髋臼骨折伴骨盆环断裂的手术治疗,延迟的时间依赖性效应

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Islam Sameeh, Yamen Safwat, Mohammed Khalid Saleh
{"title":"髋臼骨折伴骨盆环断裂的手术治疗,延迟的时间依赖性效应","authors":"Islam Sameeh, Yamen Safwat, Mohammed Khalid Saleh","doi":"10.1097/bco.0000000000001242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Associated fractures of the acetabulum and pelvic ring represent considerable percentage of polytrauma victims. These types of injuries are different from isolated acetabular or pelvic injuries regarding injury severity scores, haemodynamic status, blood transfusion requirements, and higher mortality rates up to 13%. Both Letournel and Matta have definitively shown that anatomic reduction of the fracture is the most influential factor predictive of clinical outcome. The ability of obtaining anatomical reduction is affected by age, fracture pattern, associated injuries, patient general condition, timing to surgery and complications. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: It is a retrospective study among 24 patients performed in Zagazig university hospitals between May 2017 and February 2019. Matta scoring system was used to quantify the radiological outcome of both acetabular and pelvic components while, both Majeed and Merle d’Aubigné were used for clinical grading at the final follow up. Timing to surgery was found to affect the quality of reduction significantly. Results: We divided our cases into 2 groups; First group including the patients underwent operative management from day 0 to day 10 which include 18 cases and Second group including the patients underwent operative management from day 11 to day 21 which include 6 cases and we will observe if there is a correlation between the preoperative delay and Matta scoring for both acetabular and pelvic components. Among the operatively managed acetabular fracture There was significant association between preoperative delay and Matta scoring system for acetabular component ( P <0.05) Among the operatively managed pelvic ring injuries There was significant association between preoperative delay and Matta scoring system for pelvic component ( P <0.05). Conclusion: The quality of reduction can be controlled by controlling the time to surgery after optimization of the general condition of the patient and controlling the local complications. In our study the earlier to operate on both components within the first 10 days after initial trauma the better to get anatomical reduction.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"23 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical management of acetabular fractures associated with pelvic ring disruption, the time-dependent effect of delay\",\"authors\":\"Islam Sameeh, Yamen Safwat, Mohammed Khalid Saleh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/bco.0000000000001242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Associated fractures of the acetabulum and pelvic ring represent considerable percentage of polytrauma victims. These types of injuries are different from isolated acetabular or pelvic injuries regarding injury severity scores, haemodynamic status, blood transfusion requirements, and higher mortality rates up to 13%. Both Letournel and Matta have definitively shown that anatomic reduction of the fracture is the most influential factor predictive of clinical outcome. The ability of obtaining anatomical reduction is affected by age, fracture pattern, associated injuries, patient general condition, timing to surgery and complications. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: It is a retrospective study among 24 patients performed in Zagazig university hospitals between May 2017 and February 2019. Matta scoring system was used to quantify the radiological outcome of both acetabular and pelvic components while, both Majeed and Merle d’Aubigné were used for clinical grading at the final follow up. Timing to surgery was found to affect the quality of reduction significantly. Results: We divided our cases into 2 groups; First group including the patients underwent operative management from day 0 to day 10 which include 18 cases and Second group including the patients underwent operative management from day 11 to day 21 which include 6 cases and we will observe if there is a correlation between the preoperative delay and Matta scoring for both acetabular and pelvic components. Among the operatively managed acetabular fracture There was significant association between preoperative delay and Matta scoring system for acetabular component ( P <0.05) Among the operatively managed pelvic ring injuries There was significant association between preoperative delay and Matta scoring system for pelvic component ( P <0.05). Conclusion: The quality of reduction can be controlled by controlling the time to surgery after optimization of the general condition of the patient and controlling the local complications. In our study the earlier to operate on both components within the first 10 days after initial trauma the better to get anatomical reduction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/bco.0000000000001242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bco.0000000000001242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:髋臼和骨盆环相关骨折在多发外伤患者中占相当大的比例。这些类型的损伤在损伤严重程度评分、血流动力学状况、输血要求和高达13%的高死亡率方面不同于孤立的髋臼或骨盆损伤。Letournel和Matta都明确表明,骨折解剖复位是预测临床结果的最重要因素。获得解剖复位的能力受年龄、骨折类型、相关损伤、患者一般情况、手术时机和并发症的影响。设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:对2017年5月至2019年2月在扎加齐格大学附属医院就诊的24例患者进行回顾性研究。Matta评分系统用于量化髋臼和骨盆部位的放射学结果,而在最后随访时使用Majeed和Merle d ' aubign进行临床分级。发现手术时机对复位质量有显著影响。结果:我们将病例分为两组;第一组包括从0天到10天接受手术治疗的患者,包括18例;第二组包括从11天到21天接受手术治疗的患者,包括6例,我们将观察术前延迟与髋臼和骨盆成分的Matta评分之间是否存在相关性。在手术处理的髋臼骨折中,术前延迟与髋臼成分Matta评分系统有显著相关性(P <0.05)。在手术处理的骨盆环损伤中,术前延迟与骨盆成分Matta评分系统有显著相关性(P <0.05)。结论:优化患者全身情况,控制局部并发症,控制手术时间,可控制复位质量。在我们的研究中,创伤后10天内越早对两个部位进行手术,解剖复位效果越好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical management of acetabular fractures associated with pelvic ring disruption, the time-dependent effect of delay
Background: Associated fractures of the acetabulum and pelvic ring represent considerable percentage of polytrauma victims. These types of injuries are different from isolated acetabular or pelvic injuries regarding injury severity scores, haemodynamic status, blood transfusion requirements, and higher mortality rates up to 13%. Both Letournel and Matta have definitively shown that anatomic reduction of the fracture is the most influential factor predictive of clinical outcome. The ability of obtaining anatomical reduction is affected by age, fracture pattern, associated injuries, patient general condition, timing to surgery and complications. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: It is a retrospective study among 24 patients performed in Zagazig university hospitals between May 2017 and February 2019. Matta scoring system was used to quantify the radiological outcome of both acetabular and pelvic components while, both Majeed and Merle d’Aubigné were used for clinical grading at the final follow up. Timing to surgery was found to affect the quality of reduction significantly. Results: We divided our cases into 2 groups; First group including the patients underwent operative management from day 0 to day 10 which include 18 cases and Second group including the patients underwent operative management from day 11 to day 21 which include 6 cases and we will observe if there is a correlation between the preoperative delay and Matta scoring for both acetabular and pelvic components. Among the operatively managed acetabular fracture There was significant association between preoperative delay and Matta scoring system for acetabular component ( P <0.05) Among the operatively managed pelvic ring injuries There was significant association between preoperative delay and Matta scoring system for pelvic component ( P <0.05). Conclusion: The quality of reduction can be controlled by controlling the time to surgery after optimization of the general condition of the patient and controlling the local complications. In our study the earlier to operate on both components within the first 10 days after initial trauma the better to get anatomical reduction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信