国际私法是向海外投射欧盟数字价值的一种手段

Edoardo Benvenuti
{"title":"国际私法是向海外投射欧盟数字价值的一种手段","authors":"Edoardo Benvenuti","doi":"10.25234/eclic/28266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In light of the pivotal role that new technologies play for the achievement of policy objectives, and considering their ability to negatively affect rights and freedoms in a ubiquitous manner, EU law is adopting a number of instruments to regulate those matters that are particularly influenced by digitalisation. Such instruments include substantive rules applicable to several online activities. This legislation aims at establishing an environment where digital interactions take place in accordance with fundamental rights, whose protection is enshrined within EU primary law, as well as to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market. Given the ubiquitous nature of digital technologies, and in order for these rules to be effective, their scope of application is designed to also include cases that may be strongly related to Third States. In this way, the EU aims at strengthening its digital sovereignty by creating a strong digital single market, and by guaranteeing the protection of European users, whose rights should benefit from the protection of EU substantive law even when digital activities take place abroad. Although the EU has a strong interest in ensuring a broad application of its substantive rules, the possibility for EU law to be concretely applicable abroad depends – in the first place – on the existence of jurisdictional rules specifically designed to apply to disputes that may involve parties from Third States. Nonetheless, while some of the instruments adopted in this area ensure the application of substantive rules by providing for specific grounds of jurisdiction, litigation in these matters will normally fall within the scope of Regulation (EU) n. 1215/2012, whose rules apply – in general – only when the defendant has her/his domicile in the Union. In light of these considerations, the paper will assess the coherence between the broad scope of some of the instruments that the EU has adopted (or is going to adopt) in fields strongly affected by digitalisation – such as the GDPR, as well as other EU’s initiatives pertaining to Artificial Intelligence and to digital platforms – and Regulation (EU) n. 1215/2012, in order to evaluate the ability of the latter to support the application of EU digital standards world-wide.","PeriodicalId":483313,"journal":{"name":"EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AS A MEANS TO PROJECT EU DIGITAL VALUES ABROAD\",\"authors\":\"Edoardo Benvenuti\",\"doi\":\"10.25234/eclic/28266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In light of the pivotal role that new technologies play for the achievement of policy objectives, and considering their ability to negatively affect rights and freedoms in a ubiquitous manner, EU law is adopting a number of instruments to regulate those matters that are particularly influenced by digitalisation. Such instruments include substantive rules applicable to several online activities. This legislation aims at establishing an environment where digital interactions take place in accordance with fundamental rights, whose protection is enshrined within EU primary law, as well as to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market. Given the ubiquitous nature of digital technologies, and in order for these rules to be effective, their scope of application is designed to also include cases that may be strongly related to Third States. In this way, the EU aims at strengthening its digital sovereignty by creating a strong digital single market, and by guaranteeing the protection of European users, whose rights should benefit from the protection of EU substantive law even when digital activities take place abroad. Although the EU has a strong interest in ensuring a broad application of its substantive rules, the possibility for EU law to be concretely applicable abroad depends – in the first place – on the existence of jurisdictional rules specifically designed to apply to disputes that may involve parties from Third States. Nonetheless, while some of the instruments adopted in this area ensure the application of substantive rules by providing for specific grounds of jurisdiction, litigation in these matters will normally fall within the scope of Regulation (EU) n. 1215/2012, whose rules apply – in general – only when the defendant has her/his domicile in the Union. In light of these considerations, the paper will assess the coherence between the broad scope of some of the instruments that the EU has adopted (or is going to adopt) in fields strongly affected by digitalisation – such as the GDPR, as well as other EU’s initiatives pertaining to Artificial Intelligence and to digital platforms – and Regulation (EU) n. 1215/2012, in order to evaluate the ability of the latter to support the application of EU digital standards world-wide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":483313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/28266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/28266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于新技术在实现政策目标方面发挥的关键作用,并考虑到它们能够以无处不在的方式对权利和自由产生负面影响,欧盟法律正在采用一系列文书来规范那些特别受数字化影响的事项。这些文书包括适用于若干在线活动的实质性规则。这项立法旨在建立一个环境,在这个环境中,数字互动是根据基本权利进行的,这些基本权利受到欧盟主要法律的保护,并确保内部市场的正常运作。鉴于数字技术无处不在的性质,为了使这些规则有效,其适用范围也被设计为包括可能与第三国密切相关的案件。通过这种方式,欧盟旨在通过创建一个强大的数字单一市场来加强其数字主权,并通过保证对欧洲用户的保护,即使数字活动发生在国外,其权利也应受益于欧盟实体法的保护。尽管欧盟在确保其实体法的广泛适用方面有着强烈的利益,但欧盟法律在国外具体适用的可能性首先取决于是否存在专门设计用于适用于可能涉及第三国当事方的争端的管辖规则。尽管如此,虽然在这一领域通过的一些文书通过规定具体的管辖权理由来确保实体法的适用,但这些事项的诉讼通常属于(EU) n. 1215/2012法规的范围,其规则通常仅在被告的住所在欧盟时适用。根据这些考虑,本文将评估之间的相干性广泛范围的一些工具,欧盟采用了(或将采取)强烈受到数字化领域——比如GDPR,以及其他欧盟的行动属于人工智能和数字平台,监管(欧盟)n。1215/2012,为了评估的能力,后者支持欧盟全球数字标准的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AS A MEANS TO PROJECT EU DIGITAL VALUES ABROAD
In light of the pivotal role that new technologies play for the achievement of policy objectives, and considering their ability to negatively affect rights and freedoms in a ubiquitous manner, EU law is adopting a number of instruments to regulate those matters that are particularly influenced by digitalisation. Such instruments include substantive rules applicable to several online activities. This legislation aims at establishing an environment where digital interactions take place in accordance with fundamental rights, whose protection is enshrined within EU primary law, as well as to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market. Given the ubiquitous nature of digital technologies, and in order for these rules to be effective, their scope of application is designed to also include cases that may be strongly related to Third States. In this way, the EU aims at strengthening its digital sovereignty by creating a strong digital single market, and by guaranteeing the protection of European users, whose rights should benefit from the protection of EU substantive law even when digital activities take place abroad. Although the EU has a strong interest in ensuring a broad application of its substantive rules, the possibility for EU law to be concretely applicable abroad depends – in the first place – on the existence of jurisdictional rules specifically designed to apply to disputes that may involve parties from Third States. Nonetheless, while some of the instruments adopted in this area ensure the application of substantive rules by providing for specific grounds of jurisdiction, litigation in these matters will normally fall within the scope of Regulation (EU) n. 1215/2012, whose rules apply – in general – only when the defendant has her/his domicile in the Union. In light of these considerations, the paper will assess the coherence between the broad scope of some of the instruments that the EU has adopted (or is going to adopt) in fields strongly affected by digitalisation – such as the GDPR, as well as other EU’s initiatives pertaining to Artificial Intelligence and to digital platforms – and Regulation (EU) n. 1215/2012, in order to evaluate the ability of the latter to support the application of EU digital standards world-wide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信