数字时代LGBTQ+群体的政治争论——比较研究的现状、限制和机会

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Verena K. Brändle, Olga Eisele, Aytalina Kulichkina
{"title":"数字时代LGBTQ+群体的政治争论——比较研究的现状、限制和机会","authors":"Verena K. Brändle, Olga Eisele, Aytalina Kulichkina","doi":"10.1080/19331681.2023.2263758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops an analytical framework for comparative research on political contention in the digital age and, building upon it, provides a literature review of social media research related to LGBTQ+ political contention. So far, we lack systematic insights into the literature on digitally-mediated LGBTQ+ political contention and its potential for comparative research. Applying scoping literature review, we focus on the key comparative dimensions such as political context, social media, and knowledge production. The results provide an overview of the state of the art, limitations, and opportunities while also developing an agenda for future comparative research. This paper supports the visibility of LGBTQ+ issues in a still hostile public debate for both LGBTQ+ activists and researchers.","PeriodicalId":47047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The political contention of LGBTQ+ communities in the digital age - state of the art, limitations, and opportunities for comparative research\",\"authors\":\"Verena K. Brändle, Olga Eisele, Aytalina Kulichkina\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19331681.2023.2263758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper develops an analytical framework for comparative research on political contention in the digital age and, building upon it, provides a literature review of social media research related to LGBTQ+ political contention. So far, we lack systematic insights into the literature on digitally-mediated LGBTQ+ political contention and its potential for comparative research. Applying scoping literature review, we focus on the key comparative dimensions such as political context, social media, and knowledge production. The results provide an overview of the state of the art, limitations, and opportunities while also developing an agenda for future comparative research. This paper supports the visibility of LGBTQ+ issues in a still hostile public debate for both LGBTQ+ activists and researchers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Technology & Politics\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Technology & Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2263758\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2263758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文为数字时代政治争论的比较研究开发了一个分析框架,并在此基础上,对与LGBTQ+政治争论相关的社交媒体研究进行了文献综述。到目前为止,我们对数字媒介LGBTQ+政治争论及其比较研究潜力的文献缺乏系统的见解。运用范围界定文献综述,我们将重点放在政治背景、社交媒体和知识生产等关键比较维度上。研究结果概述了目前的现状、局限性和机遇,同时也为未来的比较研究制定了议程。对于LGBTQ+活动家和研究人员来说,这篇论文支持LGBTQ+问题在仍然充满敌意的公共辩论中的可见性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The political contention of LGBTQ+ communities in the digital age - state of the art, limitations, and opportunities for comparative research
This paper develops an analytical framework for comparative research on political contention in the digital age and, building upon it, provides a literature review of social media research related to LGBTQ+ political contention. So far, we lack systematic insights into the literature on digitally-mediated LGBTQ+ political contention and its potential for comparative research. Applying scoping literature review, we focus on the key comparative dimensions such as political context, social media, and knowledge production. The results provide an overview of the state of the art, limitations, and opportunities while also developing an agenda for future comparative research. This paper supports the visibility of LGBTQ+ issues in a still hostile public debate for both LGBTQ+ activists and researchers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信