美国中部地区的华裔:移民、工作与社区(评述)

Donna Doan Anderson
{"title":"美国中部地区的华裔:移民、工作与社区(评述)","authors":"Donna Doan Anderson","doi":"10.2979/indimagahist.119.3.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Chinese Americans in the Heartland: Migration, Work, and Community by Huping Ling Donna Doan Anderson Chinese Americans in the Heartland: Migration, Work, and Community By Huping Ling (New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press, 2022. Pp. ix, 246. Notes, bibliography, index. Clothbound, $120.00; paperbound, $39.95.) Huping Ling’s Chinese Americans in the Heartland: Migration, Work, and Community presents a detailed history of Chinese communities in Chicago and St. Louis dating from the late nineteenth to the twentieth century. Expanding on the materials and frameworks from her first two books, Chinese St. Louis (2004) and Chinese Chicago (2012), Chinese Americans in the Heartland illustrates Ling’s truly impressive research capacity. Spanning three decades of both English and Chinese language sources that range from newspapers, census data, and city directories to oral histories of local residents conducted by her and her students, Ling presents a comprehensive engagement with “immigration and work, family and community, and the structural construction and reconstruction of” midwestern Chinese American communities (p. 7). Driving the analysis is the question: why would Chinese migrants end up in the heartland when well-established enclaves already existed on the West Coast? Broadly, Ling argues that the answer lies in a lack of development in the heartland. She does not view this adversely, noting that Chinese Americans saw plenty of opportunity in the affordable cost of living and lower crime rate. They also found attractive the social flexibility of places that did not have the legal restrictions often found on the coasts. Nonetheless, Ling demonstrates how, despite perceived geographic isolation from larger ethnic enclaves or developmental deficiencies, Chinese Americans in the heartland remained connected through their social and economic networks—regionally, nationally, and globally. She argues that convergences in ethnic business organization and cultural practices demonstrate the linkages to coastal communities, while divergences were intentionally undertaken to fit the region’s attributes and the demands of midwestern Chinese American communities. These points are proven in the book’s three parts. The first, titled “Transnational Migration and Work,” examines the closely linked transnational networks and their responsibility in building and supporting midwestern Chinese American communities from the late nineteenth to mid-twentieth centuries. The second, titled “Marriage, Family, and Community Organizations,” examines the impacts of these developments on families, marriage, and gendered entanglements. Here she makes her most notable contribution by arguing against common myths associated with Chinese American ethnic enclaves or social practices, stating that these attitudes are actually products of and responses to restrictive American [End Page 294] immigration policies. The third section, titled “New Community Structures,” traces the Chinese American community in Chicago and St. Louis since 1965, demonstrating how challenges of geographic dispersion and greater socioeconomic integration create a cultural community, which Ling describes as a new community structure based on preserving ethnic identity and promoting solidarities for future well-being. Scholars will find Ling’s thorough research valuable not only for understanding the contributions of Chinese Americans in Chicago and St. Louis, but also as an exemplary way to interrogate the contributions of Asian American communities in other locations in the U.S. heartland such as Indiana. As Ling rightfully notes, Asian Americans’ rapidly growing population in the U.S. interior presents the possibility for dynamic examinations. For instance, census data from 2020 lists 166,657 Asian-only identified individuals residing in Indiana—an impressive development since the reporting of twenty-eight Asian-identified individuals in the 1890 census, and a nearly seventy-five percent growth since 2000. Similar patterns in the rapid growth of Asian American communities throughout the Midwest since 1965 and the recent scholarly interrogations from midwestern studies scholars about its regional characteristics provide ample opportunities for expansion. In short, Chinese Americans in the Heartland provides depth and nuance to the often-overlooked contributions of Chinese Americans in the Midwest. Scholars of regional, Asian American, and urban history should take Ling’s invitation for “more intellectual dialogue on the topics” this volume has explored to develop the field of midwestern Asian American history (p. 11). Donna Doan Anderson University of California, Santa Barbara Copyright © 2023 Trustees of Indiana University","PeriodicalId":81518,"journal":{"name":"Indiana magazine of history","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chinese Americans in the Heartland: Migration, Work, and Community by Huping Ling (review)\",\"authors\":\"Donna Doan Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/indimagahist.119.3.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: Chinese Americans in the Heartland: Migration, Work, and Community by Huping Ling Donna Doan Anderson Chinese Americans in the Heartland: Migration, Work, and Community By Huping Ling (New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press, 2022. Pp. ix, 246. Notes, bibliography, index. Clothbound, $120.00; paperbound, $39.95.) Huping Ling’s Chinese Americans in the Heartland: Migration, Work, and Community presents a detailed history of Chinese communities in Chicago and St. Louis dating from the late nineteenth to the twentieth century. Expanding on the materials and frameworks from her first two books, Chinese St. Louis (2004) and Chinese Chicago (2012), Chinese Americans in the Heartland illustrates Ling’s truly impressive research capacity. Spanning three decades of both English and Chinese language sources that range from newspapers, census data, and city directories to oral histories of local residents conducted by her and her students, Ling presents a comprehensive engagement with “immigration and work, family and community, and the structural construction and reconstruction of” midwestern Chinese American communities (p. 7). Driving the analysis is the question: why would Chinese migrants end up in the heartland when well-established enclaves already existed on the West Coast? Broadly, Ling argues that the answer lies in a lack of development in the heartland. She does not view this adversely, noting that Chinese Americans saw plenty of opportunity in the affordable cost of living and lower crime rate. They also found attractive the social flexibility of places that did not have the legal restrictions often found on the coasts. Nonetheless, Ling demonstrates how, despite perceived geographic isolation from larger ethnic enclaves or developmental deficiencies, Chinese Americans in the heartland remained connected through their social and economic networks—regionally, nationally, and globally. She argues that convergences in ethnic business organization and cultural practices demonstrate the linkages to coastal communities, while divergences were intentionally undertaken to fit the region’s attributes and the demands of midwestern Chinese American communities. These points are proven in the book’s three parts. The first, titled “Transnational Migration and Work,” examines the closely linked transnational networks and their responsibility in building and supporting midwestern Chinese American communities from the late nineteenth to mid-twentieth centuries. The second, titled “Marriage, Family, and Community Organizations,” examines the impacts of these developments on families, marriage, and gendered entanglements. Here she makes her most notable contribution by arguing against common myths associated with Chinese American ethnic enclaves or social practices, stating that these attitudes are actually products of and responses to restrictive American [End Page 294] immigration policies. The third section, titled “New Community Structures,” traces the Chinese American community in Chicago and St. Louis since 1965, demonstrating how challenges of geographic dispersion and greater socioeconomic integration create a cultural community, which Ling describes as a new community structure based on preserving ethnic identity and promoting solidarities for future well-being. Scholars will find Ling’s thorough research valuable not only for understanding the contributions of Chinese Americans in Chicago and St. Louis, but also as an exemplary way to interrogate the contributions of Asian American communities in other locations in the U.S. heartland such as Indiana. As Ling rightfully notes, Asian Americans’ rapidly growing population in the U.S. interior presents the possibility for dynamic examinations. For instance, census data from 2020 lists 166,657 Asian-only identified individuals residing in Indiana—an impressive development since the reporting of twenty-eight Asian-identified individuals in the 1890 census, and a nearly seventy-five percent growth since 2000. Similar patterns in the rapid growth of Asian American communities throughout the Midwest since 1965 and the recent scholarly interrogations from midwestern studies scholars about its regional characteristics provide ample opportunities for expansion. In short, Chinese Americans in the Heartland provides depth and nuance to the often-overlooked contributions of Chinese Americans in the Midwest. Scholars of regional, Asian American, and urban history should take Ling’s invitation for “more intellectual dialogue on the topics” this volume has explored to develop the field of midwestern Asian American history (p. 11). Donna Doan Anderson University of California, Santa Barbara Copyright © 2023 Trustees of Indiana University\",\"PeriodicalId\":81518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indiana magazine of history\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indiana magazine of history\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/indimagahist.119.3.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana magazine of history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/indimagahist.119.3.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《中心地带的华裔美国人:移民、工作和社区》,凌虎萍著(New Brunswick, n.j: Rutgers University Press, 2022)。第9页,246页。注释、参考书目、索引。精装的,120.00美元;平装书,39.95美元)。凌虎平的《中心地带的华裔美国人:移民、工作和社区》详细介绍了19世纪末至20世纪芝加哥和圣路易斯华人社区的历史。在她前两本书《华裔圣路易斯》(2004)和《华裔芝加哥》(2012)的材料和框架的基础上,《美国腹地的华裔》展示了她令人印象深刻的研究能力。从报纸、人口普查数据、城市名录到由她和她的学生进行的当地居民口述历史等三十年的中英文资料中,凌呈现了对中西部华裔美国人社区“移民与工作、家庭与社区、结构建设与重建”的全面参与(第7页)。推动分析的是一个问题:既然西海岸已经有了完善的飞地,为什么中国移民最终会来到中心地带?凌认为,从广义上讲,答案在于中心地带缺乏发展。她并不认为这是负面的,她指出,华裔美国人在负担得起的生活成本和较低的犯罪率中看到了大量的机会。他们还发现,没有沿海地区常见的法律限制的地方,社会灵活性也很有吸引力。尽管如此,凌还是证明了,尽管在地理上与更大的种族飞地隔绝,或者发展不足,居住在中心地带的华裔美国人是如何通过他们的社会和经济网络——区域、国家和全球——保持联系的。她认为,少数民族商业组织和文化习俗的趋同表明了与沿海社区的联系,而差异是有意进行的,以适应该地区的特征和中西部华裔社区的需求。这些观点在本书的三个部分得到了证明。第一篇题为“跨国移民与工作”,考察了19世纪末至20世纪中期紧密相连的跨国网络及其在建立和支持中西部华裔美国人社区方面的责任。第二篇题为“婚姻、家庭和社区组织”,探讨了这些发展对家庭、婚姻和性别纠葛的影响。在这里,她最引人注目的贡献是反驳了与华裔美国人的种族飞地或社会实践有关的常见神话,指出这些态度实际上是美国限制性移民政策的产物和反应。第三部分,题为“新的社区结构”,追溯了1965年以来芝加哥和圣路易斯的华裔社区,展示了地理分散和更大的社会经济一体化的挑战如何创造了一个文化社区,凌将其描述为一种基于保留民族身份和促进团结的新社区结构。学者们会发现,凌的深入研究不仅对了解芝加哥和圣路易斯的华裔美国人的贡献有价值,而且作为一种典型的方式,可以审视印第安纳州等美国中心地带其他地区亚裔美国人社区的贡献。正如凌正确指出的那样,亚裔美国人在美国内陆迅速增长的人口为动态考试提供了可能。例如,2020年的人口普查数据列出了居住在印第安纳州的166,657名仅以亚洲身份身份的个人,这是自1890年人口普查中报告的28名亚洲人以来的一个令人印象深刻的发展,自2000年以来增长了近75%。自1965年以来,整个中西部地区亚裔美国人社区快速增长的类似模式,以及最近中西部研究学者对其地区特征的学术询问,为扩展提供了充足的机会。简而言之,《中心地带的华裔美国人》为经常被忽视的中西部华裔美国人的贡献提供了深度和细微差别。研究地区、亚裔美国人和城市历史的学者应该接受凌的邀请,参加本卷为发展中西部亚裔美国人历史领域而探索的“有关主题的更多知识对话”(第11页)。版权所有©2023印第安纳大学董事会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chinese Americans in the Heartland: Migration, Work, and Community by Huping Ling (review)
Reviewed by: Chinese Americans in the Heartland: Migration, Work, and Community by Huping Ling Donna Doan Anderson Chinese Americans in the Heartland: Migration, Work, and Community By Huping Ling (New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press, 2022. Pp. ix, 246. Notes, bibliography, index. Clothbound, $120.00; paperbound, $39.95.) Huping Ling’s Chinese Americans in the Heartland: Migration, Work, and Community presents a detailed history of Chinese communities in Chicago and St. Louis dating from the late nineteenth to the twentieth century. Expanding on the materials and frameworks from her first two books, Chinese St. Louis (2004) and Chinese Chicago (2012), Chinese Americans in the Heartland illustrates Ling’s truly impressive research capacity. Spanning three decades of both English and Chinese language sources that range from newspapers, census data, and city directories to oral histories of local residents conducted by her and her students, Ling presents a comprehensive engagement with “immigration and work, family and community, and the structural construction and reconstruction of” midwestern Chinese American communities (p. 7). Driving the analysis is the question: why would Chinese migrants end up in the heartland when well-established enclaves already existed on the West Coast? Broadly, Ling argues that the answer lies in a lack of development in the heartland. She does not view this adversely, noting that Chinese Americans saw plenty of opportunity in the affordable cost of living and lower crime rate. They also found attractive the social flexibility of places that did not have the legal restrictions often found on the coasts. Nonetheless, Ling demonstrates how, despite perceived geographic isolation from larger ethnic enclaves or developmental deficiencies, Chinese Americans in the heartland remained connected through their social and economic networks—regionally, nationally, and globally. She argues that convergences in ethnic business organization and cultural practices demonstrate the linkages to coastal communities, while divergences were intentionally undertaken to fit the region’s attributes and the demands of midwestern Chinese American communities. These points are proven in the book’s three parts. The first, titled “Transnational Migration and Work,” examines the closely linked transnational networks and their responsibility in building and supporting midwestern Chinese American communities from the late nineteenth to mid-twentieth centuries. The second, titled “Marriage, Family, and Community Organizations,” examines the impacts of these developments on families, marriage, and gendered entanglements. Here she makes her most notable contribution by arguing against common myths associated with Chinese American ethnic enclaves or social practices, stating that these attitudes are actually products of and responses to restrictive American [End Page 294] immigration policies. The third section, titled “New Community Structures,” traces the Chinese American community in Chicago and St. Louis since 1965, demonstrating how challenges of geographic dispersion and greater socioeconomic integration create a cultural community, which Ling describes as a new community structure based on preserving ethnic identity and promoting solidarities for future well-being. Scholars will find Ling’s thorough research valuable not only for understanding the contributions of Chinese Americans in Chicago and St. Louis, but also as an exemplary way to interrogate the contributions of Asian American communities in other locations in the U.S. heartland such as Indiana. As Ling rightfully notes, Asian Americans’ rapidly growing population in the U.S. interior presents the possibility for dynamic examinations. For instance, census data from 2020 lists 166,657 Asian-only identified individuals residing in Indiana—an impressive development since the reporting of twenty-eight Asian-identified individuals in the 1890 census, and a nearly seventy-five percent growth since 2000. Similar patterns in the rapid growth of Asian American communities throughout the Midwest since 1965 and the recent scholarly interrogations from midwestern studies scholars about its regional characteristics provide ample opportunities for expansion. In short, Chinese Americans in the Heartland provides depth and nuance to the often-overlooked contributions of Chinese Americans in the Midwest. Scholars of regional, Asian American, and urban history should take Ling’s invitation for “more intellectual dialogue on the topics” this volume has explored to develop the field of midwestern Asian American history (p. 11). Donna Doan Anderson University of California, Santa Barbara Copyright © 2023 Trustees of Indiana University
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信