{"title":"行政法院司法审查指南2023:司法审查从业人员的关键更新","authors":"Harriet Wakeman","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2023.2270828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Open Government Licence StatementContains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.Notes1 Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (8th edn) para 1.1.3.2 R (DVP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 606 (Admin), [2021] 4 WLR 75 [8]. See also R (AB) v Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary and others [2019] EWHC 3461 (Admin), [2020] ACD 30 [108].3 Practice Direction 54A, para 1.1.4 Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (7th edn) para 15.3.2.5 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 15.3.2.6 [2022] EWHC 2729 (Admin) [15]–[16].7 [2023] EWHC 737 (Admin).8 Cassandra Somers-Joce and Elizabeth A. O’Loughlin, ‘Recent Judicial Perspectives on the Duty of Candour’ [2023] JR (forthcoming).9 Simon Kiely and Jonathan Blunden, ‘Key Updates to the Administrative Court Guide’ (Sharpe Pritchard Blog, 7 September 2023) <https://www.sharpepritchard.co.uk/latest-news/key-updates-to-the-administrative-court-guide> accessed 4 October 2023. See also Gabriel Tan, ‘Updates to the Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide’ (Administrative Court Blog, 8 September 2023) <https://administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com/2023/09/08/updates-to-the-administrative-court-judicial-review-guide/> accessed 4 October 2023; Somers-Joce and O’Loughlin (n 8).10 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) Preface.11 R (Marandi) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2023] EWHC 587 (Admin), [2023] 2 Cr App R 15 [16].12 [2011] EWCA Civ 42, [2011] 1 WLR 1645 [21].13 [2018] EWCA Crim 1341, [2018] 1 WLR 6023 [29(vi)–(vii)].14 [2023] EWHC 1579 (Admin) [48].15 [2022] EWHC 517 (Admin), [2022] ACD 52.16 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 23.2.6.17 [2022] EWHC 682 (Admin), [2022] A.C.D. 58 [21], [28].18 [2023] EWHC 980 (Admin), [2023] 4 WLR 45 [50].19 R (Safeer) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2518 [16]–[19]; R (Singh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2861 [16].20 ibid.21 A similarly neutral approach was taken by Hallett LJ in R (Talpada) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 841 [2].22 [2022] EWCA Civ 355, [2022] 1 WLR 2339 [70].23 [2023] EWCA Civ 439, [2023] 4 WLR 37 [72].24 [2023] EWHC 50 (Admin) [26].25 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 10.1.5.26 [2022] EWHC 2890 (Admin) [13].27 [2002] EWCA Civ 879, [2002] CP Rep 6 [38].28 [2009] EWCA Civ 595.29 [2006] EWHC 816 (Comm), [2006] 5 Costs LR 714.30 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 24.1.2.31 [2020] EWCA Civ 146 [72].32 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 7.9.3, fn 103.33 [2022] EWHC 2515 (Admin), [2023] ACD 3 [74], [76].34 Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (1st edn) Preface.35 See The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 2.2.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"411 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide 2023: Key Updates for Judicial Review Practitioners\",\"authors\":\"Harriet Wakeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2023.2270828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Open Government Licence StatementContains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.Notes1 Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (8th edn) para 1.1.3.2 R (DVP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 606 (Admin), [2021] 4 WLR 75 [8]. See also R (AB) v Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary and others [2019] EWHC 3461 (Admin), [2020] ACD 30 [108].3 Practice Direction 54A, para 1.1.4 Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (7th edn) para 15.3.2.5 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 15.3.2.6 [2022] EWHC 2729 (Admin) [15]–[16].7 [2023] EWHC 737 (Admin).8 Cassandra Somers-Joce and Elizabeth A. O’Loughlin, ‘Recent Judicial Perspectives on the Duty of Candour’ [2023] JR (forthcoming).9 Simon Kiely and Jonathan Blunden, ‘Key Updates to the Administrative Court Guide’ (Sharpe Pritchard Blog, 7 September 2023) <https://www.sharpepritchard.co.uk/latest-news/key-updates-to-the-administrative-court-guide> accessed 4 October 2023. See also Gabriel Tan, ‘Updates to the Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide’ (Administrative Court Blog, 8 September 2023) <https://administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com/2023/09/08/updates-to-the-administrative-court-judicial-review-guide/> accessed 4 October 2023; Somers-Joce and O’Loughlin (n 8).10 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) Preface.11 R (Marandi) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2023] EWHC 587 (Admin), [2023] 2 Cr App R 15 [16].12 [2011] EWCA Civ 42, [2011] 1 WLR 1645 [21].13 [2018] EWCA Crim 1341, [2018] 1 WLR 6023 [29(vi)–(vii)].14 [2023] EWHC 1579 (Admin) [48].15 [2022] EWHC 517 (Admin), [2022] ACD 52.16 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 23.2.6.17 [2022] EWHC 682 (Admin), [2022] A.C.D. 58 [21], [28].18 [2023] EWHC 980 (Admin), [2023] 4 WLR 45 [50].19 R (Safeer) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2518 [16]–[19]; R (Singh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2861 [16].20 ibid.21 A similarly neutral approach was taken by Hallett LJ in R (Talpada) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 841 [2].22 [2022] EWCA Civ 355, [2022] 1 WLR 2339 [70].23 [2023] EWCA Civ 439, [2023] 4 WLR 37 [72].24 [2023] EWHC 50 (Admin) [26].25 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 10.1.5.26 [2022] EWHC 2890 (Admin) [13].27 [2002] EWCA Civ 879, [2002] CP Rep 6 [38].28 [2009] EWCA Civ 595.29 [2006] EWHC 816 (Comm), [2006] 5 Costs LR 714.30 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 24.1.2.31 [2020] EWCA Civ 146 [72].32 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 7.9.3, fn 103.33 [2022] EWHC 2515 (Admin), [2023] ACD 3 [74], [76].34 Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (1st edn) Preface.35 See The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 2.2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"411 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2270828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2023.2270828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
按此增大图像大小按此减小图像大小公开政府特许经营许可证声明包含根据公开政府特许经营许可证v3.0授权的公营机构资料。注1法院及审裁处，《行政法院司法覆核指引》(第8版)第1.1.3.2段R (DVP) v内政部国务秘书[2021]EWHC 606 (Admin)， [2021] 4 WLR 75[8]。另见R (AB) v Chief Constable of Hampshire conststable and others [2019] EWHC 3461 (Admin)， [2020] ACD 30 [108]. 2实务指示54A，第1.1.4段法院及审裁处司法机构，行政法院司法覆核指引(第七版)第15.3.2.5段行政法院司法覆核指引(第1版)第15.3.2.6段[2022]EWHC 2729(行政)[15]-[16]。[2023]中国农业大学学报(自然科学版)“坦率义务的司法视角”[j]，《司法研究》，2010年第9期Simon Kiely和Jonathan Blunden，“行政法院指南的关键更新”(Sharpe Pritchard Blog, 2023年9月7日)，2023年10月4日访问。另见Gabriel Tan，“行政法院司法审查指南更新”(行政法院博客，2023年9月8日)，于2023年10月4日访问;10 .萨默斯-乔斯和奥洛克林(第8期)行政法院司法覆核指引(第1期)preface11 R (Marandi)诉威斯敏斯特裁判法院[2023]EWHC 587 (Admin)， [2023] 2 Cr App R 15[16]。[2011]中国农业大学学报(自然科学版)，[2011][21]。[2018]中国林业大学学报，[2018]1 WLR 6023 [29(vi) - (vii)]。14 [2023] EWHC 1579 (Admin)[48]。15 [2022] EWHC 517 (Admin)， [2022] ACD 52.16行政法院司法覆核指南(n 1)第23.2.6.17段[2022]EWHC 682 (Admin)， [2022] a.c.d 58[21]，[28]。[2023]中国机械工程，[2023][4]中国机械工程，[50].19R (Safeer) v国务大臣内政部[2018]EWCA Civ 2518 [16] - [19];R (Singh) v Secretary of Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2861[16]。20同上。21 Hallett LJ在R (Talpada) v Secretary State for Home Department一案中采取了类似的中立方法[2018]EWCA Civ 841[2]。[2022]中国农业大学学报(自然科学版)，[2022][70]。[2023]中国农业大学学报(自然科学版)，[2023][72]。[2023]中国农业大学学报(自然科学版)[26]行政法院司法覆核指引(n .1)第10.1.5.26 [2022]EWHC 2890(行政)[13]。[2002]中国农业大学学报(自然科学版)，[2002][38]。[2009]中华人民共和国民事诉讼法[2006]，[2006]5 Costs LR 714.30行政法院司法审查指南(n 1) para 24.1.2.31[2020]中华人民共和国民事诉讼法[72].32行政法院司法覆核指引(n . 1)第7.9.3段，fn 103.33 [2022] EWHC 2515 (Admin)， [2023] ACD 3 [74]， [76].34法院和法庭司法，《行政法院司法审查指南》(第1版)序言。35见《行政法院司法审查指南》(第1期)第2.2段。
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Open Government Licence StatementContains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.Notes1 Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (8th edn) para 1.1.3.2 R (DVP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 606 (Admin), [2021] 4 WLR 75 [8]. See also R (AB) v Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary and others [2019] EWHC 3461 (Admin), [2020] ACD 30 [108].3 Practice Direction 54A, para 1.1.4 Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (7th edn) para 15.3.2.5 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 15.3.2.6 [2022] EWHC 2729 (Admin) [15]–[16].7 [2023] EWHC 737 (Admin).8 Cassandra Somers-Joce and Elizabeth A. O’Loughlin, ‘Recent Judicial Perspectives on the Duty of Candour’ [2023] JR (forthcoming).9 Simon Kiely and Jonathan Blunden, ‘Key Updates to the Administrative Court Guide’ (Sharpe Pritchard Blog, 7 September 2023) accessed 4 October 2023. See also Gabriel Tan, ‘Updates to the Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide’ (Administrative Court Blog, 8 September 2023) accessed 4 October 2023; Somers-Joce and O’Loughlin (n 8).10 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) Preface.11 R (Marandi) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2023] EWHC 587 (Admin), [2023] 2 Cr App R 15 [16].12 [2011] EWCA Civ 42, [2011] 1 WLR 1645 [21].13 [2018] EWCA Crim 1341, [2018] 1 WLR 6023 [29(vi)–(vii)].14 [2023] EWHC 1579 (Admin) [48].15 [2022] EWHC 517 (Admin), [2022] ACD 52.16 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 23.2.6.17 [2022] EWHC 682 (Admin), [2022] A.C.D. 58 [21], [28].18 [2023] EWHC 980 (Admin), [2023] 4 WLR 45 [50].19 R (Safeer) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2518 [16]–[19]; R (Singh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2861 [16].20 ibid.21 A similarly neutral approach was taken by Hallett LJ in R (Talpada) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 841 [2].22 [2022] EWCA Civ 355, [2022] 1 WLR 2339 [70].23 [2023] EWCA Civ 439, [2023] 4 WLR 37 [72].24 [2023] EWHC 50 (Admin) [26].25 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 10.1.5.26 [2022] EWHC 2890 (Admin) [13].27 [2002] EWCA Civ 879, [2002] CP Rep 6 [38].28 [2009] EWCA Civ 595.29 [2006] EWHC 816 (Comm), [2006] 5 Costs LR 714.30 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 24.1.2.31 [2020] EWCA Civ 146 [72].32 The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 7.9.3, fn 103.33 [2022] EWHC 2515 (Admin), [2023] ACD 3 [74], [76].34 Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (1st edn) Preface.35 See The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide (n 1) para 2.2.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
