急诊腹部手术老年患者死亡率的预测因素:一项回顾性单中心研究

Mustafa Altınay, Sibel Oba
{"title":"急诊腹部手术老年患者死亡率的预测因素:一项回顾性单中心研究","authors":"Mustafa Altınay, Sibel Oba","doi":"10.28982/josam.7972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim: Advancements in medical technologies and prolonged life expectancy have increased the number of surgical interventions for elderly patients. Despite this however, emergency surgical interventions remain associated with a high mortality rate. Managing an emergency abdominal surgery in elderly patients poses great challenges for both the surgeon and the anesthesiologist. However, knowing the risk factors that increase mortality may offer advantages to the clinician managing the treatment process. There are studies in the literature examining the mortality of emergency surgeries in elderly patients. However, there are very few studies that work with a specific patient group such as abdominal surgery and then analyze laboratory test results. Here, we aimed to identify the risk factors that can be used to predict mortality in elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Methods: The study was designed retrospectively in a single center; 100 patients over the age of 80 who underwent emergency abdominal surgery were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups as survivor and non-survivor. Demographic, surgical, and anesthetic characteristics, laboratory tests, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status scores, postoperative intensive care needs, and treatments of the groups were compared using the chi-squared and Mann Whitney U-test. Determining factors were investigated with logistic regression analysis. Results: In multivariate analysis, ASA 3 and major surgery significantly increased mortality (P=0.041, P=0.011). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that C-reactive protein with a cut-off value of >84 mg/L had a sensitivity of 58.8% and a specificity of 71.2% (AUC=0.636, P=0.004), while lactate with a cut-off value of >3.6 mmol/L had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 95.5% in predicting mortality (AUC=0.776, P<0.001). Conclusion: The magnitude of surgery and the ASA score were the best predictors of mortality in elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.","PeriodicalId":30878,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery and Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of mortality in elderly patients in emergency abdominal surgery: A retrospective single-center study\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Altınay, Sibel Oba\",\"doi\":\"10.28982/josam.7972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/Aim: Advancements in medical technologies and prolonged life expectancy have increased the number of surgical interventions for elderly patients. Despite this however, emergency surgical interventions remain associated with a high mortality rate. Managing an emergency abdominal surgery in elderly patients poses great challenges for both the surgeon and the anesthesiologist. However, knowing the risk factors that increase mortality may offer advantages to the clinician managing the treatment process. There are studies in the literature examining the mortality of emergency surgeries in elderly patients. However, there are very few studies that work with a specific patient group such as abdominal surgery and then analyze laboratory test results. Here, we aimed to identify the risk factors that can be used to predict mortality in elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Methods: The study was designed retrospectively in a single center; 100 patients over the age of 80 who underwent emergency abdominal surgery were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups as survivor and non-survivor. Demographic, surgical, and anesthetic characteristics, laboratory tests, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status scores, postoperative intensive care needs, and treatments of the groups were compared using the chi-squared and Mann Whitney U-test. Determining factors were investigated with logistic regression analysis. Results: In multivariate analysis, ASA 3 and major surgery significantly increased mortality (P=0.041, P=0.011). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that C-reactive protein with a cut-off value of >84 mg/L had a sensitivity of 58.8% and a specificity of 71.2% (AUC=0.636, P=0.004), while lactate with a cut-off value of >3.6 mmol/L had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 95.5% in predicting mortality (AUC=0.776, P<0.001). Conclusion: The magnitude of surgery and the ASA score were the best predictors of mortality in elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Surgery and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Surgery and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.7972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.7972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:医疗技术的进步和预期寿命的延长增加了老年患者的手术干预次数。然而,尽管如此,紧急手术干预仍然与高死亡率有关。老年患者急诊腹部手术的处理对外科医生和麻醉师都提出了巨大的挑战。然而,了解增加死亡率的危险因素可能会为临床医生管理治疗过程提供优势。文献中有关于老年患者急诊手术死亡率的研究。然而,很少有研究针对特定的患者群体,比如腹部手术,然后分析实验室测试结果。在这里,我们的目的是确定可用于预测急诊腹部手术的老年患者死亡率的危险因素。方法:采用单中心回顾性设计;100名80岁以上接受紧急腹部手术的患者被纳入研究。患者分为生存组和非生存组。采用卡方检验和Mann Whitney u检验比较两组的人口学、手术和麻醉特征、实验室检查、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况评分、术后重症监护需求和治疗。采用logistic回归分析探讨影响因素。结果:在多因素分析中,ASA 3和大手术显著增加死亡率(P=0.041, P=0.011)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示,c -反应蛋白截断值为84 mg/L时,预测死亡率的敏感性为58.8%,特异性为71.2% (AUC=0.636, P=0.004);乳酸截断值为3.6 mmol/L时,预测死亡率的敏感性为50%,特异性为95.5% (AUC=0.776, P<0.001)。结论:手术规模和ASA评分是老年急诊腹部手术患者死亡率的最佳预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of mortality in elderly patients in emergency abdominal surgery: A retrospective single-center study
Background/Aim: Advancements in medical technologies and prolonged life expectancy have increased the number of surgical interventions for elderly patients. Despite this however, emergency surgical interventions remain associated with a high mortality rate. Managing an emergency abdominal surgery in elderly patients poses great challenges for both the surgeon and the anesthesiologist. However, knowing the risk factors that increase mortality may offer advantages to the clinician managing the treatment process. There are studies in the literature examining the mortality of emergency surgeries in elderly patients. However, there are very few studies that work with a specific patient group such as abdominal surgery and then analyze laboratory test results. Here, we aimed to identify the risk factors that can be used to predict mortality in elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Methods: The study was designed retrospectively in a single center; 100 patients over the age of 80 who underwent emergency abdominal surgery were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups as survivor and non-survivor. Demographic, surgical, and anesthetic characteristics, laboratory tests, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status scores, postoperative intensive care needs, and treatments of the groups were compared using the chi-squared and Mann Whitney U-test. Determining factors were investigated with logistic regression analysis. Results: In multivariate analysis, ASA 3 and major surgery significantly increased mortality (P=0.041, P=0.011). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that C-reactive protein with a cut-off value of >84 mg/L had a sensitivity of 58.8% and a specificity of 71.2% (AUC=0.636, P=0.004), while lactate with a cut-off value of >3.6 mmol/L had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 95.5% in predicting mortality (AUC=0.776, P<0.001). Conclusion: The magnitude of surgery and the ASA score were the best predictors of mortality in elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信