{"title":"伊戈洛人三角形,停在电视旁:对瓦朗强奸Sa Bontok和Tokwifi的分析","authors":"Ivan Emil Labayne","doi":"10.52518/2023-04lbyne","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visual forms of communication are historically allied with the colonial project. Photography and film have been used both to create narratives about, or impart stories to, the colonized native, as part of framing their way of life, or lack of ‘civilization,’ and feeding them with the colonizer’s culture. Yet as with all things, these technologies and processes are pregnant with their opposites, as Marx put it. This short essay looks at two films, Walang Rape sa Bontok and Tokwifi, to examine how alternatives concerning the medium have been pursued. It focuses not just on the filmic content but also on the processes of the movies’ creation. Doing this betokens not just alternative representations of the Bontoc people but more importantly, alternative relationships materialized to make a historically marginalized group—the indigenous people–more present and active in procedures of storytelling, representation, and visualization. A preliminary wager is that both films approximate and bring to life the notion of communality or collectivity, counterpointing the arguably more dominant logic of tokenistic inclusion when it comes to the visibility of the indigenous in mainstream mass media.","PeriodicalId":40520,"journal":{"name":"Plaridel","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Igorot triangulates, tarries beside a TV: An analysis of Walang Rape Sa Bontok and Tokwifi\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Emil Labayne\",\"doi\":\"10.52518/2023-04lbyne\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Visual forms of communication are historically allied with the colonial project. Photography and film have been used both to create narratives about, or impart stories to, the colonized native, as part of framing their way of life, or lack of ‘civilization,’ and feeding them with the colonizer’s culture. Yet as with all things, these technologies and processes are pregnant with their opposites, as Marx put it. This short essay looks at two films, Walang Rape sa Bontok and Tokwifi, to examine how alternatives concerning the medium have been pursued. It focuses not just on the filmic content but also on the processes of the movies’ creation. Doing this betokens not just alternative representations of the Bontoc people but more importantly, alternative relationships materialized to make a historically marginalized group—the indigenous people–more present and active in procedures of storytelling, representation, and visualization. A preliminary wager is that both films approximate and bring to life the notion of communality or collectivity, counterpointing the arguably more dominant logic of tokenistic inclusion when it comes to the visibility of the indigenous in mainstream mass media.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plaridel\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plaridel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52518/2023-04lbyne\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plaridel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52518/2023-04lbyne","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
视觉形式的交流在历史上与殖民项目联系在一起。摄影和电影既被用来创作关于被殖民的土著人的叙事,也被用来向他们讲述故事,作为塑造他们的生活方式或缺乏“文明”的一部分,也被用来向他们灌输殖民者的文化。然而,正如马克思所说,与所有事物一样,这些技术和过程也孕育着它们的对立面。这篇短文着眼于两部电影,《Walang Rape sa Bontok》和《Tokwifi》,以研究如何追求关于媒介的替代方案。它不仅关注电影的内容,也关注电影的创作过程。这样做不仅代表了邦托克人的另一种表现,更重要的是,另一种关系的实现,使一个历史上被边缘化的群体——土著人——在讲故事、表现和可视化的过程中更加在场和活跃。一个初步的赌注是,这两部电影都接近并赋予了社群或集体的概念以生命,当涉及到土著在主流大众媒体中的可见性时,与象征性的包容的可论证的更占主导地位的逻辑相反。
The Igorot triangulates, tarries beside a TV: An analysis of Walang Rape Sa Bontok and Tokwifi
Visual forms of communication are historically allied with the colonial project. Photography and film have been used both to create narratives about, or impart stories to, the colonized native, as part of framing their way of life, or lack of ‘civilization,’ and feeding them with the colonizer’s culture. Yet as with all things, these technologies and processes are pregnant with their opposites, as Marx put it. This short essay looks at two films, Walang Rape sa Bontok and Tokwifi, to examine how alternatives concerning the medium have been pursued. It focuses not just on the filmic content but also on the processes of the movies’ creation. Doing this betokens not just alternative representations of the Bontoc people but more importantly, alternative relationships materialized to make a historically marginalized group—the indigenous people–more present and active in procedures of storytelling, representation, and visualization. A preliminary wager is that both films approximate and bring to life the notion of communality or collectivity, counterpointing the arguably more dominant logic of tokenistic inclusion when it comes to the visibility of the indigenous in mainstream mass media.