利用引导性问题减少创新阻力

Yossi Maaravi , Boaz Hameiri , Tamar Gur , Ben Heller , Dan Confino , Hila Amdor , Yuval Levi
{"title":"利用引导性问题减少创新阻力","authors":"Yossi Maaravi ,&nbsp;Boaz Hameiri ,&nbsp;Tamar Gur ,&nbsp;Ben Heller ,&nbsp;Dan Confino ,&nbsp;Hila Amdor ,&nbsp;Yuval Levi","doi":"10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Innovation is crucial for organizational success and survival. Yet, organizations often find it difficult to assimilate new ideas as they face internal resistance to change and innovation. Therefore, managers need to implement strategies to reduce such resistance. In two laboratory experiments, we examined the effects of asking <em>leading questions</em> – a powerful means for attitude change – to overcome innovation resistance. We investigate two leading questions strategies, which might lead to self-persuasion: the conventional and the superattitudinal (or paradoxical). The <em>conventional</em> strategy includes leading questions that encourage individuals to respond with statements which are inconsistent with their held views. In contrast, the <em>superattitudinal</em> questions stir individuals to respond with statements consistent with their opinions but more extreme and exaggerated. In the current research, the leading questions prompted answers that relate to resistance to innovation. Both persuasion methods were similarly effective for participants who had relatively low initial levels of resistance to change. However, the conventional strategy was more effective among the more resistant individuals, both when resistance to change was measured (Study 1) and when it was manipulated (Study 2). These are initial indications as to ways to better direct persuasion and attempts to reduce resistance to innovation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creativity","volume":"33 3","pages":"Article 100067"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2713374523000262/pdfft?md5=cd7988972d796ef9bc68ba817bf97a46&pid=1-s2.0-S2713374523000262-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Leading Questions to Reduce Resistance to Innovation\",\"authors\":\"Yossi Maaravi ,&nbsp;Boaz Hameiri ,&nbsp;Tamar Gur ,&nbsp;Ben Heller ,&nbsp;Dan Confino ,&nbsp;Hila Amdor ,&nbsp;Yuval Levi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Innovation is crucial for organizational success and survival. Yet, organizations often find it difficult to assimilate new ideas as they face internal resistance to change and innovation. Therefore, managers need to implement strategies to reduce such resistance. In two laboratory experiments, we examined the effects of asking <em>leading questions</em> – a powerful means for attitude change – to overcome innovation resistance. We investigate two leading questions strategies, which might lead to self-persuasion: the conventional and the superattitudinal (or paradoxical). The <em>conventional</em> strategy includes leading questions that encourage individuals to respond with statements which are inconsistent with their held views. In contrast, the <em>superattitudinal</em> questions stir individuals to respond with statements consistent with their opinions but more extreme and exaggerated. In the current research, the leading questions prompted answers that relate to resistance to innovation. Both persuasion methods were similarly effective for participants who had relatively low initial levels of resistance to change. However, the conventional strategy was more effective among the more resistant individuals, both when resistance to change was measured (Study 1) and when it was manipulated (Study 2). These are initial indications as to ways to better direct persuasion and attempts to reduce resistance to innovation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Creativity\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2713374523000262/pdfft?md5=cd7988972d796ef9bc68ba817bf97a46&pid=1-s2.0-S2713374523000262-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2713374523000262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2713374523000262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创新对组织的成功和生存至关重要。然而,组织经常发现很难吸收新的想法,因为他们面临着变革和创新的内部阻力。因此,管理者需要实施策略来减少这种阻力。在两个实验室实验中,我们检验了提出引导性问题(一种改变态度的有力手段)对克服创新阻力的影响。我们研究了两种可能导致自我说服的引导性问题策略:传统的和超态度的(或矛盾的)。传统的策略包括引导性问题,鼓励个人用与他们持有的观点不一致的陈述来回应。相反,超态度问题则会激发个体做出与自己观点一致但更为极端和夸张的回答。在目前的研究中,主要问题的答案与创新阻力有关。这两种说服方法对最初对改变的抗拒程度相对较低的参与者同样有效。然而,传统策略在更抗拒的个体中更有效,无论是在对变革的抗拒被测量时(研究1)还是在对变革的抗拒被操纵时(研究2)。这些都是关于如何更好地直接说服和尝试减少对创新的抗拒的初步迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Leading Questions to Reduce Resistance to Innovation

Innovation is crucial for organizational success and survival. Yet, organizations often find it difficult to assimilate new ideas as they face internal resistance to change and innovation. Therefore, managers need to implement strategies to reduce such resistance. In two laboratory experiments, we examined the effects of asking leading questions – a powerful means for attitude change – to overcome innovation resistance. We investigate two leading questions strategies, which might lead to self-persuasion: the conventional and the superattitudinal (or paradoxical). The conventional strategy includes leading questions that encourage individuals to respond with statements which are inconsistent with their held views. In contrast, the superattitudinal questions stir individuals to respond with statements consistent with their opinions but more extreme and exaggerated. In the current research, the leading questions prompted answers that relate to resistance to innovation. Both persuasion methods were similarly effective for participants who had relatively low initial levels of resistance to change. However, the conventional strategy was more effective among the more resistant individuals, both when resistance to change was measured (Study 1) and when it was manipulated (Study 2). These are initial indications as to ways to better direct persuasion and attempts to reduce resistance to innovation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信