{"title":"“Keo”案的理论、临床、实践与个人思考","authors":"Jerrold Lee Shapiro","doi":"10.55818/pcsp.v19i1.2130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I want to thank Arthur Bohart (2023) and Amy Curtis and Ronald Miller (2023) for each writing an excellent commentary on my existential, multicultural case study of \"Keo\" (Shapiro, 2023). In this response, I begin by discussing Bohart’s comments, which deal with more theoretical issues; and then I turn to the questions raised by Curtis and Miller, which address more clinical, practical, and personal issues.","PeriodicalId":53239,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy","volume":"361 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical, Clinical, Practical, and Personal Reflections on the Case of \\\"Keo\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Jerrold Lee Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.55818/pcsp.v19i1.2130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I want to thank Arthur Bohart (2023) and Amy Curtis and Ronald Miller (2023) for each writing an excellent commentary on my existential, multicultural case study of \\\"Keo\\\" (Shapiro, 2023). In this response, I begin by discussing Bohart’s comments, which deal with more theoretical issues; and then I turn to the questions raised by Curtis and Miller, which address more clinical, practical, and personal issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"361 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55818/pcsp.v19i1.2130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55818/pcsp.v19i1.2130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Theoretical, Clinical, Practical, and Personal Reflections on the Case of "Keo"
I want to thank Arthur Bohart (2023) and Amy Curtis and Ronald Miller (2023) for each writing an excellent commentary on my existential, multicultural case study of "Keo" (Shapiro, 2023). In this response, I begin by discussing Bohart’s comments, which deal with more theoretical issues; and then I turn to the questions raised by Curtis and Miller, which address more clinical, practical, and personal issues.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
