POPIA确实适用于健康研究:对Bronstein和Nyachowe的回应

South African Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.7196/samj.2023.v113i11.1345

D W Thaldar

{"title":"POPIA确实适用于健康研究:对Bronstein和Nyachowe的回应","authors":"D W Thaldar","doi":"10.7196/samj.2023.v113i11.1345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bronstein and Nyachowe recently argued that the conditions for the lawful processing of personal information, as provided in the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA), do not apply to health research in South Africa. This article critically analyses the authors’ interpretation of section 3(2)(b) of POPIA and challenges two of its aspects.","PeriodicalId":22034,"journal":{"name":"South African Medical Journal","volume":"29 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POPIA does indeed apply to health research: A response to Bronstein and Nyachowe\",\"authors\":\"D W Thaldar\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/samj.2023.v113i11.1345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bronstein and Nyachowe recently argued that the conditions for the lawful processing of personal information, as provided in the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA), do not apply to health research in South Africa. This article critically analyses the authors’ interpretation of section 3(2)(b) of POPIA and challenges two of its aspects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.2023.v113i11.1345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.2023.v113i11.1345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Bronstein和Nyachowe最近认为，2013年第4号《个人信息保护法》(POPIA)中规定的合法处理个人信息的条件不适用于南非的健康研究。本文批判性地分析了作者对POPIA第3(2)(b)条的解释，并对其两个方面提出了质疑。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

POPIA does indeed apply to health research: A response to Bronstein and Nyachowe

Bronstein and Nyachowe recently argued that the conditions for the lawful processing of personal information, as provided in the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA), do not apply to health research in South Africa. This article critically analyses the authors’ interpretation of section 3(2)(b) of POPIA and challenges two of its aspects.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

South African Medical Journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量