古兰经研究中的性别研究:结束语

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Nevin Reda
{"title":"古兰经研究中的性别研究:结束语","authors":"Nevin Reda","doi":"10.2979/jfemistudreli.39.2.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender-Based Research in Qur'anic StudiesConcluding Remarks Nevin Reda (bio) To conclude, this roundtable has demonstrated a variety of new and continuing directions in gender-based research in qurʾanic studies. It suggests that the field is diverse and pluralistic, not always univocal, and often engaging a plethora of methodological and theoretical frameworks. Feminist and other gender-based Qurʾan scholarship has moved beyond the immediate confines of the Qurʾan and has widened the scope of scholarly investigations to encompass tafsīr (exegesis), hadith, āthār (reports transmitted from the first two generations of Muslims), and other extra-qurʾanic corpora, as can be noted in the work of Hadia Mubarak, Rahel Fischbach, and Yasmin Amin in this volume (and Fatima Mernissi before that).1 It continues to be in conversation with multiple discourses and conversation partners, including non-Muslim Western academia, as one can note in Halla Attallah's engagement with the ideas of Rosemarie Garland-Thomson on the intersection of femininity and disability. While in the past feminist engagement focused more on masculinist constructions of women and femininity, today women scholars are seeing the need to critique constructions of masculinity and to offer their own readings of ideal masculinity, as one can note in the work of Yasmin Amin (and the broader work of Omaima Abou-Bakr).2 The tightrope that faith-based Muslim women scholars must walk when introducing constructive methodologies and theologically grounded epistemes into largely \"secular\" academic settings, while at the same time maintaining credibility in practical, faith-based settings, is eloquently addressed in the contributions of Celene Ibrahim and Mahjabeen Dhala. One can note the connection between Muslim women's lived experiences and the [End Page 101] questions that Islamic feminist scholars pose in Mulki Al-Sharmani's ethnographic research and Roshan Iqbal's arguments for reappraising fiqh related to sexual ethics. The spiritual turn is vividly illustrated in the scholarship of Amira Abou-Taleb and Omaima Abou-Bakr, who highlight the importance of the aesthetic and spiritual dimensions, as well as their connection to the Qurʾan's moral foundation, including the central value of justice. The focus on language and intra-qurʾanic coherence remains alive and well, as one can note in the work of Abla Hasan, who embodies an intertextual Qurʾan-centric hermeneutic, highlighting the gap between the literal text of the Qurʾan and heritage-based interpretations. Always, however, we remain conscious of the debt we owe to those who established the cornerstones of Muslim women's Qurʾan scholarship before us, upon whose work we build and from whose accomplishments we take inspiration. Foremost among these trailblazers are amina wadud, Asma Barlas, Riffat Hassan, and Azizah al-Hibri, who established this field in the Western academy, and Omaima Abou-Bakr, who works in both local Arabic-speaking and international contexts. In this field, these are our \"shuyūkh\" (elders) who have opened the door of women's scholarly investigation into the Qurʾan and paved the way for women to become Qurʾan scholars. Their work has made so many of these new directions possible. Where does justice stand within these emerging methodologies and epistemologies? In the tradition of amina wadud and Asma Barlas, I see the Qurʾan conveying a message of justice, especially gender justice, although I do recognize that there can be different, competing understandings of justice within the plethora of discourses in contemporary academia. I see the Qurʾan contributing highly sophisticated notions of justice, carefully weighing between two concepts: qist (equity, social justice) and 'adl (justice, equality), and I recognize the tensions between the two and how this tension can promote growth in terms of actualizing deeper experiences of justice. If one can consider 'adl to be a jalālī (majestic) manifestation of justice due to its nuance of absoluteness and finality, qisṭ would be a jamālī (beautiful) one, since it incorporates raḥma (compassion) for the vulnerable (as one can see in the case of widows and orphans in Q 4:3, for instance). The treatment of some of these sophisticated notions of justice in the context of relations between men and women suggests that this is...","PeriodicalId":44347,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender-Based Research in Qur'anic Studies: Concluding Remarks\",\"authors\":\"Nevin Reda\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/jfemistudreli.39.2.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gender-Based Research in Qur'anic StudiesConcluding Remarks Nevin Reda (bio) To conclude, this roundtable has demonstrated a variety of new and continuing directions in gender-based research in qurʾanic studies. It suggests that the field is diverse and pluralistic, not always univocal, and often engaging a plethora of methodological and theoretical frameworks. Feminist and other gender-based Qurʾan scholarship has moved beyond the immediate confines of the Qurʾan and has widened the scope of scholarly investigations to encompass tafsīr (exegesis), hadith, āthār (reports transmitted from the first two generations of Muslims), and other extra-qurʾanic corpora, as can be noted in the work of Hadia Mubarak, Rahel Fischbach, and Yasmin Amin in this volume (and Fatima Mernissi before that).1 It continues to be in conversation with multiple discourses and conversation partners, including non-Muslim Western academia, as one can note in Halla Attallah's engagement with the ideas of Rosemarie Garland-Thomson on the intersection of femininity and disability. While in the past feminist engagement focused more on masculinist constructions of women and femininity, today women scholars are seeing the need to critique constructions of masculinity and to offer their own readings of ideal masculinity, as one can note in the work of Yasmin Amin (and the broader work of Omaima Abou-Bakr).2 The tightrope that faith-based Muslim women scholars must walk when introducing constructive methodologies and theologically grounded epistemes into largely \\\"secular\\\" academic settings, while at the same time maintaining credibility in practical, faith-based settings, is eloquently addressed in the contributions of Celene Ibrahim and Mahjabeen Dhala. One can note the connection between Muslim women's lived experiences and the [End Page 101] questions that Islamic feminist scholars pose in Mulki Al-Sharmani's ethnographic research and Roshan Iqbal's arguments for reappraising fiqh related to sexual ethics. The spiritual turn is vividly illustrated in the scholarship of Amira Abou-Taleb and Omaima Abou-Bakr, who highlight the importance of the aesthetic and spiritual dimensions, as well as their connection to the Qurʾan's moral foundation, including the central value of justice. The focus on language and intra-qurʾanic coherence remains alive and well, as one can note in the work of Abla Hasan, who embodies an intertextual Qurʾan-centric hermeneutic, highlighting the gap between the literal text of the Qurʾan and heritage-based interpretations. Always, however, we remain conscious of the debt we owe to those who established the cornerstones of Muslim women's Qurʾan scholarship before us, upon whose work we build and from whose accomplishments we take inspiration. Foremost among these trailblazers are amina wadud, Asma Barlas, Riffat Hassan, and Azizah al-Hibri, who established this field in the Western academy, and Omaima Abou-Bakr, who works in both local Arabic-speaking and international contexts. In this field, these are our \\\"shuyūkh\\\" (elders) who have opened the door of women's scholarly investigation into the Qurʾan and paved the way for women to become Qurʾan scholars. Their work has made so many of these new directions possible. Where does justice stand within these emerging methodologies and epistemologies? In the tradition of amina wadud and Asma Barlas, I see the Qurʾan conveying a message of justice, especially gender justice, although I do recognize that there can be different, competing understandings of justice within the plethora of discourses in contemporary academia. I see the Qurʾan contributing highly sophisticated notions of justice, carefully weighing between two concepts: qist (equity, social justice) and 'adl (justice, equality), and I recognize the tensions between the two and how this tension can promote growth in terms of actualizing deeper experiences of justice. If one can consider 'adl to be a jalālī (majestic) manifestation of justice due to its nuance of absoluteness and finality, qisṭ would be a jamālī (beautiful) one, since it incorporates raḥma (compassion) for the vulnerable (as one can see in the case of widows and orphans in Q 4:3, for instance). The treatment of some of these sophisticated notions of justice in the context of relations between men and women suggests that this is...\",\"PeriodicalId\":44347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/jfemistudreli.39.2.17\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/jfemistudreli.39.2.17","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

古兰经研究中的基于性别的研究总结评论Nevin Reda(生物)总之,这次圆桌会议展示了古兰经研究中基于性别的各种新的和持续的方向。它表明,该领域是多样化和多元化的,并不总是单一的,而且经常涉及过多的方法和理论框架。女权主义者和其他以性别为基础的《古兰经》学者已经超越了《古兰经》的直接局限,并扩大了学术研究的范围,包括训诂学、圣训、āthār(从前两代穆斯林传下来的报告)和其他《古兰经》以外的语料库,这可以在Hadia Mubarak、Rahel Fischbach和Yasmin Amin在本卷(以及Fatima Mernissi在此之前)的工作中注意到它继续与多种话语和对话伙伴进行对话,包括非穆斯林的西方学术界,正如我们可以注意到的那样,Halla Attallah参与了Rosemarie Garland-Thomson关于女性气质和残疾交集的观点。在过去,女权主义的参与更多地关注女性和女性气质的男性主义结构,而今天,女性学者看到了批判男性气质结构的必要性,并提供了自己对理想男性气质的解读,正如人们可以在Yasmin Amin的作品(以及Omaima Abou-Bakr的更广泛的作品)中注意到的那样以信仰为基础的穆斯林女性学者在将建设性的方法和基于神学的知识引入主要是“世俗”的学术环境时必须走的钢丝绳,同时在实际的,以信仰为基础的环境中保持可信度,Celene Ibrahim和Mahjabeen Dhala的贡献雄辩地解决了这一问题。我们可以注意到穆斯林妇女的生活经历与伊斯兰女权主义学者在Mulki Al-Sharmani的人种学研究和Roshan Iqbal关于重新评价与性伦理有关的伊斯兰教的论点中提出的问题之间的联系。阿米拉·阿布-塔勒布(Amira abu - taleb)和奥玛玛·阿布-巴克尔(Omaima abu - bakr)的学术研究生动地说明了这种精神转向,他们强调了美学和精神维度的重要性,以及它们与《古兰经》道德基础的联系,包括正义的核心价值。对语言和《古兰经》内部一致性的关注仍然存在,正如人们可以在亚伯拉·哈桑的作品中注意到的那样,他体现了以《古兰经》为中心的互文解释学,突出了《古兰经》字面文本和基于遗产的解释之间的差距。然而,我们始终意识到,我们应该感谢那些在我们面前为穆斯林妇女的《古兰经》学术奠定基石的人,他们的工作是我们赖以发展的基础,他们的成就是我们汲取灵感的源泉。这些先驱中最重要的是阿米娜·瓦杜德、阿斯玛·巴拉斯、里法特·哈桑和阿齐扎·阿尔-希布里,他们在西方学术界建立了这一领域,奥迈玛·阿布-巴克尔在当地阿拉伯语和国际环境中都有工作。在这个领域,这些是我们的“shuyūkh”(长老),他们打开了女性对古兰经学术研究的大门,为女性成为古兰经学者铺平了道路。他们的工作使许多新方向成为可能。正义在这些新兴的方法论和认识论中处于什么位置?在amina wadud和Asma Barlas的传统中,我看到《古兰经》传达了正义的信息,尤其是性别正义,尽管我确实认识到,在当代学术界的众多话语中,可能存在不同的、相互竞争的正义理解。我看到《古兰经》贡献了高度复杂的正义概念,仔细权衡了两个概念:qist(公平,社会正义)和adl(正义,平等),我认识到两者之间的紧张关系,以及这种紧张关系如何促进实现更深层次的正义体验。如果一个人认为'adl是一个jalālī(庄严)正义的表现,因为它的绝对性和终局性的细微差别,那么qisha将是一个jamālī(美丽)的表现,因为它包含了对弱势群体的raḥma(同情)(例如,在Q章4章3节寡妇和孤儿的例子中可以看到)。在男女关系的背景下处理这些复杂的正义概念表明,这是……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender-Based Research in Qur'anic Studies: Concluding Remarks
Gender-Based Research in Qur'anic StudiesConcluding Remarks Nevin Reda (bio) To conclude, this roundtable has demonstrated a variety of new and continuing directions in gender-based research in qurʾanic studies. It suggests that the field is diverse and pluralistic, not always univocal, and often engaging a plethora of methodological and theoretical frameworks. Feminist and other gender-based Qurʾan scholarship has moved beyond the immediate confines of the Qurʾan and has widened the scope of scholarly investigations to encompass tafsīr (exegesis), hadith, āthār (reports transmitted from the first two generations of Muslims), and other extra-qurʾanic corpora, as can be noted in the work of Hadia Mubarak, Rahel Fischbach, and Yasmin Amin in this volume (and Fatima Mernissi before that).1 It continues to be in conversation with multiple discourses and conversation partners, including non-Muslim Western academia, as one can note in Halla Attallah's engagement with the ideas of Rosemarie Garland-Thomson on the intersection of femininity and disability. While in the past feminist engagement focused more on masculinist constructions of women and femininity, today women scholars are seeing the need to critique constructions of masculinity and to offer their own readings of ideal masculinity, as one can note in the work of Yasmin Amin (and the broader work of Omaima Abou-Bakr).2 The tightrope that faith-based Muslim women scholars must walk when introducing constructive methodologies and theologically grounded epistemes into largely "secular" academic settings, while at the same time maintaining credibility in practical, faith-based settings, is eloquently addressed in the contributions of Celene Ibrahim and Mahjabeen Dhala. One can note the connection between Muslim women's lived experiences and the [End Page 101] questions that Islamic feminist scholars pose in Mulki Al-Sharmani's ethnographic research and Roshan Iqbal's arguments for reappraising fiqh related to sexual ethics. The spiritual turn is vividly illustrated in the scholarship of Amira Abou-Taleb and Omaima Abou-Bakr, who highlight the importance of the aesthetic and spiritual dimensions, as well as their connection to the Qurʾan's moral foundation, including the central value of justice. The focus on language and intra-qurʾanic coherence remains alive and well, as one can note in the work of Abla Hasan, who embodies an intertextual Qurʾan-centric hermeneutic, highlighting the gap between the literal text of the Qurʾan and heritage-based interpretations. Always, however, we remain conscious of the debt we owe to those who established the cornerstones of Muslim women's Qurʾan scholarship before us, upon whose work we build and from whose accomplishments we take inspiration. Foremost among these trailblazers are amina wadud, Asma Barlas, Riffat Hassan, and Azizah al-Hibri, who established this field in the Western academy, and Omaima Abou-Bakr, who works in both local Arabic-speaking and international contexts. In this field, these are our "shuyūkh" (elders) who have opened the door of women's scholarly investigation into the Qurʾan and paved the way for women to become Qurʾan scholars. Their work has made so many of these new directions possible. Where does justice stand within these emerging methodologies and epistemologies? In the tradition of amina wadud and Asma Barlas, I see the Qurʾan conveying a message of justice, especially gender justice, although I do recognize that there can be different, competing understandings of justice within the plethora of discourses in contemporary academia. I see the Qurʾan contributing highly sophisticated notions of justice, carefully weighing between two concepts: qist (equity, social justice) and 'adl (justice, equality), and I recognize the tensions between the two and how this tension can promote growth in terms of actualizing deeper experiences of justice. If one can consider 'adl to be a jalālī (majestic) manifestation of justice due to its nuance of absoluteness and finality, qisṭ would be a jamālī (beautiful) one, since it incorporates raḥma (compassion) for the vulnerable (as one can see in the case of widows and orphans in Q 4:3, for instance). The treatment of some of these sophisticated notions of justice in the context of relations between men and women suggests that this is...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, the oldest interdisciplinary, inter-religious feminist academic journal in religious studies, is a channel for the publication of feminist scholarship in religion and a forum for discussion and dialogue among women and men of differing feminist perspectives. Active electronic and combined electronic/print subscriptions to this journal include access to the online backrun.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信