跨国宪政之镜中的死刑

Семенова Оксана Николаевна, Петров Антон Михайлович
{"title":"跨国宪政之镜中的死刑","authors":"Семенова Оксана Николаевна, Петров Антон Михайлович","doi":"10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-3-40-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constitutionalism has become the foundation of a globalizing world. Human rights have been recognized as a democratic value of any State. However, due to a number of reasons, the issue of the appointment and execution of the death penalty has not found an unambiguous solution in the legislation of various countries. In the Russian Federation, when the country officially withdrew from the Council of Europe, whose membership was accompanied by a demand for the non-application of this criminal punishment, disputes about the resumption of the imposition of death sentences for a number of crimes resumed. The authors of the article, based on the analysis of the provisions of international legislation, Russia's voluntarily assumed international obligations in the field of human rights, constitutional norms, legal positions and decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, scientific papers on the studied issues, formulate their own vision regarding the legal possibilities of resuming the use of the death penalty in the country through the prism of the values of transnational constitutionalism, international obligations of the state.","PeriodicalId":33262,"journal":{"name":"SeveroKavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The death penalty in the mirror of the transnational constitutionalism\",\"authors\":\"Семенова Оксана Николаевна, Петров Антон Михайлович\",\"doi\":\"10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-3-40-49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Constitutionalism has become the foundation of a globalizing world. Human rights have been recognized as a democratic value of any State. However, due to a number of reasons, the issue of the appointment and execution of the death penalty has not found an unambiguous solution in the legislation of various countries. In the Russian Federation, when the country officially withdrew from the Council of Europe, whose membership was accompanied by a demand for the non-application of this criminal punishment, disputes about the resumption of the imposition of death sentences for a number of crimes resumed. The authors of the article, based on the analysis of the provisions of international legislation, Russia's voluntarily assumed international obligations in the field of human rights, constitutional norms, legal positions and decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, scientific papers on the studied issues, formulate their own vision regarding the legal possibilities of resuming the use of the death penalty in the country through the prism of the values of transnational constitutionalism, international obligations of the state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SeveroKavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SeveroKavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-3-40-49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SeveroKavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-3-40-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宪政已成为全球化世界的基础。人权已被承认为任何国家的民主价值。然而,由于若干原因,死刑的任命和执行问题未能在各国立法中找到明确的解决办法。在俄罗斯联邦,当该国正式退出欧洲委员会时,关于恢复对若干罪行判处死刑的争端又恢复了。欧洲委员会的成员资格是伴随着不适用这种刑罚的要求而出现的。本文作者在分析国际法规定、俄罗斯在人权领域自愿承担的国际义务、宪法规范、俄罗斯联邦宪法法院的法律立场和决定、关于所研究问题的科学论文的基础上,从跨国宪政价值观和国家的国际义务的角度,就在该国恢复使用死刑的法律可能性提出自己的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The death penalty in the mirror of the transnational constitutionalism
Constitutionalism has become the foundation of a globalizing world. Human rights have been recognized as a democratic value of any State. However, due to a number of reasons, the issue of the appointment and execution of the death penalty has not found an unambiguous solution in the legislation of various countries. In the Russian Federation, when the country officially withdrew from the Council of Europe, whose membership was accompanied by a demand for the non-application of this criminal punishment, disputes about the resumption of the imposition of death sentences for a number of crimes resumed. The authors of the article, based on the analysis of the provisions of international legislation, Russia's voluntarily assumed international obligations in the field of human rights, constitutional norms, legal positions and decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, scientific papers on the studied issues, formulate their own vision regarding the legal possibilities of resuming the use of the death penalty in the country through the prism of the values of transnational constitutionalism, international obligations of the state.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信