{"title":"静脉注射纳布啡与鞘内注射纳布啡预防骨科手术鞘内吗啡性瘙痒的随机双盲试验比较","authors":"Pranjali Kurhekar, J. Shesha dhiviya Krishna","doi":"10.4038/slja.v31i2.9031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intrathecal morphine provides excellent postoperative pain relief but results in pruritus in 30-60% of patients. Nalbuphine, an opioid agonist-antagonist prevents intrathecal morphine-induced itch when given by intravenous route. In this study, we compared efficacy of intrathecal and intravenous nalbuphine for the prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus. 90 patients were randomly divided into two groups. IT group received 100 mcg of morphine with 400 mcg of nalbuphine intrathecally. IV group received 100 mcg of morphine intrathecally and 400 mcg of nalbuphine intravenously. Incidence of itching, respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea, vomiting, sedation and analgesia were compared between the groups every 4th hourly for 24 hours. Data were analyzed with Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test. Incidence of itching in 24 hours period was 11.6% (5 patients) in IV group and 4.8% (2 patients) in IT group which was comparable. (P= 0.250) Two patients in IV group had intractable itching requiring naloxone. Incidence of itching at all time intervals was comparable between the groups. Analgesia was prolonged in IV group (P=0.03) Incidence of nausea, vomiting, sedation and respiratory depression was comparable. We conclude that intrathecal nalbuphine and intravenous nalbuphine were equally effective in preventing intrathecal morphine induced pruritus. The duration of analgesia was more when nalbuphine was given by IV route as compared to IT route.","PeriodicalId":41531,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Double-Blind Trial Comparing Efficacy of Intravenous Nalbuphine vs Intrathecal Nalbuphine for Prevention of Intrathecal Morphine Induced Pruritus in Orthopaedic Surgeries\",\"authors\":\"Pranjali Kurhekar, J. Shesha dhiviya Krishna\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/slja.v31i2.9031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intrathecal morphine provides excellent postoperative pain relief but results in pruritus in 30-60% of patients. Nalbuphine, an opioid agonist-antagonist prevents intrathecal morphine-induced itch when given by intravenous route. In this study, we compared efficacy of intrathecal and intravenous nalbuphine for the prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus. 90 patients were randomly divided into two groups. IT group received 100 mcg of morphine with 400 mcg of nalbuphine intrathecally. IV group received 100 mcg of morphine intrathecally and 400 mcg of nalbuphine intravenously. Incidence of itching, respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea, vomiting, sedation and analgesia were compared between the groups every 4th hourly for 24 hours. Data were analyzed with Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test. Incidence of itching in 24 hours period was 11.6% (5 patients) in IV group and 4.8% (2 patients) in IT group which was comparable. (P= 0.250) Two patients in IV group had intractable itching requiring naloxone. Incidence of itching at all time intervals was comparable between the groups. Analgesia was prolonged in IV group (P=0.03) Incidence of nausea, vomiting, sedation and respiratory depression was comparable. We conclude that intrathecal nalbuphine and intravenous nalbuphine were equally effective in preventing intrathecal morphine induced pruritus. The duration of analgesia was more when nalbuphine was given by IV route as compared to IT route.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"221 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/slja.v31i2.9031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/slja.v31i2.9031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
鞘内注射吗啡能很好地缓解术后疼痛,但30-60%的患者会出现瘙痒。纳布啡,一种阿片激动剂-拮抗剂,通过静脉给药可预防鞘内吗啡引起的瘙痒。在这项研究中,我们比较了鞘内注射和静脉注射纳布啡预防鞘内吗啡引起的瘙痒的疗效。90例患者随机分为两组。IT组给予吗啡100 mcg +纳布啡400 mcg的鞘内注射。静脉注射组给予鞘内吗啡100 mcg,静脉注射纳布啡400 mcg。比较各组瘙痒、呼吸抑制、低血压、恶心、呕吐、镇静、镇痛的发生率,每4 h进行一次,持续24 h。资料分析采用卡方检验和Mann-Whitney检验。静脉注射组24 h内瘙痒发生率为11.6%(5例),静脉注射组为4.8%(2例),两组比较具有可比性。(P= 0.250)静脉注射组有2例难治性瘙痒需要纳洛酮治疗。各组间瘙痒发生率在所有时间间隔均具有可比性。静脉注射组镇痛时间延长(P=0.03),恶心、呕吐、镇静、呼吸抑制发生率无明显差异。我们得出结论,鞘内注射纳布啡和静脉注射纳布啡在预防鞘内吗啡引起的瘙痒方面同样有效。静脉给药比IT给药镇痛时间更长。
Randomized Double-Blind Trial Comparing Efficacy of Intravenous Nalbuphine vs Intrathecal Nalbuphine for Prevention of Intrathecal Morphine Induced Pruritus in Orthopaedic Surgeries
Intrathecal morphine provides excellent postoperative pain relief but results in pruritus in 30-60% of patients. Nalbuphine, an opioid agonist-antagonist prevents intrathecal morphine-induced itch when given by intravenous route. In this study, we compared efficacy of intrathecal and intravenous nalbuphine for the prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus. 90 patients were randomly divided into two groups. IT group received 100 mcg of morphine with 400 mcg of nalbuphine intrathecally. IV group received 100 mcg of morphine intrathecally and 400 mcg of nalbuphine intravenously. Incidence of itching, respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea, vomiting, sedation and analgesia were compared between the groups every 4th hourly for 24 hours. Data were analyzed with Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test. Incidence of itching in 24 hours period was 11.6% (5 patients) in IV group and 4.8% (2 patients) in IT group which was comparable. (P= 0.250) Two patients in IV group had intractable itching requiring naloxone. Incidence of itching at all time intervals was comparable between the groups. Analgesia was prolonged in IV group (P=0.03) Incidence of nausea, vomiting, sedation and respiratory depression was comparable. We conclude that intrathecal nalbuphine and intravenous nalbuphine were equally effective in preventing intrathecal morphine induced pruritus. The duration of analgesia was more when nalbuphine was given by IV route as compared to IT route.