《在多样性中寻找秩序:1792-1848年哈布斯堡帝国的宗教宽容》作者:斯科特·伯格

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"《在多样性中寻找秩序:1792-1848年哈布斯堡帝国的宗教宽容》作者:斯科特·伯格","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a906962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Finding Order in Diversity: Religious Toleration in the Habsburg Empire, 1792–1848 by Scott Berg Peter Höyng Scott Berg, Finding Order in Diversity: Religious Toleration in the Habsburg Empire, 1792–1848. Lafayette, IN: Purdue UP, 2022. 345 pp. Beginning to review Scott Berg's Finding Order in Diversity: Religious Toleration in the Habsburg Empire, 1792–1848 from its back end quickly indicates its forte: the thirty-page-long bibliography divides into six sections: archival sources in Austria and Hungary (1 page), published primary sources (4 pages), separated from a brief but pertinent list of consulted newspapers as printed material, unpublished dissertations (1.5 pages), articles (11 pages), and, at last, books (11 pages). In sum, Berg has accomplished an impressive scope of thorough research in both quantity and, given that he used archival material in German and Hungarian, quality. As a result of Berg's stupendous thoroughness, the accompanying and often detailed notes take close to 100 pages. Given this depth, Berg can authoritatively proclaim his central thesis, one that demystifies the premise that the Habsburgs relied throughout history on Catholicism as a political pillar. Instead, Berg demonstrates that the reigns of Francis II/I (r. 1792–1835) and his son Ferdinand (r. 1835–1848) \"marked the only era\" (203) when the Habsburgs actively pursued tolerance toward confessional diversity to maintain stability within their multiethnic empire. In fact, his research leads him to the bold thesis that \"the idea of authoritarian or nondemocratic regimes, such as the Habsburg Empire, pioneering human rights is an uncomfortable one today but one that is rooted in historical reality\" (14). Starting with Joseph II's enlightened policies, Berg guides the reader in six chapters through the institutionalization of toleration that took place in the \"much-maligned regime (1792–1848) that followed Joseph II's brief, unsuccessful reign\" (13). Yet Joseph II's decade-long reign was not as futile as Berg insinuates here. After all, he himself shows that, despite many opportunities to overturn Josephism \"and to promote an alliance of throne and altar,\" [End Page 101] Francis \"remained under the influence of his Josephist advisors\" (37). While recognizing these limited attempts at Catholic revivalism in reaction to the French Revolution and the Enlightenment, therefore, Berg largely follows and supports Pieter Judson's line of argument in The Habsburg Empire: A New History (2016) that the Empire provided, thanks to Josephism, a common imperial citizenship that for stability's sake respected its multiethnic and religious diversity. In 1846, the monarchy counted 26.3 million Catholics, 6.8 million Orthodox Christians (Greek Catholic and non-united Orthodox), 3.3 million Protestants (Lutherans and Calvinists), and 729,000 Jews, \"making non-Catholics nearly a third of the monarchy's population\" (6). Despite the admiration that Berg shows for the conservative emperors Francis and his son Ferdinand, he is not shy to see the shortcomings of this relative tolerance in dealing with religious diversity, as is evident in Chapter 5, where he canvasses the limited success of integrating Jews, predominantly living in the colonized Galicia, into the monarchy. While Jewish emancipation was still far away, Berg emphasizes that the government was able to ward off anti-Semitic violence. In Chapter 6, Berg focuses on the emergence of popular Catholicism after the 1848 revolution, as cemented first in the counterrevolution and then in the 1855 concordat, after the Josephists, according to Berg, had been removed from the government. Convincingly though Berg masters his narrative on how the government diligently promoted policies of relative tolerance toward religious minorities in an empire with a majority of Catholics, the book would be even more compelling if the plentitude of historical details did not lead the reader to lose sight of the forest for the trees. Too often, terms, persons, organizations, geographic information, and political maneuvers obscure a more thorough discussion of a given issue. Whereas Berg beautifully starts each of his six chapters with a vignette of cultural history by taking us to a specific location within the Empire to frame the forthcoming focus of the given chapter, he then leaves this interpretive approach behind. Instead, he moves quickly to a blizzard of granular details without further or...","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding Order in Diversity: Religious Toleration in the Habsburg Empire, 1792–1848 by Scott Berg (review)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/oas.2023.a906962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: Finding Order in Diversity: Religious Toleration in the Habsburg Empire, 1792–1848 by Scott Berg Peter Höyng Scott Berg, Finding Order in Diversity: Religious Toleration in the Habsburg Empire, 1792–1848. Lafayette, IN: Purdue UP, 2022. 345 pp. Beginning to review Scott Berg's Finding Order in Diversity: Religious Toleration in the Habsburg Empire, 1792–1848 from its back end quickly indicates its forte: the thirty-page-long bibliography divides into six sections: archival sources in Austria and Hungary (1 page), published primary sources (4 pages), separated from a brief but pertinent list of consulted newspapers as printed material, unpublished dissertations (1.5 pages), articles (11 pages), and, at last, books (11 pages). In sum, Berg has accomplished an impressive scope of thorough research in both quantity and, given that he used archival material in German and Hungarian, quality. As a result of Berg's stupendous thoroughness, the accompanying and often detailed notes take close to 100 pages. Given this depth, Berg can authoritatively proclaim his central thesis, one that demystifies the premise that the Habsburgs relied throughout history on Catholicism as a political pillar. Instead, Berg demonstrates that the reigns of Francis II/I (r. 1792–1835) and his son Ferdinand (r. 1835–1848) \\\"marked the only era\\\" (203) when the Habsburgs actively pursued tolerance toward confessional diversity to maintain stability within their multiethnic empire. In fact, his research leads him to the bold thesis that \\\"the idea of authoritarian or nondemocratic regimes, such as the Habsburg Empire, pioneering human rights is an uncomfortable one today but one that is rooted in historical reality\\\" (14). Starting with Joseph II's enlightened policies, Berg guides the reader in six chapters through the institutionalization of toleration that took place in the \\\"much-maligned regime (1792–1848) that followed Joseph II's brief, unsuccessful reign\\\" (13). Yet Joseph II's decade-long reign was not as futile as Berg insinuates here. After all, he himself shows that, despite many opportunities to overturn Josephism \\\"and to promote an alliance of throne and altar,\\\" [End Page 101] Francis \\\"remained under the influence of his Josephist advisors\\\" (37). While recognizing these limited attempts at Catholic revivalism in reaction to the French Revolution and the Enlightenment, therefore, Berg largely follows and supports Pieter Judson's line of argument in The Habsburg Empire: A New History (2016) that the Empire provided, thanks to Josephism, a common imperial citizenship that for stability's sake respected its multiethnic and religious diversity. In 1846, the monarchy counted 26.3 million Catholics, 6.8 million Orthodox Christians (Greek Catholic and non-united Orthodox), 3.3 million Protestants (Lutherans and Calvinists), and 729,000 Jews, \\\"making non-Catholics nearly a third of the monarchy's population\\\" (6). Despite the admiration that Berg shows for the conservative emperors Francis and his son Ferdinand, he is not shy to see the shortcomings of this relative tolerance in dealing with religious diversity, as is evident in Chapter 5, where he canvasses the limited success of integrating Jews, predominantly living in the colonized Galicia, into the monarchy. While Jewish emancipation was still far away, Berg emphasizes that the government was able to ward off anti-Semitic violence. In Chapter 6, Berg focuses on the emergence of popular Catholicism after the 1848 revolution, as cemented first in the counterrevolution and then in the 1855 concordat, after the Josephists, according to Berg, had been removed from the government. Convincingly though Berg masters his narrative on how the government diligently promoted policies of relative tolerance toward religious minorities in an empire with a majority of Catholics, the book would be even more compelling if the plentitude of historical details did not lead the reader to lose sight of the forest for the trees. Too often, terms, persons, organizations, geographic information, and political maneuvers obscure a more thorough discussion of a given issue. Whereas Berg beautifully starts each of his six chapters with a vignette of cultural history by taking us to a specific location within the Empire to frame the forthcoming focus of the given chapter, he then leaves this interpretive approach behind. Instead, he moves quickly to a blizzard of granular details without further or...\",\"PeriodicalId\":40350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Austrian Studies\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Austrian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a906962\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Austrian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a906962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

斯科特·伯格:《在多样性中寻找秩序:哈布斯堡帝国的宗教宽容,1792-1848》,作者:彼得Höyng斯科特·伯格:《在多样性中寻找秩序:哈布斯堡帝国的宗教宽容,1792-1848》。拉斐特,印第安纳州:普渡大学,2022年。开始回顾斯科特·伯格的《发现多样性的秩序:哈布斯堡帝国的宗教宽容,1792-1848》,从它的后端很快就能看出它的长处:30页长的参考书目分为六个部分:奥地利和匈牙利的档案资料(1页),出版的原始资料(4页),从简短但相关的参考报纸作为印刷材料,未发表的论文(1.5页),文章(11页),最后是书籍(11页)。总而言之,伯格在数量和质量上都完成了令人印象深刻的深入研究,因为他使用了德语和匈牙利语的档案材料。由于伯格惊人的彻底性,伴随而来的、经常是详细的笔记有将近100页。考虑到这种深度,伯格可以权威地宣布他的中心论点,一个揭开哈布斯堡王朝在历史上一直依赖天主教作为政治支柱的前提的神秘面纱。相反,伯格证明了弗朗西斯二世/一世(1792-1835)和他的儿子费迪南德(1835-1848)的统治“标志着唯一一个时代”(203年),哈布斯堡王朝积极追求对宗教多样性的宽容,以维持其多民族帝国的稳定。事实上,他的研究使他得出了一个大胆的论点,即“独裁或非民主政权,如哈布斯堡帝国,开创人权的想法在今天是一个令人不安的想法,但它植根于历史现实”(14)。从约瑟夫二世开明的政策开始,伯格用六个章节引导读者了解“约瑟夫二世短暂而不成功的统治之后饱受诟病的政权(1792-1848)”中宽容的制度化(13)。然而,约瑟夫二世长达十年的统治并不像伯格在这里暗示的那样徒劳。毕竟,他自己表明,尽管有很多机会推翻约瑟夫派“并促进王位和祭坛的联盟”,弗朗西斯“仍然在他的约瑟夫派顾问的影响下”(37)。因此,贝格在承认天主教复兴运动对法国大革命和启蒙运动的有限尝试的同时,在很大程度上遵循并支持彼得·贾德森(Pieter Judson)在《哈布斯堡帝国:新历史》(2016)中的观点,即由于约瑟夫主义,帝国提供了一个共同的帝国公民身份,为了稳定,尊重其多民族和宗教多样性。1846年,君主制统计了2630万天主教徒,680万东正教教徒(希腊天主教徒和非统一的东正教教徒),330万新教徒(路德教徒和加尔文教徒)和72.9万犹太人,“使非天主教徒占君主制人口的近三分之一”(6)。尽管伯格对保守的皇帝弗朗西斯和他的儿子费迪南德表示钦佩,但他并不害羞地看到这种相对宽容在处理宗教多样性方面的缺点,如第5章所示。在书中,他考察了将犹太人(主要生活在加利西亚殖民地)融入君主制的有限成功。虽然犹太人解放还很遥远,但伯格强调,政府能够抵御反犹太暴力。在第6章中,伯格将重点放在1848年革命后大众天主教的出现上,根据伯格的说法,这首先是在反革命中巩固的,然后是在1855年的协议中,在约瑟夫派被赶出政府之后。令人信服的是,尽管伯格在他的叙述中掌握了政府如何在一个天主教徒占多数的帝国中努力推行对宗教少数群体相对宽容的政策,但如果大量的历史细节没有导致读者只见树木而不见森林,这本书将更加引人注目。术语、人物、组织、地理信息和政治手段往往掩盖了对给定问题的更彻底的讨论。贝格在他的六章中,每一章都以文化史的小插曲开始,将我们带到了帝国的一个特定地点,以框架下一章的重点,然后他把这种解释方法抛在了后面。相反,他很快就进入了一大堆细节,没有进一步或……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finding Order in Diversity: Religious Toleration in the Habsburg Empire, 1792–1848 by Scott Berg (review)
Reviewed by: Finding Order in Diversity: Religious Toleration in the Habsburg Empire, 1792–1848 by Scott Berg Peter Höyng Scott Berg, Finding Order in Diversity: Religious Toleration in the Habsburg Empire, 1792–1848. Lafayette, IN: Purdue UP, 2022. 345 pp. Beginning to review Scott Berg's Finding Order in Diversity: Religious Toleration in the Habsburg Empire, 1792–1848 from its back end quickly indicates its forte: the thirty-page-long bibliography divides into six sections: archival sources in Austria and Hungary (1 page), published primary sources (4 pages), separated from a brief but pertinent list of consulted newspapers as printed material, unpublished dissertations (1.5 pages), articles (11 pages), and, at last, books (11 pages). In sum, Berg has accomplished an impressive scope of thorough research in both quantity and, given that he used archival material in German and Hungarian, quality. As a result of Berg's stupendous thoroughness, the accompanying and often detailed notes take close to 100 pages. Given this depth, Berg can authoritatively proclaim his central thesis, one that demystifies the premise that the Habsburgs relied throughout history on Catholicism as a political pillar. Instead, Berg demonstrates that the reigns of Francis II/I (r. 1792–1835) and his son Ferdinand (r. 1835–1848) "marked the only era" (203) when the Habsburgs actively pursued tolerance toward confessional diversity to maintain stability within their multiethnic empire. In fact, his research leads him to the bold thesis that "the idea of authoritarian or nondemocratic regimes, such as the Habsburg Empire, pioneering human rights is an uncomfortable one today but one that is rooted in historical reality" (14). Starting with Joseph II's enlightened policies, Berg guides the reader in six chapters through the institutionalization of toleration that took place in the "much-maligned regime (1792–1848) that followed Joseph II's brief, unsuccessful reign" (13). Yet Joseph II's decade-long reign was not as futile as Berg insinuates here. After all, he himself shows that, despite many opportunities to overturn Josephism "and to promote an alliance of throne and altar," [End Page 101] Francis "remained under the influence of his Josephist advisors" (37). While recognizing these limited attempts at Catholic revivalism in reaction to the French Revolution and the Enlightenment, therefore, Berg largely follows and supports Pieter Judson's line of argument in The Habsburg Empire: A New History (2016) that the Empire provided, thanks to Josephism, a common imperial citizenship that for stability's sake respected its multiethnic and religious diversity. In 1846, the monarchy counted 26.3 million Catholics, 6.8 million Orthodox Christians (Greek Catholic and non-united Orthodox), 3.3 million Protestants (Lutherans and Calvinists), and 729,000 Jews, "making non-Catholics nearly a third of the monarchy's population" (6). Despite the admiration that Berg shows for the conservative emperors Francis and his son Ferdinand, he is not shy to see the shortcomings of this relative tolerance in dealing with religious diversity, as is evident in Chapter 5, where he canvasses the limited success of integrating Jews, predominantly living in the colonized Galicia, into the monarchy. While Jewish emancipation was still far away, Berg emphasizes that the government was able to ward off anti-Semitic violence. In Chapter 6, Berg focuses on the emergence of popular Catholicism after the 1848 revolution, as cemented first in the counterrevolution and then in the 1855 concordat, after the Josephists, according to Berg, had been removed from the government. Convincingly though Berg masters his narrative on how the government diligently promoted policies of relative tolerance toward religious minorities in an empire with a majority of Catholics, the book would be even more compelling if the plentitude of historical details did not lead the reader to lose sight of the forest for the trees. Too often, terms, persons, organizations, geographic information, and political maneuvers obscure a more thorough discussion of a given issue. Whereas Berg beautifully starts each of his six chapters with a vignette of cultural history by taking us to a specific location within the Empire to frame the forthcoming focus of the given chapter, he then leaves this interpretive approach behind. Instead, he moves quickly to a blizzard of granular details without further or...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Austrian Studies
Journal of Austrian Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Journal of Austrian Studies is an interdisciplinary quarterly that publishes scholarly articles and book reviews on all aspects of the history and culture of Austria, Austro-Hungary, and the Habsburg territory. It is the flagship publication of the Austrian Studies Association and contains contributions in German and English from the world''s premiere scholars in the field of Austrian studies. The journal highlights scholarly work that draws on innovative methodologies and new ways of viewing Austrian history and culture. Although the journal was renamed in 2012 to reflect the increasing scope and diversity of its scholarship, it has a long lineage dating back over a half century as Modern Austrian Literature and, prior to that, The Journal of the International Arthur Schnitzler Research Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信