在基于分布式账本技术的系统中,加密货币何时是国际化的?

Burcu Yüksel Ripley
{"title":"在基于分布式账本技术的系统中,加密货币何时是国际化的?","authors":"Burcu Yüksel Ripley","doi":"10.25234/eclic/28263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the issue of command liability for severe criminal offenses committed by means of autonomous and semi-autonomous weapons. Research has shown that the leading military forces around the world are intensively working on designing autonomous weapons, which will provide them an enormous tactical ad logistical advantage in warfare. As the national and international law concept of command responsibility to date has been based on the idea of humans selecting and ordering the destruction of targets, the author raises the question of whether this has also created a set of legal norms that could adequately regulate such situations in the context of new warfare techniques. The first section of the paper briefly outlines the direction of the development of autonomous weapons. The second section analyzes the provisions on command responsibility of the Rome Statute and the Statute of the ad hoc tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda. The national legislation of some countries and the significant jurisprudence in this field is also analyzed and projected into the context of semi-autonomous and autonomous warfare. A special emphasis is placed on the issue of unconscious negligence. The objective of the paper is to indicate the legal gaps and to propose guidelines for future development.","PeriodicalId":483313,"journal":{"name":"EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WHEN IS A CRYPTOCURRENCY TRANSFER INTERNATIONAL IN DISTRIBUTED LEDGER TECHNOLOGY-BASED SYSTEMS?\",\"authors\":\"Burcu Yüksel Ripley\",\"doi\":\"10.25234/eclic/28263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper addresses the issue of command liability for severe criminal offenses committed by means of autonomous and semi-autonomous weapons. Research has shown that the leading military forces around the world are intensively working on designing autonomous weapons, which will provide them an enormous tactical ad logistical advantage in warfare. As the national and international law concept of command responsibility to date has been based on the idea of humans selecting and ordering the destruction of targets, the author raises the question of whether this has also created a set of legal norms that could adequately regulate such situations in the context of new warfare techniques. The first section of the paper briefly outlines the direction of the development of autonomous weapons. The second section analyzes the provisions on command responsibility of the Rome Statute and the Statute of the ad hoc tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda. The national legislation of some countries and the significant jurisprudence in this field is also analyzed and projected into the context of semi-autonomous and autonomous warfare. A special emphasis is placed on the issue of unconscious negligence. The objective of the paper is to indicate the legal gaps and to propose guidelines for future development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":483313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/28263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/28263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了使用自主和半自主武器实施严重刑事犯罪的指挥责任问题。研究表明,世界各地的主要军事力量正在加紧设计自主武器,这将为他们在战争中提供巨大的战术和后勤优势。由于到目前为止,国家和国际法的指挥责任概念是基于人选择和命令摧毁目标的想法,发件人提出的问题是,这是否也创造了一套法律规范,可以在新的战争技术范围内适当地管制这种情况。本文第一部分简要概述了自主武器的发展方向。第二节分析了《罗马规约》和《南斯拉夫问题特设法庭规约》和《卢旺达问题特设法庭规约》关于指挥责任的规定。一些国家在这一领域的国家立法和重要的法理也被分析和投射到半自治和自治战争的背景下。特别强调的是无意识过失的问题。本文的目的是指出法律空白,并为今后的发展提出指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WHEN IS A CRYPTOCURRENCY TRANSFER INTERNATIONAL IN DISTRIBUTED LEDGER TECHNOLOGY-BASED SYSTEMS?
This paper addresses the issue of command liability for severe criminal offenses committed by means of autonomous and semi-autonomous weapons. Research has shown that the leading military forces around the world are intensively working on designing autonomous weapons, which will provide them an enormous tactical ad logistical advantage in warfare. As the national and international law concept of command responsibility to date has been based on the idea of humans selecting and ordering the destruction of targets, the author raises the question of whether this has also created a set of legal norms that could adequately regulate such situations in the context of new warfare techniques. The first section of the paper briefly outlines the direction of the development of autonomous weapons. The second section analyzes the provisions on command responsibility of the Rome Statute and the Statute of the ad hoc tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda. The national legislation of some countries and the significant jurisprudence in this field is also analyzed and projected into the context of semi-autonomous and autonomous warfare. A special emphasis is placed on the issue of unconscious negligence. The objective of the paper is to indicate the legal gaps and to propose guidelines for future development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信