一个常见的临床问题:静脉注射地尔硫卓或美托洛尔治疗心房颤动是否有快速心室反应?

Zachary Visinoni, Neeladri Misra, Daniel Jurewitz
{"title":"一个常见的临床问题:静脉注射地尔硫卓或美托洛尔治疗心房颤动是否有快速心室反应?","authors":"Zachary Visinoni, Neeladri Misra, Daniel Jurewitz","doi":"10.4236/wjcd.2023.139048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two classes of rate controlling medications—beta blockers (BBs) and non- dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs)—are given to patients who present with atrial fibrillation (AF) with rapid ventricular response (RVR). Both are Class I recommendations from the American Heart Association (AHA), American College of Cardiology (ACC), and Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) for the management of AF with RVR. Multiple studies support the view that diltiazem is more effective than metoprolol, even though data from the AFFIRM trial suggests BBs are more frequently used. CCBs are generally avoided in AF with RVR patients who have concomitant heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) for concern of triggering decompensation. However, some recent studies indicate this idea may be unfounded. The aim of this article is to compare the efficacy of diltiazem and metoprolol for rate control in AF with RVR and examine the use of diltiazem in patients with both AF with RVR and HFrEF.","PeriodicalId":67027,"journal":{"name":"心血管病(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Brief Review of a Common Clinical Question: Intravenous Diltiazem or Metoprolol for Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Response?\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Visinoni, Neeladri Misra, Daniel Jurewitz\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/wjcd.2023.139048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two classes of rate controlling medications—beta blockers (BBs) and non- dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs)—are given to patients who present with atrial fibrillation (AF) with rapid ventricular response (RVR). Both are Class I recommendations from the American Heart Association (AHA), American College of Cardiology (ACC), and Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) for the management of AF with RVR. Multiple studies support the view that diltiazem is more effective than metoprolol, even though data from the AFFIRM trial suggests BBs are more frequently used. CCBs are generally avoided in AF with RVR patients who have concomitant heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) for concern of triggering decompensation. However, some recent studies indicate this idea may be unfounded. The aim of this article is to compare the efficacy of diltiazem and metoprolol for rate control in AF with RVR and examine the use of diltiazem in patients with both AF with RVR and HFrEF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":67027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"心血管病(英文)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"心血管病(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcd.2023.139048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"心血管病(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcd.2023.139048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两类速率控制药物-阻滞剂(BBs)和非二氢吡啶钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs) -给予心房颤动(AF)伴有快速心室反应(RVR)的患者。这两种方法都是美国心脏协会(AHA)、美国心脏病学会(ACC)和心律学会(HRS)对房颤合并RVR治疗的一级推荐。多项研究支持地尔硫卓比美托洛尔更有效的观点,尽管AFFIRM试验的数据表明,溴苯醚的使用频率更高。房颤合并心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)的RVR患者通常避免CCBs,因为担心触发失代偿。然而,最近的一些研究表明,这种想法可能是没有根据的。本文的目的是比较地尔硫卓和美托洛尔对房颤合并RVR的控制速率的疗效,并检查地尔硫卓在房颤合并RVR和HFrEF患者中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Brief Review of a Common Clinical Question: Intravenous Diltiazem or Metoprolol for Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Response?
Two classes of rate controlling medications—beta blockers (BBs) and non- dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs)—are given to patients who present with atrial fibrillation (AF) with rapid ventricular response (RVR). Both are Class I recommendations from the American Heart Association (AHA), American College of Cardiology (ACC), and Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) for the management of AF with RVR. Multiple studies support the view that diltiazem is more effective than metoprolol, even though data from the AFFIRM trial suggests BBs are more frequently used. CCBs are generally avoided in AF with RVR patients who have concomitant heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) for concern of triggering decompensation. However, some recent studies indicate this idea may be unfounded. The aim of this article is to compare the efficacy of diltiazem and metoprolol for rate control in AF with RVR and examine the use of diltiazem in patients with both AF with RVR and HFrEF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信