生物炭单独施用及与矿肥、有机肥配施对大白菜产量及土壤性状的影响

Manfred Jakop, Nataša Belšak, Erik Rihter, Tjaša Cenčič Predikaka, Denis Stajnko, Silva Grobelnik Mlakar
{"title":"生物炭单独施用及与矿肥、有机肥配施对大白菜产量及土壤性状的影响","authors":"Manfred Jakop, Nataša Belšak, Erik Rihter, Tjaša Cenčič Predikaka, Denis Stajnko, Silva Grobelnik Mlakar","doi":"10.18690/agricsci.20.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of biochar application on fertile soils in a temperate climate during the first year of application. The field trial was conducted on a nutrient-rich silt loam soil at two experimental sites in north-eastern Slovenia (Biš and Skorba). The effect of biochar applied alone or in combination with compost or mineral fertiliser on soil properties and yield of white cabbage was studied. In addition to the control (C), the soil received five treatments including biochar (B; 1.5 t/ha), compost (CO; 1.5 t/ha), biochar-mixed compost (BCO; 3.0 t/ha), standard mineral fertilisers (NPK; NPK 0.35 t/ha, potassium sulphate 0.25 t/ha and calcium ammonium nitrate 0.25 t/ha) and combined application of half the amountof NPK and BCO (NPK+BCO). The results showed that the applied treatments had no significant influence on the measured soil chemical parameters, except for the amount of total organic carbon, electrical conductivity and pH in Biš and total carbon in Skorba. All investigated parameters (cabbage head weight, head circumference, total and market yield) were higher at the experimental site Skorba. Statistically significant differences were found only at the experimental site Biš, where the treatment influenced all parameters (p < 0.01), except for the head circumference of the cabbage. The NPK and NPK+BCO treatments produced significantly higher total yields (66.7 t/ha and 65.8 t/ha, respectively) and marketable yields (53.2 t/ha and 51.8 t/ha, respectively) compared to the other treatments (41.3-52.6 t/ha and 30.5-42.4 t/ha, respectively). Although the differences between the other treatments were insignificant, a trend of decreasing cabbage yields towards CO > BCO > B was observed. Similar results were also obtained when analysing the average data of the two experimental sites.","PeriodicalId":37655,"journal":{"name":"中国农业科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Biochar Applied Alone and in Combination with Mineral and Organic Fertilisers on the Yield of White Cabbage and Soil Properties\",\"authors\":\"Manfred Jakop, Nataša Belšak, Erik Rihter, Tjaša Cenčič Predikaka, Denis Stajnko, Silva Grobelnik Mlakar\",\"doi\":\"10.18690/agricsci.20.1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of biochar application on fertile soils in a temperate climate during the first year of application. The field trial was conducted on a nutrient-rich silt loam soil at two experimental sites in north-eastern Slovenia (Biš and Skorba). The effect of biochar applied alone or in combination with compost or mineral fertiliser on soil properties and yield of white cabbage was studied. In addition to the control (C), the soil received five treatments including biochar (B; 1.5 t/ha), compost (CO; 1.5 t/ha), biochar-mixed compost (BCO; 3.0 t/ha), standard mineral fertilisers (NPK; NPK 0.35 t/ha, potassium sulphate 0.25 t/ha and calcium ammonium nitrate 0.25 t/ha) and combined application of half the amountof NPK and BCO (NPK+BCO). The results showed that the applied treatments had no significant influence on the measured soil chemical parameters, except for the amount of total organic carbon, electrical conductivity and pH in Biš and total carbon in Skorba. All investigated parameters (cabbage head weight, head circumference, total and market yield) were higher at the experimental site Skorba. Statistically significant differences were found only at the experimental site Biš, where the treatment influenced all parameters (p < 0.01), except for the head circumference of the cabbage. The NPK and NPK+BCO treatments produced significantly higher total yields (66.7 t/ha and 65.8 t/ha, respectively) and marketable yields (53.2 t/ha and 51.8 t/ha, respectively) compared to the other treatments (41.3-52.6 t/ha and 30.5-42.4 t/ha, respectively). Although the differences between the other treatments were insignificant, a trend of decreasing cabbage yields towards CO > BCO > B was observed. Similar results were also obtained when analysing the average data of the two experimental sites.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国农业科学\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国农业科学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18690/agricsci.20.1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国农业科学","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/agricsci.20.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在温带气候条件下施用生物炭第一年在肥沃土壤上的有效性。田间试验是在斯洛文尼亚东北部两个试验点(比什和斯科尔巴)的营养丰富的粉砂壤土上进行的。研究了生物炭单独施用或与堆肥、矿物肥配施对大白菜土壤性状和产量的影响。除对照(C)外,土壤还进行了生物炭(B)处理;1.5吨/公顷),堆肥(CO;1.5吨/公顷),生物炭混合堆肥(BCO;3.0 t/ha),标准矿物肥料(NPK;氮磷钾0.35 t/ha,硫酸钾0.25 t/ha,硝酸钙0.25 t/ha),氮磷钾和BCO (NPK+BCO)配施量的一半。结果表明:除比什比什的总有机碳、电导率、pH和斯科尔巴的总碳外,施用处理对土壤化学参数的影响不显著。白菜头重、头围、总产量和市场产量均在试验地Skorba较高。统计学上有显著差异的只有实验地点比斯,治疗影响了所有参数(p <0.01),除了白菜的头围。氮磷钾和氮磷钾+BCO处理的总产量(分别为66.7 t/ha和65.8 t/ha)和可售产量(分别为53.2 t/ha和51.8 t/ha)显著高于其他处理(分别为41.3-52.6 t/ha和30.5-42.4 t/ha)。虽然其他处理间的差异不显著,但CO和gt对白菜产量的降低趋势明显;BCO祝辞B被观察到。对两个试验点的平均数据进行分析,也得到了类似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Biochar Applied Alone and in Combination with Mineral and Organic Fertilisers on the Yield of White Cabbage and Soil Properties
The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of biochar application on fertile soils in a temperate climate during the first year of application. The field trial was conducted on a nutrient-rich silt loam soil at two experimental sites in north-eastern Slovenia (Biš and Skorba). The effect of biochar applied alone or in combination with compost or mineral fertiliser on soil properties and yield of white cabbage was studied. In addition to the control (C), the soil received five treatments including biochar (B; 1.5 t/ha), compost (CO; 1.5 t/ha), biochar-mixed compost (BCO; 3.0 t/ha), standard mineral fertilisers (NPK; NPK 0.35 t/ha, potassium sulphate 0.25 t/ha and calcium ammonium nitrate 0.25 t/ha) and combined application of half the amountof NPK and BCO (NPK+BCO). The results showed that the applied treatments had no significant influence on the measured soil chemical parameters, except for the amount of total organic carbon, electrical conductivity and pH in Biš and total carbon in Skorba. All investigated parameters (cabbage head weight, head circumference, total and market yield) were higher at the experimental site Skorba. Statistically significant differences were found only at the experimental site Biš, where the treatment influenced all parameters (p < 0.01), except for the head circumference of the cabbage. The NPK and NPK+BCO treatments produced significantly higher total yields (66.7 t/ha and 65.8 t/ha, respectively) and marketable yields (53.2 t/ha and 51.8 t/ha, respectively) compared to the other treatments (41.3-52.6 t/ha and 30.5-42.4 t/ha, respectively). Although the differences between the other treatments were insignificant, a trend of decreasing cabbage yields towards CO > BCO > B was observed. Similar results were also obtained when analysing the average data of the two experimental sites.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国农业科学
中国农业科学 Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17516
期刊介绍: Scientia Agricultura Sinica seeks to publish those papers that are influential and will significantly advance scientific understanding in agriculture fields worldwide. Scientia Agricultura Sinica publishes manuscripts in the categories focusing on the core subjects listed below. -Review describes new development and highlight future directions of a specialized or interdisciplinary significance in agricultural sciences. They should be focused on providing insights and summary/context on the published findings and introducing new concepts or viewpoints for solving the important unresolved questions by presenting the research background, approach, and outlook of the field. Most Reviews are solicited by the editors, but unsolicited submissions may also be considered. -Research Article presents important new research results through reproducible experimental design, using genetic, biochemical, cell and molecular biological methods, statistical analyses, and other scientific methods. -Research Notes is for a concise, but independent report representing a significant contribution to agricultural sciences. It is intended to publish these results that are exceptional interest and particularly topical and relevant, but the preliminary results. Core Subjects: -Crop Genetics & Breeding·GermplasmResources·Molecular Genetics -Tillage & Cultivation·Physiology & Biochemistry -Plant Protection -Soil & Fertilizer·Water-Saving Irrigation·Agro-Ecology & Environment -Horticulture -Storage·Fresh-Keeping·Processing -Animal Science·Veterinary Science -Agricultural Ecology -Research Notes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信