花生营养生长期和生殖生长期对草铵膦模拟漂移的生长和产量响应

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY
Olumide S. Daramola, Navjot Singh, Joseph E. Iboyi, Pratap Devkota
{"title":"花生营养生长期和生殖生长期对草铵膦模拟漂移的生长和产量响应","authors":"Olumide S. Daramola, Navjot Singh, Joseph E. Iboyi, Pratap Devkota","doi":"10.1017/wet.2023.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The increased incidence of glyphosate-resistant weeds has led to an exponential increase in the use of glufosinate in glufosinate-resistant corn, cotton, and soybean. Field experiments were conducted in 2021 and 2022 to evaluate peanut response to glufosinate at 25 and 60 d after planting, corresponding to vegetative (V3) and reproductive (R4) growth stages, at 1.2, 4.7, 18.9, 75.5, and 302 g ai ha -1 representing 1/514 to 1/2 of the labeled rate of 604 g ha -1 . Peanut injury and canopy and yield reductions from glufosinate were <10% when applied at 1.2, 4.7, and 18.9 g ha -1 . However, at 75.5 and 302 g ha -1 peanut injury ranged from 24% to 72% for V3 exposure timing and 33% to 54% for R4 exposure timing. Similarly, glufosinate at 75.5 and 302 g ha -1 reduced peanut canopy width by 10% to 23% for V3 exposure timing and 43% to 57% for R4 exposure timing. Averaged across exposure timing, peanut yield was reduced by 15% and 61% at 75.5 and 302 g ha -1 , respectively. Averaged across rates, peanut yield reduction was 18% for V3 exposure timing, with glufosinate at 298 g ha -1 required to cause an estimated 50% reduction in yield. For R3 exposure timing, peanut yield reduction was 20%, with glufosinate at 243 g ha -1 required to cause an estimated 50% reduction in yield. There was no difference in Normalized Difference Vegetative Index (NDVI) between untreated plants and peanut exposed to glufosinate at 1.2, 4.7, and 18.9 g ha -1 . However, peanut exposed to glufosinate at 75.5 and 302 g ha -1 were distinguished from untreated plants with lower NDVI values. Based on Pearson’s Rho correlation coefficient, the best timing for assessing potential yield reduction based on injury was between 2 and 4 wk after treatment.","PeriodicalId":23710,"journal":{"name":"Weed Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth and Yield Response of Peanut to Simulated Drift of Glufosinate at Vegetative and Reproductive Growth Stages\",\"authors\":\"Olumide S. Daramola, Navjot Singh, Joseph E. Iboyi, Pratap Devkota\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/wet.2023.81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The increased incidence of glyphosate-resistant weeds has led to an exponential increase in the use of glufosinate in glufosinate-resistant corn, cotton, and soybean. Field experiments were conducted in 2021 and 2022 to evaluate peanut response to glufosinate at 25 and 60 d after planting, corresponding to vegetative (V3) and reproductive (R4) growth stages, at 1.2, 4.7, 18.9, 75.5, and 302 g ai ha -1 representing 1/514 to 1/2 of the labeled rate of 604 g ha -1 . Peanut injury and canopy and yield reductions from glufosinate were <10% when applied at 1.2, 4.7, and 18.9 g ha -1 . However, at 75.5 and 302 g ha -1 peanut injury ranged from 24% to 72% for V3 exposure timing and 33% to 54% for R4 exposure timing. Similarly, glufosinate at 75.5 and 302 g ha -1 reduced peanut canopy width by 10% to 23% for V3 exposure timing and 43% to 57% for R4 exposure timing. Averaged across exposure timing, peanut yield was reduced by 15% and 61% at 75.5 and 302 g ha -1 , respectively. Averaged across rates, peanut yield reduction was 18% for V3 exposure timing, with glufosinate at 298 g ha -1 required to cause an estimated 50% reduction in yield. For R3 exposure timing, peanut yield reduction was 20%, with glufosinate at 243 g ha -1 required to cause an estimated 50% reduction in yield. There was no difference in Normalized Difference Vegetative Index (NDVI) between untreated plants and peanut exposed to glufosinate at 1.2, 4.7, and 18.9 g ha -1 . However, peanut exposed to glufosinate at 75.5 and 302 g ha -1 were distinguished from untreated plants with lower NDVI values. Based on Pearson’s Rho correlation coefficient, the best timing for assessing potential yield reduction based on injury was between 2 and 4 wk after treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weed Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weed Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2023.81\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2023.81","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗草甘膦杂草发病率的增加导致抗草甘膦玉米、棉花和大豆中草甘膦的使用呈指数增长。在2021年和2022年进行了田间试验,以评估花生在种植后25和60 d对草铵膦的反应,对应于营养(V3)和生殖(R4)生长阶段,分别为1.2、4.7、18.9、75.5和302 g ha -1,占604 g ha -1标记率的1/514至1/2。施用1.2、4.7和18.9 g / ha -1时,草甘膦对花生的伤害、冠层和产量的减少均为10%。然而,在75.5和302 g ha -1时,V3暴露时间的花生损伤为24% ~ 72%,R4暴露时间为33% ~ 54%。同样,75.5 g和302 g ha -1的草铵膦使V3暴露时间的花生冠层宽度减少10%至23%,R4暴露时间的花生冠层宽度减少43%至57%。处理75.5 g ha -1和302 g ha -1时,花生产量分别降低15%和61%。平均而言,在V3暴露的时间内,花生产量减少18%,草铵膦用量为298 g ha -1,估计会导致产量减少50%。对于R3暴露时间,花生产量减少20%,草铵膦用量为243 g ha -1,估计产量减少50%。未处理花生与1.2、4.7和18.9 g / ha -1草铵膦处理花生的归一化差异营养指数(NDVI)无显著差异。然而,75.5和302 g ha -1草铵膦处理花生NDVI值较低,与未处理花生不同。根据Pearson’s Rho相关系数,评估基于伤害的潜在产量减少的最佳时机是在治疗后2 - 4周。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Growth and Yield Response of Peanut to Simulated Drift of Glufosinate at Vegetative and Reproductive Growth Stages
Abstract The increased incidence of glyphosate-resistant weeds has led to an exponential increase in the use of glufosinate in glufosinate-resistant corn, cotton, and soybean. Field experiments were conducted in 2021 and 2022 to evaluate peanut response to glufosinate at 25 and 60 d after planting, corresponding to vegetative (V3) and reproductive (R4) growth stages, at 1.2, 4.7, 18.9, 75.5, and 302 g ai ha -1 representing 1/514 to 1/2 of the labeled rate of 604 g ha -1 . Peanut injury and canopy and yield reductions from glufosinate were <10% when applied at 1.2, 4.7, and 18.9 g ha -1 . However, at 75.5 and 302 g ha -1 peanut injury ranged from 24% to 72% for V3 exposure timing and 33% to 54% for R4 exposure timing. Similarly, glufosinate at 75.5 and 302 g ha -1 reduced peanut canopy width by 10% to 23% for V3 exposure timing and 43% to 57% for R4 exposure timing. Averaged across exposure timing, peanut yield was reduced by 15% and 61% at 75.5 and 302 g ha -1 , respectively. Averaged across rates, peanut yield reduction was 18% for V3 exposure timing, with glufosinate at 298 g ha -1 required to cause an estimated 50% reduction in yield. For R3 exposure timing, peanut yield reduction was 20%, with glufosinate at 243 g ha -1 required to cause an estimated 50% reduction in yield. There was no difference in Normalized Difference Vegetative Index (NDVI) between untreated plants and peanut exposed to glufosinate at 1.2, 4.7, and 18.9 g ha -1 . However, peanut exposed to glufosinate at 75.5 and 302 g ha -1 were distinguished from untreated plants with lower NDVI values. Based on Pearson’s Rho correlation coefficient, the best timing for assessing potential yield reduction based on injury was between 2 and 4 wk after treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Weed Technology
Weed Technology 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
89
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Technology publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on understanding how weeds are managed. The journal focuses on: - Applied aspects concerning the management of weeds in agricultural systems - Herbicides used to manage undesired vegetation, weed biology and control - Weed/crop management systems - Reports of new weed problems -New technologies for weed management and special articles emphasizing technology transfer to improve weed control -Articles dealing with plant growth regulators and management of undesired plant growth may also be accepted, provided there is clear relevance to weed science technology, e.g., turfgrass or woody plant management along rights-of-way, vegetation management in forest, aquatic, or other non-crop situations. -Surveys, education, and extension topics related to weeds will also be considered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信