全球化中国的环境倡导:非政府组织参与绿色“一带一路”倡议

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Ying Xia
{"title":"全球化中国的环境倡导:非政府组织参与绿色“一带一路”倡议","authors":"Ying Xia","doi":"10.1080/00472336.2023.2267062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractAlthough the Belt and Road Initiative presents growth opportunities for less developed regions, it also raises concerns about negative environmental impacts and sustainability. Despite proliferating academic interest in China’s efforts to green the Belt and Road Initiative, the engagement of non-governmental organisations in policymaking has been understudied. This research marks the first empirical effort to examine the interactions between environmental non-governmental organisations and the Chinese government under the banner of a green Belt and Road Initiative. It finds that non-governmental organisations have employed four strategies to engage with the state-led initiative – civil diplomacy, development partnership, service provision, and outside reform – and that development partners and service providers have been more active than the others in shaping China’s Belt and Road Initiative-related environmental policies. This article elucidates civil society actors’ opportunities and constraints in greening the Belt and Road Initiative and non-governmental organisations–government dynamics in a non-democratic context.Key Words: Belt and Road InitiativeChinaEnvironmental AdvocacyGlobalisation NGO–Government Relations AcknowledgementsThe author is very grateful to the many anonymous interviewees who candidly shared their opinions. The study has also benefited from the helpful comments of the anonymous reviewers. All remaining mistakes are my own.Notes1 The research that resulted in this article was approved by the University of Hong Kong Human Research Ethics Committee (No. EA210529).2 Several of the projects discussed in this article began prior to the BRI. However, many of them have now been incorporated into the BRI, either formally or into the rhetoric associated with the BRI.3 GDF is still considered a GONGO as the chairman is a retired high-level official and it is listed as a subsidiary of a state-run scientists’ association.4 The first regional chapter in Central Asia was launched in mid-2021 with support from government agencies and banks in Mongolia and Pakistan.5 Article 15 of the 1991 Civil Procedure Law provides that state entities, social organisations, and corporations may support the litigation filed by others against the infringement of the civil interests of the state, the collective, or individuals. In 2018, a revision of this law allowed the people’s procuratorates to support public interest litigation filed by social organisations.6 However, beyond organising two annual conferences, little progress seems to have been made by this network.7 Environmental public interest litigation was only legalised in China in 2015, through a revision to the Environmental Protection Law. Since then, about 30 environmental groups have brought cases to court, and all cases heard by a court have addressed domestic environmental issues.Additional informationFundingThe research is funded by the Early Career Scheme of the University Grants Committee of Hong Kong (No. 27613822).","PeriodicalId":47420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Advocacy in a Globalising China: Non-Governmental Organisation Engagement with the Green Belt and Road Initiative\",\"authors\":\"Ying Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00472336.2023.2267062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractAlthough the Belt and Road Initiative presents growth opportunities for less developed regions, it also raises concerns about negative environmental impacts and sustainability. Despite proliferating academic interest in China’s efforts to green the Belt and Road Initiative, the engagement of non-governmental organisations in policymaking has been understudied. This research marks the first empirical effort to examine the interactions between environmental non-governmental organisations and the Chinese government under the banner of a green Belt and Road Initiative. It finds that non-governmental organisations have employed four strategies to engage with the state-led initiative – civil diplomacy, development partnership, service provision, and outside reform – and that development partners and service providers have been more active than the others in shaping China’s Belt and Road Initiative-related environmental policies. This article elucidates civil society actors’ opportunities and constraints in greening the Belt and Road Initiative and non-governmental organisations–government dynamics in a non-democratic context.Key Words: Belt and Road InitiativeChinaEnvironmental AdvocacyGlobalisation NGO–Government Relations AcknowledgementsThe author is very grateful to the many anonymous interviewees who candidly shared their opinions. The study has also benefited from the helpful comments of the anonymous reviewers. All remaining mistakes are my own.Notes1 The research that resulted in this article was approved by the University of Hong Kong Human Research Ethics Committee (No. EA210529).2 Several of the projects discussed in this article began prior to the BRI. However, many of them have now been incorporated into the BRI, either formally or into the rhetoric associated with the BRI.3 GDF is still considered a GONGO as the chairman is a retired high-level official and it is listed as a subsidiary of a state-run scientists’ association.4 The first regional chapter in Central Asia was launched in mid-2021 with support from government agencies and banks in Mongolia and Pakistan.5 Article 15 of the 1991 Civil Procedure Law provides that state entities, social organisations, and corporations may support the litigation filed by others against the infringement of the civil interests of the state, the collective, or individuals. In 2018, a revision of this law allowed the people’s procuratorates to support public interest litigation filed by social organisations.6 However, beyond organising two annual conferences, little progress seems to have been made by this network.7 Environmental public interest litigation was only legalised in China in 2015, through a revision to the Environmental Protection Law. Since then, about 30 environmental groups have brought cases to court, and all cases heard by a court have addressed domestic environmental issues.Additional informationFundingThe research is funded by the Early Career Scheme of the University Grants Committee of Hong Kong (No. 27613822).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Asia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2023.2267062\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2023.2267062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然“一带一路”倡议为欠发达地区带来了增长机遇,但也引发了对负面环境影响和可持续性的担忧。尽管学术界对中国推动“一带一路”绿色发展的努力越来越感兴趣,但对非政府组织参与政策制定的研究一直不足。这一研究标志着首次实证研究在绿色“一带一路”倡议的旗帜下,环境非政府组织与中国政府之间的互动。报告发现,非政府组织采用了四种策略来参与国家主导的倡议——民间外交、发展伙伴关系、服务提供和外部改革——发展伙伴和服务提供商在制定中国“一带一路”倡议相关环境政策方面比其他伙伴和服务提供商更为积极。本文阐述了民间社会行动者在绿色“一带一路”倡议中的机遇和制约,以及非民主背景下非政府组织与政府之间的动态关系。关键词:“一带一路”倡议;中国;环境倡导;这项研究也受益于匿名评论者的有益评论。所有剩下的错误都是我自己的。注1本文所涉及的研究已获香港大学人类研究伦理委员会批准(编号:EA210529)。2本文讨论的几个项目在“一带一路”倡议之前就开始了。然而,他们中的许多人现在已经被纳入了“一带一路”,无论是正式的还是与“一带一路”相关的言论。GDF仍然被认为是一个GONGO,因为主席是一位退休的高级官员,它被列为一个国有科学家协会的子公司在蒙古和巴基斯坦政府机构和银行的支持下,中亚地区的第一个区域分会于2021年中期启动。5 1991年《民事诉讼法》第15条规定,国家实体、社会组织和公司可以支持他人对侵犯国家、集体或个人民事利益的诉讼。2018年,该法修订后,允许人民检察院受理社会组织提起的公益诉讼然而,除了组织两次年度会议之外,这个网络似乎没有取得什么进展2015年,中国通过修订《环境保护法》,才将环境公益诉讼合法化。此后,大约有30个环保团体向法院提起诉讼,法院审理的所有案件都涉及国内环境问题。本研究由香港大学教育资助委员会青年创业计划(编号27613822)资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental Advocacy in a Globalising China: Non-Governmental Organisation Engagement with the Green Belt and Road Initiative
AbstractAlthough the Belt and Road Initiative presents growth opportunities for less developed regions, it also raises concerns about negative environmental impacts and sustainability. Despite proliferating academic interest in China’s efforts to green the Belt and Road Initiative, the engagement of non-governmental organisations in policymaking has been understudied. This research marks the first empirical effort to examine the interactions between environmental non-governmental organisations and the Chinese government under the banner of a green Belt and Road Initiative. It finds that non-governmental organisations have employed four strategies to engage with the state-led initiative – civil diplomacy, development partnership, service provision, and outside reform – and that development partners and service providers have been more active than the others in shaping China’s Belt and Road Initiative-related environmental policies. This article elucidates civil society actors’ opportunities and constraints in greening the Belt and Road Initiative and non-governmental organisations–government dynamics in a non-democratic context.Key Words: Belt and Road InitiativeChinaEnvironmental AdvocacyGlobalisation NGO–Government Relations AcknowledgementsThe author is very grateful to the many anonymous interviewees who candidly shared their opinions. The study has also benefited from the helpful comments of the anonymous reviewers. All remaining mistakes are my own.Notes1 The research that resulted in this article was approved by the University of Hong Kong Human Research Ethics Committee (No. EA210529).2 Several of the projects discussed in this article began prior to the BRI. However, many of them have now been incorporated into the BRI, either formally or into the rhetoric associated with the BRI.3 GDF is still considered a GONGO as the chairman is a retired high-level official and it is listed as a subsidiary of a state-run scientists’ association.4 The first regional chapter in Central Asia was launched in mid-2021 with support from government agencies and banks in Mongolia and Pakistan.5 Article 15 of the 1991 Civil Procedure Law provides that state entities, social organisations, and corporations may support the litigation filed by others against the infringement of the civil interests of the state, the collective, or individuals. In 2018, a revision of this law allowed the people’s procuratorates to support public interest litigation filed by social organisations.6 However, beyond organising two annual conferences, little progress seems to have been made by this network.7 Environmental public interest litigation was only legalised in China in 2015, through a revision to the Environmental Protection Law. Since then, about 30 environmental groups have brought cases to court, and all cases heard by a court have addressed domestic environmental issues.Additional informationFundingThe research is funded by the Early Career Scheme of the University Grants Committee of Hong Kong (No. 27613822).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Asia is an established refereed publication, it appears quarterly and has done so since 1970. When the journal was established, it was conceived as providing an alternative to mainstream perspectives on contemporary Asian issues. The journal maintains this tradition and seeks to publish articles that deal with the broad problems of economic, political and social development of Asia. Articles on economic development issues, political economy, agriculture, planning, the working class, people"s movements, politics and power, imperialism and empire, international financial institutions, the environment, and economic history are especially welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信