论俄罗斯刑事诉讼中指控概念和类型的主要途径

Alexandra V. Bogdanova
{"title":"论俄罗斯刑事诉讼中指控概念和类型的主要途径","authors":"Alexandra V. Bogdanova","doi":"10.22394/2686-7834-2023-3-45-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this study is the institute of prosecution in domestic criminal proceedings. In the fi rst part of the article, the author explores the concept of accusation. Approaches are considered in which the accusation was identifi ed both with a criminal suit and with criminal prosecution. The second part of the presented work is devoted to the types of charges and the criteria for their differentiation. A summary analysis of the positions of modern, Soviet and pre-revolutionary researchers of law on this issue is given. Various types of charges are considered depending on the subject entitled to its implementation. Particular attention is paid to the so-called public prosecution, which was supported by citizens who were not endowed with this right ex offi cio. Based on the study, the author comes to the conclusion that the adversarial model of the criminal process is characterized by the presence of various types of charges, as well as various subjects entitled to its implementation. At the moment, in the Russian criminal process there is a so-called “prosecutor’s monopoly” on the prosecution, which is somewhat limited by the presence of a private prosecution. However, a small number of offenses classifi ed as private prosecution, as well as the number of criminal cases in this category considered by the courts, does not change the existing paradigm. Thus, the existing procedure does not fully correspond to the adversarial model of the criminal process.","PeriodicalId":498776,"journal":{"name":"Teoretičeskaâ i prikladnaâ ûrisprudenciâ","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Main Approaches to the Concept and Types of Charges in the Russian Criminal Process\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra V. Bogdanova\",\"doi\":\"10.22394/2686-7834-2023-3-45-51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The subject of this study is the institute of prosecution in domestic criminal proceedings. In the fi rst part of the article, the author explores the concept of accusation. Approaches are considered in which the accusation was identifi ed both with a criminal suit and with criminal prosecution. The second part of the presented work is devoted to the types of charges and the criteria for their differentiation. A summary analysis of the positions of modern, Soviet and pre-revolutionary researchers of law on this issue is given. Various types of charges are considered depending on the subject entitled to its implementation. Particular attention is paid to the so-called public prosecution, which was supported by citizens who were not endowed with this right ex offi cio. Based on the study, the author comes to the conclusion that the adversarial model of the criminal process is characterized by the presence of various types of charges, as well as various subjects entitled to its implementation. At the moment, in the Russian criminal process there is a so-called “prosecutor’s monopoly” on the prosecution, which is somewhat limited by the presence of a private prosecution. However, a small number of offenses classifi ed as private prosecution, as well as the number of criminal cases in this category considered by the courts, does not change the existing paradigm. Thus, the existing procedure does not fully correspond to the adversarial model of the criminal process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":498776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teoretičeskaâ i prikladnaâ ûrisprudenciâ\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teoretičeskaâ i prikladnaâ ûrisprudenciâ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2023-3-45-51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teoretičeskaâ i prikladnaâ ûrisprudenciâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2023-3-45-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主题是国内刑事诉讼中的起诉制度。文章的第一部分对指控的概念进行了探讨。考虑将指控与刑事诉讼和刑事起诉同时确定的办法。所提出的工作的第二部分致力于收费的类型和他们的区分标准。对现代、苏联和革命前的法律研究者在这一问题上的立场进行了总结分析。根据有权实施收费的主题,可考虑收取不同种类的收费。特别注意的是所谓的公诉,这是由没有依法享有这种权利的公民所支持的。在此基础上,笔者认为刑事诉讼对抗性模式的特点是存在多种类型的指控,以及不同的适用主体。目前,在俄罗斯的刑事诉讼程序中,存在所谓的“检察官垄断”起诉,这在某种程度上受到私诉的限制。然而,少数被列为自诉的罪行,以及法院审议的这类刑事案件的数量,并没有改变现有的范式。因此,现有程序并不完全符合刑事程序的对抗性模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Main Approaches to the Concept and Types of Charges in the Russian Criminal Process
The subject of this study is the institute of prosecution in domestic criminal proceedings. In the fi rst part of the article, the author explores the concept of accusation. Approaches are considered in which the accusation was identifi ed both with a criminal suit and with criminal prosecution. The second part of the presented work is devoted to the types of charges and the criteria for their differentiation. A summary analysis of the positions of modern, Soviet and pre-revolutionary researchers of law on this issue is given. Various types of charges are considered depending on the subject entitled to its implementation. Particular attention is paid to the so-called public prosecution, which was supported by citizens who were not endowed with this right ex offi cio. Based on the study, the author comes to the conclusion that the adversarial model of the criminal process is characterized by the presence of various types of charges, as well as various subjects entitled to its implementation. At the moment, in the Russian criminal process there is a so-called “prosecutor’s monopoly” on the prosecution, which is somewhat limited by the presence of a private prosecution. However, a small number of offenses classifi ed as private prosecution, as well as the number of criminal cases in this category considered by the courts, does not change the existing paradigm. Thus, the existing procedure does not fully correspond to the adversarial model of the criminal process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信