选择情节:为什么那么多小说都在考虑是否要孩子?

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERARY REVIEWS
Sanjena Sathian
{"title":"选择情节:为什么那么多小说都在考虑是否要孩子?","authors":"Sanjena Sathian","doi":"10.1353/tyr.2023.a908682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Choice PlotWhy are so many novels reckoning with whether to have children? Sanjena Sathian (bio) Imagined children loom over my life of late. They haunt nearly every conversation as my circle collectively wonders whether, when, and how to procreate. There is the friend weighing climate pessimism and a meager paycheck against his love of kids. The friend who watches graphic birthing videos as a form of contraception. The doctor friend, once eager for babies, who sees ectopic pregnancies and septic miscarriages and deems [End Page 132] gestation too risky after Dobbs. The friend who worries he won't be able to adopt as an unpartnered gay man. The child-free queer friends feeling betrayed by other queers' baby fever. The friend who joins a \"committee,\" complete with Zoom calls and pitch decks, to help a single woman pick a sperm donor. The friend who keeps her abortion secret; it is a season of babies, not terminations. The friend whose miscarriage is so physically excruciating it makes her reconsider \"trying\" again. The friend freezing embryos as truce in a long battle with her husband: he is ready for children now; she may never want them. The friend freezing eggs who absconds to the bathroom at a wedding to administer her hormone shots. Millennials did not invent waffling about reproduction, but we have put our generational spin on a familiar story. Twenty-first-century social norms and fertility technologies let us postpone childbearing; our equivocation is still further protracted because our reproductive years have been marked by recessions and environmental catastrophes, in light of which having kids can seem impossible or immoral. All this is to say nothing of the wild swings in our rights. I began my twenties in an age of procreative optimism, forty years after Roe v. Wade, when commercial egg freezing and gay marriage alike were new. I turned thirty months before the Supreme Court overturned Roe; threatened contraception, fertility treatments, and miscarriage care; and began to erode queer rights. The contemporary American paradox: we live in an age of medically expanded but legally diminished choice. Inevitably, in the United States and beyond, novelists are taking up the dilemmas of twenty-first-century procreation. There has been a slew of recent novels about pregnancy and reproductive choice. Among the newest are Louisa Hall's Reproduction (2023), about a Frankenstein-obsessed novelist's pregnancy, and Ashley Wurzbacher's How to Care for a Human Girl (2023), about two sisters who get pregnant simultaneously. Fiction is particularly suited to addressing the quandaries of choice. Interiority and free indirect discourse allow readers to gain intimacy with characters' ambivalent worldviews, while scene and plot let writers dramatize [End Page 133] multiple perspectives and eschew polemic. An ability to represent paradox may in fact be the novel's greatest ethical power. Of course, these contemporary books have ancestors. \"The novel has long been a vessel for intense but paradoxical feelings about the question of creating new life,\" writes critic Aaron Matz in The Novel and the Problem of New Life (2021), which examines literary representations of skepticism around reproduction. Such representations, Matz points out, appear in the nineteenth-century work of Gustave Flaubert and D. H. Lawrence and extend into the twentieth century in the novels of Virginia Woolf and Doris Lessing, among others. In 2018, a new kind of book about choice arrived, heralding what we might call \"the choice plot.\" Sheila Heti's Motherhood is a diaristic chronicle of a woman torn about whether to have a baby; seeking help with her decision, she turns to the I Ching and flips coins. (She decides against.) In Motherhood, the long-standing \"procreative-skeptical strain\" Matz identifies as a hallmark of fiction became a stand-alone subject. Motherhood split critics. Some saw it as navel-gazing, others as revelatory. Matz called Motherhood's focus on one woman's interior vacillation \"airless,\" and wondered, \"Can an entire novel subsist on the basis of this theme?\" The choice plot replies with a hearty yes. Because of course it can. In my friends' discussions about childbearing lie the universal, fundamental questions of fiction: of how to arrange a life, and how to make...","PeriodicalId":43039,"journal":{"name":"YALE REVIEW","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Choice Plot: Why are so many novels reckoning with whether to have children?\",\"authors\":\"Sanjena Sathian\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tyr.2023.a908682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Choice PlotWhy are so many novels reckoning with whether to have children? Sanjena Sathian (bio) Imagined children loom over my life of late. They haunt nearly every conversation as my circle collectively wonders whether, when, and how to procreate. There is the friend weighing climate pessimism and a meager paycheck against his love of kids. The friend who watches graphic birthing videos as a form of contraception. The doctor friend, once eager for babies, who sees ectopic pregnancies and septic miscarriages and deems [End Page 132] gestation too risky after Dobbs. The friend who worries he won't be able to adopt as an unpartnered gay man. The child-free queer friends feeling betrayed by other queers' baby fever. The friend who joins a \\\"committee,\\\" complete with Zoom calls and pitch decks, to help a single woman pick a sperm donor. The friend who keeps her abortion secret; it is a season of babies, not terminations. The friend whose miscarriage is so physically excruciating it makes her reconsider \\\"trying\\\" again. The friend freezing embryos as truce in a long battle with her husband: he is ready for children now; she may never want them. The friend freezing eggs who absconds to the bathroom at a wedding to administer her hormone shots. Millennials did not invent waffling about reproduction, but we have put our generational spin on a familiar story. Twenty-first-century social norms and fertility technologies let us postpone childbearing; our equivocation is still further protracted because our reproductive years have been marked by recessions and environmental catastrophes, in light of which having kids can seem impossible or immoral. All this is to say nothing of the wild swings in our rights. I began my twenties in an age of procreative optimism, forty years after Roe v. Wade, when commercial egg freezing and gay marriage alike were new. I turned thirty months before the Supreme Court overturned Roe; threatened contraception, fertility treatments, and miscarriage care; and began to erode queer rights. The contemporary American paradox: we live in an age of medically expanded but legally diminished choice. Inevitably, in the United States and beyond, novelists are taking up the dilemmas of twenty-first-century procreation. There has been a slew of recent novels about pregnancy and reproductive choice. Among the newest are Louisa Hall's Reproduction (2023), about a Frankenstein-obsessed novelist's pregnancy, and Ashley Wurzbacher's How to Care for a Human Girl (2023), about two sisters who get pregnant simultaneously. Fiction is particularly suited to addressing the quandaries of choice. Interiority and free indirect discourse allow readers to gain intimacy with characters' ambivalent worldviews, while scene and plot let writers dramatize [End Page 133] multiple perspectives and eschew polemic. An ability to represent paradox may in fact be the novel's greatest ethical power. Of course, these contemporary books have ancestors. \\\"The novel has long been a vessel for intense but paradoxical feelings about the question of creating new life,\\\" writes critic Aaron Matz in The Novel and the Problem of New Life (2021), which examines literary representations of skepticism around reproduction. Such representations, Matz points out, appear in the nineteenth-century work of Gustave Flaubert and D. H. Lawrence and extend into the twentieth century in the novels of Virginia Woolf and Doris Lessing, among others. In 2018, a new kind of book about choice arrived, heralding what we might call \\\"the choice plot.\\\" Sheila Heti's Motherhood is a diaristic chronicle of a woman torn about whether to have a baby; seeking help with her decision, she turns to the I Ching and flips coins. (She decides against.) In Motherhood, the long-standing \\\"procreative-skeptical strain\\\" Matz identifies as a hallmark of fiction became a stand-alone subject. Motherhood split critics. Some saw it as navel-gazing, others as revelatory. Matz called Motherhood's focus on one woman's interior vacillation \\\"airless,\\\" and wondered, \\\"Can an entire novel subsist on the basis of this theme?\\\" The choice plot replies with a hearty yes. Because of course it can. In my friends' discussions about childbearing lie the universal, fundamental questions of fiction: of how to arrange a life, and how to make...\",\"PeriodicalId\":43039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"YALE REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"YALE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tyr.2023.a908682\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY REVIEWS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"YALE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tyr.2023.a908682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY REVIEWS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为什么那么多小说都在考虑是否要孩子?想象中的孩子们最近在我的生活中若隐若现。当我的圈子里所有人都在想是否、何时以及如何生育时,这些问题几乎萦绕在我们的每一次谈话中。有一个朋友在气候悲观主义和微薄的薪水与他对孩子的爱之间进行权衡。看分娩视频作为避孕手段的朋友。医生朋友,曾经渴望孩子,看到异位妊娠和败血性流产,认为怀孕太危险了,多布斯。一个朋友担心他作为一个没有伴侣的同性恋者不能收养孩子。没有孩子的酷儿朋友被其他酷儿的孩子热背叛了。这个朋友加入了一个“委员会”,通过Zoom电话和演讲来帮助一位单身女性挑选精子捐赠者。保守堕胎秘密的朋友;这是一个生育的季节,而不是堕胎的季节。流产给她的身体带来了极大的痛苦,让她重新考虑“再试一次”。朋友冷冻胚胎作为与丈夫长期斗争的休战:他现在准备好要孩子了;她可能永远都不想要。冷冻卵子的朋友在婚礼上跑到洗手间注射荷尔蒙。千禧一代并没有发明关于繁殖的胡言乱语,但我们对一个熟悉的故事进行了一代人的解读。21世纪的社会规范和生育技术让我们推迟生育;由于经济衰退和环境灾难给我们的生育年龄打上了烙印,因此生孩子似乎是不可能的,甚至是不道德的,所以我们的模棱两可还会进一步延长。这一切还不包括我们权利的剧烈波动。在罗伊诉韦德案过去40年之后,商业卵子冷冻和同性婚姻都是新鲜事物,我在对生育持乐观态度的年代开始了我的20多岁。在最高法院推翻罗伊案判决前的30个月,我刚满30岁;受到威胁的避孕、生育治疗和流产护理;并开始侵蚀酷儿的权利。当代美国的悖论:我们生活在一个医学上扩大但法律上减少选择的时代。不可避免的是,在美国和其他国家,小说家们开始着手处理21世纪的生育困境。最近有大量关于怀孕和生育选择的小说。最新的是路易莎·霍尔的《再生产》(2023),讲述了一个痴迷于弗兰肯斯坦的小说家怀孕的故事,以及阿什利·沃兹巴彻的《如何照顾一个人类女孩》(2023),讲述了两个姐妹同时怀孕的故事。小说特别适合解决选择的困境。内在性和自由的间接话语让读者与人物矛盾的世界观亲密接触,而场景和情节让作者将多个视角戏剧化,避免争论。表现矛盾的能力实际上可能是小说最大的道德力量。当然,这些当代书籍都有祖先。评论家亚伦·马茨在《小说与新生活的问题》(2021年出版)中写道:“小说长期以来一直是对创造新生活问题的强烈而矛盾的感情的载体。”马茨指出,这种表现出现在19世纪的古斯塔夫·福楼拜和d·h·劳伦斯的作品中,并延伸到20世纪的弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫和多丽丝·莱辛等人的小说中。2018年,一本关于选择的新书问世,预示着我们可以称之为“选择情节”。希拉·海蒂(Sheila Heti)的《母性》(Motherhood)是一本日记式编年史,讲述了一个纠结于是否要孩子的女人;为了寻求帮助,她翻开易经,掷硬币。(她决定反对。)在《母性》中,马茨认定为小说标志的长期存在的“怀疑生育的张力”成为了一个独立的主题。母性分裂了批评者。一些人认为这是一纸空文,另一些人则认为这是启示性的。马茨把《母性》对一个女人内心摇摆的关注称为“沉闷”,并想知道,“整部小说能否在这个主题的基础上生存下去?”选择情节的回答是肯定的。因为它当然可以。在我的朋友们关于生育的讨论中,存在着小说中普遍而基本的问题:如何安排生活,以及如何使……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Choice Plot: Why are so many novels reckoning with whether to have children?
The Choice PlotWhy are so many novels reckoning with whether to have children? Sanjena Sathian (bio) Imagined children loom over my life of late. They haunt nearly every conversation as my circle collectively wonders whether, when, and how to procreate. There is the friend weighing climate pessimism and a meager paycheck against his love of kids. The friend who watches graphic birthing videos as a form of contraception. The doctor friend, once eager for babies, who sees ectopic pregnancies and septic miscarriages and deems [End Page 132] gestation too risky after Dobbs. The friend who worries he won't be able to adopt as an unpartnered gay man. The child-free queer friends feeling betrayed by other queers' baby fever. The friend who joins a "committee," complete with Zoom calls and pitch decks, to help a single woman pick a sperm donor. The friend who keeps her abortion secret; it is a season of babies, not terminations. The friend whose miscarriage is so physically excruciating it makes her reconsider "trying" again. The friend freezing embryos as truce in a long battle with her husband: he is ready for children now; she may never want them. The friend freezing eggs who absconds to the bathroom at a wedding to administer her hormone shots. Millennials did not invent waffling about reproduction, but we have put our generational spin on a familiar story. Twenty-first-century social norms and fertility technologies let us postpone childbearing; our equivocation is still further protracted because our reproductive years have been marked by recessions and environmental catastrophes, in light of which having kids can seem impossible or immoral. All this is to say nothing of the wild swings in our rights. I began my twenties in an age of procreative optimism, forty years after Roe v. Wade, when commercial egg freezing and gay marriage alike were new. I turned thirty months before the Supreme Court overturned Roe; threatened contraception, fertility treatments, and miscarriage care; and began to erode queer rights. The contemporary American paradox: we live in an age of medically expanded but legally diminished choice. Inevitably, in the United States and beyond, novelists are taking up the dilemmas of twenty-first-century procreation. There has been a slew of recent novels about pregnancy and reproductive choice. Among the newest are Louisa Hall's Reproduction (2023), about a Frankenstein-obsessed novelist's pregnancy, and Ashley Wurzbacher's How to Care for a Human Girl (2023), about two sisters who get pregnant simultaneously. Fiction is particularly suited to addressing the quandaries of choice. Interiority and free indirect discourse allow readers to gain intimacy with characters' ambivalent worldviews, while scene and plot let writers dramatize [End Page 133] multiple perspectives and eschew polemic. An ability to represent paradox may in fact be the novel's greatest ethical power. Of course, these contemporary books have ancestors. "The novel has long been a vessel for intense but paradoxical feelings about the question of creating new life," writes critic Aaron Matz in The Novel and the Problem of New Life (2021), which examines literary representations of skepticism around reproduction. Such representations, Matz points out, appear in the nineteenth-century work of Gustave Flaubert and D. H. Lawrence and extend into the twentieth century in the novels of Virginia Woolf and Doris Lessing, among others. In 2018, a new kind of book about choice arrived, heralding what we might call "the choice plot." Sheila Heti's Motherhood is a diaristic chronicle of a woman torn about whether to have a baby; seeking help with her decision, she turns to the I Ching and flips coins. (She decides against.) In Motherhood, the long-standing "procreative-skeptical strain" Matz identifies as a hallmark of fiction became a stand-alone subject. Motherhood split critics. Some saw it as navel-gazing, others as revelatory. Matz called Motherhood's focus on one woman's interior vacillation "airless," and wondered, "Can an entire novel subsist on the basis of this theme?" The choice plot replies with a hearty yes. Because of course it can. In my friends' discussions about childbearing lie the universal, fundamental questions of fiction: of how to arrange a life, and how to make...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
YALE REVIEW
YALE REVIEW LITERARY REVIEWS-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信