伊斯兰女性主义解释学:在学术与生活现实之间

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Mulki Al-Sharmani
{"title":"伊斯兰女性主义解释学:在学术与生活现实之间","authors":"Mulki Al-Sharmani","doi":"10.2979/jfemistudreli.39.2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Islamic Feminist HermeneuticsBetween Scholarship and Lived Realities Mulki Al-Sharmani (bio) One critique leveled at Islamic feminist scholarship is that it is divorced from the realities of lay Muslim women.1 But is it? If I ask a Muslim woman in rural Egypt or in Finland if she has heard of Saʾdiyya Shaikh's tafsīr of praxis or amina wadud's notion of tawḥīd as social praxis, the answer might be no.2 But there is another way to pose the question: Do the questions that Islamic feminist scholars bring to Islamic texts speak to ordinary women? Can we find similarities between the interpretive engagements of these scholars and lay women's pursuits of religious meanings? My answer would be yes. My research since 2013 comprises textual analyses of the works of Islamic feminist scholars, collaborative writings with some of these scholars, and ethnographic research on lay Muslim women in Finland and Egypt who are engaging with the Qurʾan and the interpretive tradition as they live their daily lives. I argue that both Islamic feminist scholars and the lay women I have studied are equally concerned with making sense of the Qurʾan's key theological and ethical teachings and see them as integral to informing Muslim gender norms. Both grapple with the text and appreciate its aesthetics, seeing the latter as part of its overall message of beauty and justice. [End Page 95] Two examples illustrate these connections. In her scholarly writings on Sūrat al-Raḥmān, Omaima Abou-Bakr foregrounds the affective experience of encountering the Qurʾan and shows how central qurʾanic principles such as moral beauty, justice, and harmony are highlighted through the aesthetics of the text and traced back to the Oneness of God who is the source of existence in its multiplicity and diversity. Nadia, a fifty-year-old divorced Egyptian woman, grapples with patriarchal interpretations that justify polygamy, domestic violence, and child marriage. She has not read any Islamic feminist scholarship or engaged in gender activism. She is a Muslim who believes the Qurʾan is divine and normative. I have been conducting life history interviews with Nadia over two years.3 She shares how in the past she read the Qurʾan without tadabbur (reflection), but now she reflects on what she reads. In one of our interviews, she describes her reading practice: \"I feel God is telling me about himself. I see the nature around me, and I read the sura [Sūrat al-Raḥmān], and I feel God. I feel God's power and justice. And it is so musical.\" While Nadia is not using the same conceptual language as Abou-Bakr, she captures the same understanding of qurʾanic ethos and affect. She is also making connections between what she sees and experiences around her (nature) and what she reads in the text. Life's trials such as losing a son to a car accident and an abusive marriage are also a lens through which she engages with the Qurʾan. Like Islamic feminist scholars, Nadia also reads Q 4:34 in light of her knowledge of other parts of the Qurʾan that talk about God's justice and men's and women's equal accountability. She rejects the idea of Qurʾan-sanctioned wife beating. Further, she argues that Prophet Muḥammad never beat a woman and that his wife Aisha said, \"his character was the Qurʾan.\" Nadia's reading draws on some elements of the holistic, ethically oriented methodologies employed in Islamic feminist hermeneutics. One could counterargue that she is explaining away the tension in the text—a critique that is also leveled against Islamic feminist scholars.4 But my larger reflection point is that for Nadia and other lay women, the question of gender justice is interconnected with theology and ethics. Underlying their grappling with religiously based gender injustice are similar questions that also guide Islamic feminist scholars: What do we know about the nature of God and God's attributes? What is our purpose on this earth? And how does gender (injustice) speak to these larger questions? These shared questions between scholars and...","PeriodicalId":44347,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Islamic Feminist Hermeneutics: Between Scholarship and Lived Realities\",\"authors\":\"Mulki Al-Sharmani\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/jfemistudreli.39.2.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Islamic Feminist HermeneuticsBetween Scholarship and Lived Realities Mulki Al-Sharmani (bio) One critique leveled at Islamic feminist scholarship is that it is divorced from the realities of lay Muslim women.1 But is it? If I ask a Muslim woman in rural Egypt or in Finland if she has heard of Saʾdiyya Shaikh's tafsīr of praxis or amina wadud's notion of tawḥīd as social praxis, the answer might be no.2 But there is another way to pose the question: Do the questions that Islamic feminist scholars bring to Islamic texts speak to ordinary women? Can we find similarities between the interpretive engagements of these scholars and lay women's pursuits of religious meanings? My answer would be yes. My research since 2013 comprises textual analyses of the works of Islamic feminist scholars, collaborative writings with some of these scholars, and ethnographic research on lay Muslim women in Finland and Egypt who are engaging with the Qurʾan and the interpretive tradition as they live their daily lives. I argue that both Islamic feminist scholars and the lay women I have studied are equally concerned with making sense of the Qurʾan's key theological and ethical teachings and see them as integral to informing Muslim gender norms. Both grapple with the text and appreciate its aesthetics, seeing the latter as part of its overall message of beauty and justice. [End Page 95] Two examples illustrate these connections. In her scholarly writings on Sūrat al-Raḥmān, Omaima Abou-Bakr foregrounds the affective experience of encountering the Qurʾan and shows how central qurʾanic principles such as moral beauty, justice, and harmony are highlighted through the aesthetics of the text and traced back to the Oneness of God who is the source of existence in its multiplicity and diversity. Nadia, a fifty-year-old divorced Egyptian woman, grapples with patriarchal interpretations that justify polygamy, domestic violence, and child marriage. She has not read any Islamic feminist scholarship or engaged in gender activism. She is a Muslim who believes the Qurʾan is divine and normative. I have been conducting life history interviews with Nadia over two years.3 She shares how in the past she read the Qurʾan without tadabbur (reflection), but now she reflects on what she reads. In one of our interviews, she describes her reading practice: \\\"I feel God is telling me about himself. I see the nature around me, and I read the sura [Sūrat al-Raḥmān], and I feel God. I feel God's power and justice. And it is so musical.\\\" While Nadia is not using the same conceptual language as Abou-Bakr, she captures the same understanding of qurʾanic ethos and affect. She is also making connections between what she sees and experiences around her (nature) and what she reads in the text. Life's trials such as losing a son to a car accident and an abusive marriage are also a lens through which she engages with the Qurʾan. Like Islamic feminist scholars, Nadia also reads Q 4:34 in light of her knowledge of other parts of the Qurʾan that talk about God's justice and men's and women's equal accountability. She rejects the idea of Qurʾan-sanctioned wife beating. Further, she argues that Prophet Muḥammad never beat a woman and that his wife Aisha said, \\\"his character was the Qurʾan.\\\" Nadia's reading draws on some elements of the holistic, ethically oriented methodologies employed in Islamic feminist hermeneutics. One could counterargue that she is explaining away the tension in the text—a critique that is also leveled against Islamic feminist scholars.4 But my larger reflection point is that for Nadia and other lay women, the question of gender justice is interconnected with theology and ethics. Underlying their grappling with religiously based gender injustice are similar questions that also guide Islamic feminist scholars: What do we know about the nature of God and God's attributes? What is our purpose on this earth? And how does gender (injustice) speak to these larger questions? These shared questions between scholars and...\",\"PeriodicalId\":44347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/jfemistudreli.39.2.15\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/jfemistudreli.39.2.15","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伊斯兰女权主义诠释学在学术与生活现实之间Mulki Al-Sharmani对伊斯兰女权主义的一种批评是,它脱离了世俗穆斯林妇女的现实但这是真的吗?如果我问一位生活在埃及或芬兰农村的穆斯林妇女,她是否听说过萨·迪雅·谢赫(Sa - diyya Shaikh)的实践理论或阿米娜·瓦杜德(amina wadud)的tawḥīd作为社会实践的概念,答案可能是第二但还有另一种方式来提出这个问题:伊斯兰女权主义学者在伊斯兰文本中提出的问题是针对普通女性的吗?我们能否在这些学者的阐释与世俗女性对宗教意义的追求之间找到相似之处?我的回答是肯定的。自2013年以来,我的研究包括对伊斯兰女权主义学者作品的文本分析,与其中一些学者的合作着作,以及对芬兰和埃及的非专业穆斯林妇女的民族志研究,这些妇女在日常生活中参与古兰经和解释传统。我认为,伊斯兰女权主义学者和我研究过的外行女性都同样关心理解《古兰经》的关键神学和伦理教义,并将它们视为传达穆斯林性别规范的不可或缺的部分。两者都努力与文本并欣赏其美学,将后者视为其整体信息的一部分,即美与正义。两个例子说明了这些联系。在她关于Sūrat al-Raḥmān的学术著作中,Omaima Abou-Bakr强调了与《古兰经》相遇的情感体验,并展示了《古兰经》的核心原则,如道德之美、正义和和谐,是如何通过文本的美学得到强调的,并追溯到上帝的一体性,上帝是其多样性和多样性的存在之源。五十岁的纳迪亚是一名离过婚的埃及妇女,她在为一夫多妻、家庭暴力和童婚辩护的男权解释中挣扎。她没有读过任何伊斯兰女权主义学术著作,也没有参与过性别激进主义活动。她是一名穆斯林,相信《古兰经》是神圣和规范的。两年多来,我一直在采访娜迪亚的生活史她分享了过去她是如何在没有tadabbur(反思)的情况下阅读《古兰经》的,但现在她对所读的内容进行了反思。在我们的一次采访中,她描述了她的阅读练习:“我觉得上帝在告诉我关于他自己的事情。我看到我周围的自然,我读经文[Sūrat al-Raḥmān],我感觉到了上帝。我感受到神的大能和公义。而且很有音乐性。”虽然纳迪亚使用的概念语言与阿布·贝克尔不同,但她对古兰经的精神和情感有着同样的理解。她也在她所看到的和她周围的经历(自然)和她在文本中读到的东西之间建立联系。生活中的磨难,比如在车祸中失去儿子和婚姻中的虐待,也是她接触《古兰经》的一个镜头。像伊斯兰女权主义学者一样,纳迪亚也根据她对《古兰经》中其他部分的了解来阅读《古兰经》4:34,这些部分谈到了上帝的正义和男女平等的责任。她反对《古兰经》允许的殴打妻子的做法。此外,她认为先知Muḥammad从不打女人,他的妻子阿伊莎说,“他的性格是古兰经。”纳迪亚的阅读借鉴了伊斯兰女权主义解释学中采用的整体的、以伦理为导向的方法的一些元素。有人可以反驳说,她是在解释文本中的紧张关系——这种批评也针对伊斯兰女权主义学者但我更大的反思点是,对于纳迪亚和其他非专业女性来说,性别正义的问题与神学和伦理学是相互关联的。在他们与宗教性别不平等斗争的基础上,也存在着类似的问题,这些问题也指导着伊斯兰女权主义学者:我们对上帝的本质和上帝的属性了解多少?我们在这个世界上的目的是什么?性别(不公正)如何说明这些更大的问题?这些是学者和……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Islamic Feminist Hermeneutics: Between Scholarship and Lived Realities
Islamic Feminist HermeneuticsBetween Scholarship and Lived Realities Mulki Al-Sharmani (bio) One critique leveled at Islamic feminist scholarship is that it is divorced from the realities of lay Muslim women.1 But is it? If I ask a Muslim woman in rural Egypt or in Finland if she has heard of Saʾdiyya Shaikh's tafsīr of praxis or amina wadud's notion of tawḥīd as social praxis, the answer might be no.2 But there is another way to pose the question: Do the questions that Islamic feminist scholars bring to Islamic texts speak to ordinary women? Can we find similarities between the interpretive engagements of these scholars and lay women's pursuits of religious meanings? My answer would be yes. My research since 2013 comprises textual analyses of the works of Islamic feminist scholars, collaborative writings with some of these scholars, and ethnographic research on lay Muslim women in Finland and Egypt who are engaging with the Qurʾan and the interpretive tradition as they live their daily lives. I argue that both Islamic feminist scholars and the lay women I have studied are equally concerned with making sense of the Qurʾan's key theological and ethical teachings and see them as integral to informing Muslim gender norms. Both grapple with the text and appreciate its aesthetics, seeing the latter as part of its overall message of beauty and justice. [End Page 95] Two examples illustrate these connections. In her scholarly writings on Sūrat al-Raḥmān, Omaima Abou-Bakr foregrounds the affective experience of encountering the Qurʾan and shows how central qurʾanic principles such as moral beauty, justice, and harmony are highlighted through the aesthetics of the text and traced back to the Oneness of God who is the source of existence in its multiplicity and diversity. Nadia, a fifty-year-old divorced Egyptian woman, grapples with patriarchal interpretations that justify polygamy, domestic violence, and child marriage. She has not read any Islamic feminist scholarship or engaged in gender activism. She is a Muslim who believes the Qurʾan is divine and normative. I have been conducting life history interviews with Nadia over two years.3 She shares how in the past she read the Qurʾan without tadabbur (reflection), but now she reflects on what she reads. In one of our interviews, she describes her reading practice: "I feel God is telling me about himself. I see the nature around me, and I read the sura [Sūrat al-Raḥmān], and I feel God. I feel God's power and justice. And it is so musical." While Nadia is not using the same conceptual language as Abou-Bakr, she captures the same understanding of qurʾanic ethos and affect. She is also making connections between what she sees and experiences around her (nature) and what she reads in the text. Life's trials such as losing a son to a car accident and an abusive marriage are also a lens through which she engages with the Qurʾan. Like Islamic feminist scholars, Nadia also reads Q 4:34 in light of her knowledge of other parts of the Qurʾan that talk about God's justice and men's and women's equal accountability. She rejects the idea of Qurʾan-sanctioned wife beating. Further, she argues that Prophet Muḥammad never beat a woman and that his wife Aisha said, "his character was the Qurʾan." Nadia's reading draws on some elements of the holistic, ethically oriented methodologies employed in Islamic feminist hermeneutics. One could counterargue that she is explaining away the tension in the text—a critique that is also leveled against Islamic feminist scholars.4 But my larger reflection point is that for Nadia and other lay women, the question of gender justice is interconnected with theology and ethics. Underlying their grappling with religiously based gender injustice are similar questions that also guide Islamic feminist scholars: What do we know about the nature of God and God's attributes? What is our purpose on this earth? And how does gender (injustice) speak to these larger questions? These shared questions between scholars and...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, the oldest interdisciplinary, inter-religious feminist academic journal in religious studies, is a channel for the publication of feminist scholarship in religion and a forum for discussion and dialogue among women and men of differing feminist perspectives. Active electronic and combined electronic/print subscriptions to this journal include access to the online backrun.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信