含盐含水层CO2注入过程中的瞬态压力干扰

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM
SPE Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.2118/217986-pa
Mehdi Zeidouni
{"title":"含盐含水层CO2注入过程中的瞬态压力干扰","authors":"Mehdi Zeidouni","doi":"10.2118/217986-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary CO2 injection in subsurface geological formations (e.g., deep saline aquifers) causes pressure perturbations over a large area surrounding the injection well. Observation wells are widely considered in geologic CO2 storage (GCS) projects where the pressure perturbation induced by CO2 injection is measured. In this work, we use analytical and numerical modeling tools along with field data to examine the pressure behavior in GCS projects before and after CO2 arrival at an observation well. Before CO2 arrival, a baseline pressure trend is established which corresponds to single-phase brine flow across the observation well (approximated by the Theis solution). Therefore, analysis of early time pressure data is straightforward, provides the single-phase flow characteristics (mobility and storativity), and helps in establishing a baseline pressure change that can be extended beyond the single-phase flow period at the observation well. Upon CO2 arrival, a departure from this baseline trend is expected. For the pressure to detect the CO2 arrival at an observation well, the departure from baseline pressure behavior must be significant and well above the background noise levels. We use existing analytical models to determine the strength of the expected pressure departure signal from the baseline trend upon CO2 arrival. The strength of the expected pressure departure is found to be directly proportional to the change in the mobility upon CO2 arrival. Larger change in the flow mobility—compared with single-phase brine mobility—results in a stronger pressure departure signal. In addition, the departure is found to be upward (downward) from the baseline pressure trend when the mobility ratio is less (more) than unity. We present a pressure analysis approach through application to synthetic and field data and show the characteristic pressure behavior before and after CO2 arrival. We show that while generally the pressure can be either above or below the expected baseline pressure trend, it would be likely above the baseline upon CO2 arrival. This is because the mobility ratio becomes less than unity after CO2 arrival. We show that depending on the reservoir characteristics, changes in the pressure trend may or may not be sufficient to detect the CO2 arrival.","PeriodicalId":22252,"journal":{"name":"SPE Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transient Pressure Interference during CO2 Injection in Saline Aquifers\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Zeidouni\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/217986-pa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary CO2 injection in subsurface geological formations (e.g., deep saline aquifers) causes pressure perturbations over a large area surrounding the injection well. Observation wells are widely considered in geologic CO2 storage (GCS) projects where the pressure perturbation induced by CO2 injection is measured. In this work, we use analytical and numerical modeling tools along with field data to examine the pressure behavior in GCS projects before and after CO2 arrival at an observation well. Before CO2 arrival, a baseline pressure trend is established which corresponds to single-phase brine flow across the observation well (approximated by the Theis solution). Therefore, analysis of early time pressure data is straightforward, provides the single-phase flow characteristics (mobility and storativity), and helps in establishing a baseline pressure change that can be extended beyond the single-phase flow period at the observation well. Upon CO2 arrival, a departure from this baseline trend is expected. For the pressure to detect the CO2 arrival at an observation well, the departure from baseline pressure behavior must be significant and well above the background noise levels. We use existing analytical models to determine the strength of the expected pressure departure signal from the baseline trend upon CO2 arrival. The strength of the expected pressure departure is found to be directly proportional to the change in the mobility upon CO2 arrival. Larger change in the flow mobility—compared with single-phase brine mobility—results in a stronger pressure departure signal. In addition, the departure is found to be upward (downward) from the baseline pressure trend when the mobility ratio is less (more) than unity. We present a pressure analysis approach through application to synthetic and field data and show the characteristic pressure behavior before and after CO2 arrival. We show that while generally the pressure can be either above or below the expected baseline pressure trend, it would be likely above the baseline upon CO2 arrival. This is because the mobility ratio becomes less than unity after CO2 arrival. We show that depending on the reservoir characteristics, changes in the pressure trend may or may not be sufficient to detect the CO2 arrival.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPE Journal\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPE Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/217986-pa\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/217986-pa","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在地下地质地层(如深层含盐含水层)注入二氧化碳会导致注入井周围大面积的压力扰动。在地质CO2封存(GCS)项目中,观测井被广泛考虑,因为观测井需要测量二氧化碳注入引起的压力扰动。在这项工作中,我们使用分析和数值建模工具以及现场数据来检查GCS项目中二氧化碳到达观测井前后的压力行为。在CO2到达之前,建立了一个基线压力趋势,该趋势对应于穿过观察井的单相盐水流动(由Theis溶液近似)。因此,对早期压力数据的分析非常简单,可以提供单相流动特性(流动性和存储性),并有助于建立基线压力变化,该变化可以扩展到观察井的单相流动周期之后。当二氧化碳到达时,预计会偏离这一基线趋势。为了检测到到达观测井的二氧化碳,压力必须显著偏离基线压力行为,并且远高于背景噪声水平。我们使用现有的分析模型来确定二氧化碳到达时基线趋势的预期压力偏离信号的强度。发现预期压力偏离的强度与CO2到达时迁移率的变化成正比。与单相盐水流动度相比,流体流动度的较大变化会导致更强的压力偏离信号。此外,发现当流度比小于(大于)1时,偏离基线压力趋势为向上(向下)。本文提出了一种压力分析方法,通过对合成数据和现场数据的应用,展示了CO2到达前后的特征压力行为。我们表明,虽然通常压力可能高于或低于预期的基线压力趋势,但在二氧化碳到达时,它可能高于基线。这是因为CO2到达后,迁移率小于1。我们表明,根据储层特征,压力趋势的变化可能足以也可能不足以检测到CO2的到来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transient Pressure Interference during CO2 Injection in Saline Aquifers
Summary CO2 injection in subsurface geological formations (e.g., deep saline aquifers) causes pressure perturbations over a large area surrounding the injection well. Observation wells are widely considered in geologic CO2 storage (GCS) projects where the pressure perturbation induced by CO2 injection is measured. In this work, we use analytical and numerical modeling tools along with field data to examine the pressure behavior in GCS projects before and after CO2 arrival at an observation well. Before CO2 arrival, a baseline pressure trend is established which corresponds to single-phase brine flow across the observation well (approximated by the Theis solution). Therefore, analysis of early time pressure data is straightforward, provides the single-phase flow characteristics (mobility and storativity), and helps in establishing a baseline pressure change that can be extended beyond the single-phase flow period at the observation well. Upon CO2 arrival, a departure from this baseline trend is expected. For the pressure to detect the CO2 arrival at an observation well, the departure from baseline pressure behavior must be significant and well above the background noise levels. We use existing analytical models to determine the strength of the expected pressure departure signal from the baseline trend upon CO2 arrival. The strength of the expected pressure departure is found to be directly proportional to the change in the mobility upon CO2 arrival. Larger change in the flow mobility—compared with single-phase brine mobility—results in a stronger pressure departure signal. In addition, the departure is found to be upward (downward) from the baseline pressure trend when the mobility ratio is less (more) than unity. We present a pressure analysis approach through application to synthetic and field data and show the characteristic pressure behavior before and after CO2 arrival. We show that while generally the pressure can be either above or below the expected baseline pressure trend, it would be likely above the baseline upon CO2 arrival. This is because the mobility ratio becomes less than unity after CO2 arrival. We show that depending on the reservoir characteristics, changes in the pressure trend may or may not be sufficient to detect the CO2 arrival.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SPE Journal
SPE Journal 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
229
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Covers theories and emerging concepts spanning all aspects of engineering for oil and gas exploration and production, including reservoir characterization, multiphase flow, drilling dynamics, well architecture, gas well deliverability, numerical simulation, enhanced oil recovery, CO2 sequestration, and benchmarking and performance indicators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信