美国绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒

IF 0.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Kristen Noel, Shawn Craik, Glen J. Parsons, Isabeau Pratte, Molly D. Tomlik, Mark L. Mallory
{"title":"美国绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒绒","authors":"Kristen Noel, Shawn Craik, Glen J. Parsons, Isabeau Pratte, Molly D. Tomlik, Mark L. Mallory","doi":"10.1656/045.030.0308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial nest shelters have long been used as a conservation tool for waterfowl management to provide safe nesting sites and improve breeding success of local populations. We examined occupancy rates, temperature, and humidity in 2 nest-shelter types provided for Somateria mollissima dresseri (American Common Eider) on coastal islands in the Eastern Shore Islands Wildlife Management Area, NS, Canada. We placed temperature and humidity loggers inside existing plastic barrel shelters, newly designed wooden A-frame shelters, and in natural nesting habitat on 3 islands. The annual proportion of shelters used for each shelter type varied considerably among islands, but we found no difference between the occupancy rates of wooden A-frame shelters (40%) and plastic barrels (39%). We found that wooden A-frame shelters closely mimicked daily mean temperature and humidity in natural nesting habitat, whereas barrel shelters created much hotter, drier conditions compared to natural nesting habitat and A-frame shelters. We suspect microclimate conditions under plastic barrels may cause dehydration for nesting eiders and lead to adverse effects. Therefore, we recommend the removal of plastic barrel shelters from eider colonies. Further research is needed to confirm whether A-frame shelters reduce rates of predation on eider hens and their eggs by large gulls and eagles compared to natural nesting habitat.","PeriodicalId":49742,"journal":{"name":"Northeastern Naturalist","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Nest Shelters by American Common Eiders (Somateria mollissima dresseri): Occupancy Rates and Effects of Shelter Type on Nest Microclimate\",\"authors\":\"Kristen Noel, Shawn Craik, Glen J. Parsons, Isabeau Pratte, Molly D. Tomlik, Mark L. Mallory\",\"doi\":\"10.1656/045.030.0308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial nest shelters have long been used as a conservation tool for waterfowl management to provide safe nesting sites and improve breeding success of local populations. We examined occupancy rates, temperature, and humidity in 2 nest-shelter types provided for Somateria mollissima dresseri (American Common Eider) on coastal islands in the Eastern Shore Islands Wildlife Management Area, NS, Canada. We placed temperature and humidity loggers inside existing plastic barrel shelters, newly designed wooden A-frame shelters, and in natural nesting habitat on 3 islands. The annual proportion of shelters used for each shelter type varied considerably among islands, but we found no difference between the occupancy rates of wooden A-frame shelters (40%) and plastic barrels (39%). We found that wooden A-frame shelters closely mimicked daily mean temperature and humidity in natural nesting habitat, whereas barrel shelters created much hotter, drier conditions compared to natural nesting habitat and A-frame shelters. We suspect microclimate conditions under plastic barrels may cause dehydration for nesting eiders and lead to adverse effects. Therefore, we recommend the removal of plastic barrel shelters from eider colonies. Further research is needed to confirm whether A-frame shelters reduce rates of predation on eider hens and their eggs by large gulls and eagles compared to natural nesting habitat.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Northeastern Naturalist\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Northeastern Naturalist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1656/045.030.0308\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northeastern Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1656/045.030.0308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工鸟巢长期以来一直被用作水禽管理的保护工具,以提供安全的筑巢地点并提高当地种群的繁殖成功率。在加拿大东海岸岛屿野生动物管理区的沿海岛屿上,研究了为美洲绒鸭(Somateria mollissima dresseri)提供的2种巢蔽类型的入住率、温度和湿度。我们将温度和湿度记录仪放置在现有的塑料桶避难所,新设计的木制a框架避难所以及3个岛屿上的自然筑巢栖息地。各岛屿每年使用的每种类型的庇护所比例差异很大,但我们发现木制a型框架庇护所的入住率(40%)和塑料桶庇护所的入住率(39%)之间没有差异。我们发现木制的a型框架棚子非常接近自然筑巢栖息地的日平均温度和湿度,而桶形棚子比自然筑巢栖息地和a型框架棚子创造了更热、更干燥的环境。我们怀疑塑料桶下的小气候条件可能导致筑巢的绒鸭脱水,并导致不利影响。因此,我们建议从羽绒群落中移除塑料桶状防护罩。与自然筑巢栖息地相比,需要进一步的研究来证实a型框架庇护所是否降低了大型海鸥和老鹰对羽衣鸡及其蛋的捕食率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Nest Shelters by American Common Eiders (Somateria mollissima dresseri): Occupancy Rates and Effects of Shelter Type on Nest Microclimate
Artificial nest shelters have long been used as a conservation tool for waterfowl management to provide safe nesting sites and improve breeding success of local populations. We examined occupancy rates, temperature, and humidity in 2 nest-shelter types provided for Somateria mollissima dresseri (American Common Eider) on coastal islands in the Eastern Shore Islands Wildlife Management Area, NS, Canada. We placed temperature and humidity loggers inside existing plastic barrel shelters, newly designed wooden A-frame shelters, and in natural nesting habitat on 3 islands. The annual proportion of shelters used for each shelter type varied considerably among islands, but we found no difference between the occupancy rates of wooden A-frame shelters (40%) and plastic barrels (39%). We found that wooden A-frame shelters closely mimicked daily mean temperature and humidity in natural nesting habitat, whereas barrel shelters created much hotter, drier conditions compared to natural nesting habitat and A-frame shelters. We suspect microclimate conditions under plastic barrels may cause dehydration for nesting eiders and lead to adverse effects. Therefore, we recommend the removal of plastic barrel shelters from eider colonies. Further research is needed to confirm whether A-frame shelters reduce rates of predation on eider hens and their eggs by large gulls and eagles compared to natural nesting habitat.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Northeastern Naturalist
Northeastern Naturalist 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Northeastern Naturalist covers all aspects of the natural history sciences of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine organisms and the environments of the northeastern portion of North America, roughly bounded from Virginia to Missouri, north to Minnesota and Nunavut, east to Newfoundland, and south back to Virginia. Manuscripts based on field studies outside of this region that provide information on species within this region may be considered at the Editor’s discretion. The journal welcomes manuscripts based on observations and research focused on the biology of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine organisms and communities as it relates to their life histories and their function within, use of, and adaptation to the environment and the habitats in which they are found, as well as on the ecology and conservation of species and habitats. Such studies may encompass measurements, surveys, and/or experiments in the field, under lab conditions, or utilizing museum and herbarium specimens. Subject areas include, but are not limited to, anatomy, behavior, biogeography, biology, conservation, evolution, ecology, genetics, parasitology, physiology, population biology, and taxonomy. Strict lab, modeling, and simulation studies on natural history aspects of the region, without any field component, will be considered for publication as long as the research has direct and clear significance to field naturalists and the manuscript discusses these implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信