巴西环境许可制度改革:国家环境委员会的话语分析

Q3 Social Sciences
Rossana Borioni, Luis Enrique Sánchez
{"title":"巴西环境许可制度改革:国家环境委员会的话语分析","authors":"Rossana Borioni, Luis Enrique Sánchez","doi":"10.1590/1809-4422asoc0077r4vu2023l3oa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Controversies about Environmental Licensing have been featured in the public agenda as the National Congress advances a policy reform being debated since 2004. In the National Council for the Environment, given its legal attributions, the Environmental Licensing rules and possible changes have been discussed since the first meetings. Through the analysis of Council meeting documents, the objective was to highlight such speeches and the players who pronounced them. For this purpose, memoirs and minutes of meetings of instances of the Council in the period 1984-2021 were examined. Essentially, discourses were found about the screening stage and environmental impact studies, with the absence of criticisms and proposals regarding the definition of the scope of the studies and the follow-up stage. There was a prevalence of discourses centered on administrative efficiency, without acknowledging the objectives of this environmental policy instrument, or challenges to increase its effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":35241,"journal":{"name":"Ambiente e Sociedade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reforming environmental licensing in Brazil: Discourses analysis in the National Environment Council\",\"authors\":\"Rossana Borioni, Luis Enrique Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1809-4422asoc0077r4vu2023l3oa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Controversies about Environmental Licensing have been featured in the public agenda as the National Congress advances a policy reform being debated since 2004. In the National Council for the Environment, given its legal attributions, the Environmental Licensing rules and possible changes have been discussed since the first meetings. Through the analysis of Council meeting documents, the objective was to highlight such speeches and the players who pronounced them. For this purpose, memoirs and minutes of meetings of instances of the Council in the period 1984-2021 were examined. Essentially, discourses were found about the screening stage and environmental impact studies, with the absence of criticisms and proposals regarding the definition of the scope of the studies and the follow-up stage. There was a prevalence of discourses centered on administrative efficiency, without acknowledging the objectives of this environmental policy instrument, or challenges to increase its effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ambiente e Sociedade\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ambiente e Sociedade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc0077r4vu2023l3oa\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambiente e Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc0077r4vu2023l3oa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2004年以来,随着全国人大推进一项政策改革,有关环境许可的争议已成为公共议程的重要内容。在国家环境委员会,鉴于其法律属性,自第一次会议以来一直在讨论环境许可规则和可能的变化。通过对安理会会议文件的分析,目的是突出这些发言和发表这些发言的人。为此目的,审查了1984-2021年期间安理会各次会议的回忆录和会议记录。基本上,只发现了关于筛选阶段和环境影响研究的论述,而没有对研究范围的定义和后续阶段提出批评和建议。普遍存在以行政效率为中心的论述,而没有认识到这一环境政策工具的目标,也没有认识到提高其效力的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reforming environmental licensing in Brazil: Discourses analysis in the National Environment Council
Abstract Controversies about Environmental Licensing have been featured in the public agenda as the National Congress advances a policy reform being debated since 2004. In the National Council for the Environment, given its legal attributions, the Environmental Licensing rules and possible changes have been discussed since the first meetings. Through the analysis of Council meeting documents, the objective was to highlight such speeches and the players who pronounced them. For this purpose, memoirs and minutes of meetings of instances of the Council in the period 1984-2021 were examined. Essentially, discourses were found about the screening stage and environmental impact studies, with the absence of criticisms and proposals regarding the definition of the scope of the studies and the follow-up stage. There was a prevalence of discourses centered on administrative efficiency, without acknowledging the objectives of this environmental policy instrument, or challenges to increase its effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ambiente e Sociedade
Ambiente e Sociedade Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Ambiente & Sociedade é uma publicação cuatrimestral da ANPPAS-Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ambiente e Sociedade, que busca contribuir con la producción del conocimiento en la interfaz de las cuestiones del Ambiente y la Sociedad. Publica textos de colaboradores nacionales e internacionales, mediante evaluación de los editores y pareceres emitidos por asesores ad hoc. La revista publica artículos teóricos y reseñas de libros inéditos em el área interdisciplinar que trata del proceso de interacción entre Sociedad y Medio Ambiente.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信