《流浪人物:法律、文学与警察的起源》作者:萨尔·尼古拉佐

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"《流浪人物:法律、文学与警察的起源》作者:萨尔·尼古拉佐","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/ecs.2023.a909459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Vagrant Figures: Law, Literature, and the Origins of the Police by Sal Nicolazzo Kristina Huang Sal Nicolazzo, Vagrant Figures: Law, Literature, and the Origins of the Police ( New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 2021). Pp. 320; 3 b/w illus. $65.00 cloth. Sal Nicolazzo's Vagrant Figures makes a case for how transatlantic systems of policing are not born out of historical inevitability; rather, these systems are connected to the durable and pliable category of vagrancy. Deftly and incisively, Nicolazzo reads across legal and literary genres to demonstrate the rhetorical force of vagrancy in the transatlantic eighteenth-century Anglophone world. The rhetorical force of vagrancy stems from its paratactic and anticipatory logic — \"it attributes its object with future criminality, dependence, or danger as if these things had already happened\" (18). The expansive but vague symbolic universe associated with vagrancy was co-constitutive with the development of policing. Throughout this impressive book, Nicolazzo advances an \"avowedly political literary historicism as a self-reflexive method\" (240) that can attune us to how social phenomena like vagrancy are not timeless facts; rather, such social phenomena are active traces of ideological frames, past and present, that render certain modes of governance, like the police, thinkable. Vagrant Figures is an illuminating literary-critical experimentation with the methods of Cultural Studies. The chapter analyses do not culminate in a straightforward, causal narrative as one might expect in a \"prehistory of the modern administrative state\" (33). The absence of a direct line from the past to the present is not a structural weakness but instead a result of the book's investment in developing a historical thinking that conjunctural analysis affords. To my mind, Nicolazzo's call for \"a kind of perverse historicism\" (240) is akin to Stuart Hall's call for \"some kind of rough periodisation.\" In \"Racism and Reaction\" (1978), Hall describes this periodization as \"holding two different perspectives in mind at the same time.\" This approach begins with studying the stages of a racism's development \"sequentially\" over a period of time, while analyzing \"laterally\" things that have been connected to the developing racism. Indeed, the oft-cited conclusion of Hall et al.'s Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order (1978)—\"race is the modality in which class is lived\"—is echoed in the overarching theorization of Vagrant Figures: \"Race is the modality in which primitive accumulation lived\" (30). While the book's chapter analyses carry out a conjunctural analysis from an eighteenth-century perspective, Nicolazzo also layers on a theorization of historical thinking through queer studies' debates around temporality. [End Page 120] Nicolazzo demonstrates across a wide range of texts that vagrancy was (and remains) an ideological \"catchall\" (3) and \"a racializing category\" (29). The first three chapters periodize vagrancy in stages, contextualizing the aesthetic history shared between policing and vagrancy. Together, these chapters emphasize how vagrancy was not a matter of identity or subjectivity formation; rather, vagrancy was made through legislative and literary practices of spectacularizing surplus populations and rationalizing the management of these populations. The English Rogue (1665), seventeenth-century writings about plantations in the Caribbean, and the Vagrancy Act of 1714 illustrate the ways that aesthetic pleasure and policing were enmeshed: \"digressive, episodic, unpredictable adventures\" in the picaresque form mirrored \"the parataxis at the heart of vagrancy law\" (66, 68). The way that the lumpenproletariat was imagined—figured in paratactic, heterogeneous, multitudinous, and spectacular terms—became the means to articulate different perceptions of threats and disorder. Chapter 2 turns to Henry Fielding's The Female Husband (1746), Sarah Scott's Millenium Hall (1762), and Mary Saxby's Memoirs of a Female Vagrant (1806) to shift attention from the family unit towards the parish's central role in managing terms of subsistence, welfare, and local responsibility. These terms effect gendered and sexed rubrics of surveillance that underpin the \"governmentality of social reproduction\" (100). Eighteenth-century vagrancy's relationship to the parish offers an important valence to queer studies by providing a \"model of deviance that does not depend on identitarian coherence,\" and one that moves \"outside traditional accounts of the domestic sphere and its subjects\" (115). This chapter might be productively read alongside the coda...","PeriodicalId":45802,"journal":{"name":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vagrant Figures: Law, Literature, and the Origins of the Police by Sal Nicolazzo (review)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ecs.2023.a909459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: Vagrant Figures: Law, Literature, and the Origins of the Police by Sal Nicolazzo Kristina Huang Sal Nicolazzo, Vagrant Figures: Law, Literature, and the Origins of the Police ( New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 2021). Pp. 320; 3 b/w illus. $65.00 cloth. Sal Nicolazzo's Vagrant Figures makes a case for how transatlantic systems of policing are not born out of historical inevitability; rather, these systems are connected to the durable and pliable category of vagrancy. Deftly and incisively, Nicolazzo reads across legal and literary genres to demonstrate the rhetorical force of vagrancy in the transatlantic eighteenth-century Anglophone world. The rhetorical force of vagrancy stems from its paratactic and anticipatory logic — \\\"it attributes its object with future criminality, dependence, or danger as if these things had already happened\\\" (18). The expansive but vague symbolic universe associated with vagrancy was co-constitutive with the development of policing. Throughout this impressive book, Nicolazzo advances an \\\"avowedly political literary historicism as a self-reflexive method\\\" (240) that can attune us to how social phenomena like vagrancy are not timeless facts; rather, such social phenomena are active traces of ideological frames, past and present, that render certain modes of governance, like the police, thinkable. Vagrant Figures is an illuminating literary-critical experimentation with the methods of Cultural Studies. The chapter analyses do not culminate in a straightforward, causal narrative as one might expect in a \\\"prehistory of the modern administrative state\\\" (33). The absence of a direct line from the past to the present is not a structural weakness but instead a result of the book's investment in developing a historical thinking that conjunctural analysis affords. To my mind, Nicolazzo's call for \\\"a kind of perverse historicism\\\" (240) is akin to Stuart Hall's call for \\\"some kind of rough periodisation.\\\" In \\\"Racism and Reaction\\\" (1978), Hall describes this periodization as \\\"holding two different perspectives in mind at the same time.\\\" This approach begins with studying the stages of a racism's development \\\"sequentially\\\" over a period of time, while analyzing \\\"laterally\\\" things that have been connected to the developing racism. Indeed, the oft-cited conclusion of Hall et al.'s Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order (1978)—\\\"race is the modality in which class is lived\\\"—is echoed in the overarching theorization of Vagrant Figures: \\\"Race is the modality in which primitive accumulation lived\\\" (30). While the book's chapter analyses carry out a conjunctural analysis from an eighteenth-century perspective, Nicolazzo also layers on a theorization of historical thinking through queer studies' debates around temporality. [End Page 120] Nicolazzo demonstrates across a wide range of texts that vagrancy was (and remains) an ideological \\\"catchall\\\" (3) and \\\"a racializing category\\\" (29). The first three chapters periodize vagrancy in stages, contextualizing the aesthetic history shared between policing and vagrancy. Together, these chapters emphasize how vagrancy was not a matter of identity or subjectivity formation; rather, vagrancy was made through legislative and literary practices of spectacularizing surplus populations and rationalizing the management of these populations. The English Rogue (1665), seventeenth-century writings about plantations in the Caribbean, and the Vagrancy Act of 1714 illustrate the ways that aesthetic pleasure and policing were enmeshed: \\\"digressive, episodic, unpredictable adventures\\\" in the picaresque form mirrored \\\"the parataxis at the heart of vagrancy law\\\" (66, 68). The way that the lumpenproletariat was imagined—figured in paratactic, heterogeneous, multitudinous, and spectacular terms—became the means to articulate different perceptions of threats and disorder. Chapter 2 turns to Henry Fielding's The Female Husband (1746), Sarah Scott's Millenium Hall (1762), and Mary Saxby's Memoirs of a Female Vagrant (1806) to shift attention from the family unit towards the parish's central role in managing terms of subsistence, welfare, and local responsibility. These terms effect gendered and sexed rubrics of surveillance that underpin the \\\"governmentality of social reproduction\\\" (100). Eighteenth-century vagrancy's relationship to the parish offers an important valence to queer studies by providing a \\\"model of deviance that does not depend on identitarian coherence,\\\" and one that moves \\\"outside traditional accounts of the domestic sphere and its subjects\\\" (115). This chapter might be productively read alongside the coda...\",\"PeriodicalId\":45802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2023.a909459\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2023.a909459","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由:流浪汉人物:法律,文学和警察的起源由萨尔·尼古拉佐审查克里斯蒂娜·黄萨尔·尼古拉佐,流浪汉人物:法律,文学和警察的起源(纽黑文:耶鲁大学出版社,2021)。页。320;3个b/w。布65.00美元。萨尔·尼古拉佐(Sal Nicolazzo)的《流浪人物》(Vagrant Figures)证明,跨大西洋的警务体系并非出于历史必然性而诞生;更确切地说,这些系统与持久且易受影响的流浪类别有关。尼古拉佐巧妙而精进地解读了法律和文学流派,展示了十八世纪跨大西洋英语世界中流浪的修辞力量。流浪的修辞力量源于它的意合和预期逻辑——“它把它的对象与未来的犯罪、依赖或危险联系起来,就好像这些事情已经发生了一样”(18)。与流浪有关的广阔而模糊的象征性宇宙与警务的发展是共同构成的。在这本令人印象深刻的书中,尼古拉佐提出了一种“作为一种自我反思方法的公开政治文学历史主义”(240),它可以使我们认识到流浪等社会现象并非永恒的事实;相反,这些社会现象是过去和现在的意识形态框架的活跃痕迹,它们使某些治理模式(如警察)变得可以想象。《流浪人物》是对文化研究方法的一次富有启发性的文学批评实验。章节分析并没有像人们在“现代行政国家的史前史”中所期望的那样,以直截了当的因果叙述告终(33)。没有从过去到现在的直接联系并不是一个结构上的弱点,而是这本书在发展一种历史思维方面的投资的结果,这种思维是结合分析所提供的。在我看来,Nicolazzo对“一种反常的历史主义”(240)的呼吁类似于Stuart Hall对“某种粗略的时期划分”的呼吁。在《种族主义与反应》(1978)一书中,霍尔将这种分期描述为“同时在脑海中持有两种不同的观点”。这种方法首先研究种族主义在一段时间内“按顺序”发展的各个阶段,同时分析与种族主义发展有关的“横向”事物。的确,经常被引用的霍尔等人的《危机的监管:抢劫、国家、法律和秩序》(1978)的结论——“种族是阶级生存的形态”——在《流浪人物》的总体理论中得到了呼应:“种族是原始积累生存的形态”(30)。虽然书中的章节分析从18世纪的角度进行了一种结合分析,但尼古拉佐还通过酷儿研究中围绕时间性的辩论,对历史思维进行了理论化。Nicolazzo通过广泛的文本证明了流浪曾经是(并且仍然是)一种意识形态的“包罗一切”(3)和“种族化的范畴”(29)。前三章对流浪进行了分期,将警察与流浪的审美历史置于语境之中。总之,这些章节强调流浪不是身份或主体性形成的问题;更确切地说,流浪是通过立法和文学实践来实现的,这些实践使过剩人口变得壮观,并使这些人口的管理合理化。《英国流氓》(1665),17世纪关于加勒比种植园的作品,以及1714年的《流浪法》都说明了审美愉悦与治安纠缠在一起的方式:以流浪汉的形式出现的“离题的、偶然性的、不可预测的冒险”反映了“流浪法核心的意合”(66,68)。流氓无产阶级被想象的方式——以平行的、异质的、众多的和壮观的术语来描述——成为表达对威胁和混乱的不同看法的手段。第二章转向亨利·菲尔丁的《女丈夫》(1746)、莎拉·斯科特的《千禧年大厅》(1762)和玛丽·萨克斯比的《女流浪汉回忆录》(1806),将注意力从家庭单位转移到教区在管理生存、福利和地方责任方面的核心作用上。这些术语影响着支持“社会再生产治理”的性别化和性别化的监督规则(100)。十八世纪流浪与教区的关系为酷儿研究提供了一个重要的价值,它提供了一个“不依赖于同一性一致性的越轨模式”,一个“超越传统的家庭领域及其主题”的模式(115)。这一章和结尾一起读可能会很有收获。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vagrant Figures: Law, Literature, and the Origins of the Police by Sal Nicolazzo (review)
Reviewed by: Vagrant Figures: Law, Literature, and the Origins of the Police by Sal Nicolazzo Kristina Huang Sal Nicolazzo, Vagrant Figures: Law, Literature, and the Origins of the Police ( New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 2021). Pp. 320; 3 b/w illus. $65.00 cloth. Sal Nicolazzo's Vagrant Figures makes a case for how transatlantic systems of policing are not born out of historical inevitability; rather, these systems are connected to the durable and pliable category of vagrancy. Deftly and incisively, Nicolazzo reads across legal and literary genres to demonstrate the rhetorical force of vagrancy in the transatlantic eighteenth-century Anglophone world. The rhetorical force of vagrancy stems from its paratactic and anticipatory logic — "it attributes its object with future criminality, dependence, or danger as if these things had already happened" (18). The expansive but vague symbolic universe associated with vagrancy was co-constitutive with the development of policing. Throughout this impressive book, Nicolazzo advances an "avowedly political literary historicism as a self-reflexive method" (240) that can attune us to how social phenomena like vagrancy are not timeless facts; rather, such social phenomena are active traces of ideological frames, past and present, that render certain modes of governance, like the police, thinkable. Vagrant Figures is an illuminating literary-critical experimentation with the methods of Cultural Studies. The chapter analyses do not culminate in a straightforward, causal narrative as one might expect in a "prehistory of the modern administrative state" (33). The absence of a direct line from the past to the present is not a structural weakness but instead a result of the book's investment in developing a historical thinking that conjunctural analysis affords. To my mind, Nicolazzo's call for "a kind of perverse historicism" (240) is akin to Stuart Hall's call for "some kind of rough periodisation." In "Racism and Reaction" (1978), Hall describes this periodization as "holding two different perspectives in mind at the same time." This approach begins with studying the stages of a racism's development "sequentially" over a period of time, while analyzing "laterally" things that have been connected to the developing racism. Indeed, the oft-cited conclusion of Hall et al.'s Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order (1978)—"race is the modality in which class is lived"—is echoed in the overarching theorization of Vagrant Figures: "Race is the modality in which primitive accumulation lived" (30). While the book's chapter analyses carry out a conjunctural analysis from an eighteenth-century perspective, Nicolazzo also layers on a theorization of historical thinking through queer studies' debates around temporality. [End Page 120] Nicolazzo demonstrates across a wide range of texts that vagrancy was (and remains) an ideological "catchall" (3) and "a racializing category" (29). The first three chapters periodize vagrancy in stages, contextualizing the aesthetic history shared between policing and vagrancy. Together, these chapters emphasize how vagrancy was not a matter of identity or subjectivity formation; rather, vagrancy was made through legislative and literary practices of spectacularizing surplus populations and rationalizing the management of these populations. The English Rogue (1665), seventeenth-century writings about plantations in the Caribbean, and the Vagrancy Act of 1714 illustrate the ways that aesthetic pleasure and policing were enmeshed: "digressive, episodic, unpredictable adventures" in the picaresque form mirrored "the parataxis at the heart of vagrancy law" (66, 68). The way that the lumpenproletariat was imagined—figured in paratactic, heterogeneous, multitudinous, and spectacular terms—became the means to articulate different perceptions of threats and disorder. Chapter 2 turns to Henry Fielding's The Female Husband (1746), Sarah Scott's Millenium Hall (1762), and Mary Saxby's Memoirs of a Female Vagrant (1806) to shift attention from the family unit towards the parish's central role in managing terms of subsistence, welfare, and local responsibility. These terms effect gendered and sexed rubrics of surveillance that underpin the "governmentality of social reproduction" (100). Eighteenth-century vagrancy's relationship to the parish offers an important valence to queer studies by providing a "model of deviance that does not depend on identitarian coherence," and one that moves "outside traditional accounts of the domestic sphere and its subjects" (115). This chapter might be productively read alongside the coda...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES
EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ASECS), Eighteenth-Century Studies is committed to publishing the best of current writing on all aspects of eighteenth-century culture. The journal selects essays that employ different modes of analysis and disciplinary discourses to explore how recent historiographical, critical, and theoretical ideas have engaged scholars concerned with the eighteenth century.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信