利用Beneish和Dechow模型检测财务报表舞弊

Q3 Social Sciences
Ahmad Kaab Omeir, Deimante Vasiliauskaite, Elham Soleimanizadeh
{"title":"利用Beneish和Dechow模型检测财务报表舞弊","authors":"Ahmad Kaab Omeir, Deimante Vasiliauskaite, Elham Soleimanizadeh","doi":"10.22495/jgrv12i3siart15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fraudulent financial reporting is a big issue not only for investors but also for other stakeholders. This research uses two popular fraud detection models by Beneish (1997, 1999a) and Dechow et al. (2011). The main goal of this paper is to compare the precision of these two models for the prediction of fraud in the financial statements of Iranian companies. Firstly, we try to identify the statistical description related to the first and fourth quartiles of the Beneish and Dechow models. Then, we determine the models’ forecasting capabilities using SPSS software by t-test and variance analysis. We use the sample of 197 companies during the 11-years period from 2009 till 2019. The results indicate that the Beneish model has more precision and less error level in fraud detection in the financial statements than the Dechow model. The general precision of the Beneish model, with 83%, compared to the Dechow model, with general precision of 75%, demonstrates the volume of fraud in the company’s financial statements. According to the statistical results, the prediction precision of the Beneish model, compared to the Dechow model, is more, and its estimation error is less than the latter. Therefore, according to this hypothesis, the Beneish model enjoys a higher detection power in the probability of committing fraud in the financial statements than the Dechow model. Thus, in companies with a previous record of earnings management, there is the probability of committing fraud in the financial statements. It is possible to detect fraud more easily by the Beneish model. The findings of Beneish (1999b) research, Jones et al. (2008), Dechow et al. (2011), and Perols and Lougee (2011) confirm the result obtained from this hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":15974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Governance and Regulation","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of financial statements fraud using Beneish and Dechow models\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Kaab Omeir, Deimante Vasiliauskaite, Elham Soleimanizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.22495/jgrv12i3siart15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fraudulent financial reporting is a big issue not only for investors but also for other stakeholders. This research uses two popular fraud detection models by Beneish (1997, 1999a) and Dechow et al. (2011). The main goal of this paper is to compare the precision of these two models for the prediction of fraud in the financial statements of Iranian companies. Firstly, we try to identify the statistical description related to the first and fourth quartiles of the Beneish and Dechow models. Then, we determine the models’ forecasting capabilities using SPSS software by t-test and variance analysis. We use the sample of 197 companies during the 11-years period from 2009 till 2019. The results indicate that the Beneish model has more precision and less error level in fraud detection in the financial statements than the Dechow model. The general precision of the Beneish model, with 83%, compared to the Dechow model, with general precision of 75%, demonstrates the volume of fraud in the company’s financial statements. According to the statistical results, the prediction precision of the Beneish model, compared to the Dechow model, is more, and its estimation error is less than the latter. Therefore, according to this hypothesis, the Beneish model enjoys a higher detection power in the probability of committing fraud in the financial statements than the Dechow model. Thus, in companies with a previous record of earnings management, there is the probability of committing fraud in the financial statements. It is possible to detect fraud more easily by the Beneish model. The findings of Beneish (1999b) research, Jones et al. (2008), Dechow et al. (2011), and Perols and Lougee (2011) confirm the result obtained from this hypothesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Governance and Regulation\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Governance and Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i3siart15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Governance and Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i3siart15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虚假财务报告不仅是投资者的大问题,也是其他利益相关者的大问题。本研究使用了Beneish (1997,1999a)和Dechow et al.(2011)的两种流行的欺诈检测模型。本文的主要目的是比较这两种模型在预测伊朗公司财务报表欺诈方面的精度。首先,我们试图识别与Beneish和Dechow模型的第一和第四四分位数相关的统计描述。然后利用SPSS软件进行t检验和方差分析,确定模型的预测能力。我们使用了从2009年到2019年的11年间197家公司的样本。结果表明,Beneish模型比Dechow模型在财务报表舞弊检测中具有更高的精度和更小的误差水平。Beneish模型的一般精度为83%,而Dechow模型的一般精度为75%,这表明了公司财务报表中欺诈的数量。统计结果表明,Beneish模型的预测精度高于Dechow模型,其估计误差小于Dechow模型。因此,根据这一假设,Beneish模型比Dechow模型对财务报表中舞弊的概率具有更高的检测能力。因此,在以前有盈余管理记录的公司中,在财务报表中存在欺诈的可能性。贝尼什模型可以更容易地发现欺诈行为。Beneish (1999b)、Jones et al.(2008)、Dechow et al.(2011)和Perols and Lougee(2011)的研究结果证实了这一假设的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of financial statements fraud using Beneish and Dechow models
Fraudulent financial reporting is a big issue not only for investors but also for other stakeholders. This research uses two popular fraud detection models by Beneish (1997, 1999a) and Dechow et al. (2011). The main goal of this paper is to compare the precision of these two models for the prediction of fraud in the financial statements of Iranian companies. Firstly, we try to identify the statistical description related to the first and fourth quartiles of the Beneish and Dechow models. Then, we determine the models’ forecasting capabilities using SPSS software by t-test and variance analysis. We use the sample of 197 companies during the 11-years period from 2009 till 2019. The results indicate that the Beneish model has more precision and less error level in fraud detection in the financial statements than the Dechow model. The general precision of the Beneish model, with 83%, compared to the Dechow model, with general precision of 75%, demonstrates the volume of fraud in the company’s financial statements. According to the statistical results, the prediction precision of the Beneish model, compared to the Dechow model, is more, and its estimation error is less than the latter. Therefore, according to this hypothesis, the Beneish model enjoys a higher detection power in the probability of committing fraud in the financial statements than the Dechow model. Thus, in companies with a previous record of earnings management, there is the probability of committing fraud in the financial statements. It is possible to detect fraud more easily by the Beneish model. The findings of Beneish (1999b) research, Jones et al. (2008), Dechow et al. (2011), and Perols and Lougee (2011) confirm the result obtained from this hypothesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Governance and Regulation
Journal of Governance and Regulation Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信