人类技术进步与神学人类学

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION
Victoria Lorrimar
{"title":"人类技术进步与神学人类学","authors":"Victoria Lorrimar","doi":"10.56315/pscf9-23lorrimar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HUMAN TECHNOLOGICAL ENHANCEMENT AND THEOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY by Victoria Lorrimar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 300 pages, bibliography, index. Hardcover; $120.00. ISBN: 9781316515020. *In her introduction, Victoria Lorrimar states that \"The goal of this book is to deepen our understanding of human creativity from a theological perspective, and to resource Christian theology (and more broadly the church) for reflecting on the possibilities for enhancing human capabilities through (plausible or far-fetched) technologies (p. 8).\" *Given the contemporary relevance of this topic, and that she writes \"within an (assumed) understanding of salvation as effected by God and not by us\" (p. 6), her work will be of special interest to a number of readers of this journal. *Lorrimar addresses the movement known as transhumanism and major themes associated with it: radical life extension, hedonic recalibration (replacement of pain and suffering by an abundance of \"good\" feelings), moral enhancement by technological or pharmacological means, and mind uploading. She notes that there is considerable diversity of aims within the transhumanist movement, and that not all those that endorse some of these enhancements would identify as transhumanists. *So how should Christian theology respond to technological enhancement of human beings? Lorrimar argues that the key is an understanding of human creativity in the context of the doctrine of creation, under the metaphor of \"co-creation.\" She rejects the view prevalent in many Christian circles that human technological enhancement constitutes \"playing God\" and should therefore be dismissed out of hand. Instead, she explores two broader models that might assist with developing an appropriate theological response. *The first model she discusses is the \"created co-creator\" model proposed by Philip Hefner. After explicating the model through citations from Hefner's works, she observes that \"his particular model contributes enormously to contemporary accounts that explicitly address questions of human technological enhancement\" (p. 133). Yet, while acknowledging the fruitfulness of Hefner's model, Lorrimar also notes a number of places where Hefner's model diverges from traditional Christian understandings regarding God and the nature of sin and evil. She also critiques his model for \"an overemphasis on rationality and neglect of the imagination\" (p. 134). *Lorrimar devotes a chapter to the importance of the imagination, and also refers to fiction works--especially science fiction--throughout her book. She contends that because \"the imagination takes a central place in ... transhumanist visions of the future ... a theological response will require attending to the imagination also\" (p. 135), and later states \"the central question of the present work is to consider how a greater focus on imagination might equip and expand current theological responses to the challenges of human enhancement\" (p. 169). *She then proceeds to discuss a second theological model by drawing on the writings of J. R. R. Tolkien, who created imaginative worlds within a framework which regarded each person as a \"sub-creator.\" Lorrimar contends that this model provides a foundation for addressing questions that are rarely addressed in discussions of human enhancement such as \"What is the good life?\" and \"What ought human flourishing to look like?\" At the same time, the use of Tolkien's model is complicated by his overall negative view of humanity's preoccupation with technology, seeing it as tending to destroy virtue (exemplified, for example, by a character like Saruman in the Lord of the Rings trilogy). She cites with approval the assessment of Gregory Peterson: \"To sub-create is to imitate or to work on what has already been thought out. It may imply initiative on the local level, but it reminds us that the master task always belongs to God. The implication of co-creator, however, is radically different, for it suggests that we are as much in control or responsible for creation as God is. It suggests that there is no blueprint for the future; the future is open, not determined (p. 201).\" *In the last part of the book, Lorrimar develops a synthesis which draws on the strengths of both models as well as the work of others. \"If a theology of humans as co-creators is to contribute to reflection on human enhancement technologies, it must be embedded within a context that attends to virtue\" (p. 217). Lorrimar calls this synthesis \"a vision of moral co-creation,\" which she develops in the form of ten commitments (stated in summary fashion on p. 297): \"1. Humans are products of a creative \"evolutionary\" process. *2. Creativity is central to human agency and responsibility. *3. Human creativity is modeled on divine creativity. *4. Scientific insights should be respected and incorporated into an understanding and description of what it means to be human, without reducing theological and philosophical claims to scientific ones. *5. Technology is a legitimate exercise of human co-creativity. *6. Humans are storytellers and myth makers at their core, with narrative central to the way in which we understand the world. *7. The formation of the moral imagination requires our attention, including the diversity of stories which shape our moral imaginary. *8. Embodiment is crucial for imagination and understanding. *9. Technology must not instrumentalize non-human nature. *10. Elements of the vision of transcendence inherent in transhumanist thought can be reclaimed as central to a Christian imagination. *She then applies this synthesis to the various themes listed earlier that arise from human enhancement technologies. *This book grew out of the author's doctoral research under Alister McGrath at Oxford University, and that is arguably the source of a major weakness for the general reader. Of necessity, a doctoral dissertation must interact broadly with existing literature in the field; but for the reader who is not a specialist this can obscure the central ideas--at least that's what I found when reading the book, and one which I suspect other readers would be likely to experience as well. That having been said, the general question the book addresses is an important one, and Lorrimar's exploring of issues foundational to the development of a fruitful theological approach would likely be relevant to someone wishing to develop a theological response to some aspect of human enhancement. In my opinion, the Christian public would benefit more from a second book by this author that seeks to make the central ideas more accessible to the nonspecialist, perhaps drawing on emphases in her first and final two chapters. *Reviewed by Russell Bjork, Professor Emeritus of Computer Science, Gordon College, Wenham, MA 01984.","PeriodicalId":53927,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Technological Enhancement and Theological Anthropology\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Lorrimar\",\"doi\":\"10.56315/pscf9-23lorrimar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"HUMAN TECHNOLOGICAL ENHANCEMENT AND THEOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY by Victoria Lorrimar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 300 pages, bibliography, index. Hardcover; $120.00. ISBN: 9781316515020. *In her introduction, Victoria Lorrimar states that \\\"The goal of this book is to deepen our understanding of human creativity from a theological perspective, and to resource Christian theology (and more broadly the church) for reflecting on the possibilities for enhancing human capabilities through (plausible or far-fetched) technologies (p. 8).\\\" *Given the contemporary relevance of this topic, and that she writes \\\"within an (assumed) understanding of salvation as effected by God and not by us\\\" (p. 6), her work will be of special interest to a number of readers of this journal. *Lorrimar addresses the movement known as transhumanism and major themes associated with it: radical life extension, hedonic recalibration (replacement of pain and suffering by an abundance of \\\"good\\\" feelings), moral enhancement by technological or pharmacological means, and mind uploading. She notes that there is considerable diversity of aims within the transhumanist movement, and that not all those that endorse some of these enhancements would identify as transhumanists. *So how should Christian theology respond to technological enhancement of human beings? Lorrimar argues that the key is an understanding of human creativity in the context of the doctrine of creation, under the metaphor of \\\"co-creation.\\\" She rejects the view prevalent in many Christian circles that human technological enhancement constitutes \\\"playing God\\\" and should therefore be dismissed out of hand. Instead, she explores two broader models that might assist with developing an appropriate theological response. *The first model she discusses is the \\\"created co-creator\\\" model proposed by Philip Hefner. After explicating the model through citations from Hefner's works, she observes that \\\"his particular model contributes enormously to contemporary accounts that explicitly address questions of human technological enhancement\\\" (p. 133). Yet, while acknowledging the fruitfulness of Hefner's model, Lorrimar also notes a number of places where Hefner's model diverges from traditional Christian understandings regarding God and the nature of sin and evil. She also critiques his model for \\\"an overemphasis on rationality and neglect of the imagination\\\" (p. 134). *Lorrimar devotes a chapter to the importance of the imagination, and also refers to fiction works--especially science fiction--throughout her book. She contends that because \\\"the imagination takes a central place in ... transhumanist visions of the future ... a theological response will require attending to the imagination also\\\" (p. 135), and later states \\\"the central question of the present work is to consider how a greater focus on imagination might equip and expand current theological responses to the challenges of human enhancement\\\" (p. 169). *She then proceeds to discuss a second theological model by drawing on the writings of J. R. R. Tolkien, who created imaginative worlds within a framework which regarded each person as a \\\"sub-creator.\\\" Lorrimar contends that this model provides a foundation for addressing questions that are rarely addressed in discussions of human enhancement such as \\\"What is the good life?\\\" and \\\"What ought human flourishing to look like?\\\" At the same time, the use of Tolkien's model is complicated by his overall negative view of humanity's preoccupation with technology, seeing it as tending to destroy virtue (exemplified, for example, by a character like Saruman in the Lord of the Rings trilogy). She cites with approval the assessment of Gregory Peterson: \\\"To sub-create is to imitate or to work on what has already been thought out. It may imply initiative on the local level, but it reminds us that the master task always belongs to God. The implication of co-creator, however, is radically different, for it suggests that we are as much in control or responsible for creation as God is. It suggests that there is no blueprint for the future; the future is open, not determined (p. 201).\\\" *In the last part of the book, Lorrimar develops a synthesis which draws on the strengths of both models as well as the work of others. \\\"If a theology of humans as co-creators is to contribute to reflection on human enhancement technologies, it must be embedded within a context that attends to virtue\\\" (p. 217). Lorrimar calls this synthesis \\\"a vision of moral co-creation,\\\" which she develops in the form of ten commitments (stated in summary fashion on p. 297): \\\"1. Humans are products of a creative \\\"evolutionary\\\" process. *2. Creativity is central to human agency and responsibility. *3. Human creativity is modeled on divine creativity. *4. Scientific insights should be respected and incorporated into an understanding and description of what it means to be human, without reducing theological and philosophical claims to scientific ones. *5. Technology is a legitimate exercise of human co-creativity. *6. Humans are storytellers and myth makers at their core, with narrative central to the way in which we understand the world. *7. The formation of the moral imagination requires our attention, including the diversity of stories which shape our moral imaginary. *8. Embodiment is crucial for imagination and understanding. *9. Technology must not instrumentalize non-human nature. *10. Elements of the vision of transcendence inherent in transhumanist thought can be reclaimed as central to a Christian imagination. *She then applies this synthesis to the various themes listed earlier that arise from human enhancement technologies. *This book grew out of the author's doctoral research under Alister McGrath at Oxford University, and that is arguably the source of a major weakness for the general reader. Of necessity, a doctoral dissertation must interact broadly with existing literature in the field; but for the reader who is not a specialist this can obscure the central ideas--at least that's what I found when reading the book, and one which I suspect other readers would be likely to experience as well. That having been said, the general question the book addresses is an important one, and Lorrimar's exploring of issues foundational to the development of a fruitful theological approach would likely be relevant to someone wishing to develop a theological response to some aspect of human enhancement. In my opinion, the Christian public would benefit more from a second book by this author that seeks to make the central ideas more accessible to the nonspecialist, perhaps drawing on emphases in her first and final two chapters. *Reviewed by Russell Bjork, Professor Emeritus of Computer Science, Gordon College, Wenham, MA 01984.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf9-23lorrimar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56315/pscf9-23lorrimar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

维多利亚·洛里玛著的《人类技术提升与神学人类学》。剑桥,英国:剑桥大学出版社,2022。300页,参考书目,索引。精装书;120.00美元。ISBN: 9781316515020。*在她的引言中,Victoria Lorrimar说:“这本书的目标是从神学的角度加深我们对人类创造力的理解,并为基督教神学(以及更广泛的教会)提供资源,以反思通过(看似合理或牵强的)技术提高人类能力的可能性(第8页)。”考虑到这一主题的当代相关性,以及她“在(假设的)理解救赎是由上帝而不是由我们所影响的”(第6页),她的作品将对本杂志的许多读者特别感兴趣。*Lorrimar讲述了被称为超人类主义的运动,以及与之相关的主要主题:激进的延长寿命、享乐重新校准(用丰富的“好”感觉取代痛苦和折磨)、通过技术或药物手段提高道德,以及意识上传。她指出,在超人类主义运动中,目标有相当大的多样性,并不是所有支持这些改进的人都被认为是超人类主义者。*那么基督教神学应该如何回应人类的技术进步?Lorrimar认为,关键是在创造论的背景下,在“共同创造”的隐喻下,理解人类的创造力。她反对在许多基督教圈子中流行的观点,即人类的技术进步构成了“扮演上帝”,因此应该立即被驳回。相反,她探索了两种更广泛的模式,可能有助于形成适当的神学回应。*她讨论的第一个模型是菲利普·海夫纳提出的“被创造的共同创造者”模型。在通过引用赫夫纳的著作来解释这个模型之后,她观察到“他的特殊模型对明确解决人类技术增强问题的当代描述贡献巨大”(第133页)。然而,在承认海夫纳模式硕果累累的同时,洛里马尔也注意到,海夫纳的模式在许多地方偏离了传统基督教对上帝以及罪恶和邪恶本质的理解。她还批评他的模式“过分强调理性而忽视想象力”(第134页)。*洛里玛用了一章来阐述想象力的重要性,在她的书中也提到了小说作品,尤其是科幻小说。她认为,因为“想象力在……未来的超人类主义愿景……神学上的回应也需要关注想象力”(第135页),后来又说“当前工作的中心问题是考虑对想象力的更大关注可能如何装备和扩展当前神学对人类增强挑战的回应”(第169页)。*她接着通过引用j.r.r.托尔金的作品讨论了第二种神学模式,托尔金在将每个人视为“次级创造者”的框架内创造了充满想象力的世界。Lorrimar认为,这一模型为解决在人类增强的讨论中很少提到的问题提供了基础,比如“什么是美好的生活?”和“人类繁荣应该是什么样子?”与此同时,托尔金的模型的使用也因为他对人类对科技的关注的整体负面看法而变得复杂,他认为科技倾向于摧毁美德(例如,《指环王》三部曲中的萨鲁曼角色就是一个例子)。她赞同地引用了格雷戈里·彼得森(Gregory Peterson)的评价:“次级创造就是模仿或在已经想到的东西上工作。它可能意味着在地方层面上的主动性,但它提醒我们,主要的任务永远属于上帝。然而,共同创造者的含义是完全不同的,因为它表明我们和上帝一样控制或负责创造。它表明,未来没有蓝图;未来是开放的,不是确定的(第201页)。*在书的最后一部分,Lorrimar开发了一种综合模型,利用了两种模型的优势以及其他人的工作。“如果人类作为共同创造者的神学要有助于对人类增强技术的反思,那么它必须嵌入到一个关注美德的背景中”(第217页)。Lorrimar称这种综合为“道德共同创造的愿景”,她以十项承诺的形式发展了这一愿景(在297页以总结的方式陈述):人类是创造性“进化”过程的产物。* 2。创造力是人类能动性和责任感的核心。* 3。人类的创造力是以神的创造力为模型的。* 4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Technological Enhancement and Theological Anthropology
HUMAN TECHNOLOGICAL ENHANCEMENT AND THEOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY by Victoria Lorrimar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 300 pages, bibliography, index. Hardcover; $120.00. ISBN: 9781316515020. *In her introduction, Victoria Lorrimar states that "The goal of this book is to deepen our understanding of human creativity from a theological perspective, and to resource Christian theology (and more broadly the church) for reflecting on the possibilities for enhancing human capabilities through (plausible or far-fetched) technologies (p. 8)." *Given the contemporary relevance of this topic, and that she writes "within an (assumed) understanding of salvation as effected by God and not by us" (p. 6), her work will be of special interest to a number of readers of this journal. *Lorrimar addresses the movement known as transhumanism and major themes associated with it: radical life extension, hedonic recalibration (replacement of pain and suffering by an abundance of "good" feelings), moral enhancement by technological or pharmacological means, and mind uploading. She notes that there is considerable diversity of aims within the transhumanist movement, and that not all those that endorse some of these enhancements would identify as transhumanists. *So how should Christian theology respond to technological enhancement of human beings? Lorrimar argues that the key is an understanding of human creativity in the context of the doctrine of creation, under the metaphor of "co-creation." She rejects the view prevalent in many Christian circles that human technological enhancement constitutes "playing God" and should therefore be dismissed out of hand. Instead, she explores two broader models that might assist with developing an appropriate theological response. *The first model she discusses is the "created co-creator" model proposed by Philip Hefner. After explicating the model through citations from Hefner's works, she observes that "his particular model contributes enormously to contemporary accounts that explicitly address questions of human technological enhancement" (p. 133). Yet, while acknowledging the fruitfulness of Hefner's model, Lorrimar also notes a number of places where Hefner's model diverges from traditional Christian understandings regarding God and the nature of sin and evil. She also critiques his model for "an overemphasis on rationality and neglect of the imagination" (p. 134). *Lorrimar devotes a chapter to the importance of the imagination, and also refers to fiction works--especially science fiction--throughout her book. She contends that because "the imagination takes a central place in ... transhumanist visions of the future ... a theological response will require attending to the imagination also" (p. 135), and later states "the central question of the present work is to consider how a greater focus on imagination might equip and expand current theological responses to the challenges of human enhancement" (p. 169). *She then proceeds to discuss a second theological model by drawing on the writings of J. R. R. Tolkien, who created imaginative worlds within a framework which regarded each person as a "sub-creator." Lorrimar contends that this model provides a foundation for addressing questions that are rarely addressed in discussions of human enhancement such as "What is the good life?" and "What ought human flourishing to look like?" At the same time, the use of Tolkien's model is complicated by his overall negative view of humanity's preoccupation with technology, seeing it as tending to destroy virtue (exemplified, for example, by a character like Saruman in the Lord of the Rings trilogy). She cites with approval the assessment of Gregory Peterson: "To sub-create is to imitate or to work on what has already been thought out. It may imply initiative on the local level, but it reminds us that the master task always belongs to God. The implication of co-creator, however, is radically different, for it suggests that we are as much in control or responsible for creation as God is. It suggests that there is no blueprint for the future; the future is open, not determined (p. 201)." *In the last part of the book, Lorrimar develops a synthesis which draws on the strengths of both models as well as the work of others. "If a theology of humans as co-creators is to contribute to reflection on human enhancement technologies, it must be embedded within a context that attends to virtue" (p. 217). Lorrimar calls this synthesis "a vision of moral co-creation," which she develops in the form of ten commitments (stated in summary fashion on p. 297): "1. Humans are products of a creative "evolutionary" process. *2. Creativity is central to human agency and responsibility. *3. Human creativity is modeled on divine creativity. *4. Scientific insights should be respected and incorporated into an understanding and description of what it means to be human, without reducing theological and philosophical claims to scientific ones. *5. Technology is a legitimate exercise of human co-creativity. *6. Humans are storytellers and myth makers at their core, with narrative central to the way in which we understand the world. *7. The formation of the moral imagination requires our attention, including the diversity of stories which shape our moral imaginary. *8. Embodiment is crucial for imagination and understanding. *9. Technology must not instrumentalize non-human nature. *10. Elements of the vision of transcendence inherent in transhumanist thought can be reclaimed as central to a Christian imagination. *She then applies this synthesis to the various themes listed earlier that arise from human enhancement technologies. *This book grew out of the author's doctoral research under Alister McGrath at Oxford University, and that is arguably the source of a major weakness for the general reader. Of necessity, a doctoral dissertation must interact broadly with existing literature in the field; but for the reader who is not a specialist this can obscure the central ideas--at least that's what I found when reading the book, and one which I suspect other readers would be likely to experience as well. That having been said, the general question the book addresses is an important one, and Lorrimar's exploring of issues foundational to the development of a fruitful theological approach would likely be relevant to someone wishing to develop a theological response to some aspect of human enhancement. In my opinion, the Christian public would benefit more from a second book by this author that seeks to make the central ideas more accessible to the nonspecialist, perhaps drawing on emphases in her first and final two chapters. *Reviewed by Russell Bjork, Professor Emeritus of Computer Science, Gordon College, Wenham, MA 01984.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
57.10%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信