鸵鸟生活在中欧吗?:将俄罗斯对乌克兰的攻击正常化为Visegrád四

Q2 Social Sciences
Aliaksei Kazharski
{"title":"鸵鸟生活在中欧吗?:将俄罗斯对乌克兰的攻击正常化为Visegrád四","authors":"Aliaksei Kazharski","doi":"10.5937/jrs18-43201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study surveys instances of discursive normalization of the Russian attack on Ukraine across the Visegrád Four (V4) countries, examining political discourses in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. Following February 24, 2022, the strategies that expressed an open backing of Russia were mostly marginalized becoming morally all but impossible and thus politically too costly. However, other and more indirect ways of showing \"understanding\" if not support for Moscow's actions soon (re)emerged. These included presenting the war in \"realist-geopolitical\" terms, as a proxy for the (allegedly inevitable) competition between great powers and a \"neutralist-pacifist\" discourse that criticized the Western military aid to Ukraine. In a broader sense, both discourses can be viewed as anchored in collective memories of the tragic Central European past that have traditionally infused the national identities in the V4 with a sense of vulnerability. The grim \"realist\" image of the world also rhymes well with the regional rise of the populist political style that hinges on the stated need to protect the \"underdog\" people and replaces the imperatives of solidarity with those of \"self-help.\"","PeriodicalId":36669,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Regional Security","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do ostriches live in Central Europe?: Normalizing the Russian attack on Ukraine in the Visegrád Four\",\"authors\":\"Aliaksei Kazharski\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/jrs18-43201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study surveys instances of discursive normalization of the Russian attack on Ukraine across the Visegrád Four (V4) countries, examining political discourses in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. Following February 24, 2022, the strategies that expressed an open backing of Russia were mostly marginalized becoming morally all but impossible and thus politically too costly. However, other and more indirect ways of showing \\\"understanding\\\" if not support for Moscow's actions soon (re)emerged. These included presenting the war in \\\"realist-geopolitical\\\" terms, as a proxy for the (allegedly inevitable) competition between great powers and a \\\"neutralist-pacifist\\\" discourse that criticized the Western military aid to Ukraine. In a broader sense, both discourses can be viewed as anchored in collective memories of the tragic Central European past that have traditionally infused the national identities in the V4 with a sense of vulnerability. The grim \\\"realist\\\" image of the world also rhymes well with the regional rise of the populist political style that hinges on the stated need to protect the \\\"underdog\\\" people and replaces the imperatives of solidarity with those of \\\"self-help.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":36669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Regional Security\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Regional Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/jrs18-43201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Regional Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/jrs18-43201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

该研究调查了Visegrád四国(V4)中俄罗斯攻击乌克兰的话语正常化实例,研究了捷克共和国、匈牙利、波兰和斯洛伐克的政治话语。在2022年2月24日之后,公开支持俄罗斯的战略大多被边缘化,在道德上几乎是不可能的,因此在政治上代价太高。然而,对莫斯科的行动表示“理解”(如果不是支持的话)的其他更间接的方式很快(重新)出现了。其中包括用“现实主义-地缘政治”的术语来描述这场战争,作为大国之间(据称不可避免的)竞争的代表,以及批评西方对乌克兰军事援助的“中立主义-和平主义”话语。从更广泛的意义上说,这两种话语都可以被视为锚定在中欧悲剧过去的集体记忆中,这些记忆传统上给V4的国家身份注入了一种脆弱感。这种冷酷的“现实主义”世界形象也与民粹主义政治风格的地区崛起非常吻合,民粹主义政治风格依赖于保护“弱势”人民的公开需要,并以“自助”取代团结的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do ostriches live in Central Europe?: Normalizing the Russian attack on Ukraine in the Visegrád Four
The study surveys instances of discursive normalization of the Russian attack on Ukraine across the Visegrád Four (V4) countries, examining political discourses in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. Following February 24, 2022, the strategies that expressed an open backing of Russia were mostly marginalized becoming morally all but impossible and thus politically too costly. However, other and more indirect ways of showing "understanding" if not support for Moscow's actions soon (re)emerged. These included presenting the war in "realist-geopolitical" terms, as a proxy for the (allegedly inevitable) competition between great powers and a "neutralist-pacifist" discourse that criticized the Western military aid to Ukraine. In a broader sense, both discourses can be viewed as anchored in collective memories of the tragic Central European past that have traditionally infused the national identities in the V4 with a sense of vulnerability. The grim "realist" image of the world also rhymes well with the regional rise of the populist political style that hinges on the stated need to protect the "underdog" people and replaces the imperatives of solidarity with those of "self-help."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Regional Security
Journal of Regional Security Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信