{"title":"多层殖民主义的碎片:日本学校的混血儿,美属菲律宾,1924-1945","authors":"Eri Kitada","doi":"10.1080/2201473x.2023.2265094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article examines Japanese schools in Davao Province, the American Philippines, by highlighting the mixed-race children born to Japanese fathers and Filipino mothers. How did mixed-race children experience Japanese schooling in the Philippines, in which Japan’s settler colonial project operated in a colonial territory of the U.S. empire? I call entangled conditions, such as Davao on the island of Mindanao, ‘multi-layered settler colonialism.’ In Davao, the settler colonial projects of the U.S. and Japanese empires developed co-constitutively by underlining the subjugation of tribal Filipinos to Christian Filipinos and displacing the former. By following Black and postcolonial feminist method and patching together archival fragments of different genres and locations, I uncover the perspectives of mixed-race students in the history of multi-layered settler colonialism. I argue that the goals of Japanese education in the Philippines, a product of the public and private collusion, both conflicted with and reinforced American colonial education which was also developed by state and nonstate actors. I also show that the diverse experiences of mixed-race children and their mothers contested the stated goals of American colonial and Japanese education by illuminating the multi-layered nature of settler colonialism.KEYWORDS: Mixed-racechildreneducationdiasporasettler colonialismthe PhilippinesJapanese empireU.S. empireDavaoMindanao AcknowledgementsI gratefully acknowledge the many insightful comments I received from various scholars at conferences and workshops, including the 18th Annual International Conference in Japanese Studies (in Davao!), the Japanese Empire and Mobility Working Group, the 12th International Convention of Asia Scholars, the 2021 American Studies Association Annual Meeting, the 75th Global Japan Studies Seminar at the University of Tokyo, and the workshop for this special issue organized by Rebecca Swartz and Felicity Jensz. I also wish to thank the anonymous referees of the Settler Colonial Studies for their generous and helpful suggestions. Last but not least, this article has benefitted immensely from my education and training with Chie Ikeya and Jennifer Mittelstadt. All errors and omissions are my own.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 No date, ‘Re-Mariwanay Case’, Mariwanay in ‘Series 6: Davao Land Case’, Jose P. Laurel Foundation in Manila, the Philippines; ‘Statement (Estrella Macasaet Tan)’, March 16, 2013, 1, in the possession of Philippine Nikkei-jin Legal Support Center, Tokyo, Japan.2 Some scholars have been skeptical of terms ‘race’ and ‘mixed race’ because of their legacy of scientific racism, their essentialist connotation, and different nuances in non-English languages, including Japanese and Filipinos. I use the terms, ‘race’ and ‘mixed race’, as analytic categories. On debates over the term mixed-race, see for instance, Erica Chito Childs, ‘Critical Mixed Race in Global Perspective: An Introduction’, Journal of Intercultural Studies 39, no. 4 (2018): 379–81; Also see, Takezawa Yasuko, ‘Joshо̄: Konketsu shinwa no kaitai to jibun rashiku ikiru kenri’ (Dismantling the Mixed-Blood Myth and the Right to Live as We Are) in Jinshu shinwa o kaitai suru, 3, “Chi” no seijigaku o koete (Dismantling the Race Myth, Volume 3, Hybridity: Beyond the Politics of ‘Blood’), edited by Kawashima Kohei and Takezawa Yasuko (2016), 8–10.3 The collapse of the Japanese empire through World War II did not mean the end of Japan’s settler colonial project. See, Sidney Xu Lu, The Making of Japanese Settler Colonialism: Malthusianism and Trans-Pacific Migration, 1868–1961 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019), Chapter 8.4 Candace Fujikane and Jonathan Y. Okamura, eds., Asian Settler Colonialism: From Local Governance to the Habits of Everyday Life in Hawai‘i (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2008); Dean Itsuji Saranillio, ‘Why Asian Settler Colonialism Matters: A Thought Piece on Critiques, Debates, and Indigenous Difference’, Settler Colonial Studies 3, no. 3–04 (2013): 280–94; Juliana Hu Pegues, Space-Time Colonialism: Alaska’s Indigenous and Asian Entanglements (The University of North Carolina Press, 2021).5 Eiichiro Azuma, In Search of Our Frontier: Japanese America and Settler Colonialism in the Construction of Japan’s Borderless Empire (Oakland, California: University of California Press, 2019); Lu, The Making of Japanese Settler Colonialism; Also see, Jun Uchida, Brokers of Empire: Japanese Settler Colonialism in Korea, 1876–1945 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011); Jordan Sand et al., ‘Reconfiguring Pacific History: Reflections from the Pacific Empires Working Group’, Amerasia Journal 42, no. 3 (2016): 7; Takashi Fujitani, Race for Empire: Koreans as Japanese and Japanese as Americans during World War II (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).6 The term ‘Moro’ derived from the vocabulary of the Spanish empire tasked with conquering Muslims across the globe and came to signify ethno-linguistic communities in the Philippines, including Tausūg, Maranao, and individuals who converted to Christianity. Meanwhile the term ‘Lumad’ means non-Muslim natives in Mindanao, such as Manobo, Bagobo, and Tagakaulo, and originates in inter-group political activism in the 1970s by these peoples.7 On the history of Davao, Patricia Irene Dacudao, Abaca Frontier: The Socioeconomic and Cultural Transformation of Davao, 1898–1941 (Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2023); Macario D. Tiu, Davao: Reconstructing History from Text and Memory (Davao City: Ateneo de Davao University, 2005); Patricio N. Abinales, Making Mindanao: Cotabato and Davao in the Formation of the Philippine Nation-State (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2000).8 For instance, Dacudao, Abaca Frontier; Tessa Winkelmann, Dangerous Intercourse: Gender and Interracial Relations in the American Colonial Philippines, 1898–1946 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2023), Chapter 2; Christopher John Chanco, ‘Frontier Polities and Imaginaries: The Reproduction of Settler Colonial Space in the Southern Philippines’, Settler Colonial Studies 7, no. 1 (2017): 1–23; Oliver Charbonneau, Civilizational Imperatives: Americans, Moros, and the Colonial World (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2020); Jorge Bayona, ‘Inherited Destinies: Discourses of Territorial Loss in Postcolonial States across the Pacific (Peru and the Philippines, 1903–1927)’, Verge: Studies in Global Asias 3, no. 2 (2017): 169–94.9 Winkelmann, Dangerous Intercourse; Saidiya Hartman, Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments: Intimate Histories of Social Upheaval (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2019); Marisa J. Fuentes, Dispossessed Lives: Enslaved Women, Violence, and the Archive (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016).10 For instance, Sarah Steinbock-Pratt, Educating the Empire: American Teachers and Contested Colonization in the Philippines (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019); Chie Ikeya, Refiguring Women, Colonialism, and Modernity in Burma (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2011), Chapter 2; Julia Clancy-Smith and Frances Gouda, eds., Domesticating the Empire: Race, Gender, and Family Life in French and Dutch Colonialism (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 1998); Jun Uchida, ‘A Sentimental Journey: Mapping the Interior Frontier of Japanese Settlers in Colonial Korea’, The Journal of Asian Studies 70, no. 3 (2011): 706–29.11 Sabine Frühstück, Colonizing Sex: Sexology and Social Control in Modern Japan (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003), 7.12 Masaru Kojima, Nihonjingakkou no kenkyu: Ibunkakyouikushitekikousatsu [A Study of Oversea Japanese Schools: An Analysis from the Perspective of the History of Intercultural Education] (Tokyo: Tamagawadaigakusyuppanbu, 1999), 25; Dong Hoon Lee, Zaichonihonjinshakai no keisei: Shokuminchikuukan no henyou to ishikikouzou [Formation of Japanese Settler Communities in Korea: Transformation of Colonial Space and the Mentality] (Tokyo: Akashishoten, 2019), Chapter 3.13 Kojima, Nihonjingakkou, 29; Yukuji Okita, Hawai nikkeiimin no kyouikushi [The History of Education by Japanese Immigrants in Hawaii: U.S.-Japan Cultures and Their Encounters and Conflicts] (Kyoto: Mineruba Shobou, 1997), 105, 111.14 Kojima, Nihonjingakkou, 24.15 Sousuke Watabe ed., Zaigaishiteigakkouichiran [The List of Government-Designated Overseas Schools] (Tokyo: Kokuritsukenkyuujo, 1982), preface, 48. On the GDOSs in Southeast and South Asia, Masaru Kojima, Dainijisekaitaisenmae no zaigaishiteikyoikuron no keifu [A Genealogy of Educational Theory for Overseas Japanese Children] (Kyoto: Ryukoku Gakkai, 1993), Timetable at the end.16 Watabe ed., Zaigaishiteigakkouichiran, preface.17 Kojima, Nihonjingakkou, 36–37.18 Watabe, ed., Zaigaishiteigakkouichiran, preface.19 Kojima, Nihonjingakkou, 39.20 Reiko Furiya, ‘The Japanese Community Abroad: The Case of Prewar Davao in the Philippines’, in The Japanese in Colonial Southeast Asia, ed. Saya Shiraishi and Takashi Shiraishi (Ithaca, N.Y.: Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, 1993), 158.21 Eri Kitada, ‘Intimately Intertwined: Settler and Indigenous Communities, Filipino Women, and U.S.-Japanese Imperial Formations in the Philippines, 1903–1956’ (PhD diss., Rutgers University, 2023), Chapter 5.22 I-1-5-0-2_7_1_001, 35, MoFA (Japanese Diplomatic Archives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan).23 Furiya, ‘The Japanese Community Abroad’, 161–62; Yoshizō Furukawa, Dabao Kaitakuki [Chronicle of Pioneering Davao] (Tokyo: Furukawa Takushoku, 1956), 405–6.24 Hiroji Kamohara, Dabao hōjin kaitakushi [The History of Japanese Development of Davao] (Dabao: Nippi Shimbunsha, 1938), 621–22.25 Kamohara, Dabao hōjin kaitakushi, 623.26 I-1-5-0-2_7_1_001, 42, MoFA.27 Ibid., 36; Dabao kai, Dabao natsukashi no shashinshu [Davao, a Nostalgic Photo Album] (Tokyo: Dabao kai henshubu, 1988), 192.28 Steinbock-Pratt, Educating the Empire, 19; Taihei Okada, ‘Onkei no ronri’ to shokuminchi: Amerika shokuminchiki firipin no kyouiku to sonoisei [‘Logic of Benevolence’ and the Colony: Education in the U.S. Colonial Philippines and Its Legacy] (Tokyo: Hoseidaigakushuppankyoku, 2014), Chapter 1.29 Patricia Dacudao, ‘Abaca: The Socio-Economic and Cultural Transformation of Frontier Davao, 1898–1941’ (PhD diss., Murdoch University, 2017), 306–7; Ernesto I Corcino, Davao History (Davao, Philippines: Philippine Centennial Movement, Davao City Chapter, 1998), 143.30 1.6.2.3–13, 194, MoFA.31 Tiu, Davao, 122.32 Antonio S Gabila, ‘Mindanao Pioneer Teachers Make Good: Many of Them are Now Wealthy Landowners’, Graphic, July 26, 1934, 8–9.33 I-1-5-0-1_16_037D1, 38-39, MoFA; I-1-5-0-1_16_037D2, 138–139, 156, 170–171, MoFA.34 Furiya, ‘The Japanese Community Abroad’, 164–65.35 Shinzo Hayase, ‘Tribes, Settlers and Administrators on a Frontier: Economic Development and Social Change in Davao, Southeastern Mindanao, the Philippines, 1899–1941’ (PhD diss., Western Australia, Murdoch University, 1984), 309.36 Erika Lee, ‘The ‘Yellow Peril’ and Asian Exclusion in the Americas’, Pacific Historical Review 76, no. 4 (2007): 544, 558–62; Azuma, In Search of Our Frontier.37 Furiya, ‘The Japanese Community Abroad’, 164.38 Kamohara, Dabao hōjin kaitakushi, 620.39 Patricia Irene Dacudao, ‘Filipinos in Davao and the ‘Land Problem’ of the 1930s’, Journal of History 54, no. 1–4 (2008): 122, 127–28; Grant Kohn Goodman, Davao: A Case Study in Japanese-Philippine Relations (Lawrence: Center for East Asian Studies, University of Kansas, 1967), 53, 73.40 Masatake Komeda, ‘Zaihitouhoujinshitei no gakkoukyouiku ni kansuru chousa’ [A Study on School Education of Japanese Children in the Philippine Islands], The Quarterly Journal of the Colonial Institute of Nippon 1, no. 4 (1940): 176–79.41 Louise Young, Japan’s Total Empire: Manchuria and the Culture of Wartime Imperialism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), 360–61.42 ‘Mintarujogakuin bokokukengakudan’ [Mintal Women’s School in Study Tour], The Philippine Information Bulletin 48 (June 1941): 104; Shun Ohno, Hapon: Firipin nikkeijin no nagai sengo [Hapon: The Long Postwar Period of Filipino Japanese] (Tokyo: Daisanshokan, 1991), 30; Yuji Ichioka, edited by Gordon H. Chang and Eiichiro Azuma, Before Internment: Essays in Prewar Japanese American History (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006), Chapter 3; Rong Yuan, ‘Shokokumichi Nihongoshinbun no jigyokatsudo’ [Activities Organized by Newspaper Companies in the Concession City of Dalian: Focusing on Field Trips by Manchuria-born Japanese Students Visiting Mainland Japan Organized by the Japanese Newspaper Company in Manchuria], Sokendai Review of Cultural and Social Studies 12 (2016): 55–81.43 Kenji Suzuki, Firipin zanryunikkeijin [War-Displaced Japanese in the Philippines] (Tokyo: Kusanoneshuppankai, 1997), 84–88; Yōichi Amano, Dabaokuo no matsueitachi: Firipin nikkei kimin [Descendants of Davao-Kuo: Abandoned Japanese in the Philippines] (Nagoya: Fūbaisha, 1990), 71.44 Ohno, Hapon, 30–32.45 For example, in November 1939, Over the Sea Journal (Umi wo koete, 1938–1944), a government-sponsored magazine that promoted Japanese overseas settlements and economic activities, had a special issue on Davao and printed several articles about Japanese settlers’ education there.46 Yoshitaka Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku no genjou to toujisha no niseikyouikukan’ [A Thought on Problems of Educating the Second-Generation Japanese in Davao], in Dabao hōjin kaitakushi [The History of Japanese Development of Davao], by Hiroji Kamohara (Dabao: Nippi Shimbunsha, 1938), 659.47 About the history of ishokumin, see Azuma, In Search of Our Frontier, 4–9. The principal Honshige referred to Colonization and Colonial Policy, the 1926 work by Tadao Yanaihara, a prominent, contemporaneous economist and scholar of Japan’s colonial policy.48 Ichioka, Before Internment, Introduction and Chapter 2.49 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 662.50 Kiyoshi Ibuse, ‘Dabao no nihon jin [Japanese in Davao]’ in Gaikou seisaku wo nampou ni miru [On-Site Observation of Southward Policy], ed. Satoru Hasegawa (Tokyo: Nihongaijikyokai, 1936), 301.51 Lee, Zaichonihonjinshakai no keisei, 187–88.52 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 669.53 Ryuzo Hattori, ‘Dabao ni okeru dainiseikyouiku’ [Education for the Second Generation in Davao], Umi wo koete [Over the Sea] 2, no. 11 (1939): 28.54 Nakamura Takeo, ‘Dabao zanryū hо̄jin no genjо̄’ [Current Situation of Japanese Residents in Davao], Umi wo koete (Over the Sea Journal) 2, no. 11 (1939): 7.55 Lee Jeong-Seon, ‘Naisenkekkon no kodomotachi: Naichijin to chousenjin no hazama de’ [Children of Japanese-Korean Marriages: Between Japanese and Koreans], Historical Journal 815 (2018): 42–55; Barbara J. Brooks, ‘Japanese Colonialism, Gender, and Household Registration: Legal Reconstruction of Boundaries’, in Gender and Law in the Japanese Imperium, ed. Barbara J. Brooks and Susan L. Burns (University of Hawai’i Press, 2014), 219–39.56 Paul D. Barclay, ‘Cultural Brokerage and Interethnic Marriage in Colonial Taiwan: Japanese Subalterns and Their Aborigine Wives, 1895–1930’, The Journal of Asian Studies 64, no. 2 (2005): 323–60.57 For instance, Iyo Kuminimoto, ‘Nihonjin no boribia syokiimin ni kansuru ichikousatsu’ [A Study of Early Japanese Immigrants in Bolivia], The Annual Review of Migration Studies 6 (1999): 3–20; Istuko Kamoto, Kokusaikekkon no tanjo [The Birth of International Marriages] (Tokyo: Shinyosha, 2001), 175.58 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 672.59 Ibid., 672–73.60 Komeda, ‘Zaihitouhoujinshitei’, 175.61 Hattori, ‘Dabao ni okeru’, 26.62 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 673.63 Komeda, ‘Zaihitouhoujinshitei’, 175.64 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 673.65 Kitada, ‘Intimately Intertwined’; Paul A. Kramer, The Blood of Government: Race, Empire, the United States, and the Philippines (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2006), 6.66 Antonio Sitchon Gabila, ‘Lo, the Vanishing Non-Christian’, Philippine Free Press, September 14, 1935, p2, 36.67 ‘Statement (Estrella Macasaet Tan)’, 2.68 Joan Mae Suco-Bantayan, ‘Revisiting Mintal: The Little Tokyo in a Dream’, Mindanao Times, April 14, 2012; ‘Dabao no nikkei 2sei no shougen ‘sensou heno omoi’’ [A Testimony of the Second-Generation Japanese in Davao and Her ‘Thoughts on War’], Davao Watch, September 22 and 23, 2017; Shun Ohno, Transforming Nikkeijin Identity and Citizenship: Untold Life Histories of Japanese Migrants and Their Descendants in the Philippines, 1903–2013 (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2015), 214n14.69 Hiroyuki Kawai and Norihiro Inomata, Hapon wo torimodosu: Firipin zanryunihonjin no senso to kokusekikaifuku [Get Back Hapon (Japanese): World War II of the Abandoned Japanese in the Philippines and the Recovery of Citizenship] (Tokyo: Korokara, 2020), 64–67; Norihiro Inomata, ‘Dabao no kurafutokohi to jidori no adobo wo motenashitekuretano ha shiburan no yamani zanryushiteita nisei no obachan’ [It Was a Second-Generation Grandma, Who Stayed Behind in Mt. Sibulan, That Welcomed Me with Davao’s Craft Coffee and Chicken Adobo], Davao Watch, July 3, 2020.70 Kawai and Inomata, Hapon, 65.71 Amano, Dabaokuo, 70.72 Ibid., 20, 48, 62–63. Ohno, Transforming, 122–23.73 Suzuki, Firipin, 84–88; Amano, Dabaokuo, 71.74 ‘Dabao no nikkei 2sei no shougen’.75 Ohno, Transforming, 211n68.76 Young, Japan’s Total Empire, 167–71.77 Amano, Dabaokuo, 135.78 For example, the children of Japanese father Eiji Hirao and Christian Filipino mother Monica Tan attended Bayabas Japanese School, which was created in March 1934 in the district of Bayabas. Kamohara, Dabao hōjin kaitakushi, 1517.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Social Science Research Council (International Dissertation Research Fellowship).","PeriodicalId":46232,"journal":{"name":"Settler Colonial Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fragments of multi-layered settler colonialism: mixed-race children in Japanese schooling, the American Philippines, 1924–1945\",\"authors\":\"Eri Kitada\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2201473x.2023.2265094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis article examines Japanese schools in Davao Province, the American Philippines, by highlighting the mixed-race children born to Japanese fathers and Filipino mothers. How did mixed-race children experience Japanese schooling in the Philippines, in which Japan’s settler colonial project operated in a colonial territory of the U.S. empire? I call entangled conditions, such as Davao on the island of Mindanao, ‘multi-layered settler colonialism.’ In Davao, the settler colonial projects of the U.S. and Japanese empires developed co-constitutively by underlining the subjugation of tribal Filipinos to Christian Filipinos and displacing the former. By following Black and postcolonial feminist method and patching together archival fragments of different genres and locations, I uncover the perspectives of mixed-race students in the history of multi-layered settler colonialism. I argue that the goals of Japanese education in the Philippines, a product of the public and private collusion, both conflicted with and reinforced American colonial education which was also developed by state and nonstate actors. I also show that the diverse experiences of mixed-race children and their mothers contested the stated goals of American colonial and Japanese education by illuminating the multi-layered nature of settler colonialism.KEYWORDS: Mixed-racechildreneducationdiasporasettler colonialismthe PhilippinesJapanese empireU.S. empireDavaoMindanao AcknowledgementsI gratefully acknowledge the many insightful comments I received from various scholars at conferences and workshops, including the 18th Annual International Conference in Japanese Studies (in Davao!), the Japanese Empire and Mobility Working Group, the 12th International Convention of Asia Scholars, the 2021 American Studies Association Annual Meeting, the 75th Global Japan Studies Seminar at the University of Tokyo, and the workshop for this special issue organized by Rebecca Swartz and Felicity Jensz. I also wish to thank the anonymous referees of the Settler Colonial Studies for their generous and helpful suggestions. Last but not least, this article has benefitted immensely from my education and training with Chie Ikeya and Jennifer Mittelstadt. All errors and omissions are my own.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 No date, ‘Re-Mariwanay Case’, Mariwanay in ‘Series 6: Davao Land Case’, Jose P. Laurel Foundation in Manila, the Philippines; ‘Statement (Estrella Macasaet Tan)’, March 16, 2013, 1, in the possession of Philippine Nikkei-jin Legal Support Center, Tokyo, Japan.2 Some scholars have been skeptical of terms ‘race’ and ‘mixed race’ because of their legacy of scientific racism, their essentialist connotation, and different nuances in non-English languages, including Japanese and Filipinos. I use the terms, ‘race’ and ‘mixed race’, as analytic categories. On debates over the term mixed-race, see for instance, Erica Chito Childs, ‘Critical Mixed Race in Global Perspective: An Introduction’, Journal of Intercultural Studies 39, no. 4 (2018): 379–81; Also see, Takezawa Yasuko, ‘Joshо̄: Konketsu shinwa no kaitai to jibun rashiku ikiru kenri’ (Dismantling the Mixed-Blood Myth and the Right to Live as We Are) in Jinshu shinwa o kaitai suru, 3, “Chi” no seijigaku o koete (Dismantling the Race Myth, Volume 3, Hybridity: Beyond the Politics of ‘Blood’), edited by Kawashima Kohei and Takezawa Yasuko (2016), 8–10.3 The collapse of the Japanese empire through World War II did not mean the end of Japan’s settler colonial project. See, Sidney Xu Lu, The Making of Japanese Settler Colonialism: Malthusianism and Trans-Pacific Migration, 1868–1961 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019), Chapter 8.4 Candace Fujikane and Jonathan Y. Okamura, eds., Asian Settler Colonialism: From Local Governance to the Habits of Everyday Life in Hawai‘i (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2008); Dean Itsuji Saranillio, ‘Why Asian Settler Colonialism Matters: A Thought Piece on Critiques, Debates, and Indigenous Difference’, Settler Colonial Studies 3, no. 3–04 (2013): 280–94; Juliana Hu Pegues, Space-Time Colonialism: Alaska’s Indigenous and Asian Entanglements (The University of North Carolina Press, 2021).5 Eiichiro Azuma, In Search of Our Frontier: Japanese America and Settler Colonialism in the Construction of Japan’s Borderless Empire (Oakland, California: University of California Press, 2019); Lu, The Making of Japanese Settler Colonialism; Also see, Jun Uchida, Brokers of Empire: Japanese Settler Colonialism in Korea, 1876–1945 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011); Jordan Sand et al., ‘Reconfiguring Pacific History: Reflections from the Pacific Empires Working Group’, Amerasia Journal 42, no. 3 (2016): 7; Takashi Fujitani, Race for Empire: Koreans as Japanese and Japanese as Americans during World War II (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).6 The term ‘Moro’ derived from the vocabulary of the Spanish empire tasked with conquering Muslims across the globe and came to signify ethno-linguistic communities in the Philippines, including Tausūg, Maranao, and individuals who converted to Christianity. Meanwhile the term ‘Lumad’ means non-Muslim natives in Mindanao, such as Manobo, Bagobo, and Tagakaulo, and originates in inter-group political activism in the 1970s by these peoples.7 On the history of Davao, Patricia Irene Dacudao, Abaca Frontier: The Socioeconomic and Cultural Transformation of Davao, 1898–1941 (Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2023); Macario D. Tiu, Davao: Reconstructing History from Text and Memory (Davao City: Ateneo de Davao University, 2005); Patricio N. Abinales, Making Mindanao: Cotabato and Davao in the Formation of the Philippine Nation-State (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2000).8 For instance, Dacudao, Abaca Frontier; Tessa Winkelmann, Dangerous Intercourse: Gender and Interracial Relations in the American Colonial Philippines, 1898–1946 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2023), Chapter 2; Christopher John Chanco, ‘Frontier Polities and Imaginaries: The Reproduction of Settler Colonial Space in the Southern Philippines’, Settler Colonial Studies 7, no. 1 (2017): 1–23; Oliver Charbonneau, Civilizational Imperatives: Americans, Moros, and the Colonial World (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2020); Jorge Bayona, ‘Inherited Destinies: Discourses of Territorial Loss in Postcolonial States across the Pacific (Peru and the Philippines, 1903–1927)’, Verge: Studies in Global Asias 3, no. 2 (2017): 169–94.9 Winkelmann, Dangerous Intercourse; Saidiya Hartman, Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments: Intimate Histories of Social Upheaval (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2019); Marisa J. Fuentes, Dispossessed Lives: Enslaved Women, Violence, and the Archive (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016).10 For instance, Sarah Steinbock-Pratt, Educating the Empire: American Teachers and Contested Colonization in the Philippines (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019); Chie Ikeya, Refiguring Women, Colonialism, and Modernity in Burma (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2011), Chapter 2; Julia Clancy-Smith and Frances Gouda, eds., Domesticating the Empire: Race, Gender, and Family Life in French and Dutch Colonialism (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 1998); Jun Uchida, ‘A Sentimental Journey: Mapping the Interior Frontier of Japanese Settlers in Colonial Korea’, The Journal of Asian Studies 70, no. 3 (2011): 706–29.11 Sabine Frühstück, Colonizing Sex: Sexology and Social Control in Modern Japan (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003), 7.12 Masaru Kojima, Nihonjingakkou no kenkyu: Ibunkakyouikushitekikousatsu [A Study of Oversea Japanese Schools: An Analysis from the Perspective of the History of Intercultural Education] (Tokyo: Tamagawadaigakusyuppanbu, 1999), 25; Dong Hoon Lee, Zaichonihonjinshakai no keisei: Shokuminchikuukan no henyou to ishikikouzou [Formation of Japanese Settler Communities in Korea: Transformation of Colonial Space and the Mentality] (Tokyo: Akashishoten, 2019), Chapter 3.13 Kojima, Nihonjingakkou, 29; Yukuji Okita, Hawai nikkeiimin no kyouikushi [The History of Education by Japanese Immigrants in Hawaii: U.S.-Japan Cultures and Their Encounters and Conflicts] (Kyoto: Mineruba Shobou, 1997), 105, 111.14 Kojima, Nihonjingakkou, 24.15 Sousuke Watabe ed., Zaigaishiteigakkouichiran [The List of Government-Designated Overseas Schools] (Tokyo: Kokuritsukenkyuujo, 1982), preface, 48. On the GDOSs in Southeast and South Asia, Masaru Kojima, Dainijisekaitaisenmae no zaigaishiteikyoikuron no keifu [A Genealogy of Educational Theory for Overseas Japanese Children] (Kyoto: Ryukoku Gakkai, 1993), Timetable at the end.16 Watabe ed., Zaigaishiteigakkouichiran, preface.17 Kojima, Nihonjingakkou, 36–37.18 Watabe, ed., Zaigaishiteigakkouichiran, preface.19 Kojima, Nihonjingakkou, 39.20 Reiko Furiya, ‘The Japanese Community Abroad: The Case of Prewar Davao in the Philippines’, in The Japanese in Colonial Southeast Asia, ed. Saya Shiraishi and Takashi Shiraishi (Ithaca, N.Y.: Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, 1993), 158.21 Eri Kitada, ‘Intimately Intertwined: Settler and Indigenous Communities, Filipino Women, and U.S.-Japanese Imperial Formations in the Philippines, 1903–1956’ (PhD diss., Rutgers University, 2023), Chapter 5.22 I-1-5-0-2_7_1_001, 35, MoFA (Japanese Diplomatic Archives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan).23 Furiya, ‘The Japanese Community Abroad’, 161–62; Yoshizō Furukawa, Dabao Kaitakuki [Chronicle of Pioneering Davao] (Tokyo: Furukawa Takushoku, 1956), 405–6.24 Hiroji Kamohara, Dabao hōjin kaitakushi [The History of Japanese Development of Davao] (Dabao: Nippi Shimbunsha, 1938), 621–22.25 Kamohara, Dabao hōjin kaitakushi, 623.26 I-1-5-0-2_7_1_001, 42, MoFA.27 Ibid., 36; Dabao kai, Dabao natsukashi no shashinshu [Davao, a Nostalgic Photo Album] (Tokyo: Dabao kai henshubu, 1988), 192.28 Steinbock-Pratt, Educating the Empire, 19; Taihei Okada, ‘Onkei no ronri’ to shokuminchi: Amerika shokuminchiki firipin no kyouiku to sonoisei [‘Logic of Benevolence’ and the Colony: Education in the U.S. Colonial Philippines and Its Legacy] (Tokyo: Hoseidaigakushuppankyoku, 2014), Chapter 1.29 Patricia Dacudao, ‘Abaca: The Socio-Economic and Cultural Transformation of Frontier Davao, 1898–1941’ (PhD diss., Murdoch University, 2017), 306–7; Ernesto I Corcino, Davao History (Davao, Philippines: Philippine Centennial Movement, Davao City Chapter, 1998), 143.30 1.6.2.3–13, 194, MoFA.31 Tiu, Davao, 122.32 Antonio S Gabila, ‘Mindanao Pioneer Teachers Make Good: Many of Them are Now Wealthy Landowners’, Graphic, July 26, 1934, 8–9.33 I-1-5-0-1_16_037D1, 38-39, MoFA; I-1-5-0-1_16_037D2, 138–139, 156, 170–171, MoFA.34 Furiya, ‘The Japanese Community Abroad’, 164–65.35 Shinzo Hayase, ‘Tribes, Settlers and Administrators on a Frontier: Economic Development and Social Change in Davao, Southeastern Mindanao, the Philippines, 1899–1941’ (PhD diss., Western Australia, Murdoch University, 1984), 309.36 Erika Lee, ‘The ‘Yellow Peril’ and Asian Exclusion in the Americas’, Pacific Historical Review 76, no. 4 (2007): 544, 558–62; Azuma, In Search of Our Frontier.37 Furiya, ‘The Japanese Community Abroad’, 164.38 Kamohara, Dabao hōjin kaitakushi, 620.39 Patricia Irene Dacudao, ‘Filipinos in Davao and the ‘Land Problem’ of the 1930s’, Journal of History 54, no. 1–4 (2008): 122, 127–28; Grant Kohn Goodman, Davao: A Case Study in Japanese-Philippine Relations (Lawrence: Center for East Asian Studies, University of Kansas, 1967), 53, 73.40 Masatake Komeda, ‘Zaihitouhoujinshitei no gakkoukyouiku ni kansuru chousa’ [A Study on School Education of Japanese Children in the Philippine Islands], The Quarterly Journal of the Colonial Institute of Nippon 1, no. 4 (1940): 176–79.41 Louise Young, Japan’s Total Empire: Manchuria and the Culture of Wartime Imperialism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), 360–61.42 ‘Mintarujogakuin bokokukengakudan’ [Mintal Women’s School in Study Tour], The Philippine Information Bulletin 48 (June 1941): 104; Shun Ohno, Hapon: Firipin nikkeijin no nagai sengo [Hapon: The Long Postwar Period of Filipino Japanese] (Tokyo: Daisanshokan, 1991), 30; Yuji Ichioka, edited by Gordon H. Chang and Eiichiro Azuma, Before Internment: Essays in Prewar Japanese American History (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006), Chapter 3; Rong Yuan, ‘Shokokumichi Nihongoshinbun no jigyokatsudo’ [Activities Organized by Newspaper Companies in the Concession City of Dalian: Focusing on Field Trips by Manchuria-born Japanese Students Visiting Mainland Japan Organized by the Japanese Newspaper Company in Manchuria], Sokendai Review of Cultural and Social Studies 12 (2016): 55–81.43 Kenji Suzuki, Firipin zanryunikkeijin [War-Displaced Japanese in the Philippines] (Tokyo: Kusanoneshuppankai, 1997), 84–88; Yōichi Amano, Dabaokuo no matsueitachi: Firipin nikkei kimin [Descendants of Davao-Kuo: Abandoned Japanese in the Philippines] (Nagoya: Fūbaisha, 1990), 71.44 Ohno, Hapon, 30–32.45 For example, in November 1939, Over the Sea Journal (Umi wo koete, 1938–1944), a government-sponsored magazine that promoted Japanese overseas settlements and economic activities, had a special issue on Davao and printed several articles about Japanese settlers’ education there.46 Yoshitaka Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku no genjou to toujisha no niseikyouikukan’ [A Thought on Problems of Educating the Second-Generation Japanese in Davao], in Dabao hōjin kaitakushi [The History of Japanese Development of Davao], by Hiroji Kamohara (Dabao: Nippi Shimbunsha, 1938), 659.47 About the history of ishokumin, see Azuma, In Search of Our Frontier, 4–9. The principal Honshige referred to Colonization and Colonial Policy, the 1926 work by Tadao Yanaihara, a prominent, contemporaneous economist and scholar of Japan’s colonial policy.48 Ichioka, Before Internment, Introduction and Chapter 2.49 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 662.50 Kiyoshi Ibuse, ‘Dabao no nihon jin [Japanese in Davao]’ in Gaikou seisaku wo nampou ni miru [On-Site Observation of Southward Policy], ed. Satoru Hasegawa (Tokyo: Nihongaijikyokai, 1936), 301.51 Lee, Zaichonihonjinshakai no keisei, 187–88.52 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 669.53 Ryuzo Hattori, ‘Dabao ni okeru dainiseikyouiku’ [Education for the Second Generation in Davao], Umi wo koete [Over the Sea] 2, no. 11 (1939): 28.54 Nakamura Takeo, ‘Dabao zanryū hо̄jin no genjо̄’ [Current Situation of Japanese Residents in Davao], Umi wo koete (Over the Sea Journal) 2, no. 11 (1939): 7.55 Lee Jeong-Seon, ‘Naisenkekkon no kodomotachi: Naichijin to chousenjin no hazama de’ [Children of Japanese-Korean Marriages: Between Japanese and Koreans], Historical Journal 815 (2018): 42–55; Barbara J. Brooks, ‘Japanese Colonialism, Gender, and Household Registration: Legal Reconstruction of Boundaries’, in Gender and Law in the Japanese Imperium, ed. Barbara J. Brooks and Susan L. Burns (University of Hawai’i Press, 2014), 219–39.56 Paul D. Barclay, ‘Cultural Brokerage and Interethnic Marriage in Colonial Taiwan: Japanese Subalterns and Their Aborigine Wives, 1895–1930’, The Journal of Asian Studies 64, no. 2 (2005): 323–60.57 For instance, Iyo Kuminimoto, ‘Nihonjin no boribia syokiimin ni kansuru ichikousatsu’ [A Study of Early Japanese Immigrants in Bolivia], The Annual Review of Migration Studies 6 (1999): 3–20; Istuko Kamoto, Kokusaikekkon no tanjo [The Birth of International Marriages] (Tokyo: Shinyosha, 2001), 175.58 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 672.59 Ibid., 672–73.60 Komeda, ‘Zaihitouhoujinshitei’, 175.61 Hattori, ‘Dabao ni okeru’, 26.62 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 673.63 Komeda, ‘Zaihitouhoujinshitei’, 175.64 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 673.65 Kitada, ‘Intimately Intertwined’; Paul A. Kramer, The Blood of Government: Race, Empire, the United States, and the Philippines (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2006), 6.66 Antonio Sitchon Gabila, ‘Lo, the Vanishing Non-Christian’, Philippine Free Press, September 14, 1935, p2, 36.67 ‘Statement (Estrella Macasaet Tan)’, 2.68 Joan Mae Suco-Bantayan, ‘Revisiting Mintal: The Little Tokyo in a Dream’, Mindanao Times, April 14, 2012; ‘Dabao no nikkei 2sei no shougen ‘sensou heno omoi’’ [A Testimony of the Second-Generation Japanese in Davao and Her ‘Thoughts on War’], Davao Watch, September 22 and 23, 2017; Shun Ohno, Transforming Nikkeijin Identity and Citizenship: Untold Life Histories of Japanese Migrants and Their Descendants in the Philippines, 1903–2013 (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2015), 214n14.69 Hiroyuki Kawai and Norihiro Inomata, Hapon wo torimodosu: Firipin zanryunihonjin no senso to kokusekikaifuku [Get Back Hapon (Japanese): World War II of the Abandoned Japanese in the Philippines and the Recovery of Citizenship] (Tokyo: Korokara, 2020), 64–67; Norihiro Inomata, ‘Dabao no kurafutokohi to jidori no adobo wo motenashitekuretano ha shiburan no yamani zanryushiteita nisei no obachan’ [It Was a Second-Generation Grandma, Who Stayed Behind in Mt. Sibulan, That Welcomed Me with Davao’s Craft Coffee and Chicken Adobo], Davao Watch, July 3, 2020.70 Kawai and Inomata, Hapon, 65.71 Amano, Dabaokuo, 70.72 Ibid., 20, 48, 62–63. Ohno, Transforming, 122–23.73 Suzuki, Firipin, 84–88; Amano, Dabaokuo, 71.74 ‘Dabao no nikkei 2sei no shougen’.75 Ohno, Transforming, 211n68.76 Young, Japan’s Total Empire, 167–71.77 Amano, Dabaokuo, 135.78 For example, the children of Japanese father Eiji Hirao and Christian Filipino mother Monica Tan attended Bayabas Japanese School, which was created in March 1934 in the district of Bayabas. Kamohara, Dabao hōjin kaitakushi, 1517.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Social Science Research Council (International Dissertation Research Fellowship).\",\"PeriodicalId\":46232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Settler Colonial Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Settler Colonial Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473x.2023.2265094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Settler Colonial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473x.2023.2265094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本文考察了美属菲律宾达沃省的日本学校,重点介绍了日本父亲和菲律宾母亲所生的混血儿。在美国帝国的殖民领土上,日本的移民殖民项目在菲律宾进行,混血儿们是如何体验日本教育的?我把像棉兰老岛上的达沃这样的纠缠状态称为“多层定居者殖民主义”。在达沃,美国和日本帝国的移民殖民项目共同发展,强调菲律宾部落对菲律宾基督徒的征服,取代了前者。通过遵循黑人和后殖民女性主义的方法,并将不同类型和地点的档案碎片拼凑在一起,我揭示了混血学生在多层次定居者殖民主义历史中的视角。我认为,日本教育在菲律宾的目标,是公共和私人勾结的产物,既与美国殖民教育相冲突,又加强了美国殖民教育,后者也由国家和非国家行为者发展。我还展示了混血儿童及其母亲的不同经历,通过阐明定居者殖民主义的多层次本质,对美国殖民主义和日本教育的既定目标提出了质疑。关键词:混血儿教育移民殖民主义菲律宾日本帝国美国我非常感谢在会议和研讨会上收到的许多学者的深刻评论,包括第18届日本研究国际年会(在达沃!),日本帝国和流动性工作组,第12届亚洲学者国际会议,2021年美国研究协会年会,第75届全球日本研究研讨会在东京大学,以及丽贝卡·斯沃茨和费利西蒂·简斯组织的本期专题研讨会。我还要感谢《定居者殖民研究》的匿名审稿人提出的慷慨和有益的建议。最后但并非最不重要的是,这篇文章极大地受益于我与chiie Ikeya和Jennifer Mittelstadt的教育和培训。所有的错误和遗漏都是我自己的。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1无日期,“Re-Mariwanay案例”,马里wanay在“系列6:达沃土地案例”中,菲律宾马尼拉何塞·p·劳雷尔基金会;“声明(Estrella Macasaet Tan)”,2013年3月16日,1日,日本东京,菲律宾日经法律支持中心所有。一些学者对“种族”和“混合种族”这两个术语持怀疑态度,因为它们具有科学种族主义的遗产,它们的本质主义内涵,以及在非英语语言(包括日语和菲律宾语)中的不同细微差别。我使用“种族”和“混血”这两个术语作为分析范畴。关于“混合种族”一词的争论,参见Erica Chito Childs,“全球视角下的关键混合种族:导论”,《跨文化研究杂志》第39期。4 (2018): 379-81;另见,竹泽靖子,“josh: Konketsu shinwa no kaitai to jibun rashiku ikiru kenri”(拆解混血神话和我们生活的权利),载于《金书》第3期,“Chi”no seijigaku o koete”(拆解种族神话,第3卷,杂交:超越“血统”的政治),由川岛浩平和竹泽靖子编辑(2016),8-10.3 .二战期间日本帝国的崩溃并不意味着日本定居者殖民计划的结束。参见西德尼·徐路,《日本殖民主义的形成:马尔萨斯主义和跨太平洋移民,1868-1961》(纽约:剑桥大学出版社,2019),第8.4章。《亚洲移民殖民主义:从地方治理到夏威夷的日常生活习惯》(檀香山:夏威夷大学出版社,2008);院长Itsuji Saranillio,“为什么亚洲移民殖民主义很重要:一个关于批评、辩论和土著差异的思想片段”,《移民殖民研究》第3期。3-04 (2013): 280-94;朱丽安娜·胡·佩格斯,《时空殖民主义:阿拉斯加土著和亚洲人的纠缠》(北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2021年)安间英一郎:《寻找边疆:日裔美国人和日本无边界帝国建设中的定居者殖民主义》(加州奥克兰:加州大学出版社,2019);《日本殖民主义的形成》;另见内田俊,《帝国的经纪人:日本殖民者在朝鲜的殖民主义,1876-1945》(剑桥:哈佛大学出版社,2011);Jordan Sand等人,“重新配置太平洋历史:来自太平洋帝国工作组的反思”,《美洲月刊》42期,第2期。3 (2016): 7;藤谷隆,《帝国的竞赛:二战期间作为日本人的韩国人和作为美国人的日本人》(伯克利:加州大学出版社,2011)。 “摩洛人”一词源于西班牙帝国的词汇,该帝国的任务是征服全球的穆斯林,并开始表示菲律宾的民族语言社区,包括Tausūg,马拉瑙和皈依基督教的个人。同时,“Lumad”一词指的是棉兰老岛的非穆斯林原住民,如Manobo、Bagobo和Tagakaulo,起源于20世纪70年代这些人的群体间政治活动关于达沃的历史,Patricia Irene Dacudao, Abaca Frontier:达沃的社会经济和文化转型,1898-1941(马尼拉:雅典耀马尼拉大学出版社,2023);Macario D. Tiu,《达沃市:从文本和记忆中重建历史》(达沃市:雅典耀大学,2005);8 .帕特里西奥·n·阿比纳莱斯,《棉兰老岛的形成:哥打巴托和达沃在菲律宾民族国家的形成》(奎松市:马尼拉雅典奥大学出版社,2000)例如,《大岛》、《Abaca Frontier》;泰莎·温克尔曼,《危险的交往:1898-1946年美国殖民菲律宾的性别和种族间关系》(伊萨卡:康奈尔大学出版社,2023年),第二章;Christopher John Chanco,《边境政策与想象:菲律宾南部定居者殖民空间的再生产》,《定居者殖民研究》第7期。1 (2017): 1 - 23;Oliver Charbonneau,《文明的必要性:美国人、莫罗斯人和殖民世界》(伊萨卡:康奈尔大学出版社,2020年);Jorge Bayona,“继承的命运:横跨太平洋的后殖民国家(秘鲁和菲律宾,1903-1927)的领土损失话语”,《边缘:全球亚洲研究》第3期。温克尔曼,《危险性交》;赛迪亚·哈特曼,《任性的生活,美丽的实验:社会动荡的亲密历史》(纽约:w.w.诺顿公司,2019);玛丽莎·j·富恩特斯:《被剥夺的生活:被奴役的妇女、暴力和档案》(费城:宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2016年)例如,莎拉·斯坦伯克-普拉特,教育帝国:美国教师和菲律宾有争议的殖民(纽约:剑桥大学出版社,2019);池谷彻:《缅甸的妇女、殖民主义和现代性的重构》(檀香山:夏威夷大学出版社,2011),第2章;Julia Clancy-Smith和Frances Gouda编。《驯化帝国:法国和荷兰殖民主义中的种族、性别和家庭生活》(弗吉尼亚州夏洛茨维尔:弗吉尼亚大学出版社,1998年);内田俊,“感伤之旅:绘制日本殖民者在朝鲜殖民地的内部边界”,《亚洲研究杂志》70期,第7期。3(2011): 706-29.11萨宾·弗<s:1>斯特<e:1>克:《殖民性:近代日本的性学与社会控制》(伯克利:加州大学出版社,2003),7.12小岛正治:《日本海外学校研究:跨文化教育史视角分析》(东京:Tamagawadaigakusyuppanbu, 1999),第25页;李东勋,《在韩日裔移民社群的形成:殖民空间与心态的转变》(东京:知社,2019),第3.13章,小岛,日本知社,29;[日本移民在夏威夷的教育史:美日文化及其相遇与冲突](京都:大学书局,1997),105,111.14 .小岛,日本,24.15 .渡部修介主编,《政府指定的海外学校名单》(东京:国教学社,1982),前言,48.]《东南亚与南亚地区的GDOSs》,小岛正治,《海外日本儿童教育理论谱系》(京都:琉国学社,1993),《时间表》末页,第16页渡边编,zigaishiteigakkouichiran,序言渡边,编,Zaigaishiteigakkouichiran,前言,19Kojima, Nihonjingakkou, 39.20 Reiko Furiya,“海外日本社区:菲律宾战前达沃的案例”,在东南亚殖民地的日本人,白石Saya和白石隆(伊萨卡,纽约:东南亚项目,康奈尔大学,1993),158.21 Eri Kitada,“密切交织:定居者和土著社区,菲律宾妇女,以及美国-日本帝国在菲律宾,1903-1956”(博士论文)。第5.22章I-1-5-0-2_7_1_001, 35,日本外务省日本外交档案福瑞雅,《海外日本社群》,161-62页;古川吉日,《达沃拓荒史》(东京:古川拓荒史,1956),405-6.24坂原博司,《达沃拓荒史》hōjin《日本达沃发展史》(大宝:日本新文学社,1938),621-22.25坂原博司,hōjin《达沃拓荒史》,623.26 I-1-5-0-2_7_1_001, 42,文物部,27同前。 36个;《大宝启,大宝启怀旧相册》(东京:大宝启记事集,1988),1992;冈田太平,“Onkei no ronri”to shokuminchi: american shokuminchiki firipin no kyiku to sonoisei[“仁慈的逻辑”和殖民地:美国殖民地菲律宾的教育及其遗产](东京:hoseidaiigakushuppankyoku, 2014),第1.29章Patricia Dacudao,“Abaca:边境达沃的社会经济和文化转型,1898-1941”(博士论文)。[j] .莫道克大学学报,2017),306-7;Ernesto I Corcino, Davao History (Davao,菲律宾:菲律宾百年运动,Davao City分会,1998),143.30 1.6.2.3 - 13,194,MoFA.31安东尼奥·S·加比拉,《棉兰老岛先锋教师的成就:他们中的许多人现在是富有的地主》,图形,1934年7月26日,8-9.33 I-1-5-0-1_16_037D1, 38-39,外交部;I-1-5-0-1_16_037D2, 138-139, 156, 170-171, MoFA.34福瑞雅,《海外日本社区》,164-65.35 Hayase,《边疆的部落、定居者和管理者:1899-1941年菲律宾棉兰老岛东南部达沃的经济发展和社会变革》(博士论文)。Erika Lee,《美洲的“黄祸”与亚洲排斥》,《太平洋历史评论》76期,第309.36页。4 (2007): 544, 558-62;37福瑞雅,《海外日本社群》,164.38 Kamohara, Dabao hōjin kaitakushi, 620.39 Patricia Irene Dacudao,《在达沃的菲律宾人与20世纪30年代的“土地问题”》,《历史杂志》54,第54期。1-4 (2008): 122, 127-28;Grant Kohn Goodman,《达武:日菲关系的个案研究》(劳伦斯:堪萨斯大学东亚研究中心,1967),53,73.40 .小田正武,《菲律宾群岛日本儿童的学校教育研究》,《日本殖民研究所季刊》第1期,第53卷。4(1940): 176-79.41路易丝·扬,日本的总帝国:满洲和战时帝国主义文化(伯克利:加州大学出版社,1998),360-61.42“Mintarujogakuin bokokukengakudan”[游学中的精神妇女学校],菲律宾信息公报48(1941年6月):104;大野顺:《战后漫长的菲裔日本人》(东京:大书馆,1991),30;市冈裕二,戈登·h·张、安间英一郎主编,《拘禁之前:战前日裔美国人历史随笔》(斯坦福:斯坦福大学出版社,2006),第3章;袁荣,“大连租界城报社组织的活动:以满洲报社组织的满洲籍日本留学生访日考察为例”,《文化社会研究》12(2016):55-81.43。Yōichi天野,Dabaokuo no matsueitachi: Firipin nikkei kimin [Davao- kuo的后裔:被遗弃在菲律宾的日本人](名古屋:Fūbaisha, 1990), 71.44大野,哈本,30-32.45例如,1939年11月,政府主办的宣传日本海外定居和经济活动的杂志《海上杂志》(Umi wo koete, 1938-1944)有一期关于Davao的特刊,并刊登了几篇关于日本定居者在那里的教育的文章本重吉孝,《关于在达沃教育第二代日本人的问题的思考》,载于《大宝》hōjin《日本达沃发展的历史》,龟原博司著(大宝:日本新文社,1938年),659.47页。关于ishokumin的历史,见《寻找我们的边界》,第4-9页。Honshige校长提到了1926年由柳原忠雄(Tadao Yanaihara)所著的《殖民与殖民政策》(Colonization and Colonial Policy),柳原忠雄是同时代研究日本殖民政策的杰出经济学家和学者市冈,《拘留前,导言和第2章》,第2卷第49节,本成,《新京报》,第66卷第50节,井濑清,《达沃的日本人》,《Gaikou seisaku wo nampou ni miru》,《南向政策的现场观察》,长谷川聪编(东京:日本京报,1936年),第30卷第51节,李,《新京报》,第67卷第68页,第53节,服部龙三,《达沃第二代教育》,《海上》第2卷第2期。11(1939): 28.54中村武夫,“达沃日本居民现状”,《海上日报》第2期,第2期。11(1939): 7.55李正善,“日本人与韩国人的婚姻:Naisenkekkon no kodomotachi: Naichijin to choousenjin no hazama de”,《历史学刊》(2018):42-55;芭芭拉·J。
Fragments of multi-layered settler colonialism: mixed-race children in Japanese schooling, the American Philippines, 1924–1945
ABSTRACTThis article examines Japanese schools in Davao Province, the American Philippines, by highlighting the mixed-race children born to Japanese fathers and Filipino mothers. How did mixed-race children experience Japanese schooling in the Philippines, in which Japan’s settler colonial project operated in a colonial territory of the U.S. empire? I call entangled conditions, such as Davao on the island of Mindanao, ‘multi-layered settler colonialism.’ In Davao, the settler colonial projects of the U.S. and Japanese empires developed co-constitutively by underlining the subjugation of tribal Filipinos to Christian Filipinos and displacing the former. By following Black and postcolonial feminist method and patching together archival fragments of different genres and locations, I uncover the perspectives of mixed-race students in the history of multi-layered settler colonialism. I argue that the goals of Japanese education in the Philippines, a product of the public and private collusion, both conflicted with and reinforced American colonial education which was also developed by state and nonstate actors. I also show that the diverse experiences of mixed-race children and their mothers contested the stated goals of American colonial and Japanese education by illuminating the multi-layered nature of settler colonialism.KEYWORDS: Mixed-racechildreneducationdiasporasettler colonialismthe PhilippinesJapanese empireU.S. empireDavaoMindanao AcknowledgementsI gratefully acknowledge the many insightful comments I received from various scholars at conferences and workshops, including the 18th Annual International Conference in Japanese Studies (in Davao!), the Japanese Empire and Mobility Working Group, the 12th International Convention of Asia Scholars, the 2021 American Studies Association Annual Meeting, the 75th Global Japan Studies Seminar at the University of Tokyo, and the workshop for this special issue organized by Rebecca Swartz and Felicity Jensz. I also wish to thank the anonymous referees of the Settler Colonial Studies for their generous and helpful suggestions. Last but not least, this article has benefitted immensely from my education and training with Chie Ikeya and Jennifer Mittelstadt. All errors and omissions are my own.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 No date, ‘Re-Mariwanay Case’, Mariwanay in ‘Series 6: Davao Land Case’, Jose P. Laurel Foundation in Manila, the Philippines; ‘Statement (Estrella Macasaet Tan)’, March 16, 2013, 1, in the possession of Philippine Nikkei-jin Legal Support Center, Tokyo, Japan.2 Some scholars have been skeptical of terms ‘race’ and ‘mixed race’ because of their legacy of scientific racism, their essentialist connotation, and different nuances in non-English languages, including Japanese and Filipinos. I use the terms, ‘race’ and ‘mixed race’, as analytic categories. On debates over the term mixed-race, see for instance, Erica Chito Childs, ‘Critical Mixed Race in Global Perspective: An Introduction’, Journal of Intercultural Studies 39, no. 4 (2018): 379–81; Also see, Takezawa Yasuko, ‘Joshо̄: Konketsu shinwa no kaitai to jibun rashiku ikiru kenri’ (Dismantling the Mixed-Blood Myth and the Right to Live as We Are) in Jinshu shinwa o kaitai suru, 3, “Chi” no seijigaku o koete (Dismantling the Race Myth, Volume 3, Hybridity: Beyond the Politics of ‘Blood’), edited by Kawashima Kohei and Takezawa Yasuko (2016), 8–10.3 The collapse of the Japanese empire through World War II did not mean the end of Japan’s settler colonial project. See, Sidney Xu Lu, The Making of Japanese Settler Colonialism: Malthusianism and Trans-Pacific Migration, 1868–1961 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019), Chapter 8.4 Candace Fujikane and Jonathan Y. Okamura, eds., Asian Settler Colonialism: From Local Governance to the Habits of Everyday Life in Hawai‘i (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2008); Dean Itsuji Saranillio, ‘Why Asian Settler Colonialism Matters: A Thought Piece on Critiques, Debates, and Indigenous Difference’, Settler Colonial Studies 3, no. 3–04 (2013): 280–94; Juliana Hu Pegues, Space-Time Colonialism: Alaska’s Indigenous and Asian Entanglements (The University of North Carolina Press, 2021).5 Eiichiro Azuma, In Search of Our Frontier: Japanese America and Settler Colonialism in the Construction of Japan’s Borderless Empire (Oakland, California: University of California Press, 2019); Lu, The Making of Japanese Settler Colonialism; Also see, Jun Uchida, Brokers of Empire: Japanese Settler Colonialism in Korea, 1876–1945 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011); Jordan Sand et al., ‘Reconfiguring Pacific History: Reflections from the Pacific Empires Working Group’, Amerasia Journal 42, no. 3 (2016): 7; Takashi Fujitani, Race for Empire: Koreans as Japanese and Japanese as Americans during World War II (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).6 The term ‘Moro’ derived from the vocabulary of the Spanish empire tasked with conquering Muslims across the globe and came to signify ethno-linguistic communities in the Philippines, including Tausūg, Maranao, and individuals who converted to Christianity. Meanwhile the term ‘Lumad’ means non-Muslim natives in Mindanao, such as Manobo, Bagobo, and Tagakaulo, and originates in inter-group political activism in the 1970s by these peoples.7 On the history of Davao, Patricia Irene Dacudao, Abaca Frontier: The Socioeconomic and Cultural Transformation of Davao, 1898–1941 (Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2023); Macario D. Tiu, Davao: Reconstructing History from Text and Memory (Davao City: Ateneo de Davao University, 2005); Patricio N. Abinales, Making Mindanao: Cotabato and Davao in the Formation of the Philippine Nation-State (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2000).8 For instance, Dacudao, Abaca Frontier; Tessa Winkelmann, Dangerous Intercourse: Gender and Interracial Relations in the American Colonial Philippines, 1898–1946 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2023), Chapter 2; Christopher John Chanco, ‘Frontier Polities and Imaginaries: The Reproduction of Settler Colonial Space in the Southern Philippines’, Settler Colonial Studies 7, no. 1 (2017): 1–23; Oliver Charbonneau, Civilizational Imperatives: Americans, Moros, and the Colonial World (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2020); Jorge Bayona, ‘Inherited Destinies: Discourses of Territorial Loss in Postcolonial States across the Pacific (Peru and the Philippines, 1903–1927)’, Verge: Studies in Global Asias 3, no. 2 (2017): 169–94.9 Winkelmann, Dangerous Intercourse; Saidiya Hartman, Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments: Intimate Histories of Social Upheaval (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2019); Marisa J. Fuentes, Dispossessed Lives: Enslaved Women, Violence, and the Archive (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016).10 For instance, Sarah Steinbock-Pratt, Educating the Empire: American Teachers and Contested Colonization in the Philippines (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019); Chie Ikeya, Refiguring Women, Colonialism, and Modernity in Burma (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2011), Chapter 2; Julia Clancy-Smith and Frances Gouda, eds., Domesticating the Empire: Race, Gender, and Family Life in French and Dutch Colonialism (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 1998); Jun Uchida, ‘A Sentimental Journey: Mapping the Interior Frontier of Japanese Settlers in Colonial Korea’, The Journal of Asian Studies 70, no. 3 (2011): 706–29.11 Sabine Frühstück, Colonizing Sex: Sexology and Social Control in Modern Japan (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003), 7.12 Masaru Kojima, Nihonjingakkou no kenkyu: Ibunkakyouikushitekikousatsu [A Study of Oversea Japanese Schools: An Analysis from the Perspective of the History of Intercultural Education] (Tokyo: Tamagawadaigakusyuppanbu, 1999), 25; Dong Hoon Lee, Zaichonihonjinshakai no keisei: Shokuminchikuukan no henyou to ishikikouzou [Formation of Japanese Settler Communities in Korea: Transformation of Colonial Space and the Mentality] (Tokyo: Akashishoten, 2019), Chapter 3.13 Kojima, Nihonjingakkou, 29; Yukuji Okita, Hawai nikkeiimin no kyouikushi [The History of Education by Japanese Immigrants in Hawaii: U.S.-Japan Cultures and Their Encounters and Conflicts] (Kyoto: Mineruba Shobou, 1997), 105, 111.14 Kojima, Nihonjingakkou, 24.15 Sousuke Watabe ed., Zaigaishiteigakkouichiran [The List of Government-Designated Overseas Schools] (Tokyo: Kokuritsukenkyuujo, 1982), preface, 48. On the GDOSs in Southeast and South Asia, Masaru Kojima, Dainijisekaitaisenmae no zaigaishiteikyoikuron no keifu [A Genealogy of Educational Theory for Overseas Japanese Children] (Kyoto: Ryukoku Gakkai, 1993), Timetable at the end.16 Watabe ed., Zaigaishiteigakkouichiran, preface.17 Kojima, Nihonjingakkou, 36–37.18 Watabe, ed., Zaigaishiteigakkouichiran, preface.19 Kojima, Nihonjingakkou, 39.20 Reiko Furiya, ‘The Japanese Community Abroad: The Case of Prewar Davao in the Philippines’, in The Japanese in Colonial Southeast Asia, ed. Saya Shiraishi and Takashi Shiraishi (Ithaca, N.Y.: Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, 1993), 158.21 Eri Kitada, ‘Intimately Intertwined: Settler and Indigenous Communities, Filipino Women, and U.S.-Japanese Imperial Formations in the Philippines, 1903–1956’ (PhD diss., Rutgers University, 2023), Chapter 5.22 I-1-5-0-2_7_1_001, 35, MoFA (Japanese Diplomatic Archives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan).23 Furiya, ‘The Japanese Community Abroad’, 161–62; Yoshizō Furukawa, Dabao Kaitakuki [Chronicle of Pioneering Davao] (Tokyo: Furukawa Takushoku, 1956), 405–6.24 Hiroji Kamohara, Dabao hōjin kaitakushi [The History of Japanese Development of Davao] (Dabao: Nippi Shimbunsha, 1938), 621–22.25 Kamohara, Dabao hōjin kaitakushi, 623.26 I-1-5-0-2_7_1_001, 42, MoFA.27 Ibid., 36; Dabao kai, Dabao natsukashi no shashinshu [Davao, a Nostalgic Photo Album] (Tokyo: Dabao kai henshubu, 1988), 192.28 Steinbock-Pratt, Educating the Empire, 19; Taihei Okada, ‘Onkei no ronri’ to shokuminchi: Amerika shokuminchiki firipin no kyouiku to sonoisei [‘Logic of Benevolence’ and the Colony: Education in the U.S. Colonial Philippines and Its Legacy] (Tokyo: Hoseidaigakushuppankyoku, 2014), Chapter 1.29 Patricia Dacudao, ‘Abaca: The Socio-Economic and Cultural Transformation of Frontier Davao, 1898–1941’ (PhD diss., Murdoch University, 2017), 306–7; Ernesto I Corcino, Davao History (Davao, Philippines: Philippine Centennial Movement, Davao City Chapter, 1998), 143.30 1.6.2.3–13, 194, MoFA.31 Tiu, Davao, 122.32 Antonio S Gabila, ‘Mindanao Pioneer Teachers Make Good: Many of Them are Now Wealthy Landowners’, Graphic, July 26, 1934, 8–9.33 I-1-5-0-1_16_037D1, 38-39, MoFA; I-1-5-0-1_16_037D2, 138–139, 156, 170–171, MoFA.34 Furiya, ‘The Japanese Community Abroad’, 164–65.35 Shinzo Hayase, ‘Tribes, Settlers and Administrators on a Frontier: Economic Development and Social Change in Davao, Southeastern Mindanao, the Philippines, 1899–1941’ (PhD diss., Western Australia, Murdoch University, 1984), 309.36 Erika Lee, ‘The ‘Yellow Peril’ and Asian Exclusion in the Americas’, Pacific Historical Review 76, no. 4 (2007): 544, 558–62; Azuma, In Search of Our Frontier.37 Furiya, ‘The Japanese Community Abroad’, 164.38 Kamohara, Dabao hōjin kaitakushi, 620.39 Patricia Irene Dacudao, ‘Filipinos in Davao and the ‘Land Problem’ of the 1930s’, Journal of History 54, no. 1–4 (2008): 122, 127–28; Grant Kohn Goodman, Davao: A Case Study in Japanese-Philippine Relations (Lawrence: Center for East Asian Studies, University of Kansas, 1967), 53, 73.40 Masatake Komeda, ‘Zaihitouhoujinshitei no gakkoukyouiku ni kansuru chousa’ [A Study on School Education of Japanese Children in the Philippine Islands], The Quarterly Journal of the Colonial Institute of Nippon 1, no. 4 (1940): 176–79.41 Louise Young, Japan’s Total Empire: Manchuria and the Culture of Wartime Imperialism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), 360–61.42 ‘Mintarujogakuin bokokukengakudan’ [Mintal Women’s School in Study Tour], The Philippine Information Bulletin 48 (June 1941): 104; Shun Ohno, Hapon: Firipin nikkeijin no nagai sengo [Hapon: The Long Postwar Period of Filipino Japanese] (Tokyo: Daisanshokan, 1991), 30; Yuji Ichioka, edited by Gordon H. Chang and Eiichiro Azuma, Before Internment: Essays in Prewar Japanese American History (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006), Chapter 3; Rong Yuan, ‘Shokokumichi Nihongoshinbun no jigyokatsudo’ [Activities Organized by Newspaper Companies in the Concession City of Dalian: Focusing on Field Trips by Manchuria-born Japanese Students Visiting Mainland Japan Organized by the Japanese Newspaper Company in Manchuria], Sokendai Review of Cultural and Social Studies 12 (2016): 55–81.43 Kenji Suzuki, Firipin zanryunikkeijin [War-Displaced Japanese in the Philippines] (Tokyo: Kusanoneshuppankai, 1997), 84–88; Yōichi Amano, Dabaokuo no matsueitachi: Firipin nikkei kimin [Descendants of Davao-Kuo: Abandoned Japanese in the Philippines] (Nagoya: Fūbaisha, 1990), 71.44 Ohno, Hapon, 30–32.45 For example, in November 1939, Over the Sea Journal (Umi wo koete, 1938–1944), a government-sponsored magazine that promoted Japanese overseas settlements and economic activities, had a special issue on Davao and printed several articles about Japanese settlers’ education there.46 Yoshitaka Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku no genjou to toujisha no niseikyouikukan’ [A Thought on Problems of Educating the Second-Generation Japanese in Davao], in Dabao hōjin kaitakushi [The History of Japanese Development of Davao], by Hiroji Kamohara (Dabao: Nippi Shimbunsha, 1938), 659.47 About the history of ishokumin, see Azuma, In Search of Our Frontier, 4–9. The principal Honshige referred to Colonization and Colonial Policy, the 1926 work by Tadao Yanaihara, a prominent, contemporaneous economist and scholar of Japan’s colonial policy.48 Ichioka, Before Internment, Introduction and Chapter 2.49 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 662.50 Kiyoshi Ibuse, ‘Dabao no nihon jin [Japanese in Davao]’ in Gaikou seisaku wo nampou ni miru [On-Site Observation of Southward Policy], ed. Satoru Hasegawa (Tokyo: Nihongaijikyokai, 1936), 301.51 Lee, Zaichonihonjinshakai no keisei, 187–88.52 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 669.53 Ryuzo Hattori, ‘Dabao ni okeru dainiseikyouiku’ [Education for the Second Generation in Davao], Umi wo koete [Over the Sea] 2, no. 11 (1939): 28.54 Nakamura Takeo, ‘Dabao zanryū hо̄jin no genjо̄’ [Current Situation of Japanese Residents in Davao], Umi wo koete (Over the Sea Journal) 2, no. 11 (1939): 7.55 Lee Jeong-Seon, ‘Naisenkekkon no kodomotachi: Naichijin to chousenjin no hazama de’ [Children of Japanese-Korean Marriages: Between Japanese and Koreans], Historical Journal 815 (2018): 42–55; Barbara J. Brooks, ‘Japanese Colonialism, Gender, and Household Registration: Legal Reconstruction of Boundaries’, in Gender and Law in the Japanese Imperium, ed. Barbara J. Brooks and Susan L. Burns (University of Hawai’i Press, 2014), 219–39.56 Paul D. Barclay, ‘Cultural Brokerage and Interethnic Marriage in Colonial Taiwan: Japanese Subalterns and Their Aborigine Wives, 1895–1930’, The Journal of Asian Studies 64, no. 2 (2005): 323–60.57 For instance, Iyo Kuminimoto, ‘Nihonjin no boribia syokiimin ni kansuru ichikousatsu’ [A Study of Early Japanese Immigrants in Bolivia], The Annual Review of Migration Studies 6 (1999): 3–20; Istuko Kamoto, Kokusaikekkon no tanjo [The Birth of International Marriages] (Tokyo: Shinyosha, 2001), 175.58 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 672.59 Ibid., 672–73.60 Komeda, ‘Zaihitouhoujinshitei’, 175.61 Hattori, ‘Dabao ni okeru’, 26.62 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 673.63 Komeda, ‘Zaihitouhoujinshitei’, 175.64 Honshige, ‘Niseikyouiku’, 673.65 Kitada, ‘Intimately Intertwined’; Paul A. Kramer, The Blood of Government: Race, Empire, the United States, and the Philippines (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2006), 6.66 Antonio Sitchon Gabila, ‘Lo, the Vanishing Non-Christian’, Philippine Free Press, September 14, 1935, p2, 36.67 ‘Statement (Estrella Macasaet Tan)’, 2.68 Joan Mae Suco-Bantayan, ‘Revisiting Mintal: The Little Tokyo in a Dream’, Mindanao Times, April 14, 2012; ‘Dabao no nikkei 2sei no shougen ‘sensou heno omoi’’ [A Testimony of the Second-Generation Japanese in Davao and Her ‘Thoughts on War’], Davao Watch, September 22 and 23, 2017; Shun Ohno, Transforming Nikkeijin Identity and Citizenship: Untold Life Histories of Japanese Migrants and Their Descendants in the Philippines, 1903–2013 (Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2015), 214n14.69 Hiroyuki Kawai and Norihiro Inomata, Hapon wo torimodosu: Firipin zanryunihonjin no senso to kokusekikaifuku [Get Back Hapon (Japanese): World War II of the Abandoned Japanese in the Philippines and the Recovery of Citizenship] (Tokyo: Korokara, 2020), 64–67; Norihiro Inomata, ‘Dabao no kurafutokohi to jidori no adobo wo motenashitekuretano ha shiburan no yamani zanryushiteita nisei no obachan’ [It Was a Second-Generation Grandma, Who Stayed Behind in Mt. Sibulan, That Welcomed Me with Davao’s Craft Coffee and Chicken Adobo], Davao Watch, July 3, 2020.70 Kawai and Inomata, Hapon, 65.71 Amano, Dabaokuo, 70.72 Ibid., 20, 48, 62–63. Ohno, Transforming, 122–23.73 Suzuki, Firipin, 84–88; Amano, Dabaokuo, 71.74 ‘Dabao no nikkei 2sei no shougen’.75 Ohno, Transforming, 211n68.76 Young, Japan’s Total Empire, 167–71.77 Amano, Dabaokuo, 135.78 For example, the children of Japanese father Eiji Hirao and Christian Filipino mother Monica Tan attended Bayabas Japanese School, which was created in March 1934 in the district of Bayabas. Kamohara, Dabao hōjin kaitakushi, 1517.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Social Science Research Council (International Dissertation Research Fellowship).
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to establish settler colonial studies as a distinct field of scholarly research. Scholars and students will find and contribute to historically-oriented research and analyses covering contemporary issues. We also aim to present multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research, involving areas like history, law, genocide studies, indigenous, colonial and postcolonial studies, anthropology, historical geography, economics, politics, sociology, international relations, political science, literary criticism, cultural and gender studies and philosophy.