翻转课堂中基于问题的学习方法:疼痛管理课程习得的结果

Soumia Merrou, Abdellah Idrissi Jouicha, Abdelmounaim Baslam, Zakaria Ouhaz, Ahmed Rhassane El Adib
{"title":"翻转课堂中基于问题的学习方法:疼痛管理课程习得的结果","authors":"Soumia Merrou, Abdellah Idrissi Jouicha, Abdelmounaim Baslam, Zakaria Ouhaz, Ahmed Rhassane El Adib","doi":"10.29060/taps.2023-8-4/oa2883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A deep understanding of physiology, physiopathology, pharmacology, and the management of pain is crucial for nurse anaesthetists to ensure the well-being of their patients. Thus, the teaching strategies should enhance the transition from acquiring the fundamental pain phenomena, to developing translational and critical thinking. The aim of the study is to determine if the flipped classroom that is considered an active learning approach is most effective compared to the traditional method in teaching pain management and if it improves students' academic performance. Methods: This study was quasi experimental, at a higher institute of nursing professions, among third-year anaesthesia resuscitation nursing students. participants were randomly allocated into either: the flipped classroom group where PBL was used (FG, n = 19), or the traditional lecture-based classroom group (TG, n = 19). The results and impact of the above approach were appreciated via the analysis of the summative assessment of the class group and from the questionnaire submitted to students. Results: The present study revealed that in the midterm exam, the mean score of the flipped classroom group (14.0) which is significantly higher (p<0.01) than the traditional lecture group (11.9). Moreover, the standard deviation of this latter is slightly higher (2.41) which indicates scores far from the average. Also, a significant difference between the averages of the two approaches in favor of flipped classroom Group was revealed (p<0.01). Conclusion: The assessment of student’s grades and their appreciation of both teaching approaches showed a preference for the PBL. Keywords: Flipped Classroom, Nursing Education, Pain Management, Problem-Based Learning","PeriodicalId":494652,"journal":{"name":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problem-based learning method in the context of a flipped classroom: Outcomes on pain management course acquisition\",\"authors\":\"Soumia Merrou, Abdellah Idrissi Jouicha, Abdelmounaim Baslam, Zakaria Ouhaz, Ahmed Rhassane El Adib\",\"doi\":\"10.29060/taps.2023-8-4/oa2883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: A deep understanding of physiology, physiopathology, pharmacology, and the management of pain is crucial for nurse anaesthetists to ensure the well-being of their patients. Thus, the teaching strategies should enhance the transition from acquiring the fundamental pain phenomena, to developing translational and critical thinking. The aim of the study is to determine if the flipped classroom that is considered an active learning approach is most effective compared to the traditional method in teaching pain management and if it improves students' academic performance. Methods: This study was quasi experimental, at a higher institute of nursing professions, among third-year anaesthesia resuscitation nursing students. participants were randomly allocated into either: the flipped classroom group where PBL was used (FG, n = 19), or the traditional lecture-based classroom group (TG, n = 19). The results and impact of the above approach were appreciated via the analysis of the summative assessment of the class group and from the questionnaire submitted to students. Results: The present study revealed that in the midterm exam, the mean score of the flipped classroom group (14.0) which is significantly higher (p<0.01) than the traditional lecture group (11.9). Moreover, the standard deviation of this latter is slightly higher (2.41) which indicates scores far from the average. Also, a significant difference between the averages of the two approaches in favor of flipped classroom Group was revealed (p<0.01). Conclusion: The assessment of student’s grades and their appreciation of both teaching approaches showed a preference for the PBL. Keywords: Flipped Classroom, Nursing Education, Pain Management, Problem-Based Learning\",\"PeriodicalId\":494652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Asia Pacific Scholar\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Asia Pacific Scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2023-8-4/oa2883\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2023-8-4/oa2883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对生理学、生理病理学、药理学和疼痛管理的深刻理解对于麻醉师护士确保患者的健康至关重要。因此,教学策略应加强从获取基本疼痛现象到培养翻译思维和批判性思维的转变。本研究的目的是确定与传统的疼痛管理教学方法相比,被认为是一种主动学习方法的翻转课堂是否最有效,以及它是否提高了学生的学习成绩。方法:本研究采用准实验方法,在某高等护理专业学院麻醉复苏护理专业三年级学生中进行。参与者被随机分配到:使用PBL的翻转课堂组(FG, n = 19)或传统的基于讲座的课堂组(TG, n = 19)。通过对班级总结性评估的分析和提交给学生的调查问卷,对上述方法的结果和影响表示赞赏。结果:本研究发现,在期中考试中,翻转课堂组学生的平均分为14.0分,显著高于传统课堂组的11.9分(p<0.01)。而且,后者的标准差略高,为2.41,表明得分与平均水平相差甚远。此外,两种方法的平均值也有显著差异(p<0.01)。结论:学生的成绩评价和对两种教学方法的评价均表现出对PBL教学法的偏好。关键词:翻转课堂;护理教育;疼痛管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problem-based learning method in the context of a flipped classroom: Outcomes on pain management course acquisition
Introduction: A deep understanding of physiology, physiopathology, pharmacology, and the management of pain is crucial for nurse anaesthetists to ensure the well-being of their patients. Thus, the teaching strategies should enhance the transition from acquiring the fundamental pain phenomena, to developing translational and critical thinking. The aim of the study is to determine if the flipped classroom that is considered an active learning approach is most effective compared to the traditional method in teaching pain management and if it improves students' academic performance. Methods: This study was quasi experimental, at a higher institute of nursing professions, among third-year anaesthesia resuscitation nursing students. participants were randomly allocated into either: the flipped classroom group where PBL was used (FG, n = 19), or the traditional lecture-based classroom group (TG, n = 19). The results and impact of the above approach were appreciated via the analysis of the summative assessment of the class group and from the questionnaire submitted to students. Results: The present study revealed that in the midterm exam, the mean score of the flipped classroom group (14.0) which is significantly higher (p<0.01) than the traditional lecture group (11.9). Moreover, the standard deviation of this latter is slightly higher (2.41) which indicates scores far from the average. Also, a significant difference between the averages of the two approaches in favor of flipped classroom Group was revealed (p<0.01). Conclusion: The assessment of student’s grades and their appreciation of both teaching approaches showed a preference for the PBL. Keywords: Flipped Classroom, Nursing Education, Pain Management, Problem-Based Learning
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信