澳大利亚典型桥梁快速设计与评估的荷载分配系数

IF 0.9 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Setthawuth Yuprasert, Tariq Maqsood, Srikanth Venkatesan, Ricky Chan
{"title":"澳大利亚典型桥梁快速设计与评估的荷载分配系数","authors":"Setthawuth Yuprasert, Tariq Maqsood, Srikanth Venkatesan, Ricky Chan","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2023.2255457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increase in freight productivity in Australia is pressuring Australian bridge infrastructure. Bridge assessment is crucial to ensure the safety of bridges to accommodate heavier vehicles. Load distribution factor (LDF) has been widely used for bridge design and evaluation in the preliminary stage, but it is not specified in the Australian standard code. This study aims to develop the LDFs for typical Australian bridges with the most adverse load effects of single- and two-lane loads. Later, the LDFs were compared with the LDF equations in the different standards, including National Association of Australian State Road Authorities (National Association of Australian State Road Authorities, 1976), American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials: Load and Resistance Factor Design (AASHTO (2017), Henry’s and modified Henry’s methods. It can be concluded that the AASHTO (2017) LDF equations provide very good correlations with typical Australian bridges. It is possible to use the AASHTO LRFD LDF equations for assessing and designing in Australian concrete I-girder and Super-T girder bridges. However, most AASHTO LFRD provides conservative results of LDFs compared with LDFs of Australian bridges. It is recommended that LDFs of Australian bridges should be developed for bridge design and assessment.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Load distribution factors for quick design and assessment in typical Australian bridges\",\"authors\":\"Setthawuth Yuprasert, Tariq Maqsood, Srikanth Venkatesan, Ricky Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13287982.2023.2255457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increase in freight productivity in Australia is pressuring Australian bridge infrastructure. Bridge assessment is crucial to ensure the safety of bridges to accommodate heavier vehicles. Load distribution factor (LDF) has been widely used for bridge design and evaluation in the preliminary stage, but it is not specified in the Australian standard code. This study aims to develop the LDFs for typical Australian bridges with the most adverse load effects of single- and two-lane loads. Later, the LDFs were compared with the LDF equations in the different standards, including National Association of Australian State Road Authorities (National Association of Australian State Road Authorities, 1976), American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials: Load and Resistance Factor Design (AASHTO (2017), Henry’s and modified Henry’s methods. It can be concluded that the AASHTO (2017) LDF equations provide very good correlations with typical Australian bridges. It is possible to use the AASHTO LRFD LDF equations for assessing and designing in Australian concrete I-girder and Super-T girder bridges. However, most AASHTO LFRD provides conservative results of LDFs compared with LDFs of Australian bridges. It is recommended that LDFs of Australian bridges should be developed for bridge design and assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2023.2255457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2023.2255457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚货运生产力的提高给澳大利亚的桥梁基础设施带来了压力。桥梁评估是确保桥梁安全的关键,以容纳较重的车辆。荷载分配系数(LDF)已被广泛用于桥梁设计和初步评估,但在澳大利亚标准规范中未作具体规定。本研究的目的是开发具有最不利的单车道和双车道荷载影响的典型澳大利亚桥梁的ldf。随后,将LDF与不同标准下的LDF方程进行比较,包括澳大利亚国家道路管理局协会(National Association of Australian State Road Authorities, 1976)、美国公路和运输官员协会:荷载和阻力因素设计(AASHTO, 2017)、Henry的方法和修改的Henry的方法。可以得出结论,AASHTO (2017) LDF方程与典型的澳大利亚桥梁提供了非常好的相关性。AASHTO LRFD LDF方程可用于澳大利亚混凝土工字梁和超t梁桥的评估和设计。然而,与澳大利亚桥梁的ldf相比,大多数AASHTO LFRD提供了保守的ldf结果。建议制定澳大利亚桥梁的ldf,用于桥梁设计和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Load distribution factors for quick design and assessment in typical Australian bridges
The increase in freight productivity in Australia is pressuring Australian bridge infrastructure. Bridge assessment is crucial to ensure the safety of bridges to accommodate heavier vehicles. Load distribution factor (LDF) has been widely used for bridge design and evaluation in the preliminary stage, but it is not specified in the Australian standard code. This study aims to develop the LDFs for typical Australian bridges with the most adverse load effects of single- and two-lane loads. Later, the LDFs were compared with the LDF equations in the different standards, including National Association of Australian State Road Authorities (National Association of Australian State Road Authorities, 1976), American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials: Load and Resistance Factor Design (AASHTO (2017), Henry’s and modified Henry’s methods. It can be concluded that the AASHTO (2017) LDF equations provide very good correlations with typical Australian bridges. It is possible to use the AASHTO LRFD LDF equations for assessing and designing in Australian concrete I-girder and Super-T girder bridges. However, most AASHTO LFRD provides conservative results of LDFs compared with LDFs of Australian bridges. It is recommended that LDFs of Australian bridges should be developed for bridge design and assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信