经胸超声在呼吸机相关性肺炎诊断及随访中的应用

IF 0.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Olfat M El-shinnawy, Mohamed Metwally, Nermeen Abdelaleem, Dina R R Gharieb
{"title":"经胸超声在呼吸机相关性肺炎诊断及随访中的应用","authors":"Olfat M El-shinnawy, Mohamed Metwally, Nermeen Abdelaleem, Dina R R Gharieb","doi":"10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_4_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Context Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk not only from their critical illness but also from secondary processes such as nosocomial infection. Pneumonia is the second most common nosocomial infection in critically ill patients. Indeed, diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) requires a high clinical suspicion combined with bedside examination, radiographic examination, microbiological analysis of respiratory secretions, and blood test. Aims This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of lung ultrasound for VAP diagnosis and follow-up. Settings and design A prospective cohort study was conducted on 74 patients, with a total number of 54 with a high likelihood of VAP and 20 with a low likelihood of VAP. Methods and material Mechanically ventilated patients for 48 h or more were included. We calculated the clinical pulmonary infection score and the lung ultrasound was performed within 24 h. Statistical analysis Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 20, IBM, and Armonk, New York). Quantitative data were expressed as mean ±standard deviation (SD) and compared with Student’s t-test. Nominal data were given as number (n) and percentage (%). Chi 2 test was implemented on such data. Results Based on the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) with a cutoff point of ≥6, the sensitivity of transthoracic ultrasound was 81.5%, the specificity was 82%, and the accuracy was 81.6%. Regarding sonographic signs, the highest sensitivity was for subpleural dots of consolidation (82%), then B-lines (56%), followed by pleural effusion, and air bronchogram (both 19%). The highest specificity was for air bronchogram (100%), then B-lines, and pleural effusion (both 90%), followed by subpleural dots of consolidation (80%). The positive predictive value for transthoracic ultrasound was 92%; the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for the total ultrasound score was 0.82. Conclusions Transthoracic ultrasound is an easy bedside tool for the diagnosis and follow-up of ventilator-associated pneumonia.","PeriodicalId":46359,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transthoracic ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of ventilator-associated pneumonia\",\"authors\":\"Olfat M El-shinnawy, Mohamed Metwally, Nermeen Abdelaleem, Dina R R Gharieb\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_4_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Context Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk not only from their critical illness but also from secondary processes such as nosocomial infection. Pneumonia is the second most common nosocomial infection in critically ill patients. Indeed, diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) requires a high clinical suspicion combined with bedside examination, radiographic examination, microbiological analysis of respiratory secretions, and blood test. Aims This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of lung ultrasound for VAP diagnosis and follow-up. Settings and design A prospective cohort study was conducted on 74 patients, with a total number of 54 with a high likelihood of VAP and 20 with a low likelihood of VAP. Methods and material Mechanically ventilated patients for 48 h or more were included. We calculated the clinical pulmonary infection score and the lung ultrasound was performed within 24 h. Statistical analysis Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 20, IBM, and Armonk, New York). Quantitative data were expressed as mean ±standard deviation (SD) and compared with Student’s t-test. Nominal data were given as number (n) and percentage (%). Chi 2 test was implemented on such data. Results Based on the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) with a cutoff point of ≥6, the sensitivity of transthoracic ultrasound was 81.5%, the specificity was 82%, and the accuracy was 81.6%. Regarding sonographic signs, the highest sensitivity was for subpleural dots of consolidation (82%), then B-lines (56%), followed by pleural effusion, and air bronchogram (both 19%). The highest specificity was for air bronchogram (100%), then B-lines, and pleural effusion (both 90%), followed by subpleural dots of consolidation (80%). The positive predictive value for transthoracic ultrasound was 92%; the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for the total ultrasound score was 0.82. Conclusions Transthoracic ultrasound is an easy bedside tool for the diagnosis and follow-up of ventilator-associated pneumonia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_4_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_4_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重症监护病房(ICU)的患者不仅面临危重疾病的风险,还面临院内感染等继发过程的风险。肺炎是危重病人第二大常见的医院感染。实际上,诊断呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)需要高度的临床怀疑,并结合床边检查、x线检查、呼吸道分泌物微生物学分析和血液检查。目的评价肺超声在VAP诊断及随访中的有效性和准确性。前瞻性队列研究纳入74例患者,其中高可能性VAP 54例,低可能性VAP 20例。方法和材料纳入机械通气48 h及以上患者。我们计算临床肺部感染评分,并在24 h内进行肺部超声检查。统计分析数据收集和分析使用SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 20, IBM, Armonk, New York)。定量数据以均数±标准差(SD)表示,采用Student’s t检验进行比较。标称数据以数字(n)和百分比(%)表示。对这些数据进行Chi 2检验。结果基于截断点≥6的临床肺部感染评分(CPIS),经胸超声诊断的敏感性为81.5%,特异性为82%,准确性为81.6%。关于超声征象,敏感度最高的是胸膜下实变点(82%),其次是b线(56%),其次是胸膜积液和支气管气征(均为19%)。特异性最高的是空气支气管图(100%),其次是b线和胸膜积液(均为90%),其次是胸膜下实变点(80%)。经胸超声阳性预测值为92%;超声总评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.82。结论经胸超声是一种简便的诊断和随访呼吸机相关性肺炎的床边工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transthoracic ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of ventilator-associated pneumonia
Abstract Context Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk not only from their critical illness but also from secondary processes such as nosocomial infection. Pneumonia is the second most common nosocomial infection in critically ill patients. Indeed, diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) requires a high clinical suspicion combined with bedside examination, radiographic examination, microbiological analysis of respiratory secretions, and blood test. Aims This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of lung ultrasound for VAP diagnosis and follow-up. Settings and design A prospective cohort study was conducted on 74 patients, with a total number of 54 with a high likelihood of VAP and 20 with a low likelihood of VAP. Methods and material Mechanically ventilated patients for 48 h or more were included. We calculated the clinical pulmonary infection score and the lung ultrasound was performed within 24 h. Statistical analysis Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 20, IBM, and Armonk, New York). Quantitative data were expressed as mean ±standard deviation (SD) and compared with Student’s t-test. Nominal data were given as number (n) and percentage (%). Chi 2 test was implemented on such data. Results Based on the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) with a cutoff point of ≥6, the sensitivity of transthoracic ultrasound was 81.5%, the specificity was 82%, and the accuracy was 81.6%. Regarding sonographic signs, the highest sensitivity was for subpleural dots of consolidation (82%), then B-lines (56%), followed by pleural effusion, and air bronchogram (both 19%). The highest specificity was for air bronchogram (100%), then B-lines, and pleural effusion (both 90%), followed by subpleural dots of consolidation (80%). The positive predictive value for transthoracic ultrasound was 92%; the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for the total ultrasound score was 0.82. Conclusions Transthoracic ultrasound is an easy bedside tool for the diagnosis and follow-up of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of The Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis aims to publish and inform readers and all chest physicians of the progress in medical research concerning all aspect of chest diseases. Publications include original articles review articles, editorials, case studies and reports which are relevant to chest diseases. The Journal also aims to highlight recent updates in chest medicine. . Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信