人类连接组的枢纽能否与扩散MRI一致地识别?

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Mehul Gajwani, Stuart J. Oldham, James C. Pang, Aurina Arnatkevičiūtė, Jeggan Tiego, Mark A. Bellgrove, Alex Fornito
{"title":"人类连接组的枢纽能否与扩散MRI一致地识别?","authors":"Mehul Gajwani, Stuart J. Oldham, James C. Pang, Aurina Arnatkevičiūtė, Jeggan Tiego, Mark A. Bellgrove, Alex Fornito","doi":"10.1162/netn_a_00324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recent years have seen a surge in the use of diffusion MRI to map connectomes in humans, paralleled by a similar increase in processing and analysis choices. Yet these different steps and their effects are rarely compared systematically. Here, in a healthy young adult population (n = 294), we characterized the impact of a range of analysis pipelines on one widely studied property of the human connectome: its degree distribution. We evaluated the effects of 40 pipelines (comparing common choices of parcellation, streamline seeding, tractography algorithm, and streamline propagation constraint) and 44 group-representative connectome reconstruction schemes on highly connected hub regions. We found that hub location is highly variable between pipelines. The choice of parcellation has a major influence on hub architecture, and hub connectivity is highly correlated with regional surface area in most of the assessed pipelines (ρ > 0.70 in 69% of the pipelines), particularly when using weighted networks. Overall, our results demonstrate the need for prudent decision-making when processing diffusion MRI data, and for carefully considering how different processing choices can influence connectome organization.","PeriodicalId":48520,"journal":{"name":"Network Neuroscience","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can hubs of the human connectome be identified consistently with diffusion MRI?\",\"authors\":\"Mehul Gajwani, Stuart J. Oldham, James C. Pang, Aurina Arnatkevičiūtė, Jeggan Tiego, Mark A. Bellgrove, Alex Fornito\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/netn_a_00324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Recent years have seen a surge in the use of diffusion MRI to map connectomes in humans, paralleled by a similar increase in processing and analysis choices. Yet these different steps and their effects are rarely compared systematically. Here, in a healthy young adult population (n = 294), we characterized the impact of a range of analysis pipelines on one widely studied property of the human connectome: its degree distribution. We evaluated the effects of 40 pipelines (comparing common choices of parcellation, streamline seeding, tractography algorithm, and streamline propagation constraint) and 44 group-representative connectome reconstruction schemes on highly connected hub regions. We found that hub location is highly variable between pipelines. The choice of parcellation has a major influence on hub architecture, and hub connectivity is highly correlated with regional surface area in most of the assessed pipelines (ρ > 0.70 in 69% of the pipelines), particularly when using weighted networks. Overall, our results demonstrate the need for prudent decision-making when processing diffusion MRI data, and for carefully considering how different processing choices can influence connectome organization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Network Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"215 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Network Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00324\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Network Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,扩散核磁共振成像在人类连接体图谱中的应用激增,与此同时,处理和分析选择也有类似的增加。然而,很少有人系统地比较这些不同的步骤及其效果。在这里,在一个健康的年轻成人人群(n = 294)中,我们描述了一系列分析管道对一个被广泛研究的人类连接组属性的影响:它的程度分布。我们评估了40个管道(比较了分组、流线播种、通道成像算法和流线传播约束的常见选择)和44个具有组代表性的连接体重建方案在高度连接的枢纽区域的效果。我们发现轮毂位置在管道之间变化很大。分组的选择对枢纽结构有重大影响,在大多数评估的管道中,枢纽连通性与区域表面积高度相关(ρ >0.70(69%的管道),特别是在使用加权网络时。总的来说,我们的结果表明,在处理扩散MRI数据时需要谨慎的决策,并仔细考虑不同的处理选择如何影响连接体组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can hubs of the human connectome be identified consistently with diffusion MRI?
Abstract Recent years have seen a surge in the use of diffusion MRI to map connectomes in humans, paralleled by a similar increase in processing and analysis choices. Yet these different steps and their effects are rarely compared systematically. Here, in a healthy young adult population (n = 294), we characterized the impact of a range of analysis pipelines on one widely studied property of the human connectome: its degree distribution. We evaluated the effects of 40 pipelines (comparing common choices of parcellation, streamline seeding, tractography algorithm, and streamline propagation constraint) and 44 group-representative connectome reconstruction schemes on highly connected hub regions. We found that hub location is highly variable between pipelines. The choice of parcellation has a major influence on hub architecture, and hub connectivity is highly correlated with regional surface area in most of the assessed pipelines (ρ > 0.70 in 69% of the pipelines), particularly when using weighted networks. Overall, our results demonstrate the need for prudent decision-making when processing diffusion MRI data, and for carefully considering how different processing choices can influence connectome organization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Network Neuroscience
Network Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
68
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信