数据保护与网络安全:两个欧洲法院的判例法

Dunja Duić, Tunjica Petrašević
{"title":"数据保护与网络安全:两个欧洲法院的判例法","authors":"Dunja Duić, Tunjica Petrašević","doi":"10.25234/eclic/28259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cybersecurity is not easily defined. The 2019 EU Cybersecurity Act defines it as the activities necessary to protect network and information systems, the users of such systems, and other persons affected by cyber threats. Enduringly, cybersecurity was associated with national security, without consideration of what ‘secure’ Internet means for individual users. In reality, cybersecurity policy focused by and large on systems rather than users, i.e., people. However, as a policy area concerned with online behavior regulation, its definition and implementation inevitably has profound implications for human rights, especially in regard to data protection and freedom of expression. Unsurprisingly, cybersecurity has become a new human rights battleground. The EU Cybersecurity Act and subsequent legislation represent a normative shift in our conception of data ownership, putting ownership and control of personal information in the hands of the user rather than the service provider. Luckily, there have been positive legislative shifts regarding data protection in the context of the EU cybersecurity policy at EU level. But are they (or will they be) adopted by European courts? To answer, this paper peers into the relevant case-law of the Court of Justice of the EU as well as of the European Court of Human Rights.","PeriodicalId":483313,"journal":{"name":"EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DATA PROTECTION AND CYBERSECURITY : CASE-LAW OF TWO EUROPEAN COURTS\",\"authors\":\"Dunja Duić, Tunjica Petrašević\",\"doi\":\"10.25234/eclic/28259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cybersecurity is not easily defined. The 2019 EU Cybersecurity Act defines it as the activities necessary to protect network and information systems, the users of such systems, and other persons affected by cyber threats. Enduringly, cybersecurity was associated with national security, without consideration of what ‘secure’ Internet means for individual users. In reality, cybersecurity policy focused by and large on systems rather than users, i.e., people. However, as a policy area concerned with online behavior regulation, its definition and implementation inevitably has profound implications for human rights, especially in regard to data protection and freedom of expression. Unsurprisingly, cybersecurity has become a new human rights battleground. The EU Cybersecurity Act and subsequent legislation represent a normative shift in our conception of data ownership, putting ownership and control of personal information in the hands of the user rather than the service provider. Luckily, there have been positive legislative shifts regarding data protection in the context of the EU cybersecurity policy at EU level. But are they (or will they be) adopted by European courts? To answer, this paper peers into the relevant case-law of the Court of Justice of the EU as well as of the European Court of Human Rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":483313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/28259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/28259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网络安全不容易定义。2019年《欧盟网络安全法》将其定义为保护网络和信息系统、此类系统的用户以及受网络威胁影响的其他人员所必需的活动。长期以来,网络安全一直与国家安全联系在一起,而没有考虑到“安全”互联网对个人用户意味着什么。实际上,网络安全政策基本上关注的是系统,而不是用户,也就是人。然而,作为一个涉及网络行为监管的政策领域,其定义和实施不可避免地对人权产生深远影响,特别是在数据保护和言论自由方面。不出所料,网络安全已成为一个新的人权战场。《欧盟网络安全法》(EU Cybersecurity Act)及其后续立法代表了我们对数据所有权概念的规范性转变,将个人信息的所有权和控制权交给了用户,而不是服务提供商。幸运的是,在欧盟层面的网络安全政策背景下,有关数据保护的立法已经发生了积极的转变。但欧洲法院是否(或是否会)采用它们?为了回答这个问题,本文对欧盟法院和欧洲人权法院的相关判例法进行了研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DATA PROTECTION AND CYBERSECURITY : CASE-LAW OF TWO EUROPEAN COURTS
Cybersecurity is not easily defined. The 2019 EU Cybersecurity Act defines it as the activities necessary to protect network and information systems, the users of such systems, and other persons affected by cyber threats. Enduringly, cybersecurity was associated with national security, without consideration of what ‘secure’ Internet means for individual users. In reality, cybersecurity policy focused by and large on systems rather than users, i.e., people. However, as a policy area concerned with online behavior regulation, its definition and implementation inevitably has profound implications for human rights, especially in regard to data protection and freedom of expression. Unsurprisingly, cybersecurity has become a new human rights battleground. The EU Cybersecurity Act and subsequent legislation represent a normative shift in our conception of data ownership, putting ownership and control of personal information in the hands of the user rather than the service provider. Luckily, there have been positive legislative shifts regarding data protection in the context of the EU cybersecurity policy at EU level. But are they (or will they be) adopted by European courts? To answer, this paper peers into the relevant case-law of the Court of Justice of the EU as well as of the European Court of Human Rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信