{"title":"现代反乌托邦研究的理论和方法基础:艺术文学中的社会替代政治意识形态","authors":"Igor I. Kuznetsov, Makar M. Vanteevsky","doi":"10.18500/1818-9601-2023-23-3-325-333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents an approach to the analysis of modern dystopia as a space for the representation and construction of political ideology. The modern dystopia is understood in the work as a direction of creative thought, which is a cultural example of understanding the ideological and value foundations of modernity, the historical consciousness of society and citizens, as well as possible scenarios for further development and goal setting in the future. Attention is focused on the fact that modern dystopia has a number of its own features and distinctive features, and can also be implemented in the form of “dystopia” or “heterotopia”. In this study, a classification of dystopian writers is formed according to generational characteristics (“late Soviet” – “perestroika” writers of the 2000s and 2010s), as well as according to ideological affiliation (“left Slavophiles” and “right Westerners”). It is also proposed to study the works of writers and their continuation in the form of film adaptation and socio-political discourse using three levels of analysis: the macro level (enclave-conglomerative theory by A. D. Bogaturov and A. V. Vinogradov, game theory by J. Huizinga, postmodernism); mesolevel (critical discourse analysis, content analysis); micro level (semiotic analysis). As a result, three versions of a work of art are formed.: the author’s intention; interpretation of the reader; images, ideas and symbols of the work, which have become an element of mass culture, which have been formed as a result of averaging ideas, values and meanings, supported by the majority and become popular. Thus, with the help of the formed classification of writers, understanding of modern dystopia and the presented scientific methods, it is proposed to analyze this phenomenon in the context of the formation and representation of political ideology.","PeriodicalId":42592,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Irkutsk State University-Series Mathematics","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical and methodological bases for the study of modern anti-utopias: Political ideologies as social alternatives in art literature\",\"authors\":\"Igor I. Kuznetsov, Makar M. Vanteevsky\",\"doi\":\"10.18500/1818-9601-2023-23-3-325-333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents an approach to the analysis of modern dystopia as a space for the representation and construction of political ideology. The modern dystopia is understood in the work as a direction of creative thought, which is a cultural example of understanding the ideological and value foundations of modernity, the historical consciousness of society and citizens, as well as possible scenarios for further development and goal setting in the future. Attention is focused on the fact that modern dystopia has a number of its own features and distinctive features, and can also be implemented in the form of “dystopia” or “heterotopia”. In this study, a classification of dystopian writers is formed according to generational characteristics (“late Soviet” – “perestroika” writers of the 2000s and 2010s), as well as according to ideological affiliation (“left Slavophiles” and “right Westerners”). It is also proposed to study the works of writers and their continuation in the form of film adaptation and socio-political discourse using three levels of analysis: the macro level (enclave-conglomerative theory by A. D. Bogaturov and A. V. Vinogradov, game theory by J. Huizinga, postmodernism); mesolevel (critical discourse analysis, content analysis); micro level (semiotic analysis). As a result, three versions of a work of art are formed.: the author’s intention; interpretation of the reader; images, ideas and symbols of the work, which have become an element of mass culture, which have been formed as a result of averaging ideas, values and meanings, supported by the majority and become popular. Thus, with the help of the formed classification of writers, understanding of modern dystopia and the presented scientific methods, it is proposed to analyze this phenomenon in the context of the formation and representation of political ideology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Irkutsk State University-Series Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Irkutsk State University-Series Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2023-23-3-325-333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Irkutsk State University-Series Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2023-23-3-325-333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文提出了一种分析现代反乌托邦作为政治意识形态表征和建构空间的方法。在作品中,现代反乌托邦被理解为一种创造性思维的方向,这是理解现代性的思想基础和价值基础,社会和公民的历史意识,以及未来进一步发展的可能场景和目标设定的文化范例。需要注意的是,现代反乌托邦有许多自己的特点和鲜明的特点,也可以以“反乌托邦”或“异托邦”的形式实现。在本研究中,根据代际特征(2000年代和2010年代的“苏联晚期”-“改革”作家)以及意识形态归属(“左派斯拉夫主义者”和“右派西方人”)对反乌托邦作家进行了分类。作者的作品及其以电影改编和社会政治话语形式的延续采用了三个层次的分析:宏观层面(A. D. Bogaturov和A. V. Vinogradov的飞地集团理论、J. Huizinga的博弈论、后现代主义);中层次(批评话语分析、内容分析);微观层面(符号学分析)。因此,就形成了一件艺术品的三个版本。:作者的意图;解读读者;作品的形象、思想和符号,已经成为大众文化的一个元素,这是由于平均的思想、价值观和意义而形成的,得到了大多数人的支持和流行。因此,本文拟借助已形成的作家分类、对现代反乌托邦的理解以及现有的科学方法,将这一现象置于政治意识形态的形成与表征的背景下进行分析。
Theoretical and methodological bases for the study of modern anti-utopias: Political ideologies as social alternatives in art literature
The article presents an approach to the analysis of modern dystopia as a space for the representation and construction of political ideology. The modern dystopia is understood in the work as a direction of creative thought, which is a cultural example of understanding the ideological and value foundations of modernity, the historical consciousness of society and citizens, as well as possible scenarios for further development and goal setting in the future. Attention is focused on the fact that modern dystopia has a number of its own features and distinctive features, and can also be implemented in the form of “dystopia” or “heterotopia”. In this study, a classification of dystopian writers is formed according to generational characteristics (“late Soviet” – “perestroika” writers of the 2000s and 2010s), as well as according to ideological affiliation (“left Slavophiles” and “right Westerners”). It is also proposed to study the works of writers and their continuation in the form of film adaptation and socio-political discourse using three levels of analysis: the macro level (enclave-conglomerative theory by A. D. Bogaturov and A. V. Vinogradov, game theory by J. Huizinga, postmodernism); mesolevel (critical discourse analysis, content analysis); micro level (semiotic analysis). As a result, three versions of a work of art are formed.: the author’s intention; interpretation of the reader; images, ideas and symbols of the work, which have become an element of mass culture, which have been formed as a result of averaging ideas, values and meanings, supported by the majority and become popular. Thus, with the help of the formed classification of writers, understanding of modern dystopia and the presented scientific methods, it is proposed to analyze this phenomenon in the context of the formation and representation of political ideology.