{"title":"《近代早期创伤:欧洲与大西洋世界》,艾琳·彼得斯、辛西娅·理查兹主编","authors":"Justine Semmens","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World ed. by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards Justine Semmens Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards, eds., Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2021), xii + 397 pp., 7 ills. Melinda Rabb opens the afterword to Early Modern Trauma with a rich and satisfying salvo that more than justifies the need for more research into the role and impact that trauma played in shaping early modern texts: “Seen through the complex lens of contemporary trauma theories, the early modern world discloses its vulnerabilities, its catastrophes, and its strategies for representing experiences that defy representation” (361). First developed as a field of Freudian psychoanalytical theory in the 1990s, trauma studies originally posited that extreme experiences of physical, psychological, and emotional suffering can cause severe disruptions in memory, the integrity of identity and the psyche, and an epistemological rupture between the experience of this suffering and the inadequacy of language to describe or comprehend it. Although trauma was initially pathologized as a diagnostic function for clinical settings, by the early aughts deploying trauma as a category of analysis was beginning to enter the margins of the lexical toolbox of literary criticism, cultural studies, and historical analysis. Much of this scholarship has concentrated on examinations of trauma in modern or, even more precisely, the late modern contexts and social rupture of industrialized war, genocide, and mass economic migration that has isolated the interrogation of trauma from the more distant past. The first aim of Early Modern Trauma, a collection of essays edited by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards, is to urge scholars of premodern art, literature, and society to take more seriously the opportunity to examine the early modern past through the lens of trauma studies—a lacuna they argue that is all the more vexing because the early modern world was shaped by the sort of rupture and violence that trauma studies is devoted to understanding. Peters and Richards point out that scholars of the early modern world have exhibited a certain amount of reticence about configuring trauma studies into their analyses on the basis that it introduces anachronistic models of identity, individuality, and social belonging that cannot be accurately or reliably transported to the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The second aim of this collection of essays is to demonstrate that trauma theories can be applied fruitfully “beyond and before” contemporary experience that “transcends time” (4). In other words, while what constitutes a traumatic event is specific to cultural, historical, and social contexts, violent and unspeakable rupture remains germane to the human experience of trauma. The ways that various texts and the authors that produce them ultimately derive meaning from trauma by synthesizing it into their specific contexts, worldviews, and cultural and social lexica provide an important opportunity to understand the past. This volume is organized into two parts with the somewhat presentist intention of exploring “what early modern texts can teach us about the concept of early modern trauma and what the modern concept of trauma can teach us about early modern texts” (15). The essays in part 1, “Reframing Modern Trauma,” [End Page 255] discover the utility and limitations of applying modern trauma theory to the historical interpretation of texts from the past. This section opens with Susan Broomhall’s fascinating essay on spiritual, theological, and philosophical responses to the collective suffering and environmental devastation resulting from natural catastrophe in court poetry during the French Renaissance. Zachariah Long examines the exegesis of rape trauma in Shakespeare’s The Rape of Lucrece (1594) by synthesizing the “identification with the aggressor” theory of posttraumatic stress survival proposed by the early twentieth-century century Freudian analyst Sándor Ferenczi with Edward Reynold’s humoral theory of conceptual identification which he exposited in A Treatise of the Passions and Faculties of the Soul of Man (ca. 1640). Amelia Zurcher explores as a trauma narrative the unexplainable experience of conversion, identity formation, rupture, and reformation described in the English nonconformist Hannah Allen’s spiritual biography A Narrative of God’s Gracious Dealings with the Choice Christian (1683). Moving away from themes of environmental, personal, and spiritual apocalypse, Katherine Ellison examines poetic...","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World ed. by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards (review)\",\"authors\":\"Justine Semmens\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World ed. by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards Justine Semmens Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards, eds., Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2021), xii + 397 pp., 7 ills. Melinda Rabb opens the afterword to Early Modern Trauma with a rich and satisfying salvo that more than justifies the need for more research into the role and impact that trauma played in shaping early modern texts: “Seen through the complex lens of contemporary trauma theories, the early modern world discloses its vulnerabilities, its catastrophes, and its strategies for representing experiences that defy representation” (361). First developed as a field of Freudian psychoanalytical theory in the 1990s, trauma studies originally posited that extreme experiences of physical, psychological, and emotional suffering can cause severe disruptions in memory, the integrity of identity and the psyche, and an epistemological rupture between the experience of this suffering and the inadequacy of language to describe or comprehend it. Although trauma was initially pathologized as a diagnostic function for clinical settings, by the early aughts deploying trauma as a category of analysis was beginning to enter the margins of the lexical toolbox of literary criticism, cultural studies, and historical analysis. Much of this scholarship has concentrated on examinations of trauma in modern or, even more precisely, the late modern contexts and social rupture of industrialized war, genocide, and mass economic migration that has isolated the interrogation of trauma from the more distant past. The first aim of Early Modern Trauma, a collection of essays edited by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards, is to urge scholars of premodern art, literature, and society to take more seriously the opportunity to examine the early modern past through the lens of trauma studies—a lacuna they argue that is all the more vexing because the early modern world was shaped by the sort of rupture and violence that trauma studies is devoted to understanding. Peters and Richards point out that scholars of the early modern world have exhibited a certain amount of reticence about configuring trauma studies into their analyses on the basis that it introduces anachronistic models of identity, individuality, and social belonging that cannot be accurately or reliably transported to the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The second aim of this collection of essays is to demonstrate that trauma theories can be applied fruitfully “beyond and before” contemporary experience that “transcends time” (4). In other words, while what constitutes a traumatic event is specific to cultural, historical, and social contexts, violent and unspeakable rupture remains germane to the human experience of trauma. The ways that various texts and the authors that produce them ultimately derive meaning from trauma by synthesizing it into their specific contexts, worldviews, and cultural and social lexica provide an important opportunity to understand the past. This volume is organized into two parts with the somewhat presentist intention of exploring “what early modern texts can teach us about the concept of early modern trauma and what the modern concept of trauma can teach us about early modern texts” (15). The essays in part 1, “Reframing Modern Trauma,” [End Page 255] discover the utility and limitations of applying modern trauma theory to the historical interpretation of texts from the past. This section opens with Susan Broomhall’s fascinating essay on spiritual, theological, and philosophical responses to the collective suffering and environmental devastation resulting from natural catastrophe in court poetry during the French Renaissance. Zachariah Long examines the exegesis of rape trauma in Shakespeare’s The Rape of Lucrece (1594) by synthesizing the “identification with the aggressor” theory of posttraumatic stress survival proposed by the early twentieth-century century Freudian analyst Sándor Ferenczi with Edward Reynold’s humoral theory of conceptual identification which he exposited in A Treatise of the Passions and Faculties of the Soul of Man (ca. 1640). Amelia Zurcher explores as a trauma narrative the unexplainable experience of conversion, identity formation, rupture, and reformation described in the English nonconformist Hannah Allen’s spiritual biography A Narrative of God’s Gracious Dealings with the Choice Christian (1683). Moving away from themes of environmental, personal, and spiritual apocalypse, Katherine Ellison examines poetic...\",\"PeriodicalId\":53903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912700\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912700","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
书评:早期现代创伤:欧洲和大西洋世界由艾琳·彼得斯和辛西娅·理查兹贾斯汀·塞门斯艾琳·彼得斯和辛西娅·理查兹编辑。,早期现代创伤:欧洲和大西洋世界(林肯:内布拉斯加大学出版社,2021年),12 + 397页,7病。梅琳达·拉布(Melinda Rabb)在《早期现代创伤》(Early Modern Trauma)一书的后篇中,以丰富而令人满意的论述开篇,不仅证明了对创伤在塑造早期现代文本中的作用和影响进行更多研究的必要性:“通过当代创伤理论的复杂镜头,早期现代世界揭示了它的脆弱性、灾难,以及它对不被表现的经历的表现策略”(361)。创伤研究最初是在20世纪90年代作为弗洛伊德精神分析理论的一个领域发展起来的,它最初假设身体、心理和情感痛苦的极端经历会导致记忆、身份和精神的完整性严重中断,并且在这种痛苦的经历和语言不足以描述或理解它之间产生认识论上的断裂。尽管创伤最初是作为一种临床诊断功能被病理化的,但在早期,将创伤作为一种分析范畴的部署开始进入文学批评、文化研究和历史分析的词汇工具箱的边缘。这些学术研究大多集中在对现代创伤的研究上,或者更准确地说,集中在对现代晚期的创伤的研究上,以及工业化战争、种族灭绝和大规模经济移民造成的社会破裂上,这些都把对创伤的研究与更遥远的过去隔离开来。《早期现代创伤》是一本由艾琳·彼得斯和辛西娅·理查兹编辑的文集,其第一个目的是敦促研究前现代艺术、文学和社会的学者们更认真地利用这个机会,通过创伤研究的视角来审视早期现代的过去。他们认为,这是一个更令人烦恼的空白,因为早期现代世界是由创伤研究致力于理解的那种破裂和暴力塑造的。彼得斯和理查兹指出,早期现代世界的学者在将创伤研究纳入他们的分析时表现出一定程度的沉默,因为它引入了身份、个性和社会归属的时代错误模型,这些模型无法准确或可靠地追溯到16世纪和17世纪。这本文集的第二个目的是证明创伤理论可以有效地应用于“超越时间”的当代经验(4)。换句话说,虽然构成创伤事件的因素是特定于文化、历史和社会背景的,但暴力和无法形容的破裂仍然与人类的创伤经验密切相关。各种文本及其作者最终从创伤中获得意义的方式,通过将其综合到他们特定的语境、世界观、文化和社会词汇中,为理解过去提供了重要的机会。这本书分为两部分,带有一些现世主义的意图,即探索“早期现代文本可以教给我们关于早期现代创伤概念的东西,以及现代创伤概念可以教给我们关于早期现代文本的东西”(15)。第一部分“重构现代创伤”中的文章发现了将现代创伤理论应用于对过去文本的历史解释的效用和局限性。这一部分以苏珊·布鲁姆霍尔的一篇引人入胜的文章开篇,这篇文章探讨了法国文艺复兴时期宫廷诗歌中自然灾害造成的集体苦难和环境破坏在精神、神学和哲学上的反应。Zachariah Long通过综合20世纪早期弗洛伊德分析学家Sándor Ferenczi提出的关于创伤后应激生存的“与侵略者的认同”理论和爱德华·雷诺在《人类灵魂的激情和能力》(约1640年)中阐述的关于概念认同的体液理论,研究了莎士比亚的《卢克蕾丝的强奸》(1594年)中对强奸创伤的解释。阿米莉亚·泽尔彻以创伤叙事的方式探索了英国不墨于国教的汉娜·艾伦的精神传记《上帝与选择基督徒仁慈相处的叙述》(1683)中描述的不可解释的皈依、身份形成、破裂和改革经历。远离环境、个人和精神启示的主题,凯瑟琳·埃里森审视了诗歌……
Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World ed. by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards (review)
Reviewed by: Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World ed. by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards Justine Semmens Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards, eds., Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2021), xii + 397 pp., 7 ills. Melinda Rabb opens the afterword to Early Modern Trauma with a rich and satisfying salvo that more than justifies the need for more research into the role and impact that trauma played in shaping early modern texts: “Seen through the complex lens of contemporary trauma theories, the early modern world discloses its vulnerabilities, its catastrophes, and its strategies for representing experiences that defy representation” (361). First developed as a field of Freudian psychoanalytical theory in the 1990s, trauma studies originally posited that extreme experiences of physical, psychological, and emotional suffering can cause severe disruptions in memory, the integrity of identity and the psyche, and an epistemological rupture between the experience of this suffering and the inadequacy of language to describe or comprehend it. Although trauma was initially pathologized as a diagnostic function for clinical settings, by the early aughts deploying trauma as a category of analysis was beginning to enter the margins of the lexical toolbox of literary criticism, cultural studies, and historical analysis. Much of this scholarship has concentrated on examinations of trauma in modern or, even more precisely, the late modern contexts and social rupture of industrialized war, genocide, and mass economic migration that has isolated the interrogation of trauma from the more distant past. The first aim of Early Modern Trauma, a collection of essays edited by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards, is to urge scholars of premodern art, literature, and society to take more seriously the opportunity to examine the early modern past through the lens of trauma studies—a lacuna they argue that is all the more vexing because the early modern world was shaped by the sort of rupture and violence that trauma studies is devoted to understanding. Peters and Richards point out that scholars of the early modern world have exhibited a certain amount of reticence about configuring trauma studies into their analyses on the basis that it introduces anachronistic models of identity, individuality, and social belonging that cannot be accurately or reliably transported to the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The second aim of this collection of essays is to demonstrate that trauma theories can be applied fruitfully “beyond and before” contemporary experience that “transcends time” (4). In other words, while what constitutes a traumatic event is specific to cultural, historical, and social contexts, violent and unspeakable rupture remains germane to the human experience of trauma. The ways that various texts and the authors that produce them ultimately derive meaning from trauma by synthesizing it into their specific contexts, worldviews, and cultural and social lexica provide an important opportunity to understand the past. This volume is organized into two parts with the somewhat presentist intention of exploring “what early modern texts can teach us about the concept of early modern trauma and what the modern concept of trauma can teach us about early modern texts” (15). The essays in part 1, “Reframing Modern Trauma,” [End Page 255] discover the utility and limitations of applying modern trauma theory to the historical interpretation of texts from the past. This section opens with Susan Broomhall’s fascinating essay on spiritual, theological, and philosophical responses to the collective suffering and environmental devastation resulting from natural catastrophe in court poetry during the French Renaissance. Zachariah Long examines the exegesis of rape trauma in Shakespeare’s The Rape of Lucrece (1594) by synthesizing the “identification with the aggressor” theory of posttraumatic stress survival proposed by the early twentieth-century century Freudian analyst Sándor Ferenczi with Edward Reynold’s humoral theory of conceptual identification which he exposited in A Treatise of the Passions and Faculties of the Soul of Man (ca. 1640). Amelia Zurcher explores as a trauma narrative the unexplainable experience of conversion, identity formation, rupture, and reformation described in the English nonconformist Hannah Allen’s spiritual biography A Narrative of God’s Gracious Dealings with the Choice Christian (1683). Moving away from themes of environmental, personal, and spiritual apocalypse, Katherine Ellison examines poetic...
期刊介绍:
Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies publishes articles by graduate students and recent PhDs in any field of medieval and Renaissance studies. The journal maintains a tradition of gathering work from across disciplines, with a special interest in articles that have an interdisciplinary or cross-cultural scope.