由高分辨率全球再分析数据集解析的对流层和平流层中尺度动能的对比

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Ziyi Li, Junhong Wei, Xinghua Bao, Y. Qiang Sun
{"title":"由高分辨率全球再分析数据集解析的对流层和平流层中尺度动能的对比","authors":"Ziyi Li, Junhong Wei, Xinghua Bao, Y. Qiang Sun","doi":"10.1002/qj.4605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract With the development of advanced data assimilation and computing techniques, many modern global reanalysis datasets aim to resolve the atmospheric mesoscale spectrum. However, large uncertainties remain with respect to the representation of mesoscale motions in these reanalysis datasets, for which a clear understanding is lacking. The above challenges have served as a strong motivation to reveal and quantify their mesoscale differences. This study presents the first comprehensive global intercomparison of the tropospheric and stratospheric mesoscale kinetic energy and its spectra over two selected periods of summer and winter events among six leading high‐resolution atmospheric reanalysis products, including ERA5, CRA, MERRA2, CFSv2, JRA‐55, and ERA‐I. A state‐of‐the‐art global operational model is adopted as a supplementary reference. Although all reanalysis datasets can reproduce broad distribution characteristics that are grossly consistent with the 9‐km model, there are substantial discrepancies among them in magnitudes. The ability to capture mesoscale signals is closely linked to their resolutions, but it is also impacted by other factors, including but not limited to the selected types of energy, seasons, altitudes, latitudes, model diffusions, parameterization schemes, moist condition, assimilation methods, and observation inputs. Moreover, all datasets illustrate conclusive behaviors for the prevalence of the rotational component in the troposphere, while only very few products fail to exhibit the dominance of the divergent component in the stratosphere. Overall, stratospheric ERA5 and CFSv2 outperform the other reanalysis datasets, and only these two can reproduce the feature of the canonical kinetic energy spectrum with a distinct shift from a steeper slope (~‐3) at lower wavenumbers to a shallower slope (~‐5/3) at higher wavenumbers. In addition, the relative disparities among datasets increase dramatically with height and they are more pronounced in the divergent component. It is also found that the correlations among these datasets are much weaker in the tropics. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":"29 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intercomparison of Tropospheric and Stratospheric Mesoscale Kinetic Energy Resolved by the High‐Resolution Global Reanalysis Datasets\",\"authors\":\"Ziyi Li, Junhong Wei, Xinghua Bao, Y. Qiang Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/qj.4605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract With the development of advanced data assimilation and computing techniques, many modern global reanalysis datasets aim to resolve the atmospheric mesoscale spectrum. However, large uncertainties remain with respect to the representation of mesoscale motions in these reanalysis datasets, for which a clear understanding is lacking. The above challenges have served as a strong motivation to reveal and quantify their mesoscale differences. This study presents the first comprehensive global intercomparison of the tropospheric and stratospheric mesoscale kinetic energy and its spectra over two selected periods of summer and winter events among six leading high‐resolution atmospheric reanalysis products, including ERA5, CRA, MERRA2, CFSv2, JRA‐55, and ERA‐I. A state‐of‐the‐art global operational model is adopted as a supplementary reference. Although all reanalysis datasets can reproduce broad distribution characteristics that are grossly consistent with the 9‐km model, there are substantial discrepancies among them in magnitudes. The ability to capture mesoscale signals is closely linked to their resolutions, but it is also impacted by other factors, including but not limited to the selected types of energy, seasons, altitudes, latitudes, model diffusions, parameterization schemes, moist condition, assimilation methods, and observation inputs. Moreover, all datasets illustrate conclusive behaviors for the prevalence of the rotational component in the troposphere, while only very few products fail to exhibit the dominance of the divergent component in the stratosphere. Overall, stratospheric ERA5 and CFSv2 outperform the other reanalysis datasets, and only these two can reproduce the feature of the canonical kinetic energy spectrum with a distinct shift from a steeper slope (~‐3) at lower wavenumbers to a shallower slope (~‐5/3) at higher wavenumbers. In addition, the relative disparities among datasets increase dramatically with height and they are more pronounced in the divergent component. It is also found that the correlations among these datasets are much weaker in the tropics. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4605\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4605","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着先进的数据同化和计算技术的发展,许多现代全球再分析数据集的目标都是解析大气中尺度光谱。然而,在这些再分析数据集中,关于中尺度运动的表示仍然存在很大的不确定性,对此缺乏明确的认识。上述挑战已成为揭示和量化它们中尺度差异的强烈动机。本研究首次利用ERA5、CRA、MERRA2、CFSv2、JRA‐55和ERA‐I等6个领先的高分辨率大气再分析产品,对夏季和冬季两个特定时期的对流层和平流层中尺度动能及其光谱进行了全面的全球对比。采用最先进的全球操作模型作为补充参考。尽管所有再分析数据集都能再现与9公里模式大致一致的广泛分布特征,但它们之间在量级上存在很大差异。捕获中尺度信号的能力与其分辨率密切相关,但也受到其他因素的影响,包括但不限于选定的能量类型、季节、海拔、纬度、模式扩散、参数化方案、潮湿条件、同化方法和观测输入。此外,所有数据集都表明对流层中旋转分量的普遍存在,而只有极少数产品没有显示出平流层中发散分量的主导地位。总体而言,平流层ERA5和CFSv2优于其他再分析数据集,并且只有这两个数据集能够再现典型动能谱的特征,并且在较低波数下斜率较陡(~‐3),在较高波数下斜率较浅(~‐5/3)。此外,数据集之间的相对差异随着高度的增加而急剧增加,并且在发散分量中更为明显。研究还发现,这些数据集之间的相关性在热带地区要弱得多。这篇文章受版权保护。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Intercomparison of Tropospheric and Stratospheric Mesoscale Kinetic Energy Resolved by the High‐Resolution Global Reanalysis Datasets

Intercomparison of Tropospheric and Stratospheric Mesoscale Kinetic Energy Resolved by the High‐Resolution Global Reanalysis Datasets
Abstract With the development of advanced data assimilation and computing techniques, many modern global reanalysis datasets aim to resolve the atmospheric mesoscale spectrum. However, large uncertainties remain with respect to the representation of mesoscale motions in these reanalysis datasets, for which a clear understanding is lacking. The above challenges have served as a strong motivation to reveal and quantify their mesoscale differences. This study presents the first comprehensive global intercomparison of the tropospheric and stratospheric mesoscale kinetic energy and its spectra over two selected periods of summer and winter events among six leading high‐resolution atmospheric reanalysis products, including ERA5, CRA, MERRA2, CFSv2, JRA‐55, and ERA‐I. A state‐of‐the‐art global operational model is adopted as a supplementary reference. Although all reanalysis datasets can reproduce broad distribution characteristics that are grossly consistent with the 9‐km model, there are substantial discrepancies among them in magnitudes. The ability to capture mesoscale signals is closely linked to their resolutions, but it is also impacted by other factors, including but not limited to the selected types of energy, seasons, altitudes, latitudes, model diffusions, parameterization schemes, moist condition, assimilation methods, and observation inputs. Moreover, all datasets illustrate conclusive behaviors for the prevalence of the rotational component in the troposphere, while only very few products fail to exhibit the dominance of the divergent component in the stratosphere. Overall, stratospheric ERA5 and CFSv2 outperform the other reanalysis datasets, and only these two can reproduce the feature of the canonical kinetic energy spectrum with a distinct shift from a steeper slope (~‐3) at lower wavenumbers to a shallower slope (~‐5/3) at higher wavenumbers. In addition, the relative disparities among datasets increase dramatically with height and they are more pronounced in the divergent component. It is also found that the correlations among these datasets are much weaker in the tropics. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues. The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信