抗sars - cov -2抗体在有症状的儿童和青少年中检测COVID-19的效用:一项分析性横断面研究

IF 0.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Reza Sinaei, Kimia Iranmanesh, Sara Pezeshki, Mohammad Hasannejad, Ali Hoseininasab, Saeedeh Parvaresh, Roya Sinaei
{"title":"抗sars - cov -2抗体在有症状的儿童和青少年中检测COVID-19的效用:一项分析性横断面研究","authors":"Reza Sinaei, Kimia Iranmanesh, Sara Pezeshki, Mohammad Hasannejad, Ali Hoseininasab, Saeedeh Parvaresh, Roya Sinaei","doi":"10.2174/011573398x267876231017072820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Understanding immunoreactivity against SARS-CoV-2 provides a basis for the pathophysiology of COVID-19 while also providing a means to confirm the disease and reduce its transmission. Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted from February 1st, 2020 to December 30th, 2022. The patients’ characteristics, clinical and laboratory data, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) results, and the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (serology testing) were recorded. Results: A total of 182 children were included. PCR returned positive in 60.4%, while serology indicated infection in 86.4% of the participants. Sex as a factor was not significantly associated with the results of either of the tests. However, seropositive children were older (p < 0.001), while PCR-positive children were younger (p < 0.01). Those who presented with cough (p < 0.05) or Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) (p < 0.05) had higher seropositivity rates than those without. In contrast, those who presented with fever (p < 0.001) or seizures (p < 0.01) had higher chances of having a positive PCR for COVID-19. In individuals suffering from arthralgia, limping, or arthritis, positive serology was observed in 96.3%, 95.2%, and 96.9%, respectively. However, positive results from PCR were observed in 67.2%, 67.1%, and 30.3% of the mentioned individuals, respectively. Conclusion: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology is a valuable diagnostic tool in individuals presenting late with arthralgia, arthritis, limping, MIS-C, or other delayed presentations, especially when PCR returns negative for the virus.","PeriodicalId":44030,"journal":{"name":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of the Presence of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Detecting COVID-19 in Symptomatic Children and Adolescents: An Analytical Cross-sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Reza Sinaei, Kimia Iranmanesh, Sara Pezeshki, Mohammad Hasannejad, Ali Hoseininasab, Saeedeh Parvaresh, Roya Sinaei\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/011573398x267876231017072820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Understanding immunoreactivity against SARS-CoV-2 provides a basis for the pathophysiology of COVID-19 while also providing a means to confirm the disease and reduce its transmission. Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted from February 1st, 2020 to December 30th, 2022. The patients’ characteristics, clinical and laboratory data, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) results, and the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (serology testing) were recorded. Results: A total of 182 children were included. PCR returned positive in 60.4%, while serology indicated infection in 86.4% of the participants. Sex as a factor was not significantly associated with the results of either of the tests. However, seropositive children were older (p < 0.001), while PCR-positive children were younger (p < 0.01). Those who presented with cough (p < 0.05) or Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) (p < 0.05) had higher seropositivity rates than those without. In contrast, those who presented with fever (p < 0.001) or seizures (p < 0.01) had higher chances of having a positive PCR for COVID-19. In individuals suffering from arthralgia, limping, or arthritis, positive serology was observed in 96.3%, 95.2%, and 96.9%, respectively. However, positive results from PCR were observed in 67.2%, 67.1%, and 30.3% of the mentioned individuals, respectively. Conclusion: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology is a valuable diagnostic tool in individuals presenting late with arthralgia, arthritis, limping, MIS-C, or other delayed presentations, especially when PCR returns negative for the virus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/011573398x267876231017072820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011573398x267876231017072820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:了解对SARS-CoV-2的免疫反应性是了解COVID-19病理生理学的基础,也是确认疾病和减少传播的手段。方法:本横断面研究时间为2020年2月1日至2022年12月30日。记录患者的特征、临床和实验室资料、聚合酶链反应(PCR)结果以及抗sars - cov -2抗体(血清学检测)的存在。结果:共纳入182例患儿。PCR阳性率为60.4%,血清学阳性率为86.4%。性别作为一个因素与两项测试的结果都没有显著关联。然而,血清阳性儿童年龄较大(p <0.001),而pcr阳性儿童年龄更小(p <0.01)。出现咳嗽的患者(p <0.05)或多系统炎症综合征(MIS-C) (p <0.05)血清阳性率高于对照组。相比之下,那些出现发烧的人(p <0.001)或癫痫发作(p <0.01) PCR阳性的几率更高。在患有关节痛、跛行或关节炎的个体中,血清学阳性分别为96.3%、95.2%和96.9%。PCR阳性检出率分别为67.2%、67.1%和30.3%。结论:抗sars - cov -2血清学是晚期出现关节痛、关节炎、跛行、miss - c或其他延迟症状的个体的宝贵诊断工具,特别是当病毒PCR结果为阴性时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility of the Presence of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Detecting COVID-19 in Symptomatic Children and Adolescents: An Analytical Cross-sectional Study
Background: Understanding immunoreactivity against SARS-CoV-2 provides a basis for the pathophysiology of COVID-19 while also providing a means to confirm the disease and reduce its transmission. Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted from February 1st, 2020 to December 30th, 2022. The patients’ characteristics, clinical and laboratory data, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) results, and the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (serology testing) were recorded. Results: A total of 182 children were included. PCR returned positive in 60.4%, while serology indicated infection in 86.4% of the participants. Sex as a factor was not significantly associated with the results of either of the tests. However, seropositive children were older (p < 0.001), while PCR-positive children were younger (p < 0.01). Those who presented with cough (p < 0.05) or Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) (p < 0.05) had higher seropositivity rates than those without. In contrast, those who presented with fever (p < 0.001) or seizures (p < 0.01) had higher chances of having a positive PCR for COVID-19. In individuals suffering from arthralgia, limping, or arthritis, positive serology was observed in 96.3%, 95.2%, and 96.9%, respectively. However, positive results from PCR were observed in 67.2%, 67.1%, and 30.3% of the mentioned individuals, respectively. Conclusion: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology is a valuable diagnostic tool in individuals presenting late with arthralgia, arthritis, limping, MIS-C, or other delayed presentations, especially when PCR returns negative for the virus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on respiratory diseases and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信