口咽癌 HPV 状态与弥散加权磁共振成像和 FDG-PET 参数的关系

Fabian Kalt , Martin Hüllner , Moritz C. Wurnig , Gregoire B. Morand , Martina A. Broglie , Paul Stolzmann , Martin Lanzer
{"title":"口咽癌 HPV 状态与弥散加权磁共振成像和 FDG-PET 参数的关系","authors":"Fabian Kalt ,&nbsp;Martin Hüllner ,&nbsp;Moritz C. Wurnig ,&nbsp;Gregoire B. Morand ,&nbsp;Martina A. Broglie ,&nbsp;Paul Stolzmann ,&nbsp;Martin Lanzer","doi":"10.1016/j.adoms.2023.100464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Human papilloma virus (HPV) infection is an important risk factor in oropharyngeal cancer. Several studies have analyzed the association of tumoral HPV status and different imaging parameters in FDG-PET/CT and magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), with contradictory findings. In this retrospective study, the influence of HPV-status on different parameters in FDG-imaging and MR DWI is investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective, single-center study we analyzed patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal cancer between January 2018 and December 2020 at a tertiary center in Switzerland. HPV status was assessed via p16 immunohistochemistry and/or PCR. Standardized uptake value (SUV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured in pretreatment imaging (FDG-PET/CT, FDG-PET/MR, DWI MR). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney-U tests. All p values reported are two-sided, and p values &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>142 patients were included. 67% of tumors were HPV-positive. Mean SUV<sub>max</sub> in FDG-PET was 15.0+/-5.9 for HPV-positive tumors and 18.6+/-9.7 for HPV-negative tumors (p = 0.15). Mean ADC was 1109 x 10<sup>6</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s+/-326.8 for HPV-positive tumors and 1045.8 x 10<sup>6</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s+/-467.0 for HPV-negative tumors (p = 0.76).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>and Relevance: We found no correlation between oropharyngeal carcinoma HPV status and any of the analyzed imaging parameters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100051,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100464"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667147623000766/pdfft?md5=99ff6db4030f3fe418e355d9e9209f7d&pid=1-s2.0-S2667147623000766-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of oropharyngeal cancer HPV status with diffusion-weighted MR imaging and FDG-PET parameters\",\"authors\":\"Fabian Kalt ,&nbsp;Martin Hüllner ,&nbsp;Moritz C. Wurnig ,&nbsp;Gregoire B. Morand ,&nbsp;Martina A. Broglie ,&nbsp;Paul Stolzmann ,&nbsp;Martin Lanzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adoms.2023.100464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Human papilloma virus (HPV) infection is an important risk factor in oropharyngeal cancer. Several studies have analyzed the association of tumoral HPV status and different imaging parameters in FDG-PET/CT and magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), with contradictory findings. In this retrospective study, the influence of HPV-status on different parameters in FDG-imaging and MR DWI is investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective, single-center study we analyzed patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal cancer between January 2018 and December 2020 at a tertiary center in Switzerland. HPV status was assessed via p16 immunohistochemistry and/or PCR. Standardized uptake value (SUV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured in pretreatment imaging (FDG-PET/CT, FDG-PET/MR, DWI MR). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney-U tests. All p values reported are two-sided, and p values &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>142 patients were included. 67% of tumors were HPV-positive. Mean SUV<sub>max</sub> in FDG-PET was 15.0+/-5.9 for HPV-positive tumors and 18.6+/-9.7 for HPV-negative tumors (p = 0.15). Mean ADC was 1109 x 10<sup>6</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s+/-326.8 for HPV-positive tumors and 1045.8 x 10<sup>6</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s+/-467.0 for HPV-negative tumors (p = 0.76).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>and Relevance: We found no correlation between oropharyngeal carcinoma HPV status and any of the analyzed imaging parameters.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667147623000766/pdfft?md5=99ff6db4030f3fe418e355d9e9209f7d&pid=1-s2.0-S2667147623000766-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667147623000766\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667147623000766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染是口咽癌的一个重要危险因素。有几项研究分析了肿瘤 HPV 状态与 FDG-PET/CT 和磁共振(MR)弥散加权成像(DWI)中不同成像参数的关系,但结果相互矛盾。在这项回顾性研究中,我们调查了HPV状态对FDG成像和MR DWI不同参数的影响。方法在这项回顾性单中心研究中,我们分析了2018年1月至2020年12月期间在瑞士一家三级中心确诊的口咽癌患者。HPV状态通过p16免疫组化和/或PCR进行评估。在预处理成像(FDG-PET/CT、FDG-PET/MR、DWI MR)中测量了标准化摄取值(SUV)、病变总糖酵解(TLG)和表观弥散系数(ADC)。统计分析采用 Mann-Whitney-U 检验。所有报告的 p 值均为双侧,p 值为 0.05 时具有统计学意义。67%的肿瘤为HPV阳性。HPV阳性肿瘤的FDG-PET平均SUVmax为15.0+/-5.9,HPV阴性肿瘤为18.6+/-9.7(P = 0.15)。HPV阳性肿瘤的平均ADC为1109 x 106 mm2/s+/-326.8,HPV阴性肿瘤的平均ADC为1045.8 x 106 mm2/s+/-467.0(p = 0.76):我们没有发现口咽癌 HPV 状态与任何分析的成像参数之间存在相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of oropharyngeal cancer HPV status with diffusion-weighted MR imaging and FDG-PET parameters

Background

Human papilloma virus (HPV) infection is an important risk factor in oropharyngeal cancer. Several studies have analyzed the association of tumoral HPV status and different imaging parameters in FDG-PET/CT and magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), with contradictory findings. In this retrospective study, the influence of HPV-status on different parameters in FDG-imaging and MR DWI is investigated.

Methods

In this retrospective, single-center study we analyzed patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal cancer between January 2018 and December 2020 at a tertiary center in Switzerland. HPV status was assessed via p16 immunohistochemistry and/or PCR. Standardized uptake value (SUV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured in pretreatment imaging (FDG-PET/CT, FDG-PET/MR, DWI MR). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney-U tests. All p values reported are two-sided, and p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

142 patients were included. 67% of tumors were HPV-positive. Mean SUVmax in FDG-PET was 15.0+/-5.9 for HPV-positive tumors and 18.6+/-9.7 for HPV-negative tumors (p = 0.15). Mean ADC was 1109 x 106 mm2/s+/-326.8 for HPV-positive tumors and 1045.8 x 106 mm2/s+/-467.0 for HPV-negative tumors (p = 0.76).

Conclusion

and Relevance: We found no correlation between oropharyngeal carcinoma HPV status and any of the analyzed imaging parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信