在布里尼奥萨(泰奥曼县)罗马堡垒中心地区的发掘

Eugen S. Teodor, Emil Dumitrașcu
{"title":"在布里尼奥萨(泰奥曼县)罗马堡垒中心地区的发掘","authors":"Eugen S. Teodor, Emil Dumitrașcu","doi":"10.46535/ca.30.2.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last two archaeological campaigns (2021-2022) we worked in the central area of the large fort at Băneasa. As we expected, the trenches have intersected the defensive ditch of the second phase of the fort (it shrank at less than half of the original surface), and the new gate of the eastern precinct. The two phases are similar in many respects, as the shape and the size of the ditch, the almost flat rampart, the undersized palisade, as well as that unique tower-gate, with no analogies for the first half of the third century. There are also some differences; for instance, the end of this fortification seems rather pacific, as rendered by both the stratigraphic rendition and the short list of findings. There is still some news, as the discovery of stamped tiles, which is a first for this frontier – Limes Transalutanus – all across the plain, south of Pitești City. Unfortunately, those tiles were brought from Slăveni (the largest fort from southern Romania, located 39 km west-northwest of Băneasa, beyond Olt River) therefore we still do not know the name of the military unit garrisoned at Băneasa. The comparison made for the pottery of the two phases does not show relevant differences, but the chronological gap is not greater than two decades.","PeriodicalId":169679,"journal":{"name":"Cercetări Arheologice","volume":"160 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Excavations in the central area of the roman fort at Băneasa (Teleorman County)\",\"authors\":\"Eugen S. Teodor, Emil Dumitrașcu\",\"doi\":\"10.46535/ca.30.2.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the last two archaeological campaigns (2021-2022) we worked in the central area of the large fort at Băneasa. As we expected, the trenches have intersected the defensive ditch of the second phase of the fort (it shrank at less than half of the original surface), and the new gate of the eastern precinct. The two phases are similar in many respects, as the shape and the size of the ditch, the almost flat rampart, the undersized palisade, as well as that unique tower-gate, with no analogies for the first half of the third century. There are also some differences; for instance, the end of this fortification seems rather pacific, as rendered by both the stratigraphic rendition and the short list of findings. There is still some news, as the discovery of stamped tiles, which is a first for this frontier – Limes Transalutanus – all across the plain, south of Pitești City. Unfortunately, those tiles were brought from Slăveni (the largest fort from southern Romania, located 39 km west-northwest of Băneasa, beyond Olt River) therefore we still do not know the name of the military unit garrisoned at Băneasa. The comparison made for the pottery of the two phases does not show relevant differences, but the chronological gap is not greater than two decades.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cercetări Arheologice\",\"volume\":\"160 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cercetări Arheologice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46535/ca.30.2.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cercetări Arheologice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46535/ca.30.2.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在最近的两次考古活动(2021-2022)中,我们在布里尼奥萨大堡垒的中心地区工作。正如我们所料,战壕与堡垒第二期的防御沟(它缩小到不到原表面的一半)和东部区域的新大门相交。这两个阶段在很多方面都很相似,比如沟渠的形状和大小,几乎平坦的城墙,矮小的栅栏,以及独特的塔门,三世纪上半叶没有类似的东西。也有一些不同之处;例如,这个防御工事的结束似乎是相当和平的,从地层分析和简短的发现清单来看都是如此。还有一些新闻,比如发现了印花瓷砖,这是这片边疆的第一次——莱姆斯横跨了Pitești市南部的平原。不幸的是,这些瓦片是从slveni(罗马尼亚南部最大的堡垒,位于布里尼奥萨西北以西39公里处,在Olt河之外)运来的,因此我们仍然不知道驻扎在布里尼奥萨的军事单位的名字。对这两个时期的陶器进行的比较没有显示出相关的差异,但时间上的差距不超过20年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Excavations in the central area of the roman fort at Băneasa (Teleorman County)
During the last two archaeological campaigns (2021-2022) we worked in the central area of the large fort at Băneasa. As we expected, the trenches have intersected the defensive ditch of the second phase of the fort (it shrank at less than half of the original surface), and the new gate of the eastern precinct. The two phases are similar in many respects, as the shape and the size of the ditch, the almost flat rampart, the undersized palisade, as well as that unique tower-gate, with no analogies for the first half of the third century. There are also some differences; for instance, the end of this fortification seems rather pacific, as rendered by both the stratigraphic rendition and the short list of findings. There is still some news, as the discovery of stamped tiles, which is a first for this frontier – Limes Transalutanus – all across the plain, south of Pitești City. Unfortunately, those tiles were brought from Slăveni (the largest fort from southern Romania, located 39 km west-northwest of Băneasa, beyond Olt River) therefore we still do not know the name of the military unit garrisoned at Băneasa. The comparison made for the pottery of the two phases does not show relevant differences, but the chronological gap is not greater than two decades.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信