为未来做准备:通过库伯勒-罗斯危机周期的镜头理解集体悲伤

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Trevor Gerhardt, Roman Puchkov
{"title":"为未来做准备:通过库伯勒-罗斯危机周期的镜头理解集体悲伤","authors":"Trevor Gerhardt, Roman Puchkov","doi":"10.1108/heswbl-12-2022-0289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper explored collective grief through the case of a Business Management College which suddenly and unexpectedly went into administration. The aim was to gain and apply insight to future crises in collective grief such as what occurred during Covid 19. Design/methodology/approach 120 EVRE submissions with weekly reflective journal entries and 121 Capstone submissions including reflections were analysed as secondary textual data using content-thematic analysis and inferential statistics. Findings This study confirms the theory that grief is not linear. However, even though no positive correlation was found between two different cohorts (EVRE and CAPP submissions), who did experience the same crisis in different ways, those people did all seem to share the stage of avoidance. Research limitations/implications The textual data was limited in scope as not all students chose to express their grief through the written submission or the Kubler-Ross lens. Practical implications This research does suggest that initially, institutional responses to collective grief should address initial stages of “avoidance”. Social implications In responding to collecting grief, such as Covid 19, institutions need to recognise the non-linear process of grief and not expect a “one-size-fits-all” approach to be a viable solution. Originality/value There is not much research available looking at student experience and emotional pressures (if at all) collectively during a crisis.","PeriodicalId":45549,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning","volume":"235 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preparing for the future: understanding collective grief through the lens of the Kubler-Ross crisis cycle\",\"authors\":\"Trevor Gerhardt, Roman Puchkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/heswbl-12-2022-0289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose This paper explored collective grief through the case of a Business Management College which suddenly and unexpectedly went into administration. The aim was to gain and apply insight to future crises in collective grief such as what occurred during Covid 19. Design/methodology/approach 120 EVRE submissions with weekly reflective journal entries and 121 Capstone submissions including reflections were analysed as secondary textual data using content-thematic analysis and inferential statistics. Findings This study confirms the theory that grief is not linear. However, even though no positive correlation was found between two different cohorts (EVRE and CAPP submissions), who did experience the same crisis in different ways, those people did all seem to share the stage of avoidance. Research limitations/implications The textual data was limited in scope as not all students chose to express their grief through the written submission or the Kubler-Ross lens. Practical implications This research does suggest that initially, institutional responses to collective grief should address initial stages of “avoidance”. Social implications In responding to collecting grief, such as Covid 19, institutions need to recognise the non-linear process of grief and not expect a “one-size-fits-all” approach to be a viable solution. Originality/value There is not much research available looking at student experience and emotional pressures (if at all) collectively during a crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning\",\"volume\":\"235 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-12-2022-0289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-12-2022-0289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过某工商管理学院突然改制的案例探讨集体悲痛。其目的是获得洞察力,并将其应用于未来的集体悲伤危机,如2019冠状病毒病期间发生的危机。设计/方法/方法120份EVRE提交的每周反思日志条目和121份Capstone提交的包括反思作为次要文本数据,使用内容主题分析和推理统计进行分析。本研究证实了悲伤不是线性的理论。然而,即使在两个不同的队列(EVRE和CAPP提交)之间没有发现正相关,他们确实以不同的方式经历了同样的危机,这些人似乎都分享了回避的阶段。研究局限性/启示文本数据的范围有限,因为并非所有学生都选择通过书面提交或库伯勒-罗斯镜头来表达他们的悲伤。本研究确实表明,最初,对集体悲伤的制度性反应应该解决“回避”的初始阶段。在应对诸如2019冠状病毒病等悲伤情绪时,各机构需要认识到悲伤情绪的非线性过程,不要指望“一刀切”的方法是可行的解决方案。在危机期间,没有太多研究将学生的经历和情绪压力(如果有的话)放在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preparing for the future: understanding collective grief through the lens of the Kubler-Ross crisis cycle
Purpose This paper explored collective grief through the case of a Business Management College which suddenly and unexpectedly went into administration. The aim was to gain and apply insight to future crises in collective grief such as what occurred during Covid 19. Design/methodology/approach 120 EVRE submissions with weekly reflective journal entries and 121 Capstone submissions including reflections were analysed as secondary textual data using content-thematic analysis and inferential statistics. Findings This study confirms the theory that grief is not linear. However, even though no positive correlation was found between two different cohorts (EVRE and CAPP submissions), who did experience the same crisis in different ways, those people did all seem to share the stage of avoidance. Research limitations/implications The textual data was limited in scope as not all students chose to express their grief through the written submission or the Kubler-Ross lens. Practical implications This research does suggest that initially, institutional responses to collective grief should address initial stages of “avoidance”. Social implications In responding to collecting grief, such as Covid 19, institutions need to recognise the non-linear process of grief and not expect a “one-size-fits-all” approach to be a viable solution. Originality/value There is not much research available looking at student experience and emotional pressures (if at all) collectively during a crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning
Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信