","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The subject and procedure for consideration of cases of compliance of the initiative to hold a referendum on the proposed issue (proposed issues) of the referendum with the Constitution of the Russian Federation by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation\",\"authors\":\"Vitalii B. Sychev\",\"doi\":\"10.18500/1994-2540-2023-23-3-341-348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The issue of the subject of review of cases of compliance of the initiative to hold a referendum on the proposed issue (proposed issues) of the referendum with the Constitution of the Russian Federation by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is not regulated in the federal legislation. In addition, the federal legislation regulates the procedure for considering cases of this category only in general terms. Theoretical analysis. The systematization of the opinions presented in the scientific literature regarding the subject of verification in this category of cases allows us to distinguish two positions: the subject of consideration by the Constitutional Court should include both the issues proposed for a referendum and the entire procedure for the initiative of holding a referendum; only the issues proposed for a referendum should be the subject of consideration by the Constitutional Court. Empirical analysis. The analysis of the criteria (limits) of verification for the category of cases under consideration showed that, in any case, they should include compliance of the issues proposed for a referendum, the division of jurisdiction and powers between the state authorities of the Russian Federation and the state authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation with the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The criteria for the admissibility of the motion, the procedural form and procedural periods of consideration of cases of the category under study need to be improved. Conclusions. The subject of verification in cases of the category under consideration should be not only the issues proposed for a referendum but also the entire procedure for the initiative of holding a referendum. The author proposes to amend the legislation providing for the exemption of the President of the Russian Federation from paying state duty when bringing the matter before the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in cases of the category in question, the possibility of participation of representatives of the electoral association or public authority proposing the initiative to hold a referendum, the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation and the President of the Russian Federation in consideration of cases of this category. The author also proposes to provide a special chapter in the relevant law regulating the consideration of cases of compliance of the initiative to hold a referendum on the proposed issue (proposed issues) of the referendum with the Constitution of the Russian Federation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":476403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Izvestiâ Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaâ seriâ\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Izvestiâ Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaâ seriâ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2023-23-3-341-348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiâ Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaâ seriâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2023-23-3-341-348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。俄罗斯联邦宪法法院审查关于就公民投票的拟议问题(拟议问题)举行公民投票的倡议是否符合俄罗斯联邦宪法的案件的问题,在联邦立法中没有规定。此外,联邦立法对审议这一类案件的程序只作一般性规定。理论分析。科学文献中提出的关于这类案件的核查问题的意见的系统化使我们能够区分两种立场:宪法法院审议的问题应包括提议举行全民投票的问题和倡议举行全民投票的整个程序;只有提出全民公决的问题才应由宪法法院审议。实证分析。对正在审议的这类案件的核查标准(限度)的分析表明,在任何情况下,这些标准(限度)都应包括为全民投票提出的问题、俄罗斯联邦国家当局和俄罗斯联邦组成实体的国家当局之间的管辖权和权力的划分是否符合俄罗斯联邦宪法。需要改进动议可否受理的标准、审议所研究的这类案件的程序形式和程序期限。结论。在审议中的这类情况下,核查的主题不仅应该是为全民投票提议的问题,而且应该是举行全民投票倡议的整个程序。发件人建议修改立法,规定俄罗斯联邦总统在上述情况下向俄罗斯联邦宪法法院提出问题时免除缴纳国家义务,并允许提出举行全民投票倡议的选举协会或公共当局的代表参加;俄罗斯联邦中央选举委员会和俄罗斯联邦总统审议这类案件。提交人还建议在有关法律中专门设立一章,规定审议关于就公民投票的拟议问题(拟议问题)举行公民投票的倡议是否符合俄罗斯联邦宪法的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The subject and procedure for consideration of cases of compliance of the initiative to hold a referendum on the proposed issue (proposed issues) of the referendum with the Constitution of the Russian Federation by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation
Introduction. The issue of the subject of review of cases of compliance of the initiative to hold a referendum on the proposed issue (proposed issues) of the referendum with the Constitution of the Russian Federation by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is not regulated in the federal legislation. In addition, the federal legislation regulates the procedure for considering cases of this category only in general terms. Theoretical analysis. The systematization of the opinions presented in the scientific literature regarding the subject of verification in this category of cases allows us to distinguish two positions: the subject of consideration by the Constitutional Court should include both the issues proposed for a referendum and the entire procedure for the initiative of holding a referendum; only the issues proposed for a referendum should be the subject of consideration by the Constitutional Court. Empirical analysis. The analysis of the criteria (limits) of verification for the category of cases under consideration showed that, in any case, they should include compliance of the issues proposed for a referendum, the division of jurisdiction and powers between the state authorities of the Russian Federation and the state authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation with the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The criteria for the admissibility of the motion, the procedural form and procedural periods of consideration of cases of the category under study need to be improved. Conclusions. The subject of verification in cases of the category under consideration should be not only the issues proposed for a referendum but also the entire procedure for the initiative of holding a referendum. The author proposes to amend the legislation providing for the exemption of the President of the Russian Federation from paying state duty when bringing the matter before the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in cases of the category in question, the possibility of participation of representatives of the electoral association or public authority proposing the initiative to hold a referendum, the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation and the President of the Russian Federation in consideration of cases of this category. The author also proposes to provide a special chapter in the relevant law regulating the consideration of cases of compliance of the initiative to hold a referendum on the proposed issue (proposed issues) of the referendum with the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信