伊朗老年人波斯语版护理转变量表(CTM-15)的心理测量特性

IF 0.9 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Seyed Ebrahim Seyed Alavi, Farahnaz Mohammadi-Shahboulaghi, Mohammad Ali Hosseini, Mohsen Vahedi, Maryam Khoshbakht-Pishkhani, Nasim Sadeghi Mahalli
{"title":"伊朗老年人波斯语版护理转变量表(CTM-15)的心理测量特性","authors":"Seyed Ebrahim Seyed Alavi, Farahnaz Mohammadi-Shahboulaghi, Mohammad Ali Hosseini, Mohsen Vahedi, Maryam Khoshbakht-Pishkhani, Nasim Sadeghi Mahalli","doi":"10.32598/sija.2023.3532.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The care transitions measure (CTM-15) is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the transition of care. This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of CTM-15 in Iranian older people. Methods &amp; Materials This is a psychometrics study. The questionnaire was first translated into Persian based on the international quality of life assessment protocol. Then, it was completed by 200 older people who were selected using a convenience sampling method based on the inclusion criteria. After completion, face validity, content validity, construct validity (using confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis) and convergent validity were investigated. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated in terms of internal consistency (using Cronbach’s α) and test-retest reliability. Statistical analyses were done in SPSS software, version 26 and AMOS software, version 24. Results The content validity index (CVI) for the whole questionnaire was obtained as S-CVI=0.966. Following CFA, the 4-factor solution was not confirmed and did not show a good fit (P<0.001, RMSEA=0.093, GFI=0.851, NFI=0.644, CFI=0.731). After performing EFA, three factors were found and named as “patient and caregiver preferences”, “self-management and follow-up” and “medication management”. Convergence validity of the Persian CTM-15 with GSE-10 was assessed using Pearson’s correlation test which obtained as r=0.468. The internal consistency using Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.76 and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.85. Conclusion The Persian version of CTM-15 did not support the 4-factor model of the original version. The Persian version with 3 subscales, due to having acceptable validity and reliability, can be used as an efficient tool to evaluate the transition of care for the elderly in Iran. The benefits of measuring the transition of care and its impact on the promotion of discharge programs and continuity of care in various settings justify the need to pay attention to this tool.","PeriodicalId":44423,"journal":{"name":"Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Care Transitions Measure (CTM-15) in Iranian Older People\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Ebrahim Seyed Alavi, Farahnaz Mohammadi-Shahboulaghi, Mohammad Ali Hosseini, Mohsen Vahedi, Maryam Khoshbakht-Pishkhani, Nasim Sadeghi Mahalli\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/sija.2023.3532.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives The care transitions measure (CTM-15) is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the transition of care. This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of CTM-15 in Iranian older people. Methods &amp; Materials This is a psychometrics study. The questionnaire was first translated into Persian based on the international quality of life assessment protocol. Then, it was completed by 200 older people who were selected using a convenience sampling method based on the inclusion criteria. After completion, face validity, content validity, construct validity (using confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis) and convergent validity were investigated. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated in terms of internal consistency (using Cronbach’s α) and test-retest reliability. Statistical analyses were done in SPSS software, version 26 and AMOS software, version 24. Results The content validity index (CVI) for the whole questionnaire was obtained as S-CVI=0.966. Following CFA, the 4-factor solution was not confirmed and did not show a good fit (P<0.001, RMSEA=0.093, GFI=0.851, NFI=0.644, CFI=0.731). After performing EFA, three factors were found and named as “patient and caregiver preferences”, “self-management and follow-up” and “medication management”. Convergence validity of the Persian CTM-15 with GSE-10 was assessed using Pearson’s correlation test which obtained as r=0.468. The internal consistency using Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.76 and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.85. Conclusion The Persian version of CTM-15 did not support the 4-factor model of the original version. The Persian version with 3 subscales, due to having acceptable validity and reliability, can be used as an efficient tool to evaluate the transition of care for the elderly in Iran. The benefits of measuring the transition of care and its impact on the promotion of discharge programs and continuity of care in various settings justify the need to pay attention to this tool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/sija.2023.3532.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/sija.2023.3532.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的护理过渡量表(CTM-15)是一种可靠、有效的评估护理过渡的工具。本研究旨在评估伊朗老年人波斯语版CTM-15的心理测量特性。方法,这是一项心理测量学研究。问卷首先根据国际生活质量评估协议翻译成波斯语。然后,使用基于纳入标准的便利抽样方法选择200名老年人完成。完成后,进行了面效度、内容效度、结构效度(采用验证性因子分析和探索性因子分析)和收敛效度的调查。用内部一致性(Cronbach’s α)和重测信度来评价问卷的信度。采用SPSS软件26版和AMOS软件24版进行统计分析。结果整个问卷的内容效度指数(CVI)为S-CVI=0.966。经CFA检验后,四因素解未得到证实,拟合不佳(P<0.001, RMSEA=0.093, GFI=0.851, NFI=0.644, CFI=0.731)。在实施全民教育后,发现了三个因素,分别是“患者和护理者偏好”、“自我管理和随访”和“药物管理”。采用Pearson相关检验评估波斯CTM-15与GSE-10的收敛效度,r=0.468。用Cronbach’s α系数计算的内部一致性为0.76,类内相关系数为0.85。结论波斯语版CTM-15不支持原版本的四因素模型。波斯语版本有3个分量表,由于具有可接受的效度和信度,可以作为评估伊朗老年人护理过渡的有效工具。衡量护理过渡的好处及其对促进出院方案和各种环境下护理连续性的影响证明有必要关注这一工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Care Transitions Measure (CTM-15) in Iranian Older People
Objectives The care transitions measure (CTM-15) is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the transition of care. This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of CTM-15 in Iranian older people. Methods & Materials This is a psychometrics study. The questionnaire was first translated into Persian based on the international quality of life assessment protocol. Then, it was completed by 200 older people who were selected using a convenience sampling method based on the inclusion criteria. After completion, face validity, content validity, construct validity (using confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis) and convergent validity were investigated. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated in terms of internal consistency (using Cronbach’s α) and test-retest reliability. Statistical analyses were done in SPSS software, version 26 and AMOS software, version 24. Results The content validity index (CVI) for the whole questionnaire was obtained as S-CVI=0.966. Following CFA, the 4-factor solution was not confirmed and did not show a good fit (P<0.001, RMSEA=0.093, GFI=0.851, NFI=0.644, CFI=0.731). After performing EFA, three factors were found and named as “patient and caregiver preferences”, “self-management and follow-up” and “medication management”. Convergence validity of the Persian CTM-15 with GSE-10 was assessed using Pearson’s correlation test which obtained as r=0.468. The internal consistency using Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.76 and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.85. Conclusion The Persian version of CTM-15 did not support the 4-factor model of the original version. The Persian version with 3 subscales, due to having acceptable validity and reliability, can be used as an efficient tool to evaluate the transition of care for the elderly in Iran. The benefits of measuring the transition of care and its impact on the promotion of discharge programs and continuity of care in various settings justify the need to pay attention to this tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing
Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信