人类受试者的生活经验研究人员和替代性创伤

Rashunda Miller Reed, LeAnn M. Morgan, Rebecca G. Cowan, Cailen Birtles
{"title":"人类受试者的生活经验研究人员和替代性创伤","authors":"Rashunda Miller Reed, LeAnn M. Morgan, Rebecca G. Cowan, Cailen Birtles","doi":"10.5590/jsbhs.2023.17.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this consensual qualitative research (CQR) study was to describe the essence of the experiences of 10 human subject researchers who have been impacted by research-related trauma. After the data was collected, transcribed, and coded, five main themes emerged from this study: (1) data engagement; (2) symptoms and impacts; (3) coping; (4) weight of representation; and (5) support. Findings of this study may help research supervisors and higher education leaders have greater awareness of how vicarious trauma may impact students and professionals who engage in research regarding traumatic content. The findings in this article can be used to recognize trauma in researchers, as well as springboard further discussions of vicarious trauma. Researcher supervisors and higher education leaders can reflect on their role in recognizing and mitigating vicarious trauma. Recommendations for future research include expanding identities for researchers using the CQR method and participants recruited, finding effective strategies and policies, exploring the incidental theme of dehumanization, and conducting quantitative studies.","PeriodicalId":89999,"journal":{"name":"Journal of social, behavioral and health sciences","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lived Experiences of Human Subjects Researchers and Vicarious Trauma\",\"authors\":\"Rashunda Miller Reed, LeAnn M. Morgan, Rebecca G. Cowan, Cailen Birtles\",\"doi\":\"10.5590/jsbhs.2023.17.1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this consensual qualitative research (CQR) study was to describe the essence of the experiences of 10 human subject researchers who have been impacted by research-related trauma. After the data was collected, transcribed, and coded, five main themes emerged from this study: (1) data engagement; (2) symptoms and impacts; (3) coping; (4) weight of representation; and (5) support. Findings of this study may help research supervisors and higher education leaders have greater awareness of how vicarious trauma may impact students and professionals who engage in research regarding traumatic content. The findings in this article can be used to recognize trauma in researchers, as well as springboard further discussions of vicarious trauma. Researcher supervisors and higher education leaders can reflect on their role in recognizing and mitigating vicarious trauma. Recommendations for future research include expanding identities for researchers using the CQR method and participants recruited, finding effective strategies and policies, exploring the incidental theme of dehumanization, and conducting quantitative studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of social, behavioral and health sciences\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of social, behavioral and health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5590/jsbhs.2023.17.1.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of social, behavioral and health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5590/jsbhs.2023.17.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本自愿性定性研究(CQR)的目的是描述10名受研究相关创伤影响的人类受试者研究人员的经历的本质。在收集、转录和编码数据后,本研究出现了五个主要主题:(1)数据参与;(2)症状和影响;(3)应对;(4)代表性权重;(5)支持。本研究的发现可以帮助研究主管和高等教育领导者更好地认识到替代性创伤如何影响从事创伤内容研究的学生和专业人员。本文的研究结果可用于研究人员识别创伤,并为进一步讨论替代性创伤提供跳板。研究人员、主管和高等教育领导者可以反思他们在识别和减轻替代创伤方面的作用。对未来研究的建议包括扩大使用CQR方法的研究人员和招募的参与者的身份,寻找有效的策略和政策,探索非人性化的附带主题,以及进行定量研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lived Experiences of Human Subjects Researchers and Vicarious Trauma
The purpose of this consensual qualitative research (CQR) study was to describe the essence of the experiences of 10 human subject researchers who have been impacted by research-related trauma. After the data was collected, transcribed, and coded, five main themes emerged from this study: (1) data engagement; (2) symptoms and impacts; (3) coping; (4) weight of representation; and (5) support. Findings of this study may help research supervisors and higher education leaders have greater awareness of how vicarious trauma may impact students and professionals who engage in research regarding traumatic content. The findings in this article can be used to recognize trauma in researchers, as well as springboard further discussions of vicarious trauma. Researcher supervisors and higher education leaders can reflect on their role in recognizing and mitigating vicarious trauma. Recommendations for future research include expanding identities for researchers using the CQR method and participants recruited, finding effective strategies and policies, exploring the incidental theme of dehumanization, and conducting quantitative studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信