青少年和成人半月板修复后失败风险和结果评分的比较

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Kyle Martin, Robert A. Magnussen, Nicholas Pappa, Alex C. DiBartola, Robert A. Duerr, Christopher C. Kaeding, David C. Flanigan
{"title":"青少年和成人半月板修复后失败风险和结果评分的比较","authors":"Kyle Martin, Robert A. Magnussen, Nicholas Pappa, Alex C. DiBartola, Robert A. Duerr, Christopher C. Kaeding, David C. Flanigan","doi":"10.1097/bco.0000000000001221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are few studies assessing the impact of age at time of surgery on meniscus repair failure risk and patient-reported outcome scores. We sought to determine whether age at time of meniscus repair surgery affects failure risk and patient-reported outcome scores. Methods: Patients who underwent meniscus repair during 2006-2013 were evaluated for meniscus repair failure and patient-reported outcome scores using the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Marx Activity score at mean follow-up 6.5±2.0 yr post-operative. A multivariable linear regression analysis was used to assess the influence of patient age on patient-reported outcome scores following meniscus repair. Results: A total of 170 patients with mean age 27.8±10.1 yr (59% male) were identified, including 29 patients age 18 and younger and 141 patients over 18. Increasing patient age was associated with significantly lower IKDC (P=0.027), KOOS-ADL (P=0.003), and Marx activity scores (P<0.001). Repair failure occurred in 46 patients (27.1%) overall, including 7 failures (24.1%) in patients 18 and under and 39 failures (27.7%) in patients over 18. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated no association between age and meniscus repair failure risk when controlled for ACL reconstruction and BMI (P=0.69). Conclusion: Increased age is associated with poorer IKDC, KOOS-ADL, and Marx Activity scores following meniscus repair. However, there is no difference in failure of healing of meniscus repair between adolescent patients and adults. Level of Evidence: III","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of failure risk and outcome scores following meniscus repair among adolescent and adult patients\",\"authors\":\"Kyle Martin, Robert A. Magnussen, Nicholas Pappa, Alex C. DiBartola, Robert A. Duerr, Christopher C. Kaeding, David C. Flanigan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/bco.0000000000001221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There are few studies assessing the impact of age at time of surgery on meniscus repair failure risk and patient-reported outcome scores. We sought to determine whether age at time of meniscus repair surgery affects failure risk and patient-reported outcome scores. Methods: Patients who underwent meniscus repair during 2006-2013 were evaluated for meniscus repair failure and patient-reported outcome scores using the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Marx Activity score at mean follow-up 6.5±2.0 yr post-operative. A multivariable linear regression analysis was used to assess the influence of patient age on patient-reported outcome scores following meniscus repair. Results: A total of 170 patients with mean age 27.8±10.1 yr (59% male) were identified, including 29 patients age 18 and younger and 141 patients over 18. Increasing patient age was associated with significantly lower IKDC (P=0.027), KOOS-ADL (P=0.003), and Marx activity scores (P<0.001). Repair failure occurred in 46 patients (27.1%) overall, including 7 failures (24.1%) in patients 18 and under and 39 failures (27.7%) in patients over 18. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated no association between age and meniscus repair failure risk when controlled for ACL reconstruction and BMI (P=0.69). Conclusion: Increased age is associated with poorer IKDC, KOOS-ADL, and Marx Activity scores following meniscus repair. However, there is no difference in failure of healing of meniscus repair between adolescent patients and adults. Level of Evidence: III\",\"PeriodicalId\":10732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/bco.0000000000001221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bco.0000000000001221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:很少有研究评估手术时年龄对半月板修复失败风险和患者报告的结果评分的影响。我们试图确定半月板修复手术时的年龄是否影响失败风险和患者报告的结果评分。方法:对2006-2013年接受半月板修复的患者进行半月板修复失败和患者报告的结果评分,采用膝关节骨关节炎结局评分(oos)、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分和马克思活动评分,平均随访6.5±2.0年。采用多变量线性回归分析来评估患者年龄对半月板修复后患者报告的结果评分的影响。结果:共发现170例患者,平均年龄27.8±10.1岁,男性59%,其中18岁及以下29例,18岁以上141例。患者年龄增加与IKDC (P=0.027)、KOOS-ADL (P=0.003)和Marx活动评分显著降低相关(P<0.001)。总共有46例(27.1%)患者出现修复失败,其中18岁及以下患者7例(24.1%),18岁以上患者39例(27.7%)。logistic回归分析显示,在控制ACL重建和BMI时,年龄与半月板修复失败风险无相关性(P=0.69)。结论:年龄增加与半月板修复后IKDC、KOOS-ADL和Marx活动评分较差有关。然而,在半月板修复失败的青少年患者和成人之间没有差异。证据水平:III
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of failure risk and outcome scores following meniscus repair among adolescent and adult patients
Background: There are few studies assessing the impact of age at time of surgery on meniscus repair failure risk and patient-reported outcome scores. We sought to determine whether age at time of meniscus repair surgery affects failure risk and patient-reported outcome scores. Methods: Patients who underwent meniscus repair during 2006-2013 were evaluated for meniscus repair failure and patient-reported outcome scores using the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Marx Activity score at mean follow-up 6.5±2.0 yr post-operative. A multivariable linear regression analysis was used to assess the influence of patient age on patient-reported outcome scores following meniscus repair. Results: A total of 170 patients with mean age 27.8±10.1 yr (59% male) were identified, including 29 patients age 18 and younger and 141 patients over 18. Increasing patient age was associated with significantly lower IKDC (P=0.027), KOOS-ADL (P=0.003), and Marx activity scores (P<0.001). Repair failure occurred in 46 patients (27.1%) overall, including 7 failures (24.1%) in patients 18 and under and 39 failures (27.7%) in patients over 18. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated no association between age and meniscus repair failure risk when controlled for ACL reconstruction and BMI (P=0.69). Conclusion: Increased age is associated with poorer IKDC, KOOS-ADL, and Marx Activity scores following meniscus repair. However, there is no difference in failure of healing of meniscus repair between adolescent patients and adults. Level of Evidence: III
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信