实践、观念、态度、障碍和动机及其对研究发表的影响

Sethapong Lertsakulbunlue, Kaophiphat Thammasoon, Kanlaya Jongcherdchootrakul, Boonsub Sakboonyarat, Anupong Kantiwong
{"title":"实践、观念、态度、障碍和动机及其对研究发表的影响","authors":"Sethapong Lertsakulbunlue, Kaophiphat Thammasoon, Kanlaya Jongcherdchootrakul, Boonsub Sakboonyarat, Anupong Kantiwong","doi":"10.29060/taps.2023-8-4/oa3006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Although medical research (MR) is constantly promoted, a global deficit of medical researchers has been noted. We aimed to explore the relationship among practice, perceptions, attitudes, barriers and motivation toward MR and its impacts on MR publication. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 262 senior medical students and interns. An electronic, standardised Likert scale questionnaire was used to collect the data. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratio between characteristics and MR publication. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to confirm the loading factor of each question, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to investigate the relationship between latent variables and MR publication. Results: Cronbach’s alpha revealed a good internal reliability of 0.93. The accumulated grade point average did not differ between those who had published and those who had not. MR presentations were strongly associated with MR publication. SEM showed that attitudes (0.71, p<0.001) and perceptions (0.27, p<0.001) had a direct effect on practices. Practices (0.49, p<0.001) and attitudes (0.30, p<0.001) had a direct effect on motivation, while motivation had a total effect = 0.36, p<0.001 on MR publication through MR presentation as a mediator. Conclusion: Positive attitudes and perceptions might lead to positivity in the intention to practice MR, which would lead to motivation and finally increase the odds of MR publication. Different approaches to promote excitement and perceptions in MR learning should be encouraged by teachers and faculty members. Keywords: Medical Research, Students, Perceptions, Attitudes, Barriers, Motivation","PeriodicalId":494652,"journal":{"name":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practices, perceptions, attitudes, barriers and motivation and its impacts on research publication\",\"authors\":\"Sethapong Lertsakulbunlue, Kaophiphat Thammasoon, Kanlaya Jongcherdchootrakul, Boonsub Sakboonyarat, Anupong Kantiwong\",\"doi\":\"10.29060/taps.2023-8-4/oa3006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Although medical research (MR) is constantly promoted, a global deficit of medical researchers has been noted. We aimed to explore the relationship among practice, perceptions, attitudes, barriers and motivation toward MR and its impacts on MR publication. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 262 senior medical students and interns. An electronic, standardised Likert scale questionnaire was used to collect the data. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratio between characteristics and MR publication. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to confirm the loading factor of each question, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to investigate the relationship between latent variables and MR publication. Results: Cronbach’s alpha revealed a good internal reliability of 0.93. The accumulated grade point average did not differ between those who had published and those who had not. MR presentations were strongly associated with MR publication. SEM showed that attitudes (0.71, p<0.001) and perceptions (0.27, p<0.001) had a direct effect on practices. Practices (0.49, p<0.001) and attitudes (0.30, p<0.001) had a direct effect on motivation, while motivation had a total effect = 0.36, p<0.001 on MR publication through MR presentation as a mediator. Conclusion: Positive attitudes and perceptions might lead to positivity in the intention to practice MR, which would lead to motivation and finally increase the odds of MR publication. Different approaches to promote excitement and perceptions in MR learning should be encouraged by teachers and faculty members. Keywords: Medical Research, Students, Perceptions, Attitudes, Barriers, Motivation\",\"PeriodicalId\":494652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Asia Pacific Scholar\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Asia Pacific Scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2023-8-4/oa3006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2023-8-4/oa3006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:虽然医学研究(MR)不断得到促进,但已经注意到全球医学研究人员的短缺。我们的目的是探讨实践、认知、态度、障碍和动机之间的关系及其对MR发表的影响。方法:采用横断面研究方法,对262名医学生和实习生进行调查。采用电子、标准化李克特量表问卷收集数据。采用二元逻辑回归确定特征与MR发表之间的比值比。采用验证性因子分析确定各题的负荷因子,并采用结构方程模型(SEM)研究潜在变量与MR发表的关系。结果:Cronbach 's alpha显示良好的内部信度为0.93。在发表过论文的学生和没有发表过论文的学生之间,累积的平均绩点没有差别。MR报告与MR出版物密切相关。扫描电镜显示,态度(0.71,p<0.001)和观念(0.27,p<0.001)对实践有直接影响。实践(0.49,p<0.001)和态度(0.30,p<0.001)对动机有直接影响,而动机通过MR展示作为中介对MR发表有总影响= 0.36,p<0.001。结论:积极的态度和认知可能导致积极的MR实践意图,从而导致动机,最终增加MR发表的几率。教师和教职员工应该鼓励不同的方法来促进MR学习的兴奋和感知。关键词:医学研究,学生,认知,态度,障碍,动机
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practices, perceptions, attitudes, barriers and motivation and its impacts on research publication
Introduction: Although medical research (MR) is constantly promoted, a global deficit of medical researchers has been noted. We aimed to explore the relationship among practice, perceptions, attitudes, barriers and motivation toward MR and its impacts on MR publication. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 262 senior medical students and interns. An electronic, standardised Likert scale questionnaire was used to collect the data. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratio between characteristics and MR publication. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to confirm the loading factor of each question, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to investigate the relationship between latent variables and MR publication. Results: Cronbach’s alpha revealed a good internal reliability of 0.93. The accumulated grade point average did not differ between those who had published and those who had not. MR presentations were strongly associated with MR publication. SEM showed that attitudes (0.71, p<0.001) and perceptions (0.27, p<0.001) had a direct effect on practices. Practices (0.49, p<0.001) and attitudes (0.30, p<0.001) had a direct effect on motivation, while motivation had a total effect = 0.36, p<0.001 on MR publication through MR presentation as a mediator. Conclusion: Positive attitudes and perceptions might lead to positivity in the intention to practice MR, which would lead to motivation and finally increase the odds of MR publication. Different approaches to promote excitement and perceptions in MR learning should be encouraged by teachers and faculty members. Keywords: Medical Research, Students, Perceptions, Attitudes, Barriers, Motivation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信