不同依恋类型在9 ~ 12岁学童中的流行:一项横断面研究

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Supriya Thambireddy, SVSG Nirmala, Sivakumar Nuvvula
{"title":"不同依恋类型在9 ~ 12岁学童中的流行:一项横断面研究","authors":"Supriya Thambireddy, SVSG Nirmala, Sivakumar Nuvvula","doi":"10.7860/jcdr/2023/64693.18639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Bowlby suggests that children develop internal working models in earlier stages depending on their attachment relationships with parents. In paediatric dental clinics, children tend to display various behaviours depending on their attachment style, which can affect the communication and treatment outcomes with the child dentist. Aim: To determine the prevalence of attachment styles in 9 to 12 years old school children and to assess the association of attachment styles with the age and gender of the children. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 384 school children aged 9 to 12 years, in the Nellore district using the cluster sampling method. Attachment styles were measured using a 15-item questionnaire developed from the Attachment Questionnaire for Children (AQ-C). The children were instructed and then asked to read and rate the extent to which each questionnaire item described themselves. Data were analysed statistically using the chi-square test for prevalence of attachment styles, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis for age and gender associations. The level of significance was set at p≤0.05. Results: The study found that 64.10% (n=246) of all participants exhibited a secure attachment style, while 7% (n=27) and 28.9% (n=111) displayed avoidant and ambivalent attachment styles, respectively. Age showed a significant association with secure (p=0.006) and ambivalent (p=0.026) attachment styles. However, gender did not show any association with attachment styles. Conclusion: The study concluded that the secure attachment style was the most prevalent, followed by ambivalent and avoidant attachment styles, regardless of gender. Age was found to be significantly associated with secure and ambivalent attachment styles.","PeriodicalId":15483,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Different Attachment Styles in 9 to 12 years old School Children: A Cross-sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Supriya Thambireddy, SVSG Nirmala, Sivakumar Nuvvula\",\"doi\":\"10.7860/jcdr/2023/64693.18639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Bowlby suggests that children develop internal working models in earlier stages depending on their attachment relationships with parents. In paediatric dental clinics, children tend to display various behaviours depending on their attachment style, which can affect the communication and treatment outcomes with the child dentist. Aim: To determine the prevalence of attachment styles in 9 to 12 years old school children and to assess the association of attachment styles with the age and gender of the children. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 384 school children aged 9 to 12 years, in the Nellore district using the cluster sampling method. Attachment styles were measured using a 15-item questionnaire developed from the Attachment Questionnaire for Children (AQ-C). The children were instructed and then asked to read and rate the extent to which each questionnaire item described themselves. Data were analysed statistically using the chi-square test for prevalence of attachment styles, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis for age and gender associations. The level of significance was set at p≤0.05. Results: The study found that 64.10% (n=246) of all participants exhibited a secure attachment style, while 7% (n=27) and 28.9% (n=111) displayed avoidant and ambivalent attachment styles, respectively. Age showed a significant association with secure (p=0.006) and ambivalent (p=0.026) attachment styles. However, gender did not show any association with attachment styles. Conclusion: The study concluded that the secure attachment style was the most prevalent, followed by ambivalent and avoidant attachment styles, regardless of gender. Age was found to be significantly associated with secure and ambivalent attachment styles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2023/64693.18639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2023/64693.18639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Bowlby认为,儿童在早期阶段发展内部工作模式取决于他们与父母的依恋关系。在儿童牙科诊所,儿童往往表现出不同的行为取决于他们的依恋类型,这可能会影响与儿童牙医的沟通和治疗结果。目的:了解9 ~ 12岁学龄期儿童依恋类型的流行情况,并探讨依恋类型与儿童年龄、性别的关系。材料与方法:采用整群抽样方法,对Nellore区384名9 ~ 12岁学龄儿童进行描述性横断面研究。依恋类型采用从儿童依恋问卷(AQ-C)中开发的15项问卷进行测量。孩子们接受指导,然后被要求阅读并对每个问卷项目描述自己的程度进行评分。采用卡方检验对依恋类型的流行率进行统计分析,Pearson相关分析,并对年龄和性别相关性进行多元回归分析。p≤0.05为显著性水平。结果:64.10% (n=246)的被试表现为安全型依恋类型,7% (n=27)的被试表现为回避型依恋类型,28.9% (n=111)的被试表现为矛盾型依恋类型。年龄与安全型(p=0.006)和矛盾型(p=0.026)依恋类型有显著相关。然而,性别与依恋类型没有任何关联。结论:无论性别如何,安全型依恋类型最为普遍,其次是矛盾型和回避型依恋类型。年龄被发现与安全和矛盾的依恋类型显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Different Attachment Styles in 9 to 12 years old School Children: A Cross-sectional Study
Introduction: Bowlby suggests that children develop internal working models in earlier stages depending on their attachment relationships with parents. In paediatric dental clinics, children tend to display various behaviours depending on their attachment style, which can affect the communication and treatment outcomes with the child dentist. Aim: To determine the prevalence of attachment styles in 9 to 12 years old school children and to assess the association of attachment styles with the age and gender of the children. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 384 school children aged 9 to 12 years, in the Nellore district using the cluster sampling method. Attachment styles were measured using a 15-item questionnaire developed from the Attachment Questionnaire for Children (AQ-C). The children were instructed and then asked to read and rate the extent to which each questionnaire item described themselves. Data were analysed statistically using the chi-square test for prevalence of attachment styles, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis for age and gender associations. The level of significance was set at p≤0.05. Results: The study found that 64.10% (n=246) of all participants exhibited a secure attachment style, while 7% (n=27) and 28.9% (n=111) displayed avoidant and ambivalent attachment styles, respectively. Age showed a significant association with secure (p=0.006) and ambivalent (p=0.026) attachment styles. However, gender did not show any association with attachment styles. Conclusion: The study concluded that the secure attachment style was the most prevalent, followed by ambivalent and avoidant attachment styles, regardless of gender. Age was found to be significantly associated with secure and ambivalent attachment styles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
761
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Specialties Covered: Anaesthesia, Anatomy, Animal Research, Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Cardiology, Community, Dermatology, Dentistry, Education, Emergency Medicine, Endocrinology, Ethics, Ear Nose and Throat, Forensic, Gastroenterology, Genetics, Haematology, Health Management and Policy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Intensive Care, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Health Management and Policy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Intensive Care, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Nephrology / Renal, Neurology and Neuro-Surgery, Nutrition, Nursing/Midwifery, Oncology, Orthopaedics, Ophthalmology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Neonatology Pharmacology, Physiology, Pathology, Plastic Surgery, Psychiatry/Mental Health, Rehabilitation / Physiotherapy, Radiology, Statistics, Surgery, Speech and Hearing (Audiology)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信