连续腰竖肌脊柱平面阻滞作为硬膜外镇痛在髋关节置换术患者疼痛治疗中的替代方案-一项前瞻性先导研究

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Agata Hanych, Paweł Kutnik, Przemysław Pasiak, Aleksandra Zakrzewska-Szalak, Oksana Wichowska, Mariusz Jednakiewicz, Adam Nogalski, Paweł Piwowarczyk, Michał Borys
{"title":"连续腰竖肌脊柱平面阻滞作为硬膜外镇痛在髋关节置换术患者疼痛治疗中的替代方案-一项前瞻性先导研究","authors":"Agata Hanych, Paweł Kutnik, Przemysław Pasiak, Aleksandra Zakrzewska-Szalak, Oksana Wichowska, Mariusz Jednakiewicz, Adam Nogalski, Paweł Piwowarczyk, Michał Borys","doi":"10.5114/ait.2023.132517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Postoperative pain associated with hip replacement surgery can be severe, decreasing the patient’s mobility and satisfaction with perioperative treatment. Regional techniques are commonly used as postoperative analgesia in hip surgery patients. Methods We performed a prospective pilot study on patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. We anesthetized each participant with spinal technique and allocated patients according to postoperative analgesia to the continuous epidural group and the continuous lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) group. We measured postope-rative oxycodone consumption with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) demands. At several points, we evaluated the patients’ pain at rest and during activity on the visual analog scale (VAS, 0–10), their quadriceps femoris’ muscle strength on the Lovett scale (0–5), and their ability to sit, stand upright, and walk on the Timed Up and Go test. Moreover, we assessed the patients’ recovery through the Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR-40) questionnaire on the first postoperative day. Results We found lower oxycodone consumption via PCA in the epidural than in the ESPB group (9.1 (mean) mg (5.2–13.0) (confidence interval) vs. 15.5 mg (9.8–21.3), P = 0.049). Patients in the ESPB group had more demands with PCA than participants in the epidural group (10.5 (median) (6–16) (interquartile range) vs. 25 (16–51), P = 0.016). We did not find differences between the groups in the other outcomes or in terms of postoperative complications. Conclusions The results suggest that the continuous lumbar ESPB group is equivalent to epidural analgesia as a pain treatment technique in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous lumbar erector spinae plane block as an alternative to epidural analgesia in pain treatment in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery – a prospective pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Agata Hanych, Paweł Kutnik, Przemysław Pasiak, Aleksandra Zakrzewska-Szalak, Oksana Wichowska, Mariusz Jednakiewicz, Adam Nogalski, Paweł Piwowarczyk, Michał Borys\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/ait.2023.132517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Postoperative pain associated with hip replacement surgery can be severe, decreasing the patient’s mobility and satisfaction with perioperative treatment. Regional techniques are commonly used as postoperative analgesia in hip surgery patients. Methods We performed a prospective pilot study on patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. We anesthetized each participant with spinal technique and allocated patients according to postoperative analgesia to the continuous epidural group and the continuous lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) group. We measured postope-rative oxycodone consumption with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) demands. At several points, we evaluated the patients’ pain at rest and during activity on the visual analog scale (VAS, 0–10), their quadriceps femoris’ muscle strength on the Lovett scale (0–5), and their ability to sit, stand upright, and walk on the Timed Up and Go test. Moreover, we assessed the patients’ recovery through the Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR-40) questionnaire on the first postoperative day. Results We found lower oxycodone consumption via PCA in the epidural than in the ESPB group (9.1 (mean) mg (5.2–13.0) (confidence interval) vs. 15.5 mg (9.8–21.3), P = 0.049). Patients in the ESPB group had more demands with PCA than participants in the epidural group (10.5 (median) (6–16) (interquartile range) vs. 25 (16–51), P = 0.016). We did not find differences between the groups in the other outcomes or in terms of postoperative complications. Conclusions The results suggest that the continuous lumbar ESPB group is equivalent to epidural analgesia as a pain treatment technique in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2023.132517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2023.132517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuous lumbar erector spinae plane block as an alternative to epidural analgesia in pain treatment in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery – a prospective pilot study
Background Postoperative pain associated with hip replacement surgery can be severe, decreasing the patient’s mobility and satisfaction with perioperative treatment. Regional techniques are commonly used as postoperative analgesia in hip surgery patients. Methods We performed a prospective pilot study on patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. We anesthetized each participant with spinal technique and allocated patients according to postoperative analgesia to the continuous epidural group and the continuous lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) group. We measured postope-rative oxycodone consumption with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) demands. At several points, we evaluated the patients’ pain at rest and during activity on the visual analog scale (VAS, 0–10), their quadriceps femoris’ muscle strength on the Lovett scale (0–5), and their ability to sit, stand upright, and walk on the Timed Up and Go test. Moreover, we assessed the patients’ recovery through the Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR-40) questionnaire on the first postoperative day. Results We found lower oxycodone consumption via PCA in the epidural than in the ESPB group (9.1 (mean) mg (5.2–13.0) (confidence interval) vs. 15.5 mg (9.8–21.3), P = 0.049). Patients in the ESPB group had more demands with PCA than participants in the epidural group (10.5 (median) (6–16) (interquartile range) vs. 25 (16–51), P = 0.016). We did not find differences between the groups in the other outcomes or in terms of postoperative complications. Conclusions The results suggest that the continuous lumbar ESPB group is equivalent to epidural analgesia as a pain treatment technique in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信